天津医药 ›› 2021, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 207-211.doi: 10.11958/20200346

• 药物临床观察 • 上一篇    下一篇

右美托咪啶经口腔颊黏膜术前用药对全麻患儿苏醒期躁动的影响 #br#

袁志浩 ,韩建阁,王欣悦   

  1. 1天津市儿童医院麻醉科(邮编300074);2天津医科大学胸科临床医院

  • 收稿日期:2020-03-02 修回日期:2020-11-20 出版日期:2021-02-15 发布日期:2021-02-02
  • 通讯作者: 韩建阁 E-mail:hanjiange@163.com

Effects of dexmedetomidine with oral transmucosal on emergence agitation in children with general anesthesia #br#

YUAN Zhi-hao, HAN Jian-ge, WANG Xin-yue   

  • Received:2020-03-02 Revised:2020-11-20 Published:2021-02-15 Online:2021-02-02
  • Contact: Jian-Ge HANG E-mail:hanjiange@163.com

摘要: 目的探讨术前经口腔颊黏膜给予单剂量右美托咪啶对七氟醚吸入全麻下行扁桃体(伴或不伴腺样体)
射频消融术患儿苏醒期躁动发生率的影响。
方法选取90例拟在全麻下行择期扁桃体(伴或不伴腺样体)射频消融
术的患儿,随机数字表法分为
3组:DEX-Ⅰ组、DEX-Ⅱ组和对照组,各30例。DEX-Ⅰ组和DEX-Ⅱ组分别于术前30
min
经口腔颊黏膜一次性给予右美托咪啶1 μg/kg2 μg/kg,对照组于同一时间点以相同方式给与等量生理盐水。
记录患儿术前
Ramsay评分,术中的平均动脉压、心率和血氧饱和度,拔管时间,入麻醉后监护室(PACU)后51015
304560 min时的Watcha激动评分和改良OPS疼痛评分(Watcha激动评分≥3分视为发生术后躁动),并记录围术
期不良事件的发生情况。
结果3Ramsay镇静评分、手术时长和拔管时间差异无统计学意义。DEX-ⅠDEX-
组在入PACU5101560 min 4个时间点Watcha激动评分均低于对照组,该24个时点评分差异均无统计
学意义。入
PACU5101530 minDEX-ⅠDEX-Ⅱ组术后改良OPS评分均低于对照组,该2组间上述4
时点评分差异无统计学意义。与对照组相比,
DEX-ⅠDEX-Ⅱ组术中心率和平均动脉压明显降低,但在正常临床
范围内。
3组患儿围术期均未见不良事件的发生。 结论术前经口腔颊黏膜一次性给予1~2 μg/kg右美托咪啶可以
有效降低全麻患儿术后苏醒期躁动的发生率。

关键词: 右美托咪啶, 麻醉, 全身, 苏醒谵妄, 口腔颊黏膜, 儿童

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of premedication with oral transmucosal buccal dexmedetomidine
(DEX) on the incidence of emergence agitation in children undergoing tonsillectomy under sevoflurane anesthesia.
MethodsA total of 90 children who were scheduled for tonsillectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into
three groups: DEX-Ⅰ group, DEX-Ⅱ group and control group, with 30 patients in each group. The DEX-Ⅰ group and the
DEX- Ⅱ group were given dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and 2 μg/kg via buccal mucosa at 30 minutes before surgery,
respectively. The control group was given normal saline in the same manner at the same time point. Preoperative sedation
score, intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation, extubating time, Watcha
s
agitation scale at 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min and 60 min after admission to post anesthesia care unit (PACU),
modified OPS pain score at the same time point and occurrence of perioperative adverse events were recorded. Postoperative
agitation was considered when Watcha
s agitation score was ≥3. ResultsThere were no significant differences in
demographics, preoperative sedation score, duration of operation and extubating time between the 3 groups. The Watcha
s
agitation scores at the four time points of 5, 10, 15 and 60 min after entering PACU were lower in DEX-Ⅰ and DEX-Ⅱ
groups than those of the control group. There were no significant differences in the four time point scores between DEX-Ⅰ
group and DEX-Ⅱ group. The modified OPS pain scores at the four time points of 5, 10, 15 and 30 min after entering PACU
were lower in DEX-Ⅰ and DEX-Ⅱ groups than those of control group. There were no significant differences in the four time
point scores between the two DEX groups. Compared with the control group, the HR and MAP were significantly lower in
DEX groups, but within the normal clinical range. No adverse events were observed during perioperative period in all three
groups.
ConclusionPreoperative administration of dexmedetomidine 1-2 μg/kg via the buccal mucosa can effectively
reduce the incidence of postoperative agitation in children with general anesthesia.

Key words: dexmedetomidine, anesthesia, general, emergence agitation, buccal mucosa, child

中图分类号: