天津医药 ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (10): 1069-1074.doi: 10.11958/20240179
收稿日期:
2024-02-04
修回日期:
2024-05-13
出版日期:
2024-10-15
发布日期:
2024-10-14
作者简介:
刘桂莹(1981),女,主治医师,主要从事妇产科方面研究。E-mail:
LIU Guiying1(), LIU Lizhi2, YANG Zongmei1
Received:
2024-02-04
Revised:
2024-05-13
Published:
2024-10-15
Online:
2024-10-14
刘桂莹, 刘立志, 杨宗梅. 胎盘生长因子与晚发型子痫前期患者超声血流参数的关系及对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(10): 1069-1074.
LIU Guiying, LIU Lizhi, YANG Zongmei. Relationship between placental growth factor and ultrasonic blood flow parameters in patients with late-onset preeclampsia and its effect on pregnancy outcome[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(10): 1069-1074.
摘要:
目的 探究血清胎盘生长因子(PLGF)水平与晚发型子痫前期(LOPE)患者超声血流参数及妊娠结局的关系。方法 选择152例LOPE患者作为研究对象,根据血清PLGF水平,按照四分位法将患者分为P1组(<12.00 ng/L)、P2组(12.00~56.73 ng/L)、P3组(>56.73~89.41 ng/L)和P4组(>89.41 ng/L),每组38例。比较4组患者的临床资料,子宫动脉搏动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)、收缩期峰值流速(S)/舒张末期流速(D),不良妊娠结局情况;线性回归分析PLGF水平与患者临床特征的关系;分层交互分析LOPE病情程度对PLGF与超声血流参数之间关系的影响;多因素广义线性混合效应模型分析PLGF水平与LOPE患者不良妊娠结局的关系。结果 舒张压、24 h尿蛋白、PI、RI、S/D随着PLGF水平升高均依次降低(P<0.05),P1组重度LOPE比例、收缩压明显高于其余组(P<0.05),上述指标均是PLGF水平的影响因素(P<0.05);分层交互检验分析结果显示,LOPE病情程度不会影响PLGF与超声血流参数间的关系;不同PLGF水平患者间HELLP综合征、胎儿生长受限、胎儿窘迫、早产、新生儿窒息发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),P1组早产发生率均高于其余组,其余不良妊娠结局情况均高于P3组和P4组;校正混杂协变量前后,PLGF水平与不良妊娠结局均存在统计学关联(P<0.05)。结论 血清PLGF水平影响LOPE患者子宫动脉血流参数及不良妊娠结局。
中图分类号:
组别 | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | 受教育程度 | 孕次/次 | 产史 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小学 | 中学 | 大专 | 本科及以上 | 初产 | 经产 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P1组 | 28.63±4.59 | 30.39±2.84 | 5(13.2) | 7(18.4) | 16(42.1) | 10(26.3) | 1.61±0.97 | 22(57.9) | 16(42.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P2组 | 28.39±4.65 | 30.12±3.01 | 5(13.2) | 6(15.8) | 19(50.0) | 8(21.1) | 1.55±0.83 | 24(63.2) | 14(36.8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P3组 | 28.56±3.73 | 29.93±2.94 | 4(10.5) | 6(15.8) | 17(44.7) | 11(28.9) | 1.50±0.92 | 21(55.3) | 17(44.7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P4组 | 28.41±4.68 | 29.61±2.85 | 3(7.9) | 7(18.4) | 16(42.1) | 12(31.6) | 1.50±1.02 | 27(71.1) | 11(28.9) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
F、P或χ2 | 0.024 | 0.481 | 0.992▲ | 0.257 | 2.342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | 子痫前期史 | LOPE发病孕周/周 | LOPE病情程度 | 收缩压/ mmHg | 舒张压/ mmHg | 平均动脉压/ mmHg | TC/ (mmol/L) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
轻度 | 重度 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P1组 | 3(7.9) | 35.21±1.07 | 7(18.4) | 31(81.6) | 158.42±11.37 | 105.31±9.72 | 117.36±12.06 | 4.73±1.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P2组 | 2(5.3) | 35.29±0.96 | 21(55.3) | 17(44.7)a | 152.47±12.41a | 98.41±9.85a | 115.49±11.59 | 4.64±1.47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P3组 | 2(5.3) | 35.32±1.12 | 28(73.7) | 10(26.3)a | 146.73±13.25a | 92.31±8.69ab | 115.28±11.73 | 4.55±1.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P4组 | 1(2.6) | 35.37±1.10 | 33(86.8) | 5(13.2)ab | 139.28±11.26abc | 86.12±10.26abc | 114.42±10.38 | 4.48±1.28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P、F或χ2 | 0.169▲ | 0.146 | 41.504** | 17.311** | 27.593** | 0.441 | 0.229 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | TG/(mmol/L) | LDL-C/(mmol/L) | HDL-C/(mmol/L) | FT3/(pmol/L) | FT4/(pmol/L) | TSH/(μIU/L) | PLT/(×109/L) | Fib/(g/L) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P1组 | 6.24±2.12 | 3.72±1.08 | 1.72±0.42 | 3.51±1.13 | 12.36±3.48 | 3.32±1.11 | 185.39±51.48 | 3.85±1.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P2组 | 6.17±2.03 | 3.55±1.21 | 1.81±0.36 | 3.58±1.09 | 12.42±3.36 | 3.20±0.87 | 187.42±49.76 | 3.96±1.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P3组 | 6.06±1.96 | 3.64±1.16 | 1.75±0.48 | 3.62±1.21 | 12.59±3.52 | 3.18±1.02 | 186.93±55.34 | 3.89±1.28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P4组 | 5.98±2.24 | 3.49±1.14 | 1.83±0.51 | 3.74±1.26 | 12.48±3.41 | 3.11±0.98 | 188.64±54.89 | 4.01±1.21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
F | 0.115 | 0.275 | 0.470 | 0.258 | 0.029 | 0.295 | 0.024 | 0.123 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | PT/s | TT/s | APTT/s | UA/(μmol/L) | Scr/(μmol/L) | 24 h尿蛋白/g | 分娩周期/周 | 剖宫产 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P1组 | 10.42±3.02 | 15.73±4.02 | 24.76±5.78 | 326.58±69.41 | 49.73±12.74 | 3.37±1.02 | 36.92±1.17 | 37(97.4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P2组 | 10.48±2.96 | 15.46±4.21 | 24.85±5.96 | 325.97±75.92 | 47.95±13.56 | 2.86±0.96a | 37.13±1.21 | 36(94.7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P3组 | 10.57±2.79 | 15.51±3.96 | 25.01±5.42 | 324.86±73.46 | 48.12±17.65 | 2.42±0.87ab | 37.24±1.10 | 34(89.5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P4组 | 10.66±3.14 | 15.38±4.18 | 25.14±5.88 | 322.12±65.37 | 46.84±15.48 | 1.75±0.65abc | 37.18±1.11 | 32(84.2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
F或P | 0.050 | 0.052 | 0.032 | 0.029 | 0.240 | 22.944** | 0.551 | 0.205▲ |
表1 4组不同PLGF水平LOPE患者临床资料的比较 (n=38)
Tab.1 Comparison of clinical data between LOPE patients with different PLGF levels
组别 | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | 受教育程度 | 孕次/次 | 产史 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小学 | 中学 | 大专 | 本科及以上 | 初产 | 经产 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P1组 | 28.63±4.59 | 30.39±2.84 | 5(13.2) | 7(18.4) | 16(42.1) | 10(26.3) | 1.61±0.97 | 22(57.9) | 16(42.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P2组 | 28.39±4.65 | 30.12±3.01 | 5(13.2) | 6(15.8) | 19(50.0) | 8(21.1) | 1.55±0.83 | 24(63.2) | 14(36.8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P3组 | 28.56±3.73 | 29.93±2.94 | 4(10.5) | 6(15.8) | 17(44.7) | 11(28.9) | 1.50±0.92 | 21(55.3) | 17(44.7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P4组 | 28.41±4.68 | 29.61±2.85 | 3(7.9) | 7(18.4) | 16(42.1) | 12(31.6) | 1.50±1.02 | 27(71.1) | 11(28.9) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
