天津医药 ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (11): 1249-1254.doi: 10.11958/20230151
收稿日期:
2023-02-13
修回日期:
2023-05-19
出版日期:
2023-11-15
发布日期:
2023-11-07
通讯作者:
△E-mail:作者简介:
唐豪言(1996),男,硕士在读,主要从事原发性肝癌方面研究。E-mail:
TANG Haoyan(), PAN Zhenglong, LIU Xiaofang△(
)
Received:
2023-02-13
Revised:
2023-05-19
Published:
2023-11-15
Online:
2023-11-07
Contact:
△E-mail:唐豪言, 潘正龙, 刘小方. TP53基因单核苷酸多态性与原发性肝细胞癌预后的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(11): 1249-1254.
TANG Haoyan, PAN Zhenglong, LIU Xiaofang. Association between single nucleotide polymorphism of TP53 gene and prognosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(11): 1249-1254.
摘要:
目的 探讨TP53基因单核苷酸多态性(SNP)与原发性肝细胞癌患者预后的关系。方法 采用聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性技术(PCR-RFLP)检测213例肝细胞癌术后患者TP53基因rs1625895、rs9895829、rs28934578位点的基因型。采用Log-rank检验法绘制肝癌术后患者的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线;采用多因素Cox比例风险回归分析探究肝癌患者术后预后的影响因素。结果 在共显性模型(HR=2.190,95%CI:1.142~4.201,P=0.018)和隐性模型(HR=2.275,95%CI:1.225~4.227,P=0.009)中,携带rs1625895 AA基因型的患者预后更差;Cox比例风险回归分析显示, rs1625895多态性(HR=2.169,95%CI:1.015~4.637,P=0.046)是肝细胞癌患者术后预后的危险因素。结论 TP53基因rs1625895多态性与肝细胞癌患者术后预后相关。
中图分类号:
变量 | n | 生存 | 死亡 | HR(95%CI) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄 <60岁 | 98 | 77(78.6) | 21(21.4) | 1 | |
≥60岁 | 115 | 86(74.8) | 29(25.2) | 1.109(0.632~1.947) | 0.718 |
性别 男 | 146 | 116(79.5) | 30(20.5) | 1 | |
女 | 67 | 47(70.1) | 20(29.9) | 1.175(0.666~2.072) | 0.578 |
吸烟 是 | 79 | 61(77.2) | 18(22.8) | 1 | |
否 | 134 | 102(76.1) | 32(23.9) | 1.104(0.583~1.855) | 0.895 |
饮酒 是 | 104 | 83(79.8) | 21(20.2) | 1 | |
否 | 109 | 80(73.4) | 29(26.6) | 1.218(0.694~2.140) | 0.492 |
HBV感染 是 | 88 | 65(73.9) | 23(26.1) | 1 | |
否 | 125 | 98(78.4) | 27(21.6) | 0.667(0.378~1.175) | 0.161 |
家族史 有 | 23 | 17(73.9) | 6(26.1) | 1 | |
无 | 190 | 146(76.8) | 44(23.2) | 0.796(0.336~1.887) | 0.605 |
T分期 T1+T2 | 154 | 129(83.8) | 25(16.2) | 1 | |
T3+T4 | 59 | 34(57.6) | 25(42.4) | 2.428(1.392~4.235) | 0.002 |
肿瘤大小 <5 cm | 168 | 133(79.2) | 35(20.8) | 1 | |
≥5 cm | 45 | 30(66.7) | 15(33.3) | 2.094(1.148~3.820) | 0.016 |
门静脉癌栓 有 | 18 | 13(72.2) | 5(27.8) | 1 | |
无 | 195 | 150(76.9) | 45(23.1) | 0.836(0.330~2.113) | 0.704 |
手术方式 根治性切除 | 170 | 138(81.2) | 32(18.8) | 1 | |
姑息性切除 | 43 | 25(58.1) | 18(41.9) | 2.145(1.198~3.839) | 0.010 |
围术期输血 是 | 74 | 47(63.5) | 27(36.5) | 1 | |
否 | 139 | 116(83.5) | 23(16.5) | 0.525(0.301~0.917) | 0.024 |
肿瘤数目 单发 | 123 | 102(82.9) | 21(17.1) | 1 | |
多发 | 90 | 61(67.8) | 29(32.2) | 2.071(1.175~3.652) | 0.012 |
肝硬化 是 | 61 | 41(67.2) | 20(32.8) | 1 | |
否 | 152 | 122(80.3) | 30(19.7) | 0.416(0.231~0.747) | 0.003 |
表1 HCC患者临床特征与预后的关系 [例(%)]
Tab.1 Relationship between clinical characteristics and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients
变量 | n | 生存 | 死亡 | HR(95%CI) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄 <60岁 | 98 | 77(78.6) | 21(21.4) | 1 | |
≥60岁 | 115 | 86(74.8) | 29(25.2) | 1.109(0.632~1.947) | 0.718 |
性别 男 | 146 | 116(79.5) | 30(20.5) | 1 | |
女 | 67 | 47(70.1) | 20(29.9) | 1.175(0.666~2.072) | 0.578 |
吸烟 是 | 79 | 61(77.2) | 18(22.8) | 1 | |
否 | 134 | 102(76.1) | 32(23.9) | 1.104(0.583~1.855) | 0.895 |
饮酒 是 | 104 | 83(79.8) | 21(20.2) | 1 | |
否 | 109 | 80(73.4) | 29(26.6) | 1.218(0.694~2.140) | 0.492 |
HBV感染 是 | 88 | 65(73.9) | 23(26.1) | 1 | |
否 | 125 | 98(78.4) | 27(21.6) | 0.667(0.378~1.175) | 0.161 |
家族史 有 | 23 | 17(73.9) | 6(26.1) | 1 | |
无 | 190 | 146(76.8) | 44(23.2) | 0.796(0.336~1.887) | 0.605 |
T分期 T1+T2 | 154 | 129(83.8) | 25(16.2) | 1 | |
T3+T4 | 59 | 34(57.6) | 25(42.4) | 2.428(1.392~4.235) | 0.002 |
肿瘤大小 <5 cm | 168 | 133(79.2) | 35(20.8) | 1 | |
≥5 cm | 45 | 30(66.7) | 15(33.3) | 2.094(1.148~3.820) | 0.016 |
门静脉癌栓 有 | 18 | 13(72.2) | 5(27.8) | 1 | |
无 | 195 | 150(76.9) | 45(23.1) | 0.836(0.330~2.113) | 0.704 |
手术方式 根治性切除 | 170 | 138(81.2) | 32(18.8) | 1 | |
姑息性切除 | 43 | 25(58.1) | 18(41.9) | 2.145(1.198~3.839) | 0.010 |
围术期输血 是 | 74 | 47(63.5) | 27(36.5) | 1 | |
否 | 139 | 116(83.5) | 23(16.5) | 0.525(0.301~0.917) | 0.024 |
肿瘤数目 单发 | 123 | 102(82.9) | 21(17.1) | 1 | |
多发 | 90 | 61(67.8) | 29(32.2) | 2.071(1.175~3.652) | 0.012 |
肝硬化 是 | 61 | 41(67.2) | 20(32.8) | 1 | |
否 | 152 | 122(80.3) | 30(19.7) | 0.416(0.231~0.747) | 0.003 |
SNP | 基因型 | n | 生存 | 死亡 | HR(95%CI) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs1625895 | 共显性模型 GG | 128 | 102(79.7) | 26(20.3) | 1 | |
AG | 49 | 39(79.6) | 10(20.6) | 0.876(0.421~1.825) | 0.724 | |
AA | 36 | 22(61.1) | 14(38.9) | 2.190(1.142~4.201) | 0.018 | |
隐性模型 AG/GG | 177 | 141(79.7) | 36(20.3) | 1 | ||
AA | 36 | 22(61.1) | 14(38.9) | 2.275(1.225~4.227) | 0.009 | |
显性模型 AG/AA | 85 | 61(71.8) | 24(28.2) | 1 | ||
GG | 128 | 102(79.7) | 26(20.3) | 0.739(0.423~1.290) | 0.287 | |
rs9895829 | 共显性模型 GG | 88 | 68(77.3) | 20(22.7) | 1 | |
AG | 52 | 41(78.8) | 11(21.2) | 0.808(0.384~1.699) | 0.574 | |
AA | 73 | 54(74.0) | 19(26.0) | 1.209(0.640~2.285) | 0.558 | |
隐性模型 AG/GG | 140 | 109(77.9) | 31(22.1) | 1 | ||
AA | 73 | 54(74.0) | 19(26.0) | 1.313(0.738~2.337) | 0.354 | |
显性模型 AG/AA | 125 | 95(76.0) | 30(24.0) | 1 | ||
GG | 88 | 68(77.3) | 20(22.7) | 0.977(0.550~1.736) | 0.938 | |
rs28934578 | 共显性模型 CC | 104 | 82(78.8) | 22(21.2) | 1 | |
AC | 66 | 49(74.2) | 17(25.8) | 1.234(0.654~2.329) | 0.516 | |
AA | 43 | 32(74.4) | 11(25.6) | 1.327(0.642~2.741) | 0.445 | |
隐性模型 AC/CC | 170 | 131(77.1) | 39(22.9) | 1 | ||
AA | 43 | 32(74.4) | 11(25.6) | 1.218(0.622~2.386) | 0.565 | |
显性模型 AC/AA | 109 | 81(74.3) | 28(25.7) | 1 | ||
CC | 104 | 82(78.8) | 22(21.2) | 0.788(0.450~1.379) | 0.404 |
表2 TP53 SNPs与HCC患者预后的关系 [例(%)]
Tab.2 Relationship between TP53 SNPs and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients
SNP | 基因型 | n | 生存 | 死亡 | HR(95%CI) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs1625895 | 共显性模型 GG | 128 | 102(79.7) | 26(20.3) | 1 | |
AG | 49 | 39(79.6) | 10(20.6) | 0.876(0.421~1.825) | 0.724 | |
AA | 36 | 22(61.1) | 14(38.9) | 2.190(1.142~4.201) | 0.018 | |
隐性模型 AG/GG | 177 | 141(79.7) | 36(20.3) | 1 | ||
AA | 36 | 22(61.1) | 14(38.9) | 2.275(1.225~4.227) | 0.009 | |
显性模型 AG/AA | 85 | 61(71.8) | 24(28.2) | 1 | ||
GG | 128 | 102(79.7) | 26(20.3) | 0.739(0.423~1.290) | 0.287 | |
rs9895829 | 共显性模型 GG | 88 | 68(77.3) | 20(22.7) | 1 | |
AG | 52 | 41(78.8) | 11(21.2) | 0.808(0.384~1.699) | 0.574 | |
AA | 73 | 54(74.0) | 19(26.0) | 1.209(0.640~2.285) | 0.558 | |
隐性模型 AG/GG | 140 | 109(77.9) | 31(22.1) | 1 | ||
