天津医药 ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (7): 709-713.doi: 10.11958/20250839
收稿日期:
2025-03-05
修回日期:
2025-05-08
出版日期:
2025-07-15
发布日期:
2025-07-21
通讯作者:
△E-mail:作者简介:
崔欢(1988),女,主治医师,主要从事胎儿生长受限方面研究。E-mail:基金资助:
CUI Huan(), GAO Ying△(
), YANG Junjuan, GUO Ying, YE Qing
Received:
2025-03-05
Revised:
2025-05-08
Published:
2025-07-15
Online:
2025-07-21
Contact:
△E-mail:崔欢, 高颖, 杨俊娟, 郭莹, 叶青. 胎儿生长受限患者血清与胎盘miR-1227-3p、miR-212-3p的表达水平及其临床意义[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(7): 709-713.
CUI Huan, GAO Ying, YANG Junjuan, GUO Ying, YE Qing. Expression levels and clinical significance of miR-1227-3p and miR-212-3p in serum and placenta in puerperas with fetal growth restriction[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2025, 53(7): 709-713.
摘要:
目的 探究胎儿生长受限(FGR)患者血清和胎盘组织中微小核糖核酸(miR)-1227-3p、miR-212-3p的表达水平及其临床意义。方法 纳入确诊为FGR并完成分娩的产妇120例为研究组,根据病情严重程度分为轻度组72例和重度组48例,另择同期产检并完成分娩的健康产妇120例为对照组。采用qRT-PCR检测血清和胎盘组织中miR-1227-3p、miR-212-3p的表达水平;记录2组妊娠结局,包括新生儿体质量、1 min Apgar评分、胎盘质量和胎盘体积。结果 研究组血清和胎盘miR-1227-3p表达水平、新生儿体质量、1 min Apgar评分、胎盘质量、胎盘体积均低于对照组,血清和胎盘miR-212-3p表达水平高于对照组(P<0.05)。重度组血清和胎盘miR-1227-3p表达水平低于轻度组,miR-212-3p表达水平高于轻度组(P<0.05)。血清和胎盘miR-1227-3p表达水平与新生儿体质量、1 min Apgar评分、胎盘质量、胎盘体积呈正相关,血清和胎盘miR-212-3p表达水平与上述指标呈负相关(P<0.01)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,血清和胎盘miR-212-3p表达水平升高为FGR的危险因素,血清和胎盘miR-1227-3p表达水平、新生儿体质量、1 min Apgar评分、胎盘质量、胎盘体积增加为保护因素(P<0.05)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析结果显示,联合检测血清和胎盘miR-1227-3p、miR-212-3p对FGR的诊断价值优于单独诊断。结论 FGR产妇血清和胎盘miR-1227-3p表达水平降低,miR-212-3p表达水平升高,二者联合检测对临床诊断FGR有较高价值。
中图分类号:
基因名称 | 引物序列(5′→3′) | 产物大小/bp |
---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | 上游:AGGACGGCTCCTCTAACCAT 下游:AGCGGCTCCACAAGTAAGAC | 183 |
miR-212-3p | 上游:AACCAGCGCATGGACAGTTA 下游:GACTTGACCACCGAACCCAT | 178 |
U6 | 上游:CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA 下游:ACGCTTCACGAATTTGCG | 163 |
表1 qRT-PCR引物序列
Tab.1 Sequences of qRT-PCR primers
基因名称 | 引物序列(5′→3′) | 产物大小/bp |
---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | 上游:AGGACGGCTCCTCTAACCAT 下游:AGCGGCTCCACAAGTAAGAC | 183 |
miR-212-3p | 上游:AACCAGCGCATGGACAGTTA 下游:GACTTGACCACCGAACCCAT | 178 |
U6 | 上游:CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA 下游:ACGCTTCACGAATTTGCG | 163 |
组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | 身高/cm | 分娩孕周/周 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 120 | 28.67±3.52 | 27.65±2.19 | 158.62±2.86 | 38.58±1.41 | ||||
研究组 | 120 | 28.59±3.48 | 27.45±2.31 | 157.96±2.85 | 38.45±1.52 | ||||
t或χ2 | 0.177 | 0.688 | 1.791 | 0.448 | |||||
组别 | 分娩方式 | 孕次/次 | 产次/次 | ||||||
顺产 | 剖宫产 | ||||||||
对照组 | 68(56.67) | 52(43.33) | 2.46±0.41 | 1.58±0.31 | |||||
研究组 | 70(58.33) | 50(41.67) | 2.48±0.43 | 1.59±0.32 | |||||
t或χ2 | 0.068 | 0.369 | 0.246 |
表2 研究组与对照组一般资料比较
Tab.2 Comparison of general information between the two groups
组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | 身高/cm | 分娩孕周/周 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 120 | 28.67±3.52 | 27.65±2.19 | 158.62±2.86 | 38.58±1.41 | ||||