F、P或χ2 | 0.024 | 0.481 | 0.992▲ | 0.257 | 2.342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | 子痫前期史 | LOPE发病孕周/周 | LOPE病情程度 | 收缩压/ mmHg | 舒张压/ mmHg | 平均动脉压/ mmHg | TC/ (mmol/L) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
轻度 | 重度 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P1组 | 3(7.9) | 35.21±1.07 | 7(18.4) | 31(81.6) | 158.42±11.37 | 105.31±9.72 | 117.36±12.06 | 4.73±1.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P2组 | 2(5.3) | 35.29±0.96 | 21(55.3) | 17(44.7)a | 152.47±12.41a | 98.41±9.85a | 115.49±11.59 | 4.64±1.47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P3组 | 2(5.3) | 35.32±1.12 | 28(73.7) | 10(26.3)a | 146.73±13.25a | 92.31±8.69ab | 115.28±11.73 | 4.55±1.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P4组 | 1(2.6) | 35.37±1.10 | 33(86.8) | 5(13.2)ab | 139.28±11.26abc | 86.12±10.26abc | 114.42±10.38 | 4.48±1.28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P、F或χ2 | 0.169▲ | 0.146 | 41.504** | 17.311** | 27.593** | 0.441 | 0.229 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | TG/(mmol/L) | LDL-C/(mmol/L) | HDL-C/(mmol/L) | FT3/(pmol/L) | FT4/(pmol/L) | TSH/(μIU/L) | PLT/(×109/L) | Fib/(g/L) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P1组 | 6.24±2.12 | 3.72±1.08 | 1.72±0.42 | 3.51±1.13 | 12.36±3.48 | 3.32±1.11 | 185.39±51.48 | 3.85±1.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P2组 | 6.17±2.03 | 3.55±1.21 | 1.81±0.36 | 3.58±1.09 | 12.42±3.36 | 3.20±0.87 | 187.42±49.76 | 3.96±1.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P3组 | 6.06±1.96 | 3.64±1.16 | 1.75±0.48 | 3.62±1.21 | 12.59±3.52 | 3.18±1.02 | 186.93±55.34 | 3.89±1.28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P4组 | 5.98±2.24 | 3.49±1.14 | 1.83±0.51 | 3.74±1.26 | 12.48±3.41 | 3.11±0.98 | 188.64±54.89 | 4.01±1.21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
F | 0.115 | 0.275 | 0.470 | 0.258 | 0.029 | 0.295 | 0.024 | 0.123 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | PT/s | TT/s | APTT/s | UA/(μmol/L) | Scr/(μmol/L) | 24 h尿蛋白/g | 分娩周期/周 | 剖宫产 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P1组 | 10.42±3.02 | 15.73±4.02 | 24.76±5.78 | 326.58±69.41 | 49.73±12.74 | 3.37±1.02 | 36.92±1.17 | 37(97.4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P2组 | 10.48±2.96 | 15.46±4.21 | 24.85±5.96 | 325.97±75.92 | 47.95±13.56 | 2.86±0.96a | 37.13±1.21 | 36(94.7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P3组 | 10.57±2.79 | 15.51±3.96 | 25.01±5.42 | 324.86±73.46 | 48.12±17.65 | 2.42±0.87ab | 37.24±1.10 | 34(89.5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P4组 | 10.66±3.14 | 15.38±4.18 | 25.14±5.88 | 322.12±65.37 | 46.84±15.48 | 1.75±0.65abc | 37.18±1.11 | 32(84.2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
F或P | 0.050 | 0.052 | 0.032 | 0.029 | 0.240 | 22.944** | 0.551 | 0.205▲ |
组别 | PI | RI | S/D |
---|---|---|---|
P1组 | 1.25±0.20 | 0.81±0.14 | 2.98±0.56 |