AA | 73 | 54(74.0) | 19(26.0) | 1.313(0.738~2.337) | 0.354 | |
显性模型 AG/AA | 125 | 95(76.0) | 30(24.0) | 1 | ||
GG | 88 | 68(77.3) | 20(22.7) | 0.977(0.550~1.736) | 0.938 | |
rs28934578 | 共显性模型 CC | 104 | 82(78.8) | 22(21.2) | 1 | |
AC | 66 | 49(74.2) | 17(25.8) | 1.234(0.654~2.329) | 0.516 | |
AA | 43 | 32(74.4) | 11(25.6) | 1.327(0.642~2.741) | 0.445 | |
隐性模型 AC/CC | 170 | 131(77.1) | 39(22.9) | 1 | ||
AA | 43 | 32(74.4) | 11(25.6) | 1.218(0.622~2.386) | 0.565 | |
显性模型 AC/AA | 109 | 81(74.3) | 28(25.7) | 1 | ||
CC | 104 | 82(78.8) | 22(21.2) | 0.788(0.450~1.379) | 0.404 |
基因型 | <60岁 | ≥60岁 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生存/死亡 | HR(95%CI) | P | 生存/死亡 | HR(95%CI) | P | |
共显性模型 GG | 47/10(82.5/17.5) | 1 | 55/16(77.5/22.5) | 1 | ||
AG | 19/6(76.0/24.0) | 1.380(0.461~4.134) | 0.565 | 20/4(83.3/16.7) | 0.627(0.201~1.955) | 0.421 |
AA | 11/5(68.8/31.2) | 2.183(0.673~7.080) | 0.193 | 11/9(55.0/45.0) | 2.882(1.059~7.841) | 0.038 |
隐性模型 AG/GG | 66/16(80.5/19.5) | 1 | 75/20(78.9/21.1) | 1 | ||
AA | 11/5(68.8/31.2) | 1.958(0.650~5.900) | 0.232 | 11/9(55.0/45.0) | 3.248(1.229~8.581) | 0.017 |
显性模型 AG/AA | 30/11(73.2/26.8) | 1 | 31/13(70.5/29.5) | 1 | ||
GG | 47/10(82.5/17.5) | 0.602(0.239~1.513) | 0.280 | 55/16(77.5/22.5) | 0.779(0.353~1.718) | 0.536 |
表3 年龄分层后TP53基因rs1625895位点多态性与HCC患者预后的关系 [例(%)]
Tab.3 Relationship between TP53 gene rs1625895 and prognosis of HCC patients after age stratification
基因型 | <60岁 | ≥60岁 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生存/死亡 | HR(95%CI) | P | 生存/死亡 | HR(95%CI) | P | |
共显性模型 GG | 47/10(82.5/17.5) | 1 | 55/16(77.5/22.5) | 1 | ||
AG | 19/6(76.0/24.0) | 1.380(0.461~4.134) | 0.565 | 20/4(83.3/16.7) | 0.627(0.201~1.955) | 0.421 |
AA | 11/5(68.8/31.2) | 2.183(0.673~7.080) | 0.193 | 11/9(55.0/45.0) | 2.882(1.059~7.841) | 0.038 |
隐性模型 AG/GG | 66/16(80.5/19.5) | 1 | 75/20(78.9/21.1) | 1 | ||
AA | 11/5(68.8/31.2) | 1.958(0.650~5.900) | 0.232 | 11/9(55.0/45.0) | 3.248(1.229~8.581) | 0.017 |
显性模型 AG/AA | 30/11(73.2/26.8) | 1 | 31/13(70.5/29.5) | 1 | ||
GG | 47/10(82.5/17.5) | 0.602(0.239~1.513) | 0.280 | 55/16(77.5/22.5) | 0.779(0.353~1.718) | 0.536 |
因素 | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P | HR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
肿瘤T分期 | 0.763 | 0.323 | 5.588 | 0.018 | 2.145(1.139~4.037) |
肿瘤大小 | 0.704 | 0.339 | 4.308 | 0.038 | 2.021(1.040~3.928) |
rs1625895 | 0.774 | 0.388 | 3.993 | 0.046 | 2.169(1.015~4.637) |
手术方式 | 0.808 | 0.313 | 6.682 | 0.010 | 2.245(1.216~4.143) |
围术期输血 | 0.642 | 0.303 | 4.498 | 0.034 | 1.901(1.050~3.440) |
肿瘤数目 | 0.769 | 0.326 | 5.562 | 0.018 | 2.157(1.139~4.085) |
肝硬化 | 0.934 | 0.364 | 6.601 | 0.010 | 2.546(1.248~5.193) |
表4 HCC患者预后多因素Cox比例风险回归结果
Tab.4 Cox regression analysis of the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients
因素 | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P | HR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
肿瘤T分期 | 0.763 | 0.323 | 5.588 | 0.018 | 2.145(1.139~4.037) |
肿瘤大小 | 0.704 | 0.339 | 4.308 | 0.038 | 2.021(1.040~3.928) |
rs1625895 | 0.774 | 0.388 | 3.993 | 0.046 | 2.169(1.015~4.637) |
手术方式 | 0.808 | 0.313 | 6.682 | 0.010 | 2.245(1.216~4.143) |
围术期输血 | 0.642 | 0.303 | 4.498 | 0.034 | 1.901(1.050~3.440) |