研究组 | 120 | 28.59±3.48 | 27.45±2.31 | 157.96±2.85 | 38.45±1.52 | ||||
t或χ2 | 0.177 | 0.688 | 1.791 | 0.448 | |||||
组别 | 分娩方式 | 孕次/次 | 产次/次 | ||||||
顺产 | 剖宫产 | ||||||||
对照组 | 68(56.67) | 52(43.33) | 2.46±0.41 | 1.58±0.31 | |||||
研究组 | 70(58.33) | 50(41.67) | 2.48±0.43 | 1.59±0.32 | |||||
t或χ2 | 0.068 | 0.369 | 0.246 |
组别 | n | 血清 | 胎盘 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | ||
对照组 | 120 | 1.01±0.21 | 1.01±0.24 | 1.02±0.30 | 1.00±0.27 |
研究组 | 120 | 0.54±0.12 | 1.47±0.25 | 0.56±0.16 | 1.56±0.29 |
t | 21.287* | 14.540* | 14.821* | 15.482* |
表3 研究组与对照组血清和胎盘miR-1227-3p、miR-212-3p表达水平比较($\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.3 Comparison of expression levels of serum and placental miR-1227-3p and miR-212-3p between the study group and the control group
组别 | n | 血清 | 胎盘 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | ||
对照组 | 120 | 1.01±0.21 | 1.01±0.24 | 1.02±0.30 | 1.00±0.27 |
研究组 | 120 | 0.54±0.12 | 1.47±0.25 | 0.56±0.16 | 1.56±0.29 |
t | 21.287* | 14.540* | 14.821* | 15.482* |
组别 | 新生儿 体质量/g | 1 min Apgar 评分/分 | 胎盘 质量/g | 胎盘 体积/cm3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 3 324.58±189.64 | 8.64±0.42 | 524.68±40.25 | 689.52±86.45 |
研究组 | 2 286.24±186.20 | 8.04±0.34 | 432.76±35.62 | 524.39±76.18 |
t | 42.798* | 12.163* | 18.734* | 15.699* |
表4 研究组与对照组妊娠结局指标比较(n=120,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.4 Comparison of pregnancy outcome indicators between the study group and the control group
组别 | 新生儿 体质量/g | 1 min Apgar 评分/分 | 胎盘 质量/g | 胎盘 体积/cm3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 3 324.58±189.64 | 8.64±0.42 | 524.68±40.25 | 689.52±86.45 |
研究组 | 2 286.24±186.20 | 8.04±0.34 | 432.76±35.62 | 524.39±76.18 |
t | 42.798* | 12.163* | 18.734* | 15.699* |
组别 | n | 血清 | 胎盘 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | ||
轻度组 | 72 | 0.76±0.17 | 1.28±0.23 | 0.78±0.23 | 1.35±0.26 |
重度组 | 48 | 0.21±0.05 | 1.76±0.27 | 0.22±0.06 | 1.87±0.34 |
t | 21.769* | 10.441* | 16.478* | 9.476* |
表5 重度组与轻度组血清和胎盘miR-1227-3p、miR-212-3p表达水平比较($\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.5 Comparison of the expression levels of serum and placental miR-1227-3p and miR-212-3p between the severe group and the mild group
组别 | n | 血清 | 胎盘 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | ||
轻度组 | 72 | 0.76±0.17 | 1.28±0.23 | 0.78±0.23 | 1.35±0.26 |
重度组 | 48 | 0.21±0.05 | 1.76±0.27 | 0.22±0.06 | 1.87±0.34 |
t | 21.769* | 10.441* | 16.478* | 9.476* |
指标 | 血清 | 胎盘 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | |
新生儿 体质量 | 0.495** | -0.501** | 0.510** | -0.478** |
1 min Apgar 评分 | 0.486** | -0.491** | 0.495** | -0.497** |
胎盘质量 | 0.487** | -0.482** | 0.491** | -0.483** |
胎盘体积 | 0.464** | -0.460** | 0.475** | -0.461** |
表6 研究组妊娠结局指标与血清和胎盘miR-1227-3p、miR-212-3p的相关性
Tab.6 Correlation between pregnancy outcome indicators and miR-1227-3p and miR-212-3p in serum and placenta of the study group
指标 | 血清 | 胎盘 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | miR-1227-3p | miR-212-3p | |
新生儿 体质量 | 0.495** | -0.501** | 0.510** | -0.478** |
1 min Apgar 评分 | 0.486** | -0.491** | 0.495** | -0.497** |
胎盘质量 | 0.487** | -0.482** | 0.491** | -0.483** |
胎盘体积 | 0.464** | -0.460** | 0.475** | -0.461** |
变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P | OR | OR 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
血清miR-1227-3p | -0.887 | 0.315 | 7.924 | 0.005 | 0.412 | 0.222~0.764 |
血清miR-212-3p | 0.719 | 0.341 | 4.449 | 0.035 | 2.053 | 1.052~4.005 |
胎盘miR-1227-3p | -0.909 | 0.289 | 9.889 | 0.002 | 0.403 | 0.228~0.710 |
胎盘miR-212-3p | 0.453 | 0.209 | 4.698 | 0.030 | 1.573 | 1.044~2.369 |
新生儿体质量 | -1.155 | 0.254 | 20.684 | <0.001 | 0.315 | 0.191~0.518 |
1 min Apgar评分 | -1.187 | 0.286 | 17.238 | <0.001 | 0.305 | 0.174~0.534 |
胎盘质量 | -1.178 | 0.301 | 15.307 | <0.001 | 0.308 | 0.171~0.556 |
胎盘体积 | -1.130 | 0.317 | 12.710 | <0.001 | 0.323 | 0.174~0.601 |
常数项 | -1.012 | 0.279 | 9.078 | 0.002 | 0.337 |
表7 FGR的影响因素分析
Tab.7 Analysis of factors affecting puerperas with FGR
变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P | OR | OR 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
血清miR-1227-3p | -0.887 | 0.315 | 7.924 | 0.005 | 0.412 | 0.222~0.764 |
血清miR-212-3p | 0.719 | 0.341 | 4.449 | 0.035 | 2.053 | 1.052~4.005 |
胎盘miR-1227-3p | -0.909 | 0.289 | 9.889 | 0.002 | 0.403 | 0.228~0.710 |
胎盘miR-212-3p | 0.453 | 0.209 | 4.698 | 0.030 | 1.573 | 1.044~2.369 |
新生儿体质量 | -1.155 | 0.254 | 20.684 | <0.001 | 0.315 | 0.191~0.518 |
1 min Apgar评分 | -1.187 | 0.286 | 17.238 | <0.001 | 0.305 | 0.174~0.534 |
胎盘质量 | -1.178 | 0.301 | 15.307 | <0.001 | 0.308 | 0.171~0.556 |
胎盘体积 | -1.130 | 0.317 | 12.710 | <0.001 | 0.323 | 0.174~0.601 |
常数项 | -1.012 | 0.279 | 9.078 | 0.002 | 0.337 |
指标 | AUC | 95%CI | 敏感度/ % | 特异度/ % | 截断值 | 约登 指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | 0.856 | 0.806~0.905 | 78.34 | 84.28 | 0.702 | 0.626 |
miR-212-3p | 0.849 | 0.801~0.897 | 80.64 | 79.34 | 1.308 | 0.599 |
联合检测 | 0.912 | 0.874~0.949 | 87.62 | 78.08 | - | 0.657 |
表8 血清miR-1227-3p、miR-212-3p对FGR的诊断效能
Tab.8 Diagnostic value of serum miR-1227-3p and miR-212-3p for FGR
指标 | AUC | 95%CI | 敏感度/ % | 特异度/ % | 截断值 | 约登 指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | 0.856 | 0.806~0.905 | 78.34 | 84.28 | 0.702 | 0.626 |
miR-212-3p | 0.849 | 0.801~0.897 | 80.64 | 79.34 | 1.308 | 0.599 |
联合检测 | 0.912 | 0.874~0.949 | 87.62 | 78.08 | - | 0.657 |
指标 | AUC | 95%CI | 敏感度/ % | 特异度/ % | 截断值 | 约登 指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | 0.846 | 0.796~0.897 | 76.85 | 82.38 | 0.725 | 0.592 |
miR-212-3p | 0.851 | 0.804~0.898 | 78.36 | 78.62 | 1.386 | 0.570 |
联合检测 | 0.920 | 0.884~0.955 | 85.67 | 77.39 | - | 0.631 |
表9 胎盘miR-1227-3p、miR-212-3p对FGR的诊断价值
Tab.9 Diagnostic value of placental miR-1227-3p and miR-212-3p for FGR
指标 | AUC | 95%CI | 敏感度/ % | 特异度/ % | 截断值 | 约登 指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
miR-1227-3p | 0.846 | 0.796~0.897 | 76.85 | 82.38 | 0.725 | 0.592 |
miR-212-3p | 0.851 | 0.804~0.898 | 78.36 | 78.62 | 1.386 | 0.570 |
联合检测 | 0.920 | 0.884~0.955 | 85.67 | 77.39 | - | 0.631 |
[1] | 陈瑞欣, 漆洪波, 刘兴会. 2021年美国妇产科医师协会胎儿生长受限指南解读[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2021, 37(12):907-909. |
CHEN R X, QI H B, LIU X H. Interpretation of the 2021 American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines on fetal growth restriction[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2021, 37(12):907-909. | |
[2] | American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins— Obstetrics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204:Fetal Growth Restriction[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 133(2):e97-e109. doi:10.1097/AOG.00000000000003070. |
[3] | WESTBY A, MILLER L. Fetal growth restriction before and after birth[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2021, 104(5):486-492. |
[4] | 范丽敏, 张雪葳, 刘培林, 等. GDM孕妇孕晚期胎儿脐动脉超声参数、血清FFA及PL在FGR诊断中的应用[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2022, 40(4):986-990. |
FAN L M, ZHANG X W, LIU P L, et al. Fetal umbilical artery ultrasound parameters,serum FFA and PL in the diagnosis of FGR during late pregnancy in pregnant women with GDM[J]. Imaging Science and Photochemistry, 2022, 40(4):986-990. doi:10.7517/issn.1674-0475.220141. | |
[5] | QIN K, XIE X, TANG W, et al. Non-coding RNAs to regulate cardiomyocyte proliferation:A new trend in therapeutic cardiac regeneration[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9(1):944393-944399. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.944393. |
[6] | MORI M A, LUDWIG R G, GARCIA-MARTIN R, et al. Extracellular miRNAs:from biomarkers to mediators of physiology and disease[J]. Cell Metab, 2019, 30(4):656-673. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.07.011. |
[7] | CUI J, KANG X, SHAN Y, et al. miR-1227-3p participates in the development of fetal growth restriction via regulating trophoblast cell proliferation and apoptosis[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1):6374-6379. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10127-w. |
[8] | YU L, SUN Y, CHU Z. MiR-212-3p promotes proliferation and migration of trophoblast in fetal growth restriction by targeting placental growth factor[J]. Bioengineered, 2021, 12(1):5655-5663. doi:10.1080/21655979.2021.1967069. |
[9] | 中华医学会围产医学分会胎儿医学学组, 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 胎儿生长受限专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2019, 22(6):361-380. |
Fetal Medicine Group of the Chinese Medical Association Branch of Perinatal Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Group of the Chinese Medical Association Branch of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Expert consensus on fetal growth restriction(2019 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2019, 22(6):361-380. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2019.06.001. | |
