• 短篇论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

拔牙与非拔牙矫治对牙弓宽度及微笑美学的影响

孙伟1,王建国2   

  1. 1. 天津市口腔医院正畸科
    2. 天津市口腔医院
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-09 修回日期:2010-06-12 出版日期:2010-12-15 发布日期:2010-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 孙伟

The influences of arch width and smile esthetics by extraction and nonextraction

2   

  • Received:2010-04-09 Revised:2010-06-12 Published:2010-12-15 Online:2010-12-15

摘要: 目的:比较拔牙与不拔牙治疗前后牙弓宽度和微笑美学的变化。方法:随机抽取30个拔除第一前磨牙和30个不拔牙患者的病例,分别从尖牙,前磨牙,和磨牙的牙尖测量牙弓的宽度,同时在中线处,从切牙最前部开始,以固定的牙弓深度为标准测量牙弓宽度。20名正畸医生拔牙和不拔牙患者的标准正面微笑相进行美学评估。结果:两组病例中,尖牙之间的宽度增加不超过1mm,并且两组之间没有差异。在拔牙组病例中,前磨牙之间和磨牙之间的牙弓宽度都显著的缩小,同时不拔牙组中前磨牙之间和磨牙之间的牙弓宽度都显著的增加。如果以固定的牙弓深度为基准测量牙弓宽度时,拔牙组病例中上下颌牙弓宽度都显著的增宽。微笑美学评分以及微笑时露出的牙齿数目在两组之间没有差别。结论:拔牙矫治并没有缩小牙弓宽度,而且两组患者的微笑美学评价都一样。

关键词: 拔牙, 非拔牙, 牙弓宽度, 微笑美学

Abstract: ABSTRACT Objective:To compare the changes of arch width as well as smile esthetics in patients treated by extraction and nonextraction procedures. Methods: Dental casts of 30 patients treated with extraction and 30 patients without extraction of four first premolars were randomly selected. Arch widths were measured from the cusp tips of the canines, premolars, and molars. Posttreatment arch widths were also measured in the midline at a constant arch depth from the most labial surfaces of the incisors. Standardized frontal photographs of the face taken during smiling of extraction and nonextraction treated subjects were evaluated. Twenty orthodontic doctors judged the esthetics of the smiles. Results: Intercanine width increased less than one mm in both groups, and there was no difference between the two groups. The interpremolar and intermolar distance in both arches decreased significantly in theextraction sample, whereas the interpret molar and intermolar widths increased significantly in the nonextraction sample. When arch widths of both groups were measured from the most labial surfaces of the teeth at a constant depth, the average arch width of both arches was significantly wider in the extraction sample. The mean esthetic score and the number of teeth displayed during a smile did not differ between the groups. Conclusion: The results indicate that arch width is not decreased at a constant arch depth because of extraction treatment,and smile esthetics are the same in both groups of patients.

Key words: Extraction, Nonextraction, Arch width, Smiles Esthetics