天津医药 ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 665-669.doi: 10.11958/20250356
收稿日期:
2025-01-23
修回日期:
2025-04-03
出版日期:
2025-06-15
发布日期:
2025-06-20
作者简介:
向立丽(1984),女,副主任医师,主要从事骨髓瘤诊治方面研究。E-mail:
XIANG Lili(), WANG Qian, MENG Yanna, FU Jie, ZHANG Pu
Received:
2025-01-23
Revised:
2025-04-03
Published:
2025-06-15
Online:
2025-06-20
向立丽, 王倩, 蒙延娜, 付杰, 张璞. 来那度胺联合硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(6): 665-669.
XIANG Lili, WANG Qian, MENG Yanna, FU Jie, ZHANG Pu. Efficacy of lenalidomide combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone in the treatment of multiple myeloma[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2025, 53(6): 665-669.
摘要:
目的 探讨来那度胺联合硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的疗效及对热休克蛋白90(HSP90)mRNA、miR-28-5p、抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶5b(TRACP-5b)、高迁移率族蛋白B1(HMGB1)的影响。方法 选取80例初诊MM患者,根据治疗方式的不同将患者分为二联组(40例,硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗)和三联组(40例,硼替佐米、地塞米松联合来那度胺治疗)。实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应检测HSP90 mRNA、miR-28-5p水平。酶联免疫吸附试验检测TRACP-5b、HMGB1水平。比较2组临床疗效,治疗前后HSP90 mRNA、miR-28-5p、TRACP-5b、HMGB1水平,免疫细胞功能、肾功能指标和不良反应发生率。结果 三联组总有效率高于二联组(92.50% vs. 75.00%,P<0.05)。与治疗前相比,治疗后2组HSP90 mRNA、TRACP-5b、血肌酐、尿素氮水平降低,且三联组低于二联组;2组miR-28-5p、HMGB1、CD4+、CD3+、CD4+/CD8+水平升高,且三联组水平高于二联组(P<0.05)。2组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义。结论 来那度胺联合硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗MM临床疗效显著,安全可靠。
中图分类号:
基因 | 引物序列(5'→3') | 产物大小/bp |
---|---|---|
HSP90 mRNA | 上游:GTCTGCGTATCCGAAAGCAAG | 2 568 |
下游:CTGAGGGGTGGGGATGATGTC | ||
miR-28-5p | 上游:GGCGTGAGGCTGAGGCTA | 47 |
下游:ATGGCTGAGCGAAATTGCGGAC | ||
U6 | 上游:CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | 150 |
下游:AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
表1 引物序列
Tab.1 Primer sequences
基因 | 引物序列(5'→3') | 产物大小/bp |
---|---|---|
HSP90 mRNA | 上游:GTCTGCGTATCCGAAAGCAAG | 2 568 |
下游:CTGAGGGGTGGGGATGATGTC | ||
miR-28-5p | 上游:GGCGTGAGGCTGAGGCTA | 47 |
下游:ATGGCTGAGCGAAATTGCGGAC | ||
U6 | 上游:CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | 150 |
下游:AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
组别 | 性别 (男/女) | 年龄/ 岁 | 病程/ 年 | D-S分期 (Ⅱ期/Ⅲ期) | ISS分期 (Ⅱ期/Ⅲ期) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
二联组 | 21/19 | 57.61±6.07 | 2.63±0.37 | 4/36 | 10/30 |
三联组 | 23/17 | 57.33±6.25 | 2.73±0.40 | 3/37 | 9/31 |
t或χ2 | 0.202 | 0.272 | 1.594 | 0.157 | 0.069 |
表2 2组一般资料比较 (n=40)
Tab.2 Comparison of general data between the two groups
组别 | 性别 (男/女) | 年龄/ 岁 | 病程/ 年 | D-S分期 (Ⅱ期/Ⅲ期) | ISS分期 (Ⅱ期/Ⅲ期) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
二联组 | 21/19 | 57.61±6.07 | 2.63±0.37 | 4/36 | 10/30 |
三联组 | 23/17 | 57.33±6.25 | 2.73±0.40 | 3/37 | 9/31 |
t或χ2 | 0.202 | 0.272 | 1.594 | 0.157 | 0.069 |
组别 | n | 完全 缓解 | 非常好的 部分缓解 | 部分 缓解 | 病情 稳定 | 病情 进展 | 总有效 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
二联组 | 40 | 2(5.00) | 11(27.50) | 17(42.50) | 7(17.50) | 3(7.50) | 30(75.00) |
三联组 | 40 | 5(12.50) | 13(32.50) | 19(47.50) | 2(5.00) | 1(2.50) | 37(92.50) |
χ2 | 4.501* |
表3 2组患者总有效率比较 [例(%)]
Tab.3 Comparison of total effective rate between the two groups of patients
组别 | n | 完全 缓解 | 非常好的 部分缓解 | 部分 缓解 | 病情 稳定 | 病情 进展 | 总有效 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
二联组 | 40 | 2(5.00) | 11(27.50) | 17(42.50) | 7(17.50) | 3(7.50) | 30(75.00) |
三联组 | 40 | 5(12.50) | 13(32.50) | 19(47.50) | 2(5.00) | 1(2.50) | 37(92.50) |
χ2 | 4.501* |
组别 | HSP90 mRNA | miR-28-5p | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
二联组 | 1.01±0.23 | 0.86±0.15 | 2.958* | 0.98±0.13 | 1.53±0.24 | 12.195** | ||||||
三联组 | 0.99±0.17 | 0.72±0.11 | 8.542** | 1.01±0.18 | 1.82±0.26 | 19.406** | ||||||
t | 0.302 | 5.919** | 0.184 | 6.440** | ||||||||
组别 | TRACP-5b/(μg/L) | HMGB1/(ng/L) | ||||||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
二联组 | 41.23±5.37 | 35.89±4.11 | 4.500** | 61.23±8.17 | 352.13±56.33 | 33.214** | ||||||
三联组 | 41.67±6.01 | 30.16±3.97 | 8.146** | 59.87±6.55 | 382.56±42.15 | 54.442** | ||||||
t | 0.340 | 4.448** | 1.568 | 3.940** |
表4 2组治疗前后HSP90 mRNA、miR-28-5p、TRACP-5b、HMGB1水平比较 (n=40,$\bar{x} \pm s$)
Tab.4 Comparison of the levels of HSP90 mRNA,miR-28-5p, TRACP-5b and HMGB1 before and after treatment between the two groups
组别 | HSP90 mRNA | miR-28-5p | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
二联组 | 1.01±0.23 | 0.86±0.15 | 2.958* | 0.98±0.13 | 1.53±0.24 | 12.195** | ||||||
三联组 | 0.99±0.17 | 0.72±0.11 | 8.542** | 1.01±0.18 | 1.82±0.26 | 19.406** | ||||||
t | 0.302 | 5.919** | 0.184 | 6.440** | ||||||||
组别 | TRACP-5b/(μg/L) | HMGB1/(ng/L) | ||||||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
二联组 | 41.23±5.37 | 35.89±4.11 | 4.500** | 61.23±8.17 | 352.13±56.33 | 33.214** | ||||||
三联组 | 41.67±6.01 | 30.16±3.97 | 8.146** | 59.87±6.55 | 382.56±42.15 | 54.442** | ||||||
t | 0.340 | 4.448** | 1.568 | 3.940** |
组别 | CD4+/% | CD3+/% | CD4+/CD8+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
二联组 | 31.27±5.64 | 36.79±4.25 | 5.110** | 58.61±7.22 | 66.85±7.66 | 5.824** | 1.01±0.28 | 1.35±0.32 | 4.840** |
三联组 | 30.65±5.13 | 46.13±5.36 | 13.068** | 57.93±6.93 | 71.23±8.12 | 9.900** | 1.03±0.31 | 1.88±0.38 | 10.977** |
t | 0.503 | 12.272** | 1.672 | 2.445* | 0.697 | 7.570** |
表5 2组患者治疗前后免疫细胞功能指标比较 (n=40,$\bar{x} \pm s$)
Tab.5 Comparison of cellular immune function indexes before and after treatment between the two groups of patients
组别 | CD4+/% | CD3+/% | CD4+/CD8+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
二联组 | 31.27±5.64 | 36.79±4.25 | 5.110** | 58.61±7.22 | 66.85±7.66 | 5.824** | 1.01±0.28 | 1.35±0.32 | 4.840** |
三联组 | 30.65±5.13 | 46.13±5.36 | 13.068** | 57.93±6.93 | 71.23±8.12 | 9.900** | 1.03±0.31 | 1.88±0.38 | 10.977** |
t | 0.503 | 12.272** | 1.672 | 2.445* | 0.697 | 7.570** |
组别 | SCr/(μmol/L) | BUN/(mmol/L) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
二联组 | 123.51±15.32 | 102.78±12.37 | 10.154** | 13.29±2.71 | 9.87±1.35 | 9.390** |
三联组 | 128.63±16.72 | 83.65±10.66 | 13.552** | 13.56±3.02 | 6.53±1.17 | 13.379** |
t | 1.002 | 6.418** | 1.269 | 11.862** |
表6 2组患者治疗前后肾功能指标比较 (n=40,$\bar{x} \pm s$)
Tab.6 Comparison of renal function indexes before and after treatment between the two groups of patients
组别 | SCr/(μmol/L) | BUN/(mmol/L) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
二联组 | 123.51±15.32 | 102.78±12.37 | 10.154** | 13.29±2.71 | 9.87±1.35 | 9.390** |
三联组 | 128.63±16.72 | 83.65±10.66 | 13.552** | 13.56±3.02 | 6.53±1.17 | 13.379** |
t | 1.002 | 6.418** | 1.269 | 11.862** |
组别 | n | 周围神经病变 | 血小板减少 | 腹泻 | 感染 | 总发生 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
二联组 | 40 | 2(5.00) | 1(2.50) | 1(2.50) | 2(5.00) | 6(15.00) |
三联组 | 40 | 1(2.50) | 0(0.00) | 1(2.50) | 3(7.50) | 5(12.50) |
χ2 | 0.105 |
表7 2组不良反应发生率比较 [例(%)]
Tab.7 Comparison of the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups
组别 | n | 周围神经病变 | 血小板减少 | 腹泻 | 感染 | 总发生 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
二联组 | 40 | 2(5.00) | 1(2.50) | 1(2.50) | 2(5.00) | 6(15.00) |
三联组 | 40 | 1(2.50) | 0(0.00) | 1(2.50) | 3(7.50) | 5(12.50) |
χ2 | 0.105 |
[1] | LIU J, DU F, CHEN C, et al. CircRNA ITCH increases bortezomib sensitivity through regulating the miR-615-3p/PRKCD axis in multiple myeloma[J]. Life Sci, 2020,262:118506. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118506. |
[2] | 刘荟敏, 许旋旋, 王远丽, 等. CircBACH1调节miR-140-5p/MDM2轴对多发性骨髓瘤细胞增殖、凋亡和化疗敏感性的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(11):1170-1175. |
LIU H M, XU X X, WANG Y L, et al. Impacts of CircBACH1 on proliferation,apoptosis and chemosensitivity of multiple myeloma cells by regulating miR-140-5p/MDM2 axis[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2023, 51(11):1170-1175. doi:10.11958/20230126. | |
[3] | SIEGEL R L, MILLER K D, FUCHS H E, et al. Cancer Statistics,2021[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(1):7-33. doi:10.3322/caac.21654. |
[4] | JURCZYSZYN A, WASZCZUK-GAJDA A, CASTILLO J J, et al. Primary refractory multiple myeloma:a real-world experience with 85 cases[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2020, 61(12):2868-2875. doi:10.1080/10428194.2020.1788014. |
[5] | FAN H, WANG W, ZHANG Y, et al. Current treatment paradigm and survival outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in China:a retrospective multicenter study[J]. Cancer Biol Med, 2023, 20(1):77-87. doi:10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0612. |
[6] | CHANUKUPPA V, MORE T H, TAUNK K, et al. Serum metabolomic alterations in multiple myeloma revealed by targeted and untargeted metabolomics approaches:a pilot study[J]. RSC Adv, 2019, 9(51):29522-29532. doi:10.1039/c9ra04458b. |
[7] | 王佳, 李晓红, 李静, 等. 补肾化浊法联合硼替佐米联合地塞米松方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效观察[J]. 广西医学, 2021, 43(23):2824-2828. |
WANG J, LI X H, LI J, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of tonifying kidney and resolving turbidity therapy combined with bortezomib plus dexamethasone regimen on multiple myeloma[J]. Guangxi Medical Journal, 2021, 43(23):2824-2828. doi:10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2021.23.12. | |
[8] | 李青青, 梁立新, 令狐锐, 等. 不同剂量来那度胺治疗初诊中晚期多发性骨髓瘤疗效分析[J]. 临床研究, 2024, 32(12):70-73. |
LI Q Q, LIANG L X, LINGHU R, et al. Efficacy analysis of different doses of lenalidomide in the treatment of newly diagnosed advanced multiple myeloma[J]. Clinical Research, 2024, 32(12):70-73. doi:10.12385/j.issn.2096-1278(2024)12-0070-04. | |
[9] | 罗曼, 胡莉文, 古学奎, 等. 来那度胺长期维持治疗对多发性骨髓瘤患者的临床疗效和预后评估[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志, 2021, 29(2):540-546. |
LUO M, HU L W, GU X K, et al. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and prognosis of long-term maintenance lenalidomide therapy in patients with multiple myeloma[J]. Journal of Experimental Hematology, 2021, 29(2):540-546. doi:10.19746/j.cnki.issn1009-2137.2021.02.037. | |
[10] | 李永莉, 傅琼瑶, 赵莲, 等. 多发性骨髓瘤患者血清HSP90 mRNA、β2-MG的表达水平及其与患者预后的关系[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2023, 31(10):1875-1879. |
LI Y L, FU Q Y, ZHAO L, et al. The expression levels of serum HSP90 mRNA and β 2-MG in patients with multiple myeloma and their relationship with patient prognosis[J]. Journal of Modern Oncology, 2023, 31(10):1875-1879. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2023.10.019. | |
[11] | 李超, 杨如玉, 段丽娟. 血清miR-28-5p、HMGB1表达与多发性骨髓瘤患者病理特征及预后的关系[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志, 2023, 15(3):392-395,400. |
LI C, YANG R Y, DUAN L J. The relationship between serum miR-28-5p, HMGB1 expression and pathological characteristics and prognosis of multiple myeloma patients[J]. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics and Therapy, 2023, 15(3):392-395,400. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-6929.2023.03.009. | |
[12] | 范小红, 王雪莲, 孟亚红. 血清MIP-1α、TRACP-5b和骨硬化蛋白水平在多发性骨髓瘤病情和预后中的临床价值[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2023, 20(2):150-154,159. |
FAN X H, WANG X L, MENG Y H. The clinical value of serum MIP-1 α,TRACP-5b,and osteopontin levels in the condition and prognosis of multiple myeloma[J]. Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, 2023, 20(2):150-154,159. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2023.02.002. | |
[13] | 中国医师协会血液科医师分会, 中华医学会血液学分会, 中国医师协会多发性骨髓瘤专业委员会. 中国多发性骨髓瘤诊治指南(2017年修订)[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2017, 56(11):866-870. |
Chinese Hematology Association, Chinese Society of Hematology, Chinese Myeloma Committee-Chinese Hematology Association. The guidelines for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma in China(2017 revision)[J]. Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine, 2017, 56(11):866-870. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2017.11.021. | |
[14] | KUMAR S, PAIVA B, ANDERSON K C, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2016, 17(8):e328-e346. doi:10.1016/S1470- 2045(16)30206-6. |
[15] | 付彬, 刘萍, 关建民. 硼替佐米每周一次用药方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤效果观察[J]. 白血病·淋巴瘤, 2020, 29(4):236-239. |
FU B, LIU P, GUAN J M. Efficacy observation of bortezomib once-weekly therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma[J]. Journal of Leukemia and Lymphoma, 2020, 29(4):236-239. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115356-20190820-00161. | |
[16] | 顾小慧, 尹淑荣, 赵凤晓, 等. 硼替佐米联合来那度胺、地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效观察[J]. 航空航天医学杂志, 2020, 31(11):1353-1354. |
GU X H, YIN S R, ZHAO F X, et al. Curative effect of bortezomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in the treatment of multiple myeloma[J]. Journal of Aerospace Medicine, 2020, 31(11):1353-1354. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1434.2020.11.039. | |
[17] | DUTTA D, LIU J, WEN K, et al. BCMA-targeted bortezomib nanotherapy improves therapeutic efficacy,overcomes resistance, and modulates the immune microenvironment in multiple myeloma[J]. Blood Cancer J, 2023, 13(1):184. doi:10.1038/s41408-023-00955-y. |
[18] | 胡晓丽. 硼替佐米联合地塞米松及来那度胺治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效及安全性[J]. 临床研究, 2023, 31(5):72-75. |
HU X L. Efficacy and safety of bortezomib combined with dexamethasone and lenalidomide in the treatment of multiple myeloma[J]. Clinical Research, 2023, 31(5):72-75. doi:10.12385/j.issn.2096-1278(2023)05-0072-04. | |
[19] | 毛沛沛, 杨琛. 硼替佐米联合地塞米松、来那度胺化疗方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效和安全性评价[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2023, 38(3):502-506. |
MAO P P, YANG C. Efficacy and safety evaluation of bortezomib combined with dexamethasone and lenalidomide chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of multiple myeloma[J]. The Practical Journal of Cancer, 2023, 38(3):502-506. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2023.03.039. | |
[20] | 许伟, 丁现超. 伊沙佐米联合来那度胺及地塞米松治疗复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效与安全性[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2022, 20(10):44-48. |
XU W, DING X C. Efficacy and safety of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma[J]. Clinical Medication Journal, 2022, 20(10):44-48. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3384.2022.10.008. | |
[21] | LI Z, WONG K Y, CHAN G C, et al. Epigenetic silencing of LPP/miR-28 in multiple myeloma[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2018, 71(3):253-258. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204501. |
[22] | YUAN S, LIU Z, XU Z, et al. High mobility group box 1(HMGB1):a pivotal regulator of hematopoietic malignancies[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2020, 13(1):91. doi:10.1186/s13045-020-00920-3. |
[23] | 吴顺泉, 陈惠君, 战榕. 热休克蛋白90在多发性骨髓瘤患者中的表达及临床意义[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志, 2021, 29(2):525-529. |
WU S Q, CHEN H J, ZHAN R. Expression and clinical significance of heat shock protein 90 in multiple myeloma patients[J]. Journal of Experimental Hematology, 2021, 29(2):525-529. doi:10.19746/j.cnki.issn1009-2137.2021.02.034. | |
[24] | CZERWIŃSKA-LEDWIG O, ŻYCHOWSKA M, JURCZYSZYN A, et al. The impact of a 6-week nordic walking training cycle and a 14-hour intermittent fasting on disease activity markers and serum levels of wnt pathway-associated proteins in patients with multiple myeloma[J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(10):2771. doi:10.3390/jcm13102771. |
[25] | 曹慧, 黄来全, 汪琼, 等. 来那度胺联合硼替佐米,地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤的效果及对免疫功能的影响研究[J]. 中国医药导报, 2024, 21(8):119-122. |
CAO H, HUANG L Q, WANG Q, et al. Study on the effect of Lenalidomide combined with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in the treatment of multiple myeloma and its effect on immune function[J]. China Medical Herald, 2024, 21(8):119-122. doi:10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2024.08.28. | |
[26] | 王珂, 杜恒飞. 来那度胺联合硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效观察[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2022, 29(5):585-588. |
WANG K, DU H F. Efficacy of lenalidomide combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone in the treatment of multiple myeloma[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation, 2022, 29(5):585-588. doi:10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2022.05.18. |
[1] | 张宇轩, 刘一丹, 陈哲, 张雯, 李瑞轩, 闫强, 徐桂萍. 血清HMGB1和sRAGE对脓毒症相关性脑病患者发病及短期预后的预测价值[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(3): 262-266. |
[2] | 倪曼, 葛郡, 孔子昂. HMGB1、MCP-1水平与脓毒症合并AKI患者预后的相关性[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(3): 297-301. |
[3] | 董文荣, 冯全跃, 秦隆朝, 田立俊, 李倩倩. 疏风通窍汤联合甲泼尼龙片用于慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者术后疗效观察[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(3): 312-316. |
[4] | 居峰, 赵广玉, 刘银, 姜鑫, 印登阳, 顾红. 血清IFN-γ、MBL、sFas表达水平对多发性骨髓瘤患者预后的评估价值[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(2): 141-145. |
[5] | 方杰, 黄芮, 郑红慧, 贾倩倩, 鲍静. miR-9-5p靶向TIMP2诱导多发性骨髓瘤细胞自噬和凋亡的机制[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 785-790. |
[6] | 王宁方, 赵崇山, 刘方, 赵鹏浩, 张东东, 蔡卓纹, 蔡芳芳. 多发性骨髓瘤患者淋巴细胞来源微泡的检测及其临床意义[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(4): 409-415. |
[7] | 林瑶, 刘从娜, 王世霞, 张志勇. 金合欢素调节HMGB1/TLR4信号通路对脂多糖诱导牙髓细胞凋亡的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(12): 1238-1243. |
[8] | 吴美娜, 戴为正, 潘毓敦, 傅懋林, 陈晓瑜. 常规脑电图联合血清miR-146a、miR-129-5p水平检测对药物难治性癫痫的临床诊断价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(11): 1207-1210. |
[9] | 王生成, 李琪, 蔡潇阳, 唐咏婕. 汉防己甲素对支气管哮喘小鼠气道重塑的影响及机制探讨[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(9): 943-947. |
[10] | 刘艳文, 刘水清, 林少伟, 刘协红. 毛蕊花糖苷调节HMGB1/RAGE/NF-κB信号通路对动脉粥样硬化大鼠内皮功能障碍的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(12): 1339-1343. |
[11] | 刘荟敏, 许旋旋, 王远丽, 熊涛, 唐元艳. CircBACH1调节miR-140-5p/MDM2轴对多发性骨髓瘤细胞增殖、凋亡和化疗敏感性的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(11): 1170-1175. |
[12] | 黄绚丽, 秘乐, 徐宇, 王红嫚. HMGB1和RAGE在呼吸机相关性肺炎中作用的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(11): 1276-1280. |
[13] | 王丹, 赵丽霞, 彭雅琪, 原大江. 不同剂量地塞米松用于超声引导下罗哌卡因髂筋膜阻滞的效果观察[J]. 天津医药, 2022, 50(8): 878-882. |
[14] | 许家威, 郭一慧, 宋辉, 程纬民. Wnt/β-catenin信号通路在多发性骨髓瘤中的机制研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2022, 50(8): 888-891. |
[15] | 田爱现, 马剑雄, 马信龙△, 李岩. 阿仑膦酸钠在地塞米松诱导C2C12细胞自噬中的作用机制探讨#br#[J]. 天津医药, 2021, 49(9): 921-925. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||