[10] | MARTINS J G, BIGGIO J R, ABUHAMAD A. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52:Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction:(Replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3,April 2012)[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 223(4):B2-B17. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.010. |
[11] | 陈振烈, 曹羽明, 张铭, 等. 白细胞介素-1β在胎儿生长受限孕妇胎盘组织中的表达及其意义[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2022, 38(9):699-704. |
CHEN Z L, CAO Y M, ZHANG M, et al. Expression of interleukin-1β in placental tissue of pregnant women with fetal growth restriction and its significance[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2022, 38(9):699-704. | |
[12] | 王婵敏, 郜蕊, 黄丽华, 等. 胎儿生长受限营养干预效果不良的影响因素分析[J]. 华南预防医学, 2020, 46(2):111-115. |
WANG C M, GAO R, HUANG L H, et al. Analysis of factors affecting the poor outcome of nutritional intervention for fetal growth restriction[J]. South China Preventive Medicine, 2020, 46(2):111-115. doi:10.12183/j.scjpm.2020.0111. | |
[13] | 刘洋, 李超, 乔炳龙, 等. 血清妊娠相关蛋白A联合子宫动脉多普勒超声在妊娠早期预测胎儿生长受限的临床价值[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2021, 42(1):53-56. |
LIU Y, LI C, QIAO B L, et al. Clinical value of serum pregnancy-associated protein A combined with uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in predicting fetal growth restriction in early pregnancy[J]. Journal of PLA Medical College, 2021, 42(1):53-56. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2021.01.012. | |
[14] | RAHAT B, HAMID A, BAGGA R, et al. Folic acid levels during pregnancy regulate trophoblast invasive behavior and the possible development of preeclampsia[J]. Front Nutr, 2022, 9(1):847136-847142. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.847136. |
[15] | HUANG Z, ZHU L, ZHANG Q, et al. Circular RNA hsa-circ-0005238 enhances trophoblast migration,invasion and suppresses apoptosis via the miR-370-3p/CDC25B axis[J]. Front Med(Lausanne), 2022, 9(1):943885-943889. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.943885. |
[16] | ZHAO Y, XU L, WANG X, et al. A novel prognostic mRNA/miRNA signature for esophageal cancer and its immune landscape in cancer progression[J]. Mol Oncol, 2021, 15(4):1088-1109. doi:10.1002/1878-0261.12902. |
[17] | BAKER B C, LUI S, LORNE I, et al. Sexually dimorphic patterns in maternal circulating micro RNAs in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction[J]. Biol Sex Differ, 2021, 12(1):61-67. doi:10.1186/s13293-021-00405-z. |
[18] | YANG C, CAI X, YU M, et al. Long noncoding RNA OR3A4 promotes the proliferation and invasion of osteosarcoma cells by sponging miR-1227-5p[J]. J Bone Oncol, 2020, 21(1):100278-100286. doi:10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100278. |
[19] | LV Y, LV M, JI X, et al. Down-regulated expressed protein HMGB3 inhibits proliferation and migration,promotes apoptosis in the placentas of fetal growth restriction[J]. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 2019, 107(1):69-76. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2018.11.007. |
[20] | HOWE C G, FOLEY H B, KENNEDY E M, et al. Extracellular vesicle microRNA in early versus late pregnancy with birth outcomes in the MADRES study[J]. Epigenetics, 2022, 17(3):269-285. doi:0.1080/15592294.2021.1899887. |
[21] | TANG R, ZHANG Z, HAN W. CircLRRK1 targets miR-223-3p to inhibit the proliferation,migration and invasion of trophoblast cells by regulating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway[J]. Placenta, 2021, 104(1):110-118. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2020.12.003. |
[22] | 郭书焕, 张青, 马学玲, 等. 妊娠期高血压孕妇血清miR-212-3p和miR-590-3p水平与胎儿生长受限的相关性分析[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2023, 25(7):52-56. |
GUO S H, ZHANG Q, MA X L, et al. Correlation analysis of serum miR-212-3p and miR-590-3p levels with fetal growth restriction in pregnant women with gestational hypertension[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Medicine, 2023, 25(7):52-56. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9463.2023.07.011. |
[1] | 杨敬敬, 闫康禄, 孟洁, 杨春丽. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血清Spexin、FoxO1水平与胰岛素抵抗及预后的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(6): 610-614. |
[2] | 王欣欣, 许慧, 吴晓. 妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症合并GDM孕妇不良妊娠结局的影响因素及预测模型构建[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(5): 503-508. |
[3] | 邓海娟, 权永娟, 李芳. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血清GPER1、CFH水平与妊娠结局的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(4): 369-373. |
[4] | 金彩凤, 吴玮, 吴轲. B族链球菌感染及阴道微生态变化与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 858-861. |
[5] | 常鸿, 张科伟, 徐静, 崔晓敏, 杨菲菲. 血清HbA1c、Alarin及Ficolin-3水平对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 625-629. |
[6] | 盛红娜, 范卓然, 华绍芳, 张俊农. 子痫前期患者循环PLGF水平对预测病情及评估母婴结局的价值初探[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 630-634. |
[7] | 张兴光, 王邦茂, 刘涛涛, 张文成, 董艳美, 李小青, 牛海艳, 夏时海. 高原IBS与肠屏障损伤、炎性介质及神经递质的相关性研究[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(5): 499-504. |
[8] | 王晶晶, 张明, 牛琛, 齐玉梅. 妊娠剧吐患者的营养状况及妊娠结局分析[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(5): 532-535. |
[9] | 单子鸿, 胡晓青, 李峰, 黄永坤. 5-羟色胺在胃肠道疾病中的作用及其机制研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(4): 438-442. |
[10] | 张丽冉, 赵延华. MP妊高征监测系统联合PLGF和PI对子痫前期的预测价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(3): 306-310. |
[11] | 顾芸芸, 仲崇明, 杨海燕. 尿酸/白蛋白比值对慢性肾脏病患者并发冠心病的预测价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(11): 1202-1206. |
[12] | 刘桂莹, 刘立志, 杨宗梅. 胎盘生长因子与晚发型子痫前期患者超声血流参数的关系及对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(10): 1069-1074. |
[13] | 杨湖, 雷君, 杨丽, 彭小铜. 儿童川崎病并发胸腔积液的临床特点及风险预测模型构建[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(10): 1089-1094. |
[14] | 武海博, 梁燕, 沈雷, 范展, 傅国惠. 复方藤梨汤含药血清对人脑胶质瘤U251细胞增殖、凋亡及上皮间质转化的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(8): 841-846. |
[15] | 陈其桂, 李大文, 成俊萍, 黄泰帅. 梗阻性无精子症患者不同来源精子ICSI助孕前药物疗效及安全性分析[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(8): 864-868. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||