天津医药 ›› 2020, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8): 736-740.doi: 10.11958/20200129

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

2种固定方式对短节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后#br# 颈椎矢状位参数变化的影响#br#

丁吉1,2,程招军2,3,张黎龙4,徐宝山2△   

  1. 1天津医科大学研究生院(邮编300070);2天津市天津医院微创脊柱外科;3天津中医药大学研究生院;4天津市人民医院脊柱一科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-13 修回日期:2020-07-02 出版日期:2020-08-15 发布日期:2020-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 徐宝山 E-mail:xubaoshan99@126.com
  • 作者简介:丁吉(1993),男,硕士在读,主要从事椎间盘组织工程研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(31670983)

Effects of two fixation methods on cervical sagittal parameters after short segment fusion of anterior cervical discectomy fusion

DING Ji1,2, CHENG Zhao-jun2,3, ZHANG Li-long4, XU Bao-shan2△   

  • Received:2020-01-13 Revised:2020-07-02 Published:2020-08-15 Online:2020-08-12
  • Contact: XU Baoshan E-mail:xubaoshan99@126.com

摘要: 目的 比较2种固定方式对短节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后颈椎矢状位参数变化的影响。方法 回顾性分析2017年9月—2019年1月于天津市人民医院脊柱一科因脊髓型颈椎病和(或)神经根型颈椎病行短节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的59例患者资料,其中男31例,女28例,年龄23~71岁,平均(47.17±11.95)岁,随访时间6~25个月,平均12(7,15)个月。根据不同内固定方式将患者分为钛板+Cage组(钛板组)39例和前路颈椎桥形锁定融合器(ROI-C)组(ROI-C组)20例。术前常规行颈椎正侧位X线摄影、颈椎CT和颈椎MRI检查,术后3、6、12及24个月时在门诊进行随访,随访时常规行颈椎正侧位X线摄影,必要时完善颈椎CT和颈椎MRI检查,并通过X线片测量术前和末次随访的颈椎矢状位参数,即C2~C7 Cobb角(Cobb角)、C2~C7矢状位轴向距离(C2~C7 SVA)、手术节段Cobb角(SCobb角)。计算末次随访与术前测量相应参数的差值,即ΔCobb角、ΔC2~C7 SVA和ΔSCobb角。比较2组间上述指标的差异。结果 2组年龄、性别、出血量、手术时间和手术节段差异均无统计学意义。组内比较发现,钛板组末次随访的Cobb角和SCobb角较术前均有明显增加,C2~C7 SVA较术前减小;ROI-C组中末次随访的SCobb角较术前有明显增加。组间比较发现,2组术前和末次随访中的Cobb角、C2~C7 SVA、SCobb角差异均无统计学意义;2组ΔCobb角和ΔC2~C7 SVA差异均无统计学意义,但钛板组ΔSCobb角较ROI-C组更大。结论 2种内固定方式的短节段ACDF术均能有效地矫正颈椎曲度,钛板+Cage的固定融合方式在恢复手术节段颈椎曲度上较优,但对于手术方式的选择还应将手术并发症等纳入以利于综合考量。

关键词: 椎间盘切除术, 脊柱融合术, 颈椎病, 颈椎曲度, 颈椎矢状位参数

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of two fixation methods on changes of cervical sagittal parameters in patients after short segment of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods A restrospective analysis was performed on 59 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and/or cervical spondylotic radiculopathy with short segment of ACDF in Department 1 of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Hospital from September 2017 to January 2019. There were 31 males and 28 females in these patients, aged 23-71 years old, average (47.17±11.95) years, and follow-up time was 6-25 months, average 12 (7, 15) months. Patients were divided into titanium plate allied with cage group (titanium plate group, n=39) and ROI-C group (ROI-C group, n=20) according to the fixation methods. The patients were routinely examined with cervical X-rays, CT and MRI prior to surgery. Postoperative follow-up continued at least 6 months. The frontal and lateral cervical X-rays were performed at the follow-up, CT and MRI were also performed when necessary. Both preoperative and follow-up cervical sagittal parameters were measured through X-ray films, including C2-C7 Cobb angle (Cobb angle), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA) and segment Cobb angle (SCobb angle). The differences of corresponding cervical sagittal parameters measured preoperatively and at final follow-up were calculated, including ΔCobb angle (the difference value of C2-C7 Cobb angle before operation and at last follow-up), ΔC2-C7 SVA (the difference value of C2-C7 SVA before operation and at last follow-up) and ΔSCobb angle (the different value of segment Cobb angle before operation and at last follow-up). The differences of above indicators were compared between two groups. Results There were no significant differences in age, gender, operation time, bleeding volume and operative level between the two groups. The final follow-up Cobb angle and SCobb angle were significantly increased after operation in titanium plate group, and the C2-C7 SVA significantly decreased compared with those before operation. In ROI-C group, SCobb angle was significantly increased at the last follow-up. There were no significant differences in preoperative and final follow-up Cobb angle, C2-C7 SVA and SCobb angle between the two groups. There were no significant differences in ΔCobb angle          and ΔC2-C7 SVA between the two groups. However, the ΔSCobb angle was statistically higher in the titanium plate group than that in the ROI-C group. Conclusion Both short segment of ACDF with either titanium plate + Cage or ROI-C fixation method can effectively correct the lordosis of the cervical spine, but the titanium plate group has better operation segment cervical lordosis in the recovery. For the choice of surgical methods, surgical complications should also be taken into account.

Key words: discectomy, spinal fusion, cervical spondylosis, cervical lordosis, cervical sagittal parameters

中图分类号: