天津医药 ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 365-369.doi: 10.11958/20241463

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

重组人白细胞介素-11与海曲泊帕乙醇胺片对乳腺癌化疗所致血小板减少症的疗效对比

王超1(), 张俊梅2, 张鹏1, 刘力1,(), 王晓春1   

  1. 1 河北大学附属医院乳腺外科(邮编071000)
    2 滦南县医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-09 修回日期:2025-02-05 出版日期:2025-04-15 发布日期:2025-04-17
  • 通讯作者: E-mail:xxpog28@163.com
  • 作者简介:王超(1982),男,主治医师,主要从事乳腺疾病的诊治方面研究。E-mail:omeua8@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学科学研究课题计划项目(20231500)

Comparison of efficacy of recombinant human interleukin-11 and herombopag olamine tablets on chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in breast cancer

WANG Chao1(), ZHANG Junmei2, ZHANG Peng1, LIU Li1,(), WANG Xiaochun1   

  1. 1 Department of Breast Surgery, Hebei University Affiliated Hospital, Baoding 071000, China
    2 Department of Pathology, Luannan County Hospital
  • Received:2024-10-09 Revised:2025-02-05 Published:2025-04-15 Online:2025-04-17
  • Contact: E-mail:xxpog28@163.com

摘要:

目的 对比重组人白细胞介素-11(rhIL-11)与海曲泊帕乙醇胺片治疗乳腺癌化疗所致血小板减少症(CIT)的疗效。方法 前瞻性选择乳腺癌CIT患者86例,随机分为对照组(给予rhIL-11)和研究组(给予海曲泊帕乙醇胺片),2组各43例。治疗前和治疗14 d后,采用全自动血液分析仪检测血小板参数[血小板计数(PLT)、血小板压积(PCT)、血小板分布宽度(PDW)、平均血小板体积(MPV)],流式细胞仪检测细胞免疫指标(CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+),酶联免疫吸附试验检测血小板生成素(TPO)、白细胞介素-11(IL-11),比较2组间和每组治疗前后上述指标水平,并记录2组不良反应发生情况。结果 治疗后,2组患者PLT、PCT、CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+、TPO、IL-11均高于治疗前,且研究组高于对照组(P<0.05);2组治疗后的PDW、MPV、CD8+均低于治疗前,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组不良反应总发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 rhIL-11、海曲泊帕乙醇胺片治疗乳腺癌CIT均有效,海曲泊帕乙醇胺片在改善血小板参数、细胞免疫指标、TPO、IL-11方面较rhIL-11更具优势,且未增加不良反应的发生。

关键词: 白细胞介素11, 乙醇胺, 血小板减少, 乳腺肿瘤, 海曲泊帕乙醇胺片

Abstract:

Objective To compare the efficacy of recombinant human interleukin-11 (rhIL-11) and herombopag olamine tablets on chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) in breast cancer. Methods Eighty-six prospectively selected breast cancer patients with CIT were randomly divided into the control group (administered rhIL-11) and the study group (administered herombopag olamine tablets), with 43 cases in each group. Before treatment and 14 days after treatment, platelet parameters [platelet count (PLT), plateletcrit (PCT), platelet distribution width (PDW) and mean platelet volume (MPV)] and flow cytometry were measured by automated hematology analyzer. Cellular immune indicators (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+) were detected by flow cytometer. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine the levels of thrombopoietin (TPO) and interleukin-11 (IL-11). The above parameters were compared between the two groups, and the incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups was recorded. Results After treatment, PLT, PCT, CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, TPO and IL-11 in both groups were higher than before treatment, and which was higher in the study group than the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, PDW, MPV and CD8+ of both groups were lower than before treatment, and the study group was lower than the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Both rhIL-11 and herombopag olamine tablets are effective in treating breast cancer with CIT. Compared with rhIL-11, herombopag olamine tablets have more advantages in improving platelet parameters, cellular immune indicators, TPO and IL-11, and do not increase the adverse reactions.

Key words: interleukin-11, ethanolamine, thrombocytopenia, breast neoplasms, herombopag olamine tablets

中图分类号: