天津医药 ›› 2014, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 1226-1228.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9896.2014.12.021

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

嗓音声学检测对喉白斑患者嗓音评估的临床价值

吕倩1,彭鑫2,王晓雨3,王巍。4,杜建群3,李丽3,张圣池3,林鹏3   

  1. 1. 天津医科大学一中心临床学院
    2. 天津医科大学
    3. 天津市第一中心医院
    4. 天津市第一中心医院耳鼻喉科
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-25 修回日期:2014-08-16 出版日期:2014-12-15 发布日期:2014-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 吕倩 E-mail:catherine.lv@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金

Clinical value of the vocal acoustics to the voice evaluate in patients with larynx leukoplakia

LYU Qian 1,PENG Xin 1,WANG Xiaoyu 2,3,WANG Wei 2,3,, DU Jianqun 2,3,LI L 2,3,ZHANG Shengchi 2,3,LIN Peng 2,3   

  1. 1. First Center Clinic College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300192, China
    2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Headand Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Tianjin
    3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Headand Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Tianjin
  • Received:2014-03-25 Revised:2014-08-16 Published:2014-12-15 Online:2014-12-15
  • Contact: LYU Qian E-mail:catherine.lv@163.com

摘要:

【摘要】 目的 探讨嗓音声学检测对喉白斑患者嗓音评估的临床价值。 方法 采用 Dr. Speech 软件对 48 例喉白斑患者(喉白斑组)和 50 例健康者(正常组)进行嗓音分析和电声门图(EGG)检测, 比较 2 组基频微扰(Jitter)、振幅微扰(Shimmer)、噪声能量(NNE)、谐噪比(HNR)、信噪比(SNR)、最长发声时间(MPT)6 个嗓音分析参数和 EGG-Jit? ter、EGG-Shimmer、EGG-NNE、EGG-HNR、EGG-SNR、接触率微扰(CQP)、接触幂微扰(CIP)7 个 EGG 参数, 并分析 EGG 波形。 结果 嗓音分析参数中, 喉白斑组 Jitter、Shimmer 和 NNE 均高于正常组, HNR、SNR 和 MPT 均低于正常组( 均 P< 0.05); EGG 参数中, 喉白斑组 EGG-Jitter、EGG-Shimmer、EGG-NNE、CQP 和 CIP 均高于正常组, EGGHNR、EGG-SNR 均低于正常组(均 P< 0.05)。 喉白斑组 EGG 波形渐开相速度加快, 整个闭合相缩短, 呈尖峰状, 波形规律, 波形异常率占 72.9%(34/48)。 结论 嗓音分析和 EGG 同步化测试可为声嘶程度提供客观指标, 为喉白斑的预防、疗效评估、术后复发和发音矫治提供嗓音学依据。

关键词: 喉白斑, 嗓音学检测, 嗓音评估, 临床价值, 电声门图

Abstract:

[Abstract] Objective To explore the clinic value of the vocal acoustics on voice evaluation in larynx leukoplakia pa? tients. Methods Dr. Speech software was used to perform voice acoustic analysis and deduce EGG parameters in 48 sub? jects with larynx leukoplakia and 50 normal subjects. Voice acoustic analysis parameters (Jitter, Shimmer, NNE, HNR, SNR, MPT), EGG parameters ( EGG-Jitter、EGG-Shimmer、EGG-NNE、EGG-HNR、EGG-SNR, CQP,CIP) and EGG wave? form were compared between two groups. Results For voice acoustic analysis, Jitter, Shimmer, NNE in larynx leukoplakia group were higher than those in normal group while HNR, SNR in larynx leukoplakia group were lower than those of normal group. What’ s more, MPT in larynx leukoplakia group was obviously shorter than that in normal group with, statistically sig? nificant difference (P< 0.05). For EGG analysis, EGG-Jitter, EGG-Shimmer, EGG-NNE were higher in larynx leukoplakia group than those in normal group with significant difference (P< 0.05). EGG-HNR and EGG-SNR in larynx leukoplakia group were lower than those in normal group. Furthermore, CQP and CIP in larynx leukoplakia group were higher than those normal group with statistically significant difference (P< 0.05). Most patients’ (72.9%) EGG waveform showed gradually ac? celerate phase velocity and fast close phase, which represent a spike-like shape. Conclusion Voice acoustic analysis com? bined with EGG provide objective indicators to assess degree of hoarseness, and to provide sonic evidences for prevention, recurrence, assessment and pronunciation correction of the larynx leukoplakia.

Key words: larynx leukoplakia, voice acoustic analysis, voice assessment, clinical application, electroglottography