• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

微创内固定系统和髁支持钢板治疗股骨远端C型骨折的对比研究

陈俞涛1,杨江伟1,侯海斌1,王春生2,王坤正3   

  1. 1. 延安大学附属医院骨科一病区
    2. 西安交通大学第二附属医院
    3. 西安交通大学附属第二医院
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-04 修回日期:2013-11-25 出版日期:2014-04-15 发布日期:2014-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈俞涛

Comparative Study of LISS and the Condylar Support Plates in the Treatment of AO Type C Distal Femoral Fractures in Adults

  • Received:2013-07-04 Revised:2013-11-25 Published:2014-04-15 Online:2014-04-15
  • Contact: Yu-Tao CHEN

摘要:

【摘要】目的 探讨应用微创内固定系统(LISS)与股骨髁支持钢板治疗股骨远端C型骨折的并发症和早期临床效果疗效差异。方法 回顾性分析46例行内固定的股骨远端C型骨折患者,其中25例行微创内固定系统内固定(LISS组),21例行股骨髁支持钢板内固定(髁钢板组),从手术相关指标、术后并发症及患侧膝关节功能评分对2种治疗方法进行比较分析。结果与髁钢板组相比,LISS组切口长度短,术中出血量少,骨折愈合所需时间短(P<0.05), 2组手术时间、住院时间比较差异无统计学意义。LISS组内固定断裂1例。髁钢板组内固定松动、断裂各1例,术后4 周发生感染1例,骨折不愈合1例,因患膝关节活动度降低行膝关节镜下松解术1例。LISS组Evanich评分总分为(90.6±3.3)分,高于髁钢板组的(81.2±1.8)分。结论LISS是治疗股骨远端C型骨折的理想内固定方式。

关键词: 股骨远端骨折, 微创内固定系统, 股骨髁支持钢板

Abstract:

[Abstract] Objective To summarize complications and early clinical effect of less invasive stabilization system and the femoral condylar support plates in treatment of AO type C distal femoral fractures. MethodsWe reviewed46patients who had internal fixation of AO type C distal femoral fractures. Of all46patients,25were with less invasive stabilization sys? tem and 21were with femoral condylar support plates fixation. Comparative analysis was performed using intraoperative in? dex, postoperative complications and the Evanich score at follow- up. Results All46patients were followed up with a mean time of19.6months after surgery. The difference in incision length, blood loss, fracture healing time was significant between the2groups(P<0.05)but not in the duration of operations and hospital stays(P>0.05). The statistical signifi? cance was also found in the total incidence of postoperative complications and the Evanich score at the last follow-up(P< 0.05). Conclusion Patients with less invasive stabilization system fixation had the characteristics of less trauma, shorter fracture healing time, less postoperative complications and better functional recovery compared with femoral condylar sup? port plates. Less invasive stabilization system had became an ideal internal fixation in treatment of AO type C distal femoral fractures.

Key words: distal femoral fractures, less invasive stabilization system, femoral condylar support plate