P2组 | 1.16±0.17a | 0.73±0.12a | 2.67±0.49a |
P3组 | 1.07±0.19ab | 0.62±0.15ab | 2.42±0.52ab |
P4组 | 0.95±0.24abc | 0.53±0.11abc | 2.19±0.46abc |
F | 14.566** | 35.776** | 16.898** |
表2 4组不同PLGF水平LOPE患者超声血流参数的比较 (n=38,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.2 Comparison of ultrasonic blood flow parameters in patients with LOPE between four groups with different PLGF levels
组别 | PI | RI | S/D |
---|---|---|---|
P1组 | 1.25±0.20 | 0.81±0.14 | 2.98±0.56 |
P2组 | 1.16±0.17a | 0.73±0.12a | 2.67±0.49a |
P3组 | 1.07±0.19ab | 0.62±0.15ab | 2.42±0.52ab |
P4组 | 0.95±0.24abc | 0.53±0.11abc | 2.19±0.46abc |
F | 14.566** | 35.776** | 16.898** |
变量 | 非标准化β | 标准误 | 标准化β | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOPE病情程度 | -3.530 | 1.695 | -0.119 | -2.082 | 0.039 |
收缩压 | -0.189 | 0.058 | -0.180 | -3.277 | 0.001 |
舒张压 | -0.246 | 0.068 | -0.200 | -3.627 | <0.001 |
24 h尿蛋白 | -2.478 | 0.772 | -0.180 | -3.211 | 0.002 |
PI | -7.416 | 3.483 | -0.116 | -2.129 | 0.035 |
RI | -31.009 | 4.826 | -0.361 | -6.425 | <0.001 |
S/D | -2.985 | 1.401 | -0.119 | -2.130 | 0.035 |
常数项 | 160.160 | 9.479 | 16.897 | <0.001 |
表3 不同临床特征PLGF水平线性回归分析
Tab.3 Linear regression analysis of PLGF levels in different clinical features
变量 | 非标准化β | 标准误 | 标准化β | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOPE病情程度 | -3.530 | 1.695 | -0.119 | -2.082 | 0.039 |
收缩压 | -0.189 | 0.058 | -0.180 | -3.277 | 0.001 |
舒张压 | -0.246 | 0.068 | -0.200 | -3.627 | <0.001 |
24 h尿蛋白 | -2.478 | 0.772 | -0.180 | -3.211 | 0.002 |
PI | -7.416 | 3.483 | -0.116 | -2.129 | 0.035 |
RI | -31.009 | 4.826 | -0.361 | -6.425 | <0.001 |
S/D | -2.985 | 1.401 | -0.119 | -2.130 | 0.035 |
常数项 | 160.160 | 9.479 | 16.897 | <0.001 |
超声血流参数 | 模型 | 轻度LOPE | 重度LOPE | P交互 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β(95%CI) | P | β(95%CI) | P | |||
PI | 未校正模型 | -2.645(-3.028~-2.283) | <0.001 | -4.014(-4.368~-3.772) | <0.001 | 0.120 |
模型1 | -0.342(-0.828~0.183) | 0.083 | -0.842(-1.178~-0.511) | 0.039 | 0.365 | |
模型2 | -0.275(-0.541~0.064) | 0.116 | -1.039(-1.126~-0.983) | 0.027 | 0.298 | |
RI | 未校正模型 | -1.902(-2.056~-1.742) | <0.001 | -2.452(-2.906~-1.985) | <0.001 | 0.139 |
模型1 | -0.183(-0.562~0.201) | 0.139 | -0.649(-0.842~-0.431) | 0.041 | 0.412 | |
模型2 | -0.202(-0.588~-0.177) | 0.124 | -1.128(-1.306~-0.979) | 0.012 | 0.171 | |
S/D | 未校正模型 | -3.014(-3.248~-2.861) | <0.001 | -2.119(-2.639~-1.642) | <0.001 | 0.118 |
模型1 | -0.306(-0.625~0.021) | 0.102 | -0.503(-0.592~-0.425) | 0.045 | 0.242 | |
模型2 | -0.396(-0.912~0.101) | 0.076 | -0.972(-1.038~-0.911) | 0.032 | 0.373 |
表4 LOPE病情程度对PLGF与超声血流参数之间关系影响的分层交互分析
Tab.4 Stratified interactive analysis of the effect of LOPE severity on the relationship between PLGF and ultrasonic blood flow parameters
超声血流参数 | 模型 | 轻度LOPE | 重度LOPE | P交互 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β(95%CI) | P | β(95%CI) | P | |||
PI | 未校正模型 | -2.645(-3.028~-2.283) | <0.001 | -4.014(-4.368~-3.772) | <0.001 | 0.120 |
