天津医药 ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 504-507.doi: 10.11958/20221538

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

第二磨牙正锁相关危险因素的病例对照研究

尹力维1,2(), 武杰1, 赵艳红1,()   

  1. 1.天津医科大学口腔医院(邮编300070)
    2.中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九八三医院
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-17 修回日期:2022-11-29 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-05-05
  • 通讯作者: △E-mail:zhengjiyanjiu@163.com
  • 作者简介:尹力维(1989),女,硕士在读,主要从事口腔正畸诊疗方面研究。E-mail:haoyixuan2018@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    天津市自然科学基金项目(21JCYBJC01760)

Risk factors for second molar scissors-bite in patients: a case-control study

YIN Liwei1,2(), WU Jie1, ZHAO Yanhong1,()   

  1. 1. Tianjin Medical University Stomatological Hospital, Tianjin 300070, China
    2. the 983rd Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of People's Liberation Army
  • Received:2022-10-17 Revised:2022-11-29 Published:2023-05-15 Online:2023-05-05
  • Contact: △E-mail:zhengjiyanjiu@163.com

摘要:

目的 分析第二磨牙正锁患者与头影测量指标的关系,评估第二磨牙正锁致病的相关危险因素,探寻不同人群中的敏感指标。方法 采用病例对照研究,选取第二磨牙正锁患者106例作为病例组。对照组为无锁且双侧磨牙及尖牙为中性关系的患者102例。比较2组患者年龄、性别、骨性和牙性测量指标差异。使用多因素Logistic回归进一步分析第二磨牙正锁致病的相关危险因素。结果 单因素分析结果显示,ANB角(∠ANB)、Wits值、覆(OB)、覆盖(OJ)、SNB角(∠SNB)是第二磨牙正锁的敏感指标。Logistic回归结果显示,对于整个研究人群,低角(OR=2.907,95%CI:1.157~7.307)、∠ANB(OR=1.643,95%CI:1.203~2.245)和OB(OR=1.442,95%CI:1.116~1.862)增大是第二磨牙正锁的危险因素。男性中,∠ANB增大是主要危险因素;女性的主要危险因素为高角、较大∠ANB和OB值。青少年中较大的∠ANB和OB值,以及成年人中较大的∠ANB和低角是该病的危险因素。结论 骨性Ⅱ类是第二磨牙正锁最主要的危险因素。此外,女性高角和深覆,青少年深覆以及成年人低角是第二磨牙正锁的高风险人群。

关键词: 牙牙合, 覆咬合, 错,安氏Ⅱ类, 危险因素, 正锁牙合, ANB, OB, 高角, 低角

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the relationship between patients with second molar scissors-bite and cephalometric indicators, to assess risk factors associated with the pathogenesis of second molar scissors-bite, and to explore the sensitive indicators in different populations. Methods A case-control study was conducted with 106 patients with second molar scissors-bite (the case group). The control group was 102 patients without scissors-bite and with bilateral molars and cusps in a neutral relationship. Differences in age, sex, skeletal and dental measurements were compared between the two groups of patients. Risk factors associated with second molar scissors-bite were further analyzed using multifactor Logistic regression. Results Univariate analysis showed that five measures, ∠ANB, Wits value, OB, OJ and ∠SNB were sensitive indicators of second molar scissors-bite. Logistic regression showed that for the entire study population, low angle (OR=2.907, 95%CI: 1.157-7.307), ∠ANB (OR=1.643, 95%CI: 1.203-2.245) and OB (OR=1.442, 95%CI: 1.116-1.862) were risk factors for the pathogenesis of second molar scissors-bite. In males, large ∠ANB was the main risk factor for the pathogenesis of second molar scissors-bite. In females, the main risk factors for the pathogenesis of second molar scissors-bite were high angle and larger ∠ANB and OB. In adolescents, ∠ANB and OB value, and in adults, ∠ANB and low angle were risk factors for the pathogenesis of second molar scissors-bite. Conclusion Skeletal class Ⅱ is the most important risk factor for second molar scissors-bite. In addition, high angle and deep overbite in women, deep overbite in adolescents and low angle in adults are all at high risk of the pathogenesis of second molar scissors-bite.

Key words: dental occlusion, overbite, malocclusion, angle class Ⅱ, risk factors, scissors-bite, ANB, OB, high angle, low angle

中图分类号: