天津医药 ›› 2016, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 478-481.doi: 10.11958/20150192

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

腕表式动态血氧仪对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征筛查价值的研究

刘慧萍1 , 王巍2 , 鲁宏华2 , 张子月2 , 李前伟2 , 陈太生2 , 王晓雨2 , 韩曦2 , 林鹏2△   

  1. 1天津医科大学一中心临床学院 (邮编300192); 2天津市第一中心医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-24 修回日期:2015-11-25 出版日期:2016-04-15 发布日期:2016-05-20
  • 通讯作者: △通讯作者 E-mail: linpengf@sina.com E-mail:1609202802@qq.com
  • 作者简介:刘慧萍 (1989), 女, 硕士在读, 主要从事OSAHS诊断筛查方面的研究

Evaluation of CMS50F as a screening test for patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome

LIU Huiping1 , WANG Wei 2 , LU Honghua2 , ZHANG Ziyue2 , LI Qianwei 2 , CHEN Taisheng2 , WANG Xiaoyu2 , HAN Xi 2 , LIN Peng2△   

  1. 1 The First Center Clinic College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300192, China; 2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital
  • Received:2015-09-24 Revised:2015-11-25 Published:2016-04-15 Online:2016-05-20
  • Contact: △Corresponding Author E-mail: linpengf@sina.com E-mail:1609202802@qq.com

摘要: 摘要: 目的 探讨腕表式动态血氧仪 (CMS50F) 用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征 (OSAHS) 患者筛查的临床价值。方法 64 例研究对象同时进行多导睡眠图 (PSG)、 微动敏感床垫式睡眠监测系统 (MSMSMS) 和 CMS50F 监测, 分别以 PSG 和 MSMSMS 监测的呼吸暂停低通气指数 (AHI) 为诊断 OSAHS 的标准, 评估 CMS50F 监测睡眠的可靠性。结果 正常及轻、 中度患者监测的 CMS50F-氧减饱和度指数 (ODI3 ) 与 PSG-AHI 差异无统计学意义, 重度患者 CMS50F-ODI3 小于 PSG-AHI (P < 0.05)。但 CMS50F- ODI3 与 PSG-AHI 呈正相关 (r=0.855, P < 0.05)。以 PSG- AHI≥5 次/h 为阳性阈值, CMS50F 检测的敏感度为 94.5%, 特异度为 88.9%。正常及轻、 中度患者监测的 CMS50F- ODI3 与 MSMSMS-AHI 差异无统计学意义, 重度患者 CMS50F-ODI3 小于 MSMSMS-AHI (P < 0.05), 但两者密切相关(r=0.867, P < 0.05)。以 MSMSMS-AHI≥5 次/h 为阳性阈值, CMS50F 检测的敏感度为 94.5%, 特异度为 88.9%。结论 腕表式动态血氧仪 CMS50F 可作为一种可靠的筛查OSAHS 的便携式工具。

关键词: 睡眠呼吸暂停, 阻塞性, 多道睡眠描记术, 监测,便携式, 呼吸暂停低通气指数, 敏感度, 特异度

Abstract: Abstract: Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CMS50F for screening in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods Sixty-four volunteers with suspected OSAHS underwent simultaneous noc⁃ turnal polysomnography (PSG), micromovement sensitive mattress sleep monitoring system(MSMSMS) and CMS50F. The ap⁃ nea-hypopnea index (AHI) detected by PSG and MSMSMS was used as the diagnostic standard for OSAHS. The reliability of CMS50F for monitoring sleep was assessed. Results There was no statistic difference in CMS50F-ODI3 and PSG-AHI be⁃ tween normal, mild and moderate OSAHS groups(P > 0.05). The CMS50F-ODI3 was smaller than the PSG-AHI in severe OSAHS patients(P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between CMS50F-ODI3 and PSG-AHI(r=0.855, P < 0.05). PSG-AHI≥5 events per hour was used as the threshold value to diagnose OSAHS, the sensitivity and specificity of CMS50F were 94.5% and 88.9%. There were no significant differences in CMS50F- ODI3 and MSMSMS -AHI between normal, mild and moderate OSAHS patients(P > 0.05). The value of CMS50F-ODI3 was smaller than MSMSMS-AHI in severe OSAHS patients (P < 0.05). There was also a significant correlation between CMS50F- ODI3 and MSMSMS -AHI (r=0.867, P < 0.05). MSMSMS -AHI≥5 events per hour was used as the threshold value to diagnose OSAHS, the sensitivity and specificity of CMS50F were 94.5% and 88.9%. Conclusion CMS50F can be used as a portable and reliable device for screening of pa⁃ tients suspected OSAHS.

Key words: sleep apnea, obstructive, polysomnography, monitoring, ambulatory, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), sensitivity, specificity