天津医药 ›› 2015, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 1201-1204.doi: 10.11958/j.issn.0253-9896.2015.10.031

• 康复医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

急性加重期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复治疗效果评价

  

  1. 天津市胸科医院呼吸与危重症医学科 (邮编 300222
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-09 修回日期:2015-05-27 出版日期:2015-10-15 发布日期:2015-10-22

The value of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive#br# pulmonary disease

  1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care,Tianjin Chest Hospital,Tianjin 300222,China
  • Received:2015-04-09 Revised:2015-05-27 Published:2015-10-15 Online:2015-10-22

摘要: 摘要: 目的 观察急性加重期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)患者行早期肺康复治疗的效果。方法 97
AECOPD 住院患者随机分为急性期康复组 (58 例) 和对照组 (39 例)。2 组患者均在急性期症状好转及急性期感染控
制后(T1)进行基线评估, 急性期康复组立即行 12 周(T2)肺康复训练; 对照组在此期间仅接受常规药物治疗及肺康
复宣教而未参与肺康复训练, 至症状缓解并维持稳定 12 周 (T2) 进行第 2 次基线评估, 后开始进行 12 周 (T3) 肺康复
训练。观察肺功能指标、 6 min 步行距离 (6MWD)、 呼吸困难评分 (MRC) 及慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测量 (CAT) 评分的
变化。结果 2 组肺功能各指标在不同时点间差异均无统计学意义; 急性期康复组 T1 时的肺功能各指标与对照组
T1 时比较, T2 时分别与对照组 T2T3 时的比较差异均无统计学意义。对照组 T3 时的 6MWD 均高于 T1T2MRC
CAT 均低于 T1T2(均 P0.05), 各指标在 T1 T2 时的差异均无统计学意义; 急性期康复组 T2 时的 6MWD 明显
高于 T1MRCCAT 均明显低于 T1(均 P < 0.05)。T1 2 组间各指标差异均无统计学意义, 急性期康复组 T2 时的
6MWD 均分别高于 T2T3 时的对照组, MRCCAT 均分别低于 T2T3 时的对照组 (均 P0.05)。结论 AECOPD
早期肺康复治疗可以更早提高患者活动能力, 降低呼吸困难程度, 提高生活质量。

关键词: 肺疾病, 慢性阻塞性, 肺康复, 急性加重, 6 分钟步行距离, CAT 评分

Abstract: Abstract: Objective To observe the effect of early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on patients with acute exacerbation
of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods AECOPD patients (n=97) were randomly distributed into
two groups: control group (n=39) and rehabilitation group (n=58). Patients in both groups were assessed when symptom im⁃
proved from acute phase (baseline, T1). Then patients in control group only received pharmaco-therapy and rehabilitation ed⁃
ucation without PR. When symptom was relieved and stable (T2), they were given 12 weeks PR (T3). On the other hand, pa⁃
tients in rehabilitation group underwent a 12-week PR after T1 directly (T2). The lung function parameters, 6 min walking
distance (6MWD), MRC scores and CAT scores were observed and analyzed in two groups. Results Until the end of the 12-
weeks observation, the value of lung function showed no statistic differences between two groupseither T1 in control group vs
T1 in PR group or T2 in PR group vs T2 and T3 in control group. In control group, the value of 6MWD scores of T3 was bet⁃
ter than that of T1 and T2, in PR groupF6MWD=8.762FMRC=4.432FCAT=10.266P < 0.05while MRC, CAT value in T3 of
control group were higher than those in T1 and T2 of PR group. At T1, parameters does not demonstrate significant difference
between these two groups. Value of 6MWD was higher while MRC and CAT were lower in T2 of PR group than that in T2 and
T3 of control group. Conclusion Early pulmonary rehabilitation could improve the mobility and qulity of life, as well as
ameliorate the severity of dyspnea in AECOPD patients.

Key words: pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive, pulmonary rehabilitation, exacerbation, 6-minutes walk distance
(6MWD),
COPD assessment test(CAT)