天津医药 ›› 2018, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 1075-1078.doi: 10.11958/20180265

• 实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

牙周因素对显微根尖手术治疗慢性根尖周炎效果的影响

侯铁靖 1,邵永新 2△   

  1. 作者单位:1锦州医科大学沈阳奥新口腔医院研究生培养基地(邮编110001);2沈阳奥新全民口腔医院 作者简介:侯铁靖(1982),男,硕士研究生在读,主治医师,主要从事口腔相关疾病的诊疗研究 △通讯作者 E-mail: syx24818888@163.com
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-22 修回日期:2018-07-27 出版日期:2018-10-15 发布日期:2018-11-09
  • 通讯作者: 邵永新 E-mail:syx24818888@163.com

Evaluation of periodontal adverse factors on the treatment of chronic apical periodontitis by endodonic microsurgery

HOU Tie-jing1, SHAO Yong-xin2△   

  1. 1 Shenyang AOXIN Q&M Stomatology Hospital Postgraduate Training Base of Jinzhou Medical University, Liaoning 110001, China; 2 Shenyang AOXIN Q&M Stomatology Hospital △Corresponding Author E-mail: syx24818888@163.com
  • Received:2018-02-22 Revised:2018-07-27 Published:2018-10-15 Online:2018-11-09
  • Contact: Yong-Xin SHAO E-mail:syx24818888@163.com

摘要: 摘要:目的 评价牙周因素对显微根尖手术治疗慢性根尖周炎效果的影响。方法 选择2012—2015年于我院 牙体牙髓科进行显微根尖手术的慢性根尖周炎患者 83 例,术前进行临床症状检查、影像学检查及牙周附着丧失 (AL)值测量,并根据患者吸烟量及吸烟史将其分为吸烟组(37例)及非吸烟组(46例)。术后1年随访时,通过临床及 影像学检查结果,分析AL值及吸烟与否对治疗效果的影响。结果 随近远中向AL增加,治疗有效率下降(97.6% vs. 86.4% vs. 73.6%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.994,P=0.018);不同颊舌向 AL 患者组治疗有效率差异无统计学意义 (82.6% vs. 84.0% vs. 97.1%,χ2=4.017,P>0.05);非吸烟组患者的治疗有效率高于吸烟组(97.8% vs. 78.3%,χ2=6.137, P=0.013)。结论 牙周不良因素可降低显微根尖手术治愈率,术前应根据患牙牙周附着丧失情况及吸烟与否严格选 择适应证,以提高患牙术后存活率。

关键词: 根尖周炎, 吸烟, 牙周附着丢失, 显微根尖手术

Abstract: Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of periodontal factors on chronic apical periodontitis treated by endodontic microsurgery. Methods A total of 83 patients with chronic apical periodontitis treated in Aoxin stomatological hospital at 2012-2015 were selected in this study. Clinical data, imaging examination and periodontal attachment loss (AL) were performed before the operation. Patients were divided into smoking group (n=37) and non-smoking group (n=46) according to the smoking history. After 1 year of follow-up, the effects of AL value and smoking on the therapeutic effect were analyzed through clinical and imaging findings. Results The therapeutic effective rate decreased significantly with the increase of the mesial-distal AL (97.6% vs. 86.4% vs. 73.6%, χ2=7.994,P=0.018). There was no significant difference in the effective rate between different buccal tongue to AL patients (82.6% vs. 84.0% vs. 97.1%, χ2=4.017, P>0.05). The effective rate was significantly higher in non-smoking group than that of smoking group (97.8% vs. 78.3%, χ2=6.137, P=0.013). Conclusion Periodontal adverse factors can reduce the therapeutic effective rate of microperiapical surgery. Before operation, we should choose the indications according to the loss of periodontal attachment and smoking or not, in order to improve the survival rate of the teeth after operation.

Key words: periapical periodontitis, smoking, periodontal attachment loss, endodontic microsurgery