天津医药 ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 65-70.doi: 10.11958/20240835
收稿日期:
2024-06-27
修回日期:
2024-10-17
出版日期:
2025-01-15
发布日期:
2025-02-06
通讯作者:
△E-mail:作者简介:
宋虎(1992),男,医师,主要从事急危重症疾病方面研究。E-mail:
SONG Hu(), ZHU Jian, FU Yongmei, ZHANG Yongbiao, ZHENG Changlong(
)
Received:
2024-06-27
Revised:
2024-10-17
Published:
2025-01-15
Online:
2025-02-06
Contact:
△E-mail:宋虎, 朱键, 符永玫, 张永标, 郑常龙. PCT、IL-6、CysC联合检测对脓毒症急性肾损伤诊断及预后评估的价值[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(1): 65-70.
SONG Hu, ZHU Jian, FU Yongmei, ZHANG Yongbiao, ZHENG Changlong. The value of combined detection of PCT, IL-6 and CysC for the diagnosis and prognosis assessment of septic acute kidney injury[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2025, 53(1): 65-70.
摘要:
目的 探讨降钙素原(PCT)、白细胞介素6(IL-6)、胱抑素(CysC)联合检测在脓毒症急性肾损伤(AKI)诊断及预后评估中的价值。方法 100例脓毒症患者根据AKI发生情况分为AKI组(n=56)和无AKI组(n=44);AKI患者分为存活组(n=32)和死亡组(n=24)。收集患者临床资料,采用酶联免疫吸附试验检测PCT、IL-6、CysC水平;急性生理功能和慢性健康状况评分(APACHEⅡ)评估病情;采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估PCT、IL-6、CysC对脓毒症合并AKI诊断及死亡的预测价值。结果 AKI组男性比例、年龄、高血压合并糖尿病比例、APACHEⅡ评分、血肌酐(Scr)、PCT、IL-6、CysC水平高于非AKI组,合并症比例、发病时间低于非AKI组(P<0.05)。ROC曲线结果显示,PCT、IL-6、CysC联合诊断脓毒症合并AKI的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.859,敏感度为91.07%,特异度为90.91%,联合诊断效能优于单一指标。死亡组APACHEⅡ评分、PCT、IL-6、CysC水平高于存活组(P<0.05)。ROC曲线结果显示,PCT、IL-6、CysC联合预测脓毒症合并AKI患者死亡的AUC为0.847,敏感度为91.67%,特异度为87.50%,联合预测效能优于单一指标。结论 联合PCT、CysC、IL-6指标对脓毒症合并AKI诊断以及预后预测的价值更高。
中图分类号:
组别 | n | 性别 (男/女) | 年龄/ 岁 | BMI/ (kg/m2) | 感染部位① | 合并症② |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非AKI组 | 44 | 25/19 | 56.08±18.25 | 22.29±2.96 | 4/30/3/7 | 4/5/3/32 |
AKI组 | 56 | 43/13 | 65.14±15.87 | 22.55±3.10 | 1/43/8/4 | 11/8/14/23 |
χ2或t | 4.515* | 2.652* | 0.425 | 5.850 | 11.272* | |
组别 | 发病 时间/d | 机械 通气 | 感染性 休克 | APACHEⅡ 评分/分 | 心率/ (次/min) | |
非AKI组 | 9.34±2.52 | 23(52.27) | 25(56.82) | 18.00±7.03 | 103.25±21.04 | |
AKI组 | 5.80±1.60 | 32(57.14) | 42(75.00) | 24.63±7.08 | 108.59±22.40 | |
χ2或t | 8.551* | 0.236 | 3.684 | 4.663* | 1.215 | |
组别 | SBP/ mmHg | DBP/ mmHg | MAP/ mmHg | 24 h尿量/ mL | ||
非AKI组 | 110.73±25.32 | 68.23±17.85 | 82.39±19.08 | 1 355.82±402.37 | ||
AKI组 | 104.11±21.74 | 64.29±15.48 | 77.56±16.77 | 1 226.91±309.84 | ||
t | 1.406 | 1.181 | 1.345 | 1.811 | ||
组别 | Scr/ (μmol/L) | WBC/ (×109/L) | PCT/ (μg/L) | |||
非AKI组 | 88.83±21.72 | 14.27±3.79 | 11.00±3.00 | |||
AKI组 | 310.80±96.20 | 13.65±3.68 | 28.00±8.00 | |||
t | 14.993* | 0.825 | 13.365* | |||
组别 | IL-6/ (ng/L) | CysC/ (mg/L) | 死亡 | |||
非AKI组 | 91.88±8.12 | 1.46±0.39 | 15(11.36) | |||
AKI组 | 201.02±15.27 | 3.14±0.94 | 24(42.86) | |||
t或χ2 | 42.857* | 11.118* | 0.796 |
表1 2组患者一般资料及检查结果的比较
Tab.1 Comparison of general information and test results between the two groups
组别 | n | 性别 (男/女) | 年龄/ 岁 | BMI/ (kg/m2) | 感染部位① | 合并症② |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非AKI组 | 44 | 25/19 | 56.08±18.25 | 22.29±2.96 | 4/30/3/7 | 4/5/3/32 |
