天津医药 ›› 2022, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (9): 984-987.doi: 10.11958/20212781

• 药物临床观察 • 上一篇    下一篇

术前静脉注射艾司氯胺酮对学龄前儿童镇静及诱导合作的临床观察

王君霞1(), 黄鑫2, 王林林3, 胡卫东3, 张彬3,()   

  1. 1 山东第一医科大学第一附属医院儿科(邮编250000)
    2 山东大学公共卫生学院
    3 山东大学齐鲁儿童医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-04 修回日期:2022-03-31 出版日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2022-09-05
  • 通讯作者: 张彬 E-mail:378072589@qq.com;qletyymzk@sina.com
  • 作者简介:王君霞(1980),女,主治医师,主要从事儿科诊疗方面研究。E-mail: 378072589@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省医学会舒适化医疗基金(YXH2020ZX025)

Clinical observation of preoperative intravenous administration of esketamine on sedation and induction compliance in preschool children

WANG Junxia1(), HUANG Xin2, WANG Linlin3, HU Weidong3, ZHANG Bin3,()   

  1. 1 Department of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Ji'nan 250000, China
    2 School of Public Health, Shandong University
    3 Department of Anesthesiology, Qilu Children’s Hospital of Shandong University
  • Received:2022-01-04 Revised:2022-03-31 Published:2022-09-15 Online:2022-09-05
  • Contact: ZHANG Bin E-mail:378072589@qq.com;qletyymzk@sina.com

摘要:

目的 探讨术前静脉注射不同剂量艾司氯胺酮对学龄前儿童镇静效果和麻醉诱导合作度的影响。方法 全麻下行腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的患儿90例,年龄1~6岁。采用随机数字表法将患儿分为S1组、S2组和S3组(静脉注射艾司氯胺酮的剂量分别为0.6、0.8和1.0 mg/kg),每组30例。记录患儿用药前(T0)、用药后1 min亲子分离时(T1)和麻醉诱导时(T2)的Ramsay镇静评分、心率及麻醉诱导合作量表(ICC)评分,镇静时与苏醒后的不良反应以及苏醒时间。结果 T1和T2时,S2组和S3组Ramsay镇静评分优于S1组(P<0.05),且T2时S3组Ramsay镇静评分高于S2组(P<0.05)。S3组ICC评分低于S1组与S2组(P<0.05),S1组与S2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组患儿ICC级别差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。S3组诱导合作完美(ICC=0分)的患儿比例显著高于S1组和S2组,诱导合作差(ICC=4~10分)的患儿比例显著低于S1组和S2组(P<0.05)。各组不良反应发生率与苏醒时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 术前静脉注射艾司氯胺酮0.8 mg/kg和1.0 mg/kg均可提升学龄前儿童的术前镇静效果,但1.0 mg/kg的剂量麻醉诱导时镇静效果和诱导合作度更优。

关键词: 氯胺酮, 注射,静脉内, 深度镇静, 儿童,学龄前, 艾司氯胺酮, 诱导合作

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of preoperative intravenous administration of different doses of esketamine on sedation and anesthesia induction compliance in preschool children. Methods A total of 90 children scheduled for laparoscopic high ligation of hernia under general anesthesia were allocated, aged 1 to 6 years. The children were divided into the S1 group, the S2 group and the S3 group (according to different intravenous doses of esketamine 0.6 mg/kg, 0.8 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg respectively) by random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. The Ramsay sedation score of children were recorded before medication (T0), separating with parents 1 min after medication (T1) and anesthesia induction (T2). Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) score and heart rate were also recorded. The adverse events during sedation and after recovery, and the recovery time were recorded. Results At T1 and T2, the Ramsay sedation score was better in the S2 group and the S3 group than that of the S1 group (P<0.05), and the Ramsay score of the S3 group was higher than that of the S2 group at T2 (P<0.05). The ICC score was lower in the S3 group than that of the S1 group and the S2 group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in ICC score between the S1 group and the S2 group (P>0.05). There were significant differences in ICC grades between the three groups (P<0.01). The proportion of children with perfect induction cooperation (ICC=0) was significantly higher in the S3 group than that in the S1 group and the S2 group, and the proportion of children with poor induction cooperation (ICC=4-10) was significantly lower in the S3 group than that in the S1 group and the S2 group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events and recovery time between the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Preoperative intravenous administration of esketamine 0.8 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg can improve the sedation effect of preschool children, but the sedation effect and induction compliance is superior with 1.0 mg/kg anesthesia induction.

Key words: Ketamine, injections,intravenous, deep sedation, child,preschool, Esketamine, induction compliance

中图分类号: