天津医药 ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (12): 1293-1299.doi: 10.11958/20221929
收稿日期:
2022-11-22
修回日期:
2023-03-20
出版日期:
2023-12-15
发布日期:
2023-12-22
通讯作者:
△ E-mail:作者简介:
吴德建(1993),男,主治医师,主要从事肝炎、肝硬化诊疗方面研究。E-mail:
WU Dejian1(), YANG Qiu2, XIE Guidan1, PENG Xin1,△(
)
Received:
2022-11-22
Revised:
2023-03-20
Published:
2023-12-15
Online:
2023-12-22
Contact:
△ E-mail:吴德建, 杨秋, 谢桂丹, 彭鑫. 紫草素调节Notch信号通路对肝癌细胞恶性生物学活性的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(12): 1293-1299.
WU Dejian, YANG Qiu, XIE Guidan, PENG Xin. Impact of shikonin on the malignant biological activity of liver cancer cells by regulating Notch signaling pathway[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(12): 1293-1299.
摘要:
目的 探讨紫草素(SHI)调节Notch信号通路对肝癌细胞恶性生物学活性的影响。方法 采用Western blot分别检测肝癌组织、癌旁组织、肝癌细胞(HepG2、Hep3B、HCCLM3、Huh-7、SMMC-7721细胞)及正常肝细胞(HL-7702细胞)中Notch、发状分裂相关增强子-1(HES1)、hairy相关转录因子1(HEY1)蛋白表达;将Huh-7细胞分为对照组、L-SHI组(1 μmol/L SHI)、M-SHI组(2 μmol/L SHI)、H-SHI组(4 μmol/L SHI)、DAPT组(50 μmol/L Notch信号抑制剂DAPT)、H-SHI+丙戊酸(VPA)组(4 μmol/L SHI和8 mmol/L Notch通路激活剂VPA)。CCK-8法和平板克隆实验检测Huh-7细胞增殖;流式细胞术检测Huh-7细胞凋亡以及细胞周期;细胞划痕实验以及Transwell侵袭实验分别检测Huh-7细胞迁移和侵袭情况;Western blot检测上皮间质转化(EMT)及凋亡相关蛋白表达。结果 Notch、HES1、HEY1在肝癌组织和细胞中表达水平明显升高,且Huh-7细胞差异最明显,以Huh-7细胞为研究对象。与对照组相比,L-SHI组、M-SHI组、H-SHI组、DAPT组Notch、HES1、HEY1、Bcl-2蛋白表达水平下调,S期和G2/M期细胞比例、OD450值及克隆数、迁移率、侵袭细胞数目、N-cadherin、Vimentin水平降低(P<0.05),G1/G0期细胞比例、凋亡率、Bax、cleaved-Caspase-3、E-cadherin水平升高(P<0.05),且SHI的作用效果呈现剂量依赖性;与H-SHI组相比,H-SHI+VPA组以上指标趋势相反,VPA减弱了SHI降低肝癌细胞恶性生物学活性的作用。结论 SHI可能通过抑制Notch信号通路抑制Huh-7细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭,促进Huh-7细胞凋亡。
中图分类号:
组别 | Notch | HES1 | HEY1 |
---|---|---|---|
癌旁组织 | 0.78±0.09 | 0.63±0.07 | 0.39±0.05 |
癌组织 | 1.41±0.13 | 1.24±0.11 | 1.37±0.14 |
t | 17.819** | 10.633** | 29.481** |
表1 Notch、HES1、HEY1蛋白在癌组织及癌旁组织中的表达
Tab.1 Expression of Notch, HES1 and HEY1 proteins in liver cancer tissue and adjacent tissue (n=20,$\bar{x}±s$)
组别 | Notch | HES1 | HEY1 |
---|---|---|---|
癌旁组织 | 0.78±0.09 | 0.63±0.07 | 0.39±0.05 |
癌组织 | 1.41±0.13 | 1.24±0.11 | 1.37±0.14 |
t | 17.819** | 10.633** | 29.481** |
组别 | Notch | HES1 | HEY1 |
---|---|---|---|
HL-7702细胞 | 0.60±0.06 | 0.51±0.05 | 0.35±0.04 |
HepG2细胞 | 1.41±0.13a | 1.05±0.09a | 1.16±0.12a |
Hep3B细胞 | 1.33±0.12a | 1.13±0.12a | 1.22±0.13a |
HCCLM3细胞 | 1.35±0.14a | 1.07±0.11a | 1.26±0.14a |
SMMC-7721细胞 | 1.37±0.15a | 1.09±0.13a | 1.24±0.16a |
Huh-7细胞 | 1.60±0.17a | 1.23±0.14a | 1.42±0.17a |
F | 67.663** | 52.880** | 81.609** |
表2 Notch、HES1、HEY1蛋白在正常肝细胞及肝癌细胞中的表达
Tab.2 Expression of Notch, HES1 and HEY1 proteins in normal liver cells and liver cancer cells (n=6,$\bar{x}±s$)
组别 | Notch | HES1 | HEY1 |
---|---|---|---|
HL-7702细胞 | 0.60±0.06 | 0.51±0.05 | 0.35±0.04 |
HepG2细胞 | 1.41±0.13a | 1.05±0.09a | 1.16±0.12a |
Hep3B细胞 | 1.33±0.12a | 1.13±0.12a | 1.22±0.13a |
HCCLM3细胞 | 1.35±0.14a | 1.07±0.11a | 1.26±0.14a |
SMMC-7721细胞 | 1.37±0.15a | 1.09±0.13a | 1.24±0.16a |
Huh-7细胞 | 1.60±0.17a | 1.23±0.14a | 1.42±0.17a |
F | 67.663** | 52.880** | 81.609** |
图1 Western blot检测肝癌组织及癌旁组织中Notch、HES1、HEY1蛋白表达
Fig.1 Western blot detection of Notch, HES1 and HEY1 protein expression in liver cancer tissue and adjacent tissue
图2 Western blot检测正常肝细胞及肝癌细胞中Notch、HES1、HEY1蛋白水平 A:HL-7702细胞;B:HepG2细胞;C:Hep3B细胞;D:HCCLM3细胞;E:SMMC-7721细胞;F:Huh-7细胞。
Fig.2 Western blot detection of Notch, HES1 and HEY1 protein levels in normal hepatocytes and hepatoma cells
图3 Western blot检测SHI对Huh-7细胞中Notch、HES1、HEY1蛋白的影响 A:对照组;B:L-SHI组;C:M-SHI组;D:H-SHI组;E:DAPT组;F:H-SHI+VPA组。
Fig.3 Western blot detection of effects of SHI on Notch, HES1 and HEY1 proteins in Huh-7 cells
组别 | Notch | HES1 | HEY1 |
---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 1.63±0.19 | 1.26±0.14 | 1.48±0.17 |
L-SHI组 | 1.31±0.15a | 1.03±0.12a | 1.15±0.13a |
M-SHI组 | 0.98±0.10ab | 0.80±0.09ab | 0.79±0.09ab |
H-SHI组 | 0.64±0.06abc | 0.63±0.08abc | 0.38±0.04abc |
DAPT组 | 0.72±0.07a | 0.39±0.03a | 0.89±0.09a |
H-SHI+VPA组 | 1.39±0.14d | 1.11±0.14d | 1.27±0.15d |
F | 96.630** | 91.860** | 106.778** |
表3 SHI对Huh-7细胞中Notch、HES1、HEY1蛋白表达的影响
Tab.3 Effects of SHI on Notch, HES1 and HEY1 proteins in Huh-7 cells (n=6,$\bar{x}±s$)
组别 | Notch | HES1 | HEY1 |
---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 1.63±0.19 | 1.26±0.14 | 1.48±0.17 |
L-SHI组 | 1.31±0.15a | 1.03±0.12a | 1.15±0.13a |
M-SHI组 | 0.98±0.10ab | 0.80±0.09ab | 0.79±0.09ab |
H-SHI组 | 0.64±0.06abc | 0.63±0.08abc | 0.38±0.04abc |
DAPT组 | 0.72±0.07a | 0.39±0.03a | 0.89±0.09a |
H-SHI+VPA组 | 1.39±0.14d | 1.11±0.14d | 1.27±0.15d |
F | 96.630** | 91.860** | 106.778** |
组别 | OD450值 | 克隆数/个 |
---|---|---|
对照组 | 1.33±0.14 | 56.76±5.94 |
L-SHI组 | 1.12±0.11a | 44.83±5.54a |
M-SHI组 | 0.89±0.09ab | 35.37±4.65ab |
H-SHI组 | 0.67±0.07abc | 24.16±2.21abc |
DAPT组 | 0.70±0.06a | 26.73±2.02a |
H-SHI+VPA组 | 1.18±0.12d | 45.17±5.47d |
F | 69.795** | 32.725** |
表4 SHI对Huh-7细胞OD450值及克隆数的影响
Tab.4 Effects of SHI on OD450 value and clone number of Huh-7 cells
组别 | OD450值 | 克隆数/个 |
---|---|---|
对照组 | 1.33±0.14 | 56.76±5.94 |
L-SHI组 | 1.12±0.11a | 44.83±5.54a |
M-SHI组 | 0.89±0.09ab | 35.37±4.65ab |
H-SHI组 | 0.67±0.07abc | 24.16±2.21abc |
DAPT组 | 0.70±0.06a | 26.73±2.02a |
H-SHI+VPA组 | 1.18±0.12d | 45.17±5.47d |
F | 69.795** | 32.725** |
图7 SHI对Huh-7细胞中Bcl-2、Bax、cleaved-Caspase-3蛋白水平的影响 A:对照组;B:L-SHI组;C:M-SHI组;D:H-SHI组;E:DAPT组;F:H-SHI+VPA组。
Fig.7 Effects of SHI on Bcl-2, Bax, cleaved-Caspase-3 protein levels in Huh-7 cells
组别 | 细胞周期分布 | ||
---|---|---|---|
G1/G0 | S | G2/M | |
对照组 | 44.13±4.27 | 38.45±3.56 | 17.42±1.69 |
L-SHI组 | 51.01±5.53a | 33.65±3.16a | 15.34±1.79a |
M-SHI组 | 52.89±5.76a | 31.92±3.03a | 15.19±1.57a |
H-SHI组 | 58.34±5.65a | 26.53±2.45a | 15.13±1.35a |
DAPT组 | 57.23±5.34a | 27.96±2.67a | 14.81±1.23a |
H-SHI+VPA组 | 50.78±5.56d | 33.12±3.32d | 16.10±1.37d |
F | 9.124** | 20.200** | 7.609** |
表5 SHI对Huh-7细胞细胞周期的影响
Tab.5 Effects of SHI on cell cycle of Huh-7 cells
组别 | 细胞周期分布 | ||
---|---|---|---|
G1/G0 | S | G2/M | |
对照组 | 44.13±4.27 | 38.45±3.56 | 17.42±1.69 |
L-SHI组 | 51.01±5.53a | 33.65±3.16a | 15.34±1.79a |
M-SHI组 | 52.89±5.76a | 31.92±3.03a | 15.19±1.57a |
H-SHI组 | 58.34±5.65a | 26.53±2.45a | 15.13±1.35a |
DAPT组 | 57.23±5.34a | 27.96±2.67a | 14.81±1.23a |
H-SHI+VPA组 | 50.78±5.56d | 33.12±3.32d | 16.10±1.37d |
F | 9.124** | 20.200** | 7.609** |
组别 | 凋亡率/% | Bcl-2 | Bax | cleaved- Caspase-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 2.43±0.27 | 1.45±0.17 | 0.32±0.02 | 0.33±0.03 |
L-SHI组 | 5.35±0.52a | 1.11±0.12a | 0.73±0.06a | 0.69±0.07a |
M-SHI组 | 8.65±0.98ab | 0.82±0.09ab | 1.04±0.11ab | 0.99±0.09ab |
H-SHI组 | 11.65±1.23abc | 0.53±0.05abc | 1.36±0.14abc | 1.37±0.14abc |
DAPT组 | 9.97±0.96a | 0.46±0.04a | 1.30±0.13a | 1.28±0.12a |
H-SHI+ VPA组 | 4.78±0.46d | 1.17±0.12d | 0.67±0.07d | 0.57±0.06d |
F | 187.108** | 129.293** | 168.904** | 197.238** |
表6 SHI对Huh-7细胞凋亡率和凋亡蛋白的影响
Tab.6 Effects of SHI on apoptosis rate and apoptotic protein of Huh-7 cells
组别 | 凋亡率/% | Bcl-2 | Bax | cleaved- Caspase-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 2.43±0.27 | 1.45±0.17 | 0.32±0.02 | 0.33±0.03 |
L-SHI组 | 5.35±0.52a | 1.11±0.12a | 0.73±0.06a | 0.69±0.07a |
M-SHI组 | 8.65±0.98ab | 0.82±0.09ab | 1.04±0.11ab | 0.99±0.09ab |
H-SHI组 | 11.65±1.23abc | 0.53±0.05abc | 1.36±0.14abc | 1.37±0.14abc |
DAPT组 | 9.97±0.96a | 0.46±0.04a | 1.30±0.13a | 1.28±0.12a |
H-SHI+ VPA组 | 4.78±0.46d | 1.17±0.12d | 0.67±0.07d | 0.57±0.06d |
F | 187.108** | 129.293** | 168.904** | 197.238** |
图10 Western blot检测Huh-7细胞中E-cadherin、N-cadherin、Vimentin蛋白水平 A:对照组;B:L-SHI组;C:M-SHI组;D:H-SHI组;E:DAPT组;F:H-SHI+VPA组。
Fig.10 Western blot detection of E-cadherin, N-cadherin and Vimentin protein levels in Huh-7 cells
组别 | 迁移率/% | 侵袭细胞数目/(个/视野) |
---|---|---|
对照组 | 30.22±3.32 | 205.43±20.25 |
L-SHI组 | 23.94±2.37a | 183.35±19.48a |
M-SHI组 | 16.74±1.70ab | 166.33±16.46ab |
H-SHI组 | 10.86±1.23abc | 141.57±15.13abc |
DAPT组 | 12.13±1.26a | 150.73±15.97a |
H-SHI+VPA组 | 25.48±2.76d | 199.87±20.42d |
F | 121.414** | 20.769** |
表7 SHI对Huh-7细胞迁移率和侵袭细胞数目的影响
Tab.7 Effects of SHI on migration rate and number of invasive cells of Huh-7 cells
组别 | 迁移率/% | 侵袭细胞数目/(个/视野) |
---|---|---|
对照组 | 30.22±3.32 | 205.43±20.25 |
L-SHI组 | 23.94±2.37a | 183.35±19.48a |
M-SHI组 | 16.74±1.70ab | 166.33±16.46ab |
H-SHI组 | 10.86±1.23abc | 141.57±15.13abc |
DAPT组 | 12.13±1.26a | 150.73±15.97a |
H-SHI+VPA组 | 25.48±2.76d | 199.87±20.42d |
F | 121.414** | 20.769** |
组别 | E-cadherin | N-cadherin | Vimentin |
---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 0.22±0.02 | 0.90±0.09 | 1.18±0.21 |
L-SHI组 | 0.39±0.04a | 0.71±0.07a | 0.98±0.09a |
M-SHI组 | 0.57±0.06ab | 0.52±0.05ab | 0.74±0.08ab |
H-SHI组 | 0.78±0.09abc | 0.30±0.02abc | 0.52±0.05abc |
DAPT组 | 0.72±0.07a | 0.35±0.03a | 0.58±0.06a |
H-SHI+VPA组 | 0.36±0.03d | 0.79±0.09d | 1.04±0.13d |
F | 148.635** | 143.108** | 52.235** |
表8 SHI对Huh-7细胞E-cadherin、N-cadherin、Vimentin表达水平的影响
Tab.8 Effects of SHI on levels of E-cadherin, N-cadherin and Vimentin in Huh-7 cells
组别 | E-cadherin | N-cadherin | Vimentin |
---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 0.22±0.02 | 0.90±0.09 | 1.18±0.21 |
L-SHI组 | 0.39±0.04a | 0.71±0.07a | 0.98±0.09a |
M-SHI组 | 0.57±0.06ab | 0.52±0.05ab | 0.74±0.08ab |
H-SHI组 | 0.78±0.09abc | 0.30±0.02abc | 0.52±0.05abc |
DAPT组 | 0.72±0.07a | 0.35±0.03a | 0.58±0.06a |
H-SHI+VPA组 | 0.36±0.03d | 0.79±0.09d | 1.04±0.13d |
F | 148.635** | 143.108** | 52.235** |
[1] | CAO W, CHEN H D, YU Y W, et al. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China:a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2021, 134(7):783-791. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474. |
[2] | CHIDAMBARANATHAN-REGHUPATY S, FISHER P B, SARKAR D. Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC):epidemiology,etiology and molecular classification[J]. Adv Cancer Res, 2021, 149:1-61. doi:10.1016/bs.acr.2020.10.001. |
[3] | WALLACE M C, PREEN D B, SHORT M W, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in Australia 1982-2014:increasing incidence and improving survival[J]. Liver Int, 2019, 39(3):522-530. doi:10.1111/liv.13966. |
[4] | ZHANG S, GAO Q, LI W, et al. Shikonin inhibits cancer cell cycling by targeting Cdc25s[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019, 19(1):20. doi:10.1186/s12885-018-5220-x. |
[5] | BAO C, LIU T, QIAN L, et al. Shikonin inhibits migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells by suppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition via miR-17-5p/PTEN/Akt pathway[J]. J Cancer, 2021, 12(1):76-88. doi:10.7150/jca.47553. |
[6] | XU Z, HUANG L, ZHANG T, et al. Shikonin inhibits the proliferation of cervical cancer cells via FAK/AKT/GSK3β signalling[J]. Oncol Lett, 2022, 24(3):304. doi:10.3892/ol.2022.13424. |
[7] | LIU T, LI S, WU L, et al. Experimental study of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment by Shikonin through regulating PKM2[J]. J Hepatocell Carcinoma, 2020, 7:19-31. doi:10.2147/JHC.S237614. |
[8] | LUIKEN S, FRAAS A, BIEG M, et al. NOTCH target gene HES5 mediates oncogenic and tumor suppressive functions in hepatocarcinogenesis[J]. Oncogene, 2020, 39(15):3128-3144. doi:10.1038/s41388-020-1198-3. |
[9] | SHI J, HAN G, WANG J, et al. Matrine promotes hepatic oval cells differentiation into hepatocytes and alleviates liver injury by suppression of Notch signalling pathway[J]. Life Sci, 2020, 261:118354. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118354. |
[10] | LEE J H, HAN S H, KIM Y M, et al. Shikonin inhibits proliferation of melanoma cells by MAPK pathway-mediated induction of apoptosis[J]. Biosci Rep, 2021, 41(1):BSR20203834. doi:10.1042/BSR20203834. |
[11] | XIANG Z, MIAO Q, ZHANG J, et al. AB4 inhibits Notch signaling and promotes cancer cell apoptosis in liver cancer[J]. Oncol Rep, 2021, 45(6):112. doi:10.3892/or.2021.8063. |
[12] | YANG X, LIU J, LIANG Q, et al. Valproic acid reverses sorafenib resistance through inhibiting activated Notch/Akt signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Fundam Clin Pharmacol, 2021, 35(4):690-699. doi:10.1111/fcp.12608. |
[13] | ARMENGOL C, SARRIAS M R, SALA M. Hepatocellular carcinoma:present and future[J]. Med Clin (Barc), 2018, 150(10):390-397. doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2017.08.010. |
[14] | MARKOWITSCH S D, JUETTER K M, SCHUPP P, et al. Shikonin reduces growth of docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer cells mainly through necroptosis[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(4):882. doi:10.3390/cancers13040882. |
[15] | TSAI M F, CHEN S M, ONG A Z, et al. Shikonin induced program cell death through generation of reactive oxygen species in renal cancer cells[J]. Antioxidants (Basel), 2021, 10(11):1831-1844. doi:10.3390/antiox10111831. |
[16] | LI M Y, MI C, WANG K S, et al. Shikonin suppresses proliferation and induces cell cycle arrest through the inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α signaling[J]. Chem Biol Interact, 2017, 274:58-67. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2017.06.029. |
[17] | LI Y, ZHANG T, QIN S, et al. Effects of UPF1 expression on EMT process by targeting E-cadherin,N-cadherin,Vimentin and Twist in a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2019, 19(3):2137-2143. doi:10.3892/mmr.2019.9838. |
[18] | LI X, LIU W, GENG C, et al. Ginsenoside Rg3 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition via downregulating Notch-Hes1 signaling in colon cancer cells[J]. Am J Chin Med, 2021, 49(1):217-235. doi:10.1142/S0192415X21500129. |
[19] | ZHANG H S, ZHANG Z G, DU G Y, et al. Nrf2 promotes breast cancer cell migration via up-regulation of G6PD/HIF-1α/Notch1 axis[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2019, 23(5):3451-3463. doi:10.1111/jcmm.14241. |
[1] | 钟玉梅, 周海燕, 张敏. ASIC1a介导类风湿关节炎软骨细胞损伤机制的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 1004-1008. |
[2] | 张晋玮, 王燕, 王通. miR-107对口腔鳞癌细胞系CAL27增殖、侵袭及迁移的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 897-899. |
[3] | 梁大敏, 杨正久, 张子萍, 钱静, 毛朝坤. 山萘酚逆转肝癌耐药细胞Bel-7402/5-Fu的作用机制研究[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 900-906. |
[4] | 马佳佳, 张亚苹, 杨斌, 赵美琪, 蒋璐, 黄小玉, 范路畅, 王凤梅. ATOX1通过JAK2/STAT3通路促进肝癌细胞生物学行为的机制探讨[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 907-912. |
[5] | 高攀, 谢冰歆, 周赞东, 刘彤. 慢性肾脏病循环中FGF23对心房纤维化的促进作用[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 917-923. |
[6] | 范慧慧, 任玉梅, 田新磊, 张凯, 李晓丽. 止咳平喘方对支气管哮喘小鼠气道炎症及TLR4/TRAF6/NF-κB通路的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 924-929. |
[7] | 贾维宁, 鲍亚玲, 雷慧, 殷晓宁. 夏枯草提取物对脓毒症小鼠炎症反应和腹腔巨噬细胞的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 930-935. |
[8] | 方杰, 黄芮, 郑红慧, 贾倩倩, 鲍静. miR-9-5p靶向TIMP2诱导多发性骨髓瘤细胞自噬和凋亡的机制[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 785-790. |
[9] | 满祎, 许娅, 何先成, 宋少锋, 刘爱国. 三阴性乳腺癌EGFR、Ki-67、P53及CTC表达与预后的关系研究[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 862-867. |
[10] | 徐琼芳, 钟斐, 李子帅. 淫羊藿苷调节SDF-1/CXCR4信号通路对多囊卵巢综合征大鼠卵巢颗粒细胞凋亡的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 727-732. |
[11] | 朱文智, 邱倩, 谭宏宇. 术前焦虑对肝癌患者麻醉苏醒与术后恢复的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 762-765. |
[12] | 朱刚明, 董永德, 朱瑞婷, 谭源满, 陶娟, 刘晓, 陈德成, 杨概. 磁共振弛豫时间定量成像预测乳腺浸润性导管癌分子亚型的价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 770-774. |
[13] | 霍晶辰, 王悦, 李华, 邱嵘, 苏景伟, 王卓凡, 杨洁. 系统免疫炎症指数对根治性放疗Ⅲ期肺鳞癌患者长期生存的预测价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 634-638. |
[14] | 叶朝阳, 马建中, 李后俊, 魏鲲鹏. 急性胰腺炎患者外周血TLR4、IL-1β、NLR水平与疾病进展和预后的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 648-652. |
[15] | 顾程, 申新宇, 孙静华, 闫赛克, 王海平. 动态MRI成像技术对低位直肠癌保肛术后LARS的评估价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 653-657. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||