AKI组 | 56 | 43/13 | 65.14±15.87 | 22.55±3.10 | 1/43/8/4 | 11/8/14/23 |
χ2或t | 4.515* | 2.652* | 0.425 | 5.850 | 11.272* | |
组别 | 发病 时间/d | 机械 通气 | 感染性 休克 | APACHEⅡ 评分/分 | 心率/ (次/min) | |
非AKI组 | 9.34±2.52 | 23(52.27) | 25(56.82) | 18.00±7.03 | 103.25±21.04 | |
AKI组 | 5.80±1.60 | 32(57.14) | 42(75.00) | 24.63±7.08 | 108.59±22.40 | |
χ2或t | 8.551* | 0.236 | 3.684 | 4.663* | 1.215 | |
组别 | SBP/ mmHg | DBP/ mmHg | MAP/ mmHg | 24 h尿量/ mL | ||
非AKI组 | 110.73±25.32 | 68.23±17.85 | 82.39±19.08 | 1 355.82±402.37 | ||
AKI组 | 104.11±21.74 | 64.29±15.48 | 77.56±16.77 | 1 226.91±309.84 | ||
t | 1.406 | 1.181 | 1.345 | 1.811 | ||
组别 | Scr/ (μmol/L) | WBC/ (×109/L) | PCT/ (μg/L) | |||
非AKI组 | 88.83±21.72 | 14.27±3.79 | 11.00±3.00 | |||
AKI组 | 310.80±96.20 | 13.65±3.68 | 28.00±8.00 | |||
t | 14.993* | 0.825 | 13.365* | |||
组别 | IL-6/ (ng/L) | CysC/ (mg/L) | 死亡 | |||
非AKI组 | 91.88±8.12 | 1.46±0.39 | 15(11.36) | |||
AKI组 | 201.02±15.27 | 3.14±0.94 | 24(42.86) | |||
t或χ2 | 42.857* | 11.118* | 0.796 |
组别 | AUC | 95%CI | Cut-off值 | 敏感度/% | 特异度/% | 约登指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCT | 0.706 | 0.649~0.763 | 20.00 μg/L | 80.36 | 75.00 | 0.554 |
IL-6 | 0.642 | 0.591~0.693 | 150.00 ng/L | 69.64 | 68.18 | 0.378 |
CysC | 0.752 | 0.706~0.794 | 2.00 mg/L | 85.71 | 79.55 | 0.653 |
联合 | 0.859 | 0.769~0.949 | - | 91.07 | 90.91 | 0.820 |
表2 PCT、IL-6、CysC及三者联合诊断脓毒症合并AKI的效能分析
Tab.2 Efficacy analysis of PCT, IL-6, CysC and their combination in diagnosing sepsis combined with AKI
组别 | AUC | 95%CI | Cut-off值 | 敏感度/% | 特异度/% | 约登指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCT | 0.706 | 0.649~0.763 | 20.00 μg/L | 80.36 | 75.00 | 0.554 |
IL-6 | 0.642 | 0.591~0.693 | 150.00 ng/L | 69.64 | 68.18 | 0.378 |
CysC | 0.752 | 0.706~0.794 | 2.00 mg/L | 85.71 | 79.55 | 0.653 |
联合 | 0.859 | 0.769~0.949 | - | 91.07 | 90.91 | 0.820 |
组别 | n | 性别 (男/女) | 年龄/ 岁 | BMI/ (kg/m2) | 感染部位① | 合并症② | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
存活组 | 32 | 23/9 | 64.56±15.92 | 22.51±3.16 | 1/23/4/4 | 7/5/6/14 | ||||||||||||||
死亡组 | 24 | 20/4 | 65.92±15.77 | 22.61±3.02 | 0/20/4/0 | 4/3/8/9 | ||||||||||||||
χ2或t | 1.010 | 0.318 | 0.119 | 4.151 | 1.580 | |||||||||||||||
组别 | 发病 时间/d | 机械 通气 | 感染性 休克 | APACHEⅡ 评分/分 | 心率/ (次/min) | |||||||||||||||
存活组 | 5.71±1.34 | 19(59.38) | 23(71.88) | 22.53±6.12 | 106.81±21.98 | |||||||||||||||
死亡组 | 5.92±1.95 | 13(54.17) | 19(79.17) | 27.42±7.30 | 110.96±22.72 | |||||||||||||||
t或χ2 | 0.478 | 0.152 | 0.389 | 2.724* | 0.689 | |||||||||||||||
组别 | SBP/ mmHg | DBP/ mmHg | MAP/ mmHg | |||||||||||||||||
非AKI组 | 105.31±22.93 | 66.91±15.09 | 79.71±16.86 | |||||||||||||||||
AKI组 | 102.50±19.92 | 60.79±15.30 | 74.69±16.21 | |||||||||||||||||
t | 0.480 | 1.493 | 1.121 | |||||||||||||||||
组别 | 24 h尿量/ mL | Scr/ (μmol/L) | WBC/ (×109/L) | |||||||||||||||||
非AKI组 | 1 245.82±318.74 | 324.66±95.43 | 13.61±3.81 | |||||||||||||||||
AKI组 | 1 201.70±297.97 | 292.38±97.23 | 13.71±3.51 | |||||||||||||||||
t | 0.527 | 1.243 | 0.101 | |||||||||||||||||
组别 | PCT/ (μg/L) | IL-6/ (ng/L) | CysC/ (mg/L) | |||||||||||||||||
非AKI组 | 25.90±6.00 | 161.42±10.06 | 2.91±0.87 | |||||||||||||||||
AKI组 | 30.80±10.70 | 253.82±22.22 | 3.45±1.03 | |||||||||||||||||
t | 2.178* | 20.887* | 2.124* |
表3 AKI组存活和死亡患者一般资料及检查结果的比较
Tab.3 Comparison of general information and examination results between the survival group and the death group of AKI patients
组别 | n | 性别 (男/女) | 年龄/ 岁 | BMI/ (kg/m2) | 感染部位① | 合并症② | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
存活组 | 32 | 23/9 | 64.56±15.92 | 22.51±3.16 | 1/23/4/4 | 7/5/6/14 | ||||||||||||||
死亡组 | 24 | 20/4 | 65.92±15.77 | 22.61±3.02 | 0/20/4/0 | 4/3/8/9 | ||||||||||||||
χ2或t | 1.010 | 0.318 | 0.119 | 4.151 | 1.580 | |||||||||||||||
组别 | 发病 时间/d | 机械 通气 | 感染性 休克 | APACHEⅡ 评分/分 | 心率/ (次/min) | |||||||||||||||
存活组 | 5.71±1.34 | 19(59.38) | 23(71.88) | 22.53±6.12 | 106.81±21.98 | |||||||||||||||
死亡组 | 5.92±1.95 | 13(54.17) | 19(79.17) | 27.42±7.30 | 110.96±22.72 | |||||||||||||||
t或χ2 | 0.478 | 0.152 | 0.389 | 2.724* | 0.689 | |||||||||||||||
组别 | SBP/ mmHg | DBP/ mmHg | MAP/ mmHg | |||||||||||||||||
非AKI组 | 105.31±22.93 | 66.91±15.09 | 79.71±16.86 | |||||||||||||||||
AKI组 | 102.50±19.92 | 60.79±15.30 | 74.69±16.21 | |||||||||||||||||
t | 0.480 | 1.493 | 1.121 | |||||||||||||||||
组别 | 24 h尿量/ mL | Scr/ (μmol/L) | WBC/ (×109/L) | |||||||||||||||||
非AKI组 | 1 245.82±318.74 | 324.66±95.43 | 13.61±3.81 | |||||||||||||||||
AKI组 | 1 201.70±297.97 | 292.38±97.23 | 13.71±3.51 | |||||||||||||||||
t | 0.527 | 1.243 | 0.101 | |||||||||||||||||
组别 | PCT/ (μg/L) | IL-6/ (ng/L) | CysC/ (mg/L) | |||||||||||||||||
非AKI组 | 25.90±6.00 | 161.42±10.06 | 2.91±0.87 | |||||||||||||||||
AKI组 | 30.80±10.70 | 253.82±22.22 | 3.45±1.03 | |||||||||||||||||
t | 2.178* | 20.887* | 2.124* |
组别 | AUC | 95%CI | Cut-off值 | 敏感度/% | 特异度/% | 约登指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCT | 0.691 | 0.663~0.719 | 28.00 μg/L | 79.17 | 75.00 | 0.542 |
IL-6 | 0.601 | 0.549~0.653 | 200.00 ng/L | 70.83 | 62.50 | 0.333 |
CysC | 0.734 | 0.685~0.783 | 3.20 mg/L | 83.33 | 81.25 | 0.646 |
联合 | 0.847 | 0.788~0.906 | - | 91.67 | 87.50 | 0.792 |
表4 PCT、IL-6、CysC及三者联合预测脓毒症合并AKI患者死亡的效能分析
Tab.4 Efficacy analysis of PCT, IL-6 and CysC in predicting the death of sepsis complicated with AKI
组别 | AUC | 95%CI | Cut-off值 | 敏感度/% | 特异度/% | 约登指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCT | 0.691 | 0.663~0.719 | 28.00 μg/L | 79.17 | 75.00 | 0.542 |
IL-6 | 0.601 | 0.549~0.653 | 200.00 ng/L | 70.83 | 62.50 | 0.333 |
CysC | 0.734 | 0.685~0.783 | 3.20 mg/L | 83.33 | 81.25 | 0.646 |
联合 | 0.847 | 0.788~0.906 | - | 91.67 | 87.50 | 0.792 |
[1] | JONATHAN S C, MIGUEL I E, ALEJANDRO M G, et al. Probiotics in septic acute kidney injury,a double blind,randomized control trial[J]. Ren Fail, 2023, 45(2):2260003. doi:10.1080/0886022X. |
[2] | 肖涛, 吴锡平, 关云艳, 等. 脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤的危险因素分析[J]. 医学综述, 2018, 24(20):4133-4136. |
XIAO T, WU X P, GUAN Y Y, et al. Analysis of risk factors for sepsis-associated acute kidney injury[J]. Med Rec, 2018, 24(20):4133-4136. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2018.20.033. | |
[3] | 王娜, 李培兰. 脓毒症合并急性肾损伤的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 内科急危重症杂志, 2018, 24(3):198-200,209. |
WANG N, LI P L. Risk factors and clinical prognosis in patients with septic AKI in emergency intensive care unit[J]. Journal of Internal Intensive Medicine, 2018, 24(3):198-200,209. doi:10.11768/nkjwzzzz20180307. | |
[4] | 任广胜, 胡善友, 张和凤, 等. 血清胱抑素C联合血乳酸对脓毒症急性肾损伤早期诊断的价值[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2019, 14(6):540-543. |
REN G S, HU S Y, ZHANG H F, et al. The value of combined cystatin C and lactic acid in early diagnosis of sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury[J]. China Journal of Emergeney Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine, 2019, 14(6):540-543. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2019.06.013. | |
[5] | SHANG Y X, ZHRNG Z, WANG M, et al. Diagnostic performance of Neutrophil CD64 index,procalcitonin,and C-reactive protein for early sepsis in hematological patients[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2022, 10(7):2127-2137. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2127. |
[6] | FENG J Q, ZHANG S Y, AI T Y, et al. Effect of CRRT with oXiris filter on hemodynamic instability in surgical septic shock with AKI:a pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Artif Organs, 2022, 45(10):801-808. doi:10.1177/03913988221107947. |
[7] | 易雪琳, 欧阳亮. 血清CysC、UmAlb、Scr在脓毒症合并急性肾损伤患者中的表达及疾病预测价值[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2022, 42(1):72-76. |
YI X L, OUYANG L. Expression and predictive value of serum CysC,UmAlb and Scr in patients with sepsis and acute kidney injury[J]. Int J Urol Nephro, 2022, 42(1):72-76. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn431460-20210115-00018. | |
[8] | SINGER M, DEUTSCHMAN C S, SEYMOUR C W, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8):801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287. |
[9] | 中华医学会肾脏病学分会专家组. 新型冠状病毒感染合并急性肾损伤诊治专家共识[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2020, 36(3):242-246. |
Expert Group of the Nephrology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection with acute kidney injury[J]. Chin J Neahrol,2020, 36(3):242-246. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20200222-00035. | |
[10] | 管光辉, 浦秦华, 钱何布. 脓毒症并发急性肾损伤患者血清MMP-13、VASH-1水平与预后相关性[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(12):1360-1364. |