肿瘤数目 | 0.769 | 0.326 | 5.562 | 0.018 | 2.157(1.139~4.085) |
肝硬化 | 0.934 | 0.364 | 6.601 | 0.010 | 2.546(1.248~5.193) |
[1] | BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6):394-424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492. |
[2] | YU M, XU W, JIE Y, et al. Identification and validation of three core genes in p53 signaling pathway in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2021, 19(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12957-021-02174-w. |
[3] | LI Y, WU J, LI E, et al. TP53 mutation detected in circulating exosomal DNA is associated with prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer Biol Ther, 2022, 23(1):439-445. doi:10.1080/15384047.2022.2094666. |
[4] | XU X F, XING H, HAN J, et al. Risk factors,patterns,and outcomes of late recurrence after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma:a multicenter study from China[J]. JAMA Surg, 2019, 154(3):209-217. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4334. |
[5] | YIN J, HOU W, VOGEL U, et al. TP53 common variants and interaction with PPP1R13L and CD3EAP SNPs and lung cancer risk and smoking behavior in a Chinese population[J]. Biomed J, 2022, 45(1):169-178. doi:10.1016/j.bj.2021.01.006. |
[6] | 杨洲, 叶林森, 冯啸, 等. 生物信息学分析TP53基因在肝癌中的表达及其对预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(1):87-91. |
YANG Z, YE L S, FENG X, et al. Bioinformatics analysis of TP53 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and its effect on clinical prognosis[J]. Chin J Hepat Surg(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(1):87-91. doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2022.01.018. | |
[7] | PADMANABHAN N, USHIJIMA T, TAN P. How to stomach an epigenetic insult:the gastric cancer epigenome[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 14(8):467-478. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.53. |
[8] | LIU P, ZHUO Z J, ZHU J, et al. Association of TP53 rs1042522 C>G and miR-34b/c rs4938723 T>C polymorphisms with hepatoblastoma susceptibility:A seven-center case-control study[J]. J Gene Med, 2020, 22(7):e3182. doi:10.1002/jgm.3182. |
[9] | DOFFE F, CARBONNIER V, TISSIER M, et al. Identification and functional characterization of new missense SNPs in the coding region of the TP53 gene[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2021, 28(5):1477-1492. doi:10.1038/s41418-020-00672-0. |
[10] | WANG J, HUANG A, WANG Y P, et al. Circulating tumor DNA correlates with microvascular invasion and predicts tumor recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2020, 8(5):237. doi:10.21037/atm.2019.12.154. |
[11] | BARNOUD T, PARRIS J L D, MURPHY M E. Common genetic variants in the TP53 pathway and their impact on cancer[J]. J Mol Cell Biol, 2019, 11(7):578-585. doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjz052. |
[12] | FLORIS M, PIRA G, CASTIGLIA P, et al. Impact on breast cancer susceptibility and clinicopathological traits of common genetic polymorphisms in TP53,MDM2 and ATM genes in Sardinian women[J]. Oncol Lett, 2022, 24(4):331. doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjz052. |