模型1 | -0.342(-0.828~0.183) | 0.083 | -0.842(-1.178~-0.511) | 0.039 | 0.365 | |
模型2 | -0.275(-0.541~0.064) | 0.116 | -1.039(-1.126~-0.983) | 0.027 | 0.298 | |
RI | 未校正模型 | -1.902(-2.056~-1.742) | <0.001 | -2.452(-2.906~-1.985) | <0.001 | 0.139 |
模型1 | -0.183(-0.562~0.201) | 0.139 | -0.649(-0.842~-0.431) | 0.041 | 0.412 | |
模型2 | -0.202(-0.588~-0.177) | 0.124 | -1.128(-1.306~-0.979) | 0.012 | 0.171 | |
S/D | 未校正模型 | -3.014(-3.248~-2.861) | <0.001 | -2.119(-2.639~-1.642) | <0.001 | 0.118 |
模型1 | -0.306(-0.625~0.021) | 0.102 | -0.503(-0.592~-0.425) | 0.045 | 0.242 | |
模型2 | -0.396(-0.912~0.101) | 0.076 | -0.972(-1.038~-0.911) | 0.032 | 0.373 |
组别 | 产妇妊娠结局 | 围生儿结局 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
胎盘早剥 | 产后出血 | HELLP综合征 | 胎儿生长受限 | 胎儿窘迫 | 早产 | 新生儿窒息 | |
P1组 | 6(15.79) | 5(13.16) | 8(21.05) | 10(26.32) | 19(50.00) | 36(94.74) | 18(47.37) |
P2组 | 5(13.16) | 3(7.89) | 3(7.89) | 7(18.42) | 11(28.95) | 22(57.89)a | 10(26.32) |
P3组 | 3(7.89) | 1(2.63) | 1(2.63)a | 3(7.89)a | 5(13.16)a | 16(42.11)a | 5(13.16)a |
P4组 | 1(2.63) | 1(2.63) | 1(2.63)a | 1(2.63)ab | 3(7.89)ab | 7(18.42)abc | 2(5.26)ab |
χ2或P | 0.208▲ | 0.281▲ | 0.015▲ | 10.774* | 21.754** | 47.019** | 21.789** |
表5 不同PLGF水平患者不良妊娠结局情况 [n=38,例(%)]
Tab.5 Adverse pregnancy outcome in patients with different PLGF levels
组别 | 产妇妊娠结局 | 围生儿结局 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
胎盘早剥 | 产后出血 | HELLP综合征 | 胎儿生长受限 | 胎儿窘迫 | 早产 | 新生儿窒息 | |
P1组 | 6(15.79) | 5(13.16) | 8(21.05) | 10(26.32) | 19(50.00) | 36(94.74) | 18(47.37) |
P2组 | 5(13.16) | 3(7.89) | 3(7.89) | 7(18.42) | 11(28.95) | 22(57.89)a | 10(26.32) |
P3组 | 3(7.89) | 1(2.63) | 1(2.63)a | 3(7.89)a | 5(13.16)a | 16(42.11)a | 5(13.16)a |
P4组 | 1(2.63) | 1(2.63) | 1(2.63)a | 1(2.63)ab | 3(7.89)ab | 7(18.42)abc | 2(5.26)ab |
χ2或P | 0.208▲ | 0.281▲ | 0.015▲ | 10.774* | 21.754** | 47.019** | 21.789** |
模型 | PLGF/(ng/L) | β | SE | t | P | OR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
未校正 | <12.00 | 1.459 | 0.425 | 3.433 | <0.001 | 4.302(3.928~4.689) |
模型 | 12.00~56.73 | 1.114 | 0.511 | 2.179 | 0.002 | 3.045(2.637~3.452) |
>56.73~89.41 | 0.737 | 0.589 | 1.251 | 0.019 | 2.089(1.733~2.431) | |
>89.41 | - | - | - | - | 1.000 | |
模型1 | <12.00 | 1.438 | 0.472 | 3.046 | <0.001 | 4.212(3.896~4.534) |
12.00~56.73 | 1.089 | 0.528 | 2.063 | 0.01 | 2.972(2.741~3.225) | |
>56.73~89.41 | 0.645 | 0.602 | 1.071 | 0.021 | 1.906(1.582~2.237) | |
>89.41 | - | - | - | - | 1.000 | |
模型2 | <12.00 | 1.395 | 0.503 | 2.774 | <0.001 | 4.036(3.851~4.225) |
12.00~56.73 | 0.973 | 0.544 | 1.788 | 0.013 | 2.645(2.064~3.257) | |
>56.73~89.41 | 0.555 | 0.613 | 0.905 | 0.032 | 1.742(1.508~1.975) | |
>89.41 | - | - | - | - | 1.000 |
表6 广义线性混合效应模型分析LOPE患者不良妊娠结局与PLGF水平的关系
Tab.6 Analysis of the relationship between adverse pregnancy outcome and PLGF level in patients with LOPE by generalized linear mixed effect model
模型 | PLGF/(ng/L) | β | SE | t | P | OR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
未校正 | <12.00 | 1.459 | 0.425 | 3.433 | <0.001 | 4.302(3.928~4.689) |
模型 | 12.00~56.73 | 1.114 | 0.511 | 2.179 | 0.002 | 3.045(2.637~3.452) |
>56.73~89.41 | 0.737 | 0.589 | 1.251 | 0.019 | 2.089(1.733~2.431) | |
>89.41 | - | - | - | - | 1.000 | |
模型1 | <12.00 | 1.438 | 0.472 | 3.046 | <0.001 | 4.212(3.896~4.534) |
12.00~56.73 | 1.089 | 0.528 | 2.063 | 0.01 | 2.972(2.741~3.225) | |
>56.73~89.41 | 0.645 | 0.602 | 1.071 | 0.021 | 1.906(1.582~2.237) | |
>89.41 | - | - | - | - | 1.000 | |
模型2 | <12.00 | 1.395 | 0.503 | 2.774 | <0.001 | 4.036(3.851~4.225) |
12.00~56.73 | 0.973 | 0.544 | 1.788 | 0.013 | 2.645(2.064~3.257) | |
>56.73~89.41 | 0.555 | 0.613 | 0.905 | 0.032 | 1.742(1.508~1.975) | |
>89.41 | - | - | - | - | 1.000 |
[1] | OVERTON E, TOBES D, LEE A. Preeclampsia diagnosis and management[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2022, 36(1):107-121. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2022.02.003. |
[2] | ROBILLARD P Y, DEKKER G, SCIOSCIA M, et al. Progress in the understanding of the pathophysiology of immunologic maladaptation related to early-onset preeclampsia and metabolic syndrome related to late-onset preeclampsia[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 226(2S):S867-S875. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.019. |
[3] | ANTONIĆ T, ARDALIĆ D, VLADIMIROV S, et al. Cholesterol metabolic profiling of HDL in women with late-onset preeclampsia[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(14):11357. doi:10.3390/ijms241411357. |
[4] | PARA R, ROMERO R, GOMEZ-LOPEZ N, et al. Maternal circulating concentrations of soluble Fas and Elabela in early- and late-onset preeclampsia[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(2):316-329. doi:10.1080/14767058.2020.1716720. |
[5] | MOAWAD E, TAMMAM A, MOSAAD M M, et al. Evaluating the predictive value of fetal Doppler indices and neonatal outcome in late-onset preeclampsia with severe features:a cross-sectional study in a resource-limited setting[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22(1):377. doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04704-0. |
[6] | LI B, YANG H. Comparison of clinical features and pregnancy outcomes in early- and late-onset preeclampsia with HELLP syndrome:a 10-year retrospective study from a tertiary hospital and referral center in China[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22(1):186. doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04466-9. |
[7] | CHEN H, ANEMAN I, NIKOLIC V, et al. Maternal plasma proteome profiling of biomarkers and pathogenic mechanisms of early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1):19099. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20658-x. |
[8] | GOTO M, YAMAGISHI S I, MATSUI T, et al. Predictive ability of serum advanced glycation end products at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation for early-onset preeclampsia[J]. AJOG Glob Rep, 2022, 2(2):100052. doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100052. |
[9] | 谢幸, 孔北华, 段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018. |
XIE X, KONG B H, DUAN T. Obstetrics and gynecology[M]. 9th ed. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House, 2018. | |
[10] | IBANOGLU M C, OSKOVI-KAPLAN Z A, OZGU-ERDINC A S, et al. Comparison of the Kisspeptin levels in early onset preeclampsia and late-onset preeclampsia[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022, 306(4):991-996. doi:10.1007/s00404-021-06359-2. |
[11] | OVAYOLU A, TURKSOY V A, GUN I, et al. Analyses of maternal plasma cadmium, lead, and vanadium levels in the diagnosis and severity of late-onset preeclampsia:a prospective and comparative study[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(24):4803-4809. doi:10.1080/14767058.2020.1864318. |
[12] | 胡吉霞, 肖丽, 汪文雁. 血清可溶性FMS样酪氨酸激酶/胎盘生长因子比值预测早发型子痫前期的临床意义[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2022, 42(3):621-627. |
HU J X, XIAO L, WANG W Y. Clinical significance of ratio of soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1 and placenta growth factor to predict early onset preeclampsia[J]. Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research, 2022, 42(3):621-627. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.03.015. | |
[13] | 邱欢, 孙红梅, 孙云霞. sflt-1及超声动脉血流参数预测子痫前期临床价值[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2023, 31(2):434-437. |
QIU H, SUN H M, SUN Y X. Clinical values of the level of serum soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and the values of the arterial blood flow parameters by ultrasound for predicting the preeclampsia of pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 2023, 31(2):434-437. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2023.02.041. | |
[14] | LIU Y, XIE Z, HUANG Y, et al. Uterine arteries pulsatility index by Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of preeclampsia:an updated systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2024, 309(2):427-437. doi:10.1007/s00404-023-07044-2. |
[15] | 黄小缤, 崔世红, 刘灵, 等. 血清FFA、PLGF、tTG、T-cadherin与早发型子痫前期患者子宫动脉血流参数和围产儿不良结局的关系研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2022, 22(13):2535-2539,2554. |
HUANG X B, CUI S H, LIU L, et al. Relationship study between serum FFA,PLGF,tTG,T-cadherin and uterine artery blood flow parameters and adverse perinatal outcomes in patients with early-onset preeclampsia[J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2022, 22(13):2535-2539,2554. doi:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2022.13.026. | |
[16] | 颜露春, 朱广源, 李小林, 等. 子痫前期孕妇外周血sFlt-1、PIGF、PP-13、sEng的表达及其与子宫动脉血流的相关性研究[J]. 中国生育健康杂志, 2019, 30(3):237-240,247. |
YAN L C, ZHU G Y, LI X L, et al. Correlation of sFlt-1,PIGF,PP-13,sEng in maternal serum and uterine artery index among preeclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health, 2019, 30(3):237-240,247. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-878X.2019.03.009. | |
[17] | BENDIX E J, RAVN J D, SPERLING L, et al. First trimester serum apolipoproteins in the prediction of late-onset preeclampsia[J]. Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 2023, 83(1):23-30. doi:10.1080/00365513.2022.2155991. |
[18] | AMINUDDIN N A, SUTAN R, MAHDY Z A, et al. The feasibility of soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFLT-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio biomarker in predicting preeclampsia and adverse pregnancy outcomes among medium to high risk mothers in Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(3):e0265080. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265080. |
[19] | 邱瑞莹, 杨蕾, 姚雪梅. 妊娠糖尿病并发子痫前期产妇妊娠结局及影响因素分析[J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2018, 41(1):51-54,61. |
QIU R Y, YANG L, YAO X M. Delivery outcome and influencing factors analysis of gestational diabetes mellitus complicated with preeclampsia[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Medical University, 2018, 41(1):51-54,61. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-5551.2018.01.013. | |
[20] | KHAN B, ALLAH YAR R, KHAKWANI A K, et al. Preeclampsia incidence and its maternal and neonatal outcomes with associated risk factors[J]. Cureus, 2022, 14(11):e31143. doi:10.7759/cureus.31143. |
[1] | 戴瑶, 方向, 黄康, 冯洁, 刘敏, 伍松柏. HAT疗法治疗脓毒症休克的临床疗效观察[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 825-829. |
[2] | 金彩凤, 吴玮, 吴轲. B族链球菌感染及阴道微生态变化与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 858-861. |
[3] | 常鸿, 张科伟, 徐静, 崔晓敏, 杨菲菲. 血清HbA1c、Alarin及Ficolin-3水平对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 625-629. |
[4] | 盛红娜, 范卓然, 华绍芳, 张俊农. 子痫前期患者循环PLGF水平对预测病情及评估母婴结局的价值初探[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 630-634. |
[5] | 王晶晶, 张明, 牛琛, 齐玉梅. 妊娠剧吐患者的营养状况及妊娠结局分析[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(5): 532-535. |
[6] | 朱咏仪, 温博伦, 吴青霖, 梁少玲, 宗银东. 右美托咪定对孕产妇椎管内麻醉期间寒战及血流动力学的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(4): 387-390. |
[7] | 张丽冉, 赵延华. MP妊高征监测系统联合PLGF和PI对子痫前期的预测价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(3): 306-310. |
[8] | 赵芳园, 邹红, 时思毛, 徐芳, 左冬冬. PCOS患者血清血管生成素样蛋白2、4水平与卵巢间质血流动力学的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(9): 988-992. |
[9] | 陈其桂, 李大文, 成俊萍, 黄泰帅. 梗阻性无精子症患者不同来源精子ICSI助孕前药物疗效及安全性分析[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(8): 864-868. |
[10] | 韩贞艳, 关红琼. 子痫前期患者的胎盘环状RNA表达谱及与病情的相关性[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(5): 513-517. |
[11] | 赵永峰, 甘国财, 王雪, 赵旭, 马淑梅, 李彩琴, 张成. 高原地区高危产妇胎儿宫内窘迫超声诊断的价值分析[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(12): 1374-1377. |
[12] | 梁婷, 杨静雅, 梁沁, 周翠娟. 输卵管积水性不孕症患者子宫内膜形态及容受性评估IVF-ET妊娠结局的临床研究[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(1): 81-85. |
[13] | 朱云林, 殷广莉, 戴平涛. 颈动脉超声及血清HbA1c、FIB对急性前循环脑梗死的评估价值分析[J]. 天津医药, 2022, 50(9): 948-952. |
[14] | 陈丹丹, 万业达, 何辉, 刘妍. 超声造影评价甲状旁腺自体异位移植成活价值的初步研究[J]. 天津医药, 2022, 50(9): 980-983. |
[15] | 朱荣英, 朱艳芳, 习静. 亲环素A在GDM中的表达及其与氧化应激、炎症反应和妊娠结局的关系研究[J]. 天津医药, 2022, 50(5): 548-551. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||