GUAN G H, PU Q H, QIAN H B. Correlation between serum levels of MMP-13,VASH-1 and prognosis in patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2023, 51(12):1360-1264. doi:10.11958/20230928. | |
[11] | 徐丽, 孙鹏. 脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤的识别和管理[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2023, 35(2):221-224. |
XU L, SUN P. Identification and management of sepsis associated-acute kidney injury[J]. Chin Crit Care Med, 2023, 35(2):221-224. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220808-00725. | |
[12] | 孙伟, 何燕超, 张山, 等. 血清降钙素原和常用炎症指标与老年脓毒症的相关性及结合重症评分对其预后的评价[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2021, 27(2):290-295. |
SUN W, HE Y C, ZHANG S, et al. The predict value of procalcitonin,common inflammatory indicators combined with critical illness score in diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis in the elderly patients[J]. Geriatr Heal Care, 2021, 27(2):290-295. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8296.2021.02.021. | |
[13] | WALID A A, NAGLAA S B, AHMED A E, et al. A randomized trial to compare procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in assessing severity of sepsis and in guiding antibacterial therapy in Egyptian critically ill patients[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2021, 190(4):1487-1495. doi:10.1007/s11845-020-02494-y. |
[14] | 邓亮, 郭碧君, 邹燕群, 等. 尿中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白、血降钙素原及全身免疫炎症指数在脓毒症继发急性肾损伤中表达的临床意义[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2023, 20(4):99-103. |
DENG L, GUO B J, ZOU Y Q, et al. Expression and clinical significance of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin,pro-calcitonin combined with systemic immune inflammatory index in patients with acute kidney injury secondary to sepsis[J]. Pra J Clin Med, 2023, 20(4):99-103. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2023.04.024. | |
[15] | 杨建海, 张颖, 张晓强. 血清PCT、hs-CRP及Th17细胞对脓毒症相关急性肾损伤患者行连续肾脏替代治疗法结局的预测价值[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2023, 42(4):572-577. |
YANG J H, ZHANG Y, ZHANG X Q. Predictive value of serum PCT,hs-CRP,and Th17 cell in the outcome of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with acute renal injury caused by sepsis[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Medical Science Edition), 2023, 42(4):572-577. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6264.2023.04.013. | |
[16] | 沈侃, 许东伟, 李俊, 等. 动态监测降钙素原对脓毒症急性肾损伤近期恢复预测价值[J]. 医学综述, 2022, 28(11):2276-2282. |
SHEN K, XU D W, LI J, et al. Predictive value of dynamic monitoring of procalcitonin for short-term recovery of acute kidney injury in sepsis[J]. Med Rec, 2022, 28(11):2276-2282. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2022.11.034. | |
[17] | 周双炉, 常玲, 邢芳芳. PCT、NLR、N/LPR对重症急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J]. 新医学, 2022, 53(2):133-137. |
ZHOU S L, CHANG L, XING F F. Value of PCT, NLR and N/LPR in predicting acute kidney injury in patients with severe acute pancreatitis[J]. New Med, 2022, 53(2):133-137. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9802.2022.02.012. | |
[18] | LUKAS Z, MELANIE K, ALEXANDER H, et al. Sepsis induces interleukin 6,gp130/JAK2/STAT3,and muscle wasting[J]. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle, 2022, 13(1):713-727. doi:10.1002/jcsm.12867. |
[19] | 金仁华, 李静, 沈骁, 等. 肝素结合蛋白联合白介素-6对持续性脓毒症急性肾损伤的预测价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2023, 24(3):119-125. |
JIN R H, LI J, SHEN X, et al. Predictive value of heparin-binding protein combined with interleukin-6 in different subtypes of sepsis associated acute kidney injury[J]. Journal of Clinical Emergency, 2023, 24(3):119-125. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2023.03.003. | |
[20] | 苏秦, 高进, 付俊鲜, 等. 血流动力学指标和IL-6在脓毒症肾损伤患儿中的表达及其与免疫指标的相关性[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2020, 36(10):1235-1239. |
SU Q, GAO J, FU J X, et al. Expression of hemodynamic parameters and interleukin-6 in children with septic renal injury and their correlation with immune parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Immunology, 2020, 36(10):1235-1239. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2020.10.016. | |
[21] | YANG Y W, GE B, LIU Y, et al. The efficacy of biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute kidney injury secondary to liver cirrhosis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(14):e25411. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000025411. |
[22] | 许慧慧, 吴维雄, 于航, 等. 老年脓毒症诱发急性肾损伤患者血清NGAL、CysC水平变化及诊断价值研究[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2020, 24(7):1138-1140. |
XU H H, WU W X, YU H, et al. Changes and diagnostic value of serum NGAL and CysC levels in elderly patients with acute renal injury induced by sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis, 2020, 24(7):1138-1140. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2020.07.022. | |
[23] | HIBA S A, SHIMAA A, ZEINAB A K, et al. Potential value of TNF-α (-376 G/A) polymorphism and cystatin C (CysC) in the diagnosis of sepsis associated acute kidney injury (S-AK I) and prediction of mortality in critically Ill patients[J]. Front Mol Biosci, 2021, 8(10):751299. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.751299. |
[24] | 李晓玲, 周文杰, 邓伟, 等. 凝血指标联合血清胱抑素C对脓毒症急性肾损伤患者预后的预测价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(1):81-85. |
LI X L, ZHOU W J, DENG W, et al. Prognostic value of coagulation function index combined with serum cystatin C in patients with septic acute kidney injury[J]. J Pra Med, 2023, 39(1):81-85. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.01.014. | |
[25] | 张春芳, 王慧娟. 脓毒症继发急性肾损伤过程中的凝血变化[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2022, 29(1):15-18. |
ZHANG C F, WANG H J. The coagulation of acute kidney injury of sepsis patients[J]. Lab Immun Clin Med, 2022, 29(1):15-18. doi:10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2022.01.004. | |
[26] | 赵鹏, 赵娟, 田静朴, 等. 脓毒症合并急性肾损伤患者生物学标志物检测及其与肾动脉阻力指数的关系[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2019, 18(7):730-733. |
ZHAO P, ZHAO J, TIAN J P, et al. Detection of biomarkers in patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury and its relationship with renal artery resistance index[J]. Clin Exp Med, 2019, 18(7):730-733. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2019.07.018. |
[1] | 吴亚蒙, 李亮亮, 王彦刚, 邢德福. 血清APOC1和Klotho表达对肾癌后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术患者预后的预测价值[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(1): 61-64. |
[2] | 贾维宁, 鲍亚玲, 雷慧, 殷晓宁. 夏枯草提取物对脓毒症小鼠炎症反应和腹腔巨噬细胞的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 930-935. |
[3] | 杨敏, 潘艳莎, 张长玲, 陈红英, 郭渠莲, 刘文君. 儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病基线数据及早期治疗反应与预后的相关性[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 954-958. |
[4] | 焦爱菊, 任宝龙, 张春花, 李文瑞, 赵玮婧. NIHSS评分联合血清BDNF、IL-6对脑卒中后抑郁的预测价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 963-966. |
[5] | 王新波, 罗冰清, 石玉宝, 张也, 席江伟. 结直肠癌组织LncRNA LINC00342和miR-203a-3p表达及与预后的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(9): 971-976. |
[6] | 戴瑶, 方向, 黄康, 冯洁, 刘敏, 伍松柏. HAT疗法治疗脓毒症休克的临床疗效观察[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 825-829. |
[7] | 张锡友, 郭一丹, 张春霞, 周晓玲, 贾萌, 石志华, 罗洋. 老年维持性血液透析患者高钾血症与不良预后事件相关性的临床研究[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 840-844. |
[8] | 满祎, 许娅, 何先成, 宋少锋, 刘爱国. 三阴性乳腺癌EGFR、Ki-67、P53及CTC表达与预后的关系研究[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 862-867. |
[9] | 历丽, 曹树明, 杨仲平, 胡若梅. 鱼胶原低聚肽对急诊复杂手外伤手术患者预后的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(8): 868-871. |
[10] | 罗宴冉, 史晓飞, 韩磊, 张贝, 文路遥. 皮肌炎自身抗体在间质性肺病中的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 704-708. |
[11] | 钟敏, 施震, 周劲松, 李晋杰. GABA信号通路对脓毒症大鼠急性肺损伤内质网应激和线粒体自噬的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 733-737. |
[12] | 李勇, 苏亚坤, 张宏博, 李原, 李占虎, 闫小菊. 原发性高血压早期肾损害患者血清白脂素水平的临床意义[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 609-613. |
[13] | 薛晶, 元小冬, 邢爱君, 王连辉, 马倩, 符永山, 张萍淑. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者睡眠-觉醒生物节律变化与预后的关系研究[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 614-619. |
[14] | 叶朝阳, 马建中, 李后俊, 魏鲲鹏. 急性胰腺炎患者外周血TLR4、IL-1β、NLR水平与疾病进展和预后的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 648-652. |
[15] | 张兴光, 王邦茂, 刘涛涛, 张文成, 董艳美, 李小青, 牛海艳, 夏时海. 高原IBS与肠屏障损伤、炎性介质及神经递质的相关性研究[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(5): 499-504. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||