[13] | ASSAD SAMANI L, JAVADIRAD S M, PARSAFAR S, et al. TP53 rs1625895 is related to breast cancer incidence and early death in Iranian population[J]. Indian J Clin Biochem, 2019, 34(4):485-489. doi:10.1007/s12291-018-0774-6. |
[14] | VOROPAEVA E N, VOEVODA M I, POSPELOVA T I, et al. Prognostic impact of the TP53 rs1625895 polymorphism in DLBCL patients[J]. Br J Haematol, 2015, 169(1):32-35. doi:10.1111/bjh.13237. |
[15] | ZHANG G, XU Q, WANG Z, et al. p53 protein expression affected by TP53 polymorphism is associated with the biological behavior and prognosis of low rectal cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2019, 18(6):6807-6821. doi:10.3892/ol.2019.10999. |
[16] | ZHANG G, XU Q, LIU J, et al. Five P53 SNPs involved in low rectal cancer risk and prognosis in a Chinese population[J]. J Cancer, 2019, 10(7):1772-1780. doi:10.7150/jca.26722. |
[17] | 田艳, 朱军. p53 rs1625895基因多态性与弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤预后相关性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5):791-796. |
TIAN Y, ZHU J. Relationship between p53 rs1625895 polymorphism and prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5):791-796. doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.05.001. | |
[18] | FATHI Z, MOUSAVI S A J, ROUDI R, et al. Distribution of KRAS,DDR2,and TP53 gene mutations in lung cancer:An analysis of Iranian patients[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(7): e0200633. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200633. |
[19] | MUKHAMMADIYEVA G F, KARIMOV D O, BAKIROV A B, et al. TP53 gene polymorphisms and occupational skin cancer risks for workers of glass fiber manufacture[J]. Iran J Public Health, 2017, 46(11):1495-1501. |
[20] | LONG J, WANG A, BAI Y, et al. Development and validation of a TP53-associated immune prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. EBioMedicine, 2019, 42:363-374. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.022. |
[21] | MANNING A L, BENES C, DYSON N J. Whole chromosome instability resulting from the synergistic effects of pRB and p53 inactivation[J]. Oncogene, 2014, 33(19):2487-2494. doi:10.1038/onc.2013.201. |
[22] | 杨怡, 席子涵, 张林颖. 极光激酶B、肿瘤蛋白53在肝细胞癌中的表达及与临床病理特征、预后的关系[J]. 肝脏, 2022, 27(2):188-192. |
YANG Y, XI Z H, ZHANG L Y. The expression and clinical significance of AURKB and TP53 in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Hepatology, 2022, 27(2):188-192. doi:10.14000/j.cnki.issn.1008-1704.2022.02.006. | |
[23] | 靳镝. 乙型肝炎相关性原发性肝癌的预后因素分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(32):20-23. |
JIN D. Prognostic factors analysis of hepatitis B related primary liver cancer[J]. China Modern Medicine, 2018, 25(32):20-23. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2018.32.007. | |
[24] | 尹袁英, 刘伟, 张铭光. 影响肝癌破裂出血患者预后生存期的危险因素分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2020, 35(9):1508-1511. |
YIN Y Y, LIU W, ZHANG M G. Analysis of risk factors affecting prognosis survival time in patients with rupture and hemorrhage of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. The Practical Journal of Cancer, 2020, 35(9):1508-1511. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2020.09.031. | |
[25] | SHI J Y, XING Q, DUAN M, et al. Inferring the progression of multifocal liver cancer from spatial and temporal genomic heterogeneity[J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(3):2867-2877. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.6558. |
[26] | 赵守业, 杨敏, 马国栋. 不同手术时机选择对原发性肝细胞癌自发性破裂出血患者治疗效果及预后的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2019, 17(12):1419-1422. |
ZHAO S Y, YANG M, MA G D. Effect of different operation time on therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in patients with spontaneous ruptured bleeding of primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Oncology Progress, 2019, 17(12):1419-1422. doi:10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2019.17.12.15. | |
[27] | MUKTHINUTHALAPATI P K, GOTUR R, GHABRIL M. Incidence,risk factors and outcomes of de novo malignancies post liver transplantation[J]. World J Hepatol, 2016, 8(12):533-544. doi:10.4254/wjh.v8.i12.533. |
[28] | 薛瑞峰, 赵崇希, 王培宗, 等. 输注陈旧红细胞对肝细胞癌切除术后病人预后的影响[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2022, 43(3):449-461. |
XUE R F, ZHAO C X, WANG P Z, et al. Effect of prolonged storage of packed red blood cells on recurrence-free and overall survivals after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University(Medical Sciences), 2022, 43(3):449-461. doi:10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2022.0313. |
[1] | 王远珍, 魏红艳, 常丽仙, 张映媛, 刘春云, 刘立. 原发性肝癌干预前并发肺部感染风险预测模型的建立与验证[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 940-945. |
[2] | 杨敏, 潘艳莎, 张长玲, 陈红英, 郭渠莲, 刘文君. 儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病基线数据及早期治疗反应与预后的相关性[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 954-958. |
[3] | 肖小丽, 谢瑶, 龙志. 丙型肝炎患者血清miR-155、miR-205-5p水平变化及诊断价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 967-970. |
[4] | 王新波, 罗冰清, 石玉宝, 张也, 席江伟. 结直肠癌组织LncRNA LINC00342和miR-203a-3p表达及与预后的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 971-976. |
[5] | 戴瑶, 方向, 黄康, 冯洁, 刘敏, 伍松柏. HAT疗法治疗脓毒症休克的临床疗效观察[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 825-829. |
[6] | 张锡友, 郭一丹, 张春霞, 周晓玲, 贾萌, 石志华, 罗洋. 老年维持性血液透析患者高钾血症与不良预后事件相关性的临床研究[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 840-844. |
[7] | 王磊, 孟坤, 王兵. 支气管肺炎患儿反复喘息的影响因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 850-853. |
[8] | 满祎, 许娅, 何先成, 宋少锋, 刘爱国. 三阴性乳腺癌EGFR、Ki-67、P53及CTC表达与预后的关系研究[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 862-867. |
[9] | 历丽, 曹树明, 杨仲平, 胡若梅. 鱼胶原低聚肽对急诊复杂手外伤手术患者预后的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 868-871. |
[10] | 孙延文, 王聪, 陈世良, 张冉冉. 骨髓增生异常综合征相关的血脂异常分析[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 872-876. |
[11] | 李莘, 李雪, 王谙. 温石棉对内皮细胞Wnt5a、p16和p21表达的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 679-682. |
[12] | 罗宴冉, 史晓飞, 韩磊, 张贝, 文路遥. 皮肌炎自身抗体在间质性肺病中的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 704-708. |
[13] | 吴静, 范志娟, 刘树业. 慢性乙型肝炎发展为肝细胞癌过程中血浆游离氨基酸水平的变化及临床意义[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 738-742. |
[14] | 薛玉恒, 茆宁, 刘文强, 杨倩倩, 徐艳, 王军. 基于早期血小板相关参数的支气管肺发育不良风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 748-754. |
[15] | 王敏, 王龙胜, 陈磊. 骨质疏松症患者腰椎骨折预测模型的构建[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 766-769. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||