天津医药 ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 420-424.doi: 10.11958/20242260

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清sST2、DcR3联合动态心电图对无症状性心肌缺血的诊断价值

张叶杭(), 牛向东, 耿一鸣   

  1. 郑州大学第五附属医院心电图室(邮编450052)
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-17 修回日期:2025-02-28 出版日期:2025-04-15 发布日期:2025-04-17
  • 作者简介:张叶杭(1983),女,主治医师,主要从事动态心电图诊断方面研究。E-mail:zhanp0422002@163.com

Diagnostic value of serum sST2 and DcR3 combined with dynamic electrocardiogram in silent myocardial ischemia

ZHANG Yehang(), NIU Xiangdong, GENG Yiming   

  1. Department of Electrocardiography, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
  • Received:2024-12-17 Revised:2025-02-28 Published:2025-04-15 Online:2025-04-17

摘要:

目的 探讨血清可溶性生长刺激表达基因2蛋白(sST2)、诱捕受体3(DcR3)联合动态心电图(DCG)对无症状性心肌缺血(SMI)的诊断价值。方法 纳入冠心病患者85例并作为观察组,其中经心肌灌注显像确诊SMI患者61例(SMI组),有症状心肌缺血组24例(有症状组);另纳入84例因不明原因胸痛就诊的患者,经心肌灌注显像确诊无冠心病,作为对照组。酶联免疫吸附测定法检测血清sST2、DcR3水平;受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析血清sST2、DcR3与DCG对SMI的诊断价值;多因素Logistic回归分析SMI的影响因素。结果 观察组患者血清sST2水平高于对照组[(55.61±7.12)μg/L vs.(14.22±3.64)μg/L],DcR3水平低于对照组[(0.68±0.11)μg/L vs.(1.24±0.21)μg/L,P<0.05]。SMI组患者血清sST2水平高于有症状组[(59.28±7.12)μg/L vs.(46.28±8.15)μg/L],DcR3水平低于有症状组[(0.63±0.11)μg/L vs.(0.81±0.14)μg/L,P<0.05]。SMI组心率高于有症状组,缺血持续时间与ST段下降幅度低于有症状组(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,血清sST2、DcR3及DCG单独或联合诊断冠心病患者SMI的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.826、0.882、0.773、0.958,三者联合诊断SMI优于单独诊断(Z分别为3.188、2.225、2.770,P<0.05)。sST2和DcR3是SMI发生的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论 血清sST2升高、DcR3降低与SMI发生关系密切,且血清sST2、DcR3联合DCG对SMI具有一定的诊断价值。

关键词: 心肌缺血, 心电描记术,便携式, 可溶性生长刺激表达基因2蛋白, 诱捕受体3, 动态心电图, 无症状性心肌缺血

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of serum soluble growth stimulation expressed gene 2 (sST2), decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) and dynamic electrocardiogram (DCG) for asymptomatic myocardial ischemia (SMI). Methods Eighty-five patients with coronary heart disease were selected as observation subjects (the observation group). Sixty-one SMI patients were confirmed by coronary angiography (the SMI group). Among them, there were 24 cases with symptomatic myocardial ischemia (the symptomatic myocardial ischemia group). During the same period, 84 patients with unexplained chest pain who were examined in our hospital and without coronary heart disease were selected as the control group. ELISA was applied to detect serum levels of sST2 and DcR3. ROC was used to analyze the diagnostic value of serum sST2, DcR3 and DCG for SMI. Multivariate Logistic regression was applied to analyze the influencing factors of SMI. Results The serum level of sST2 was higher in the observation group than that in the control group[(55.61±7.12) μg/L vs. (14.22±3.64) μg/L], while the level of DcR3 was lower than that in the control group[(0.68±0.11) μg/L vs. (1.24±0.21) μg/L](P<0.05). The serum level of sST2 was higher in the SMI group than that in the symptomatic myocardial ischemia group[(59.28± 7.12) μg/L vs. (46.28±8.15) μg/L], while the level of DcR3 was lower than that in the symptomatic myocardial ischemia group[(0.63±0.11) μg/L vs. (0.81±0.14) μg/L] (P<0.05). The heart rate of the SMI group was higher than that of the symptomatic myocardial ischemia group, and the duration of ischemia and the decrease in ST segment were lower than those of the symptomatic myocardial ischemia group (P<0.05). ROC curve results showed that the AUC values of serum sST2, DcR3 and DCG alone and in their combination for diagnosing SMI in patients with coronary heart disease were 0.826, 0.882, 0.773, and 0.958, respectively, and the combined diagnosis of SMI was superior to individual diagnosis (Z=3.188, 2.225, 2.770, P<0.05). sST2 and DcR3 were influencing factors of SMI occurrence (P<0.05). Conclusion The increased serum sST2 and the decreased DcR3 are closely related to the occurrence of SMI, and the combination of serum sST2 and DcR3 with DCG has certain diagnostic value for SMI.

Key words: myocardial ischemia, electrocardiography, ambulatory, soluble growth stimulation expressed gene 2, decoy receptor 3, dynamic electrocardiogram, asymptomatic myocardial ischemia

中图分类号: