天津医药 ›› 2021, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 520-524.doi: 10.11958/20203077

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

牙合板正畸联合治疗对伴TMD的安氏Ⅱ2女性患者颞下颌关节的影响#br#

雷杰1,肖遥1△,罗茂璇2    

  1. 1西南医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科(邮编646000),2口腔颌面外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-09 修回日期:2021-02-03 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 肖遥 E-mail:495909578@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川省教育厅科研基金资助项目(18ZB0642)

The effect of stabilization splint combined with orthodontic treatment on temporomandibular joint of class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion female with temporomandibular disorders

LEI Jie1, XIAO Yao1△, LUO Mao-xuan2   

  1. 1 Department of Orthodontics, 2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
  • Received:2020-11-09 Revised:2021-02-03 Published:2021-05-15 Online:2021-05-25

摘要:

摘要:目的 探讨稳定性[ ]板联合正畸对伴有颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的安氏Ⅱ2类错[ ]女性颞下颌关节(TMJ)的影响。方法 选取15例伴TMD的安氏Ⅱ2错[ ]女性为试验组、15例安氏Ⅰ类错[ ]女性为对照组,试验组采用稳定性[ ]板联合正畸治疗;通过锥型束CT分析对照组及试验组在治疗前后髁突位置和结构的变化。结果 治疗前试验组TMJ前间隙(Sa)、上间隙(Su)和内间隙(Sm)大于对照组,而后间隙(Sp)、髁突内外径(M-L)和髁突高度(Hc)小于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组治疗各阶段颞下颌关节测量结果显示,与T0期相比,T1期Sa减小,Su、Sp、髁突前后径(A-P)、M-L增大(P<0.05),而T2期Sa减小,Sp、A-P、M-L、Hc和关节窝深度(Hf)均增大(P<0.05);与T1期相比,T2期Su减小,而Hf相对增大(P<0.05);试验组T1、T2期髁突后移位占比均低于T0期(P<0.016 7)。结论 伴TMD的安氏Ⅱ2女性患者TMJ的位置和结构与正常人群存在差异,稳定性[ ]板联合正畸治疗对该类患者有益,治疗后其关节前后间隙和髁突结构改善良好。

关键词: 错[ ], 安氏Ⅱ类;颞下颌关节障碍;正畸学;[ ]夹板;稳定性[ ]板;锥型束CT

Abstract:

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of stabilization splint combined with fixed orthodontic treatment on temporomandibular joint in class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion adolescent female patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods Fifteen class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion female patients with TMD were selected as the experimental group, and 15 class Ⅰ malocclusion female patients were used as the control group. The experimental group was treated with stabilization splint and fixed orthodontic appliance. At each stage of the treatment, cone beam CT was taken to measure the joint structure and the position of condyle. Results The anterior space (Sa), superior space (Sp) and internal space (Sm) of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) were larger in the experimental group than those of the control group, while the posterior space (Sp), the inter-external diameter of the condyle (M-L) and the height of the condyle (Hc) were smaller in the experimental group than those of the control group (P<0.05). The results of TMJ measurement in each stage of treatment in the experimental group were as follows: compared with T0 stage, Sa decreased, Su, Sp, the antero-posterior diameter of the condyle (A-P) and M-L increased in T1 stage (P<0.05), while in T2 stage Sa decreased, Sp, A-P, M-L, Hc and the depth of the articular fossa (Hf) increased (P<0.05). In addition, compared with T1 stage, Su decreased and Hf increased in T2 stage (P<0.05). In the experimental group, the proportion of condylar posterior position was significantly lower at T1 stage and T2 stage than that at T0 stage (P<0.05). Conclusion The position and structure of TMJ in class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion adolescent female patients with TMD are different from those of the normal people. The stabilization splint combined with orthodontic treatment is beneficial to those patients. There are obvious changes of joint space and condylar structure after treatment.

Key words: malocclusion, angle class Ⅱ, temporomandibular joint disorders, orthodontics, occlusal splints, stabilization splint, cone beam computed tomography