天津医药 ›› 2016, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 286-289.doi: 10.11958/20150317

• 专题研究-骨疾病 • 上一篇    下一篇

颈椎融合术后在体运动学研究进展

刘佳男1,夏群2,李宏达1,魏冬3   

  1. 1 天津医科大学研究生院(邮编 300070);2武警后勤学院附属医院骨科医院;3 天津中医药大学研究生院
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-18 修回日期:2015-12-29 出版日期:2016-03-15 发布日期:2016-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 夏群 E-mail:xiaqun6@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘佳男(1990),男,硕士在读, 主要从事脊柱外科研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目

Research progress of in-vivo kinematics after cervical arthrodesis

LIU Jia′nan, XIA Qun, LI Hongda, WEI Dong   

  1. Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China; 2 Department of Orthopedics of Affiliated Hospital of Logistics University of Chinese People′s Armed Police Forces;3 Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
  • Received:2015-11-18 Revised:2015-12-29 Published:2016-03-15 Online:2016-03-15
  • Contact: XIA Qun E-mail:xiaqun6@163.com

摘要: 本文综述了颈椎融合术后在体运动学研究进展。通过查阅颈椎融合术后有关在体运动学的相关文献,从融合相邻节段椎体间运动范围的改变、剩余运动节段在颈椎整体活动度中所占比重变化规律、融合相邻节段小关节运动模式以及相邻节段旋转中心的位置偏移等方面进行归纳总结。以期望能发现融合术后相邻椎体退变的早期征兆,为临床上相邻节段病理改变(adjacent segment pathology,ASP)的治疗提供理论依据。目前相关运动学研究多局限于对颈椎矢状面屈伸活动的观察,鲜有三维空间内的六个自由度(6-degree-of-freedom,6DOF)运动数据报道。而且,相关运动学研究并没有终止争论,ASP是由过度运动引起,还是颈椎病病程自然发展的结果仍存在争议。长期随访的大样本随机对照研究,获得精确的6-DOF运动学参数或许是解决争议的最佳途径。

关键词: 颈椎前路减压融合术, 在体运动学, 相邻节段病理改变, 先天性颈椎融合

Abstract: To review the researches of in-vivo kinematics after cervical arthrodesis. Related literature concerning the kinematics in patients after cervical arthrodesis was extensively reviewed and comprehensively analyzed in 4 terms of changes in adjacent segment range of motion , motion segment percent contributions, motion pattern of cervical facet joints, and deviated center of rotation at adjacent segments. These reported researches of in-vivo kinematics after cervical arthrodesis was almost on the sagittal plane. Few data have been reported on the 6-DOF kinematics under physiological loading conditions. Whether adjacent segment pathology caused by hypermobility remains controversial. Long-term follow-up of large sample randomized controlled studies and obtaining the accurate 6-DOF kinematics are the best way to resolve controversy.

Key words: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion, In-vivo kinematics, Adjacent segment pathology, Congenital cervical fusion