• 短篇论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

ADVIA Centaur超敏肌钙蛋白I测试法的性能分析及临床应用评价

蔡迪娅,邱晓明 ,苏月梅,王宗泽,常艳敏   

  1. 天津市南开医院
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-06 修回日期:2011-04-03 出版日期:2011-12-15 发布日期:2011-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 蔡迪娅

The analytical performance and evaluation of clinical applican about testing method of ADVIA Centaur Ultra-sensitivity TnI

  • Received:2011-01-06 Revised:2011-04-03 Published:2011-12-15 Online:2011-12-15
  • Contact: CaiDiYa

摘要: 心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)是目前反映心肌损伤最敏感和特异的生物学标志物,广泛应用于急性心肌梗死(AMI)的早期诊断[1-2]。2000年欧洲心脏病协会 (ESC)和美国心脏病学会(ACC)联合提出重新定义AMI[3],将cTn的变化作为诊断AMI的重要依据之一。近年来,随着检验技术的不断改进,新一代高敏感方法检测的试剂相继问世,对检测性能进行评估是合理选择cTn检测方法的一个重要步骤。 高敏感心肌肌钙蛋白I(hs-cTnI)检测可采用ADVIA Centaur分析系统(直接化学发光技术的3位点夹心免疫测试法。本文对该方法的检测性能进行评估,并对其在临床上的应用做初步探讨。

关键词: 肌钙蛋白I, 心肌梗死, 敏感性与特异性, ROC曲线

Abstract: [abstract] objective To evaluate the analytical performance of ADVIA Centaur TnI-Ultra testing method, in order to help the clinical diagnosis of AMI . Methods To collect the serum of emergency department patients with chest pain immediately and detect TnI-Ultra. consult 2000 ESC/ACC for AMI diagnostic criteria to diagnos AMI. Calculate the positive rate of immediated detection of patients. according to ROC curves of TnI-Ultra test results in the diagnosis of characteristics with AMI for evaluation. Evaluation of this method function sensitivity (CV = 10%), within- and between run imprecision. Results confirmed immediated positive rate of AMI patients was 34.2%, the area under the ROC curves was 0.956, definite diagnosis threshold value was 0.436 ng/ml, at this threshold value sensitivity was 90.2%, specificity was 87.3%. TnI-Ultra function sensitivity when CV=10% was 0.042 ng/ml, when CV=20% was 0.0195 ng/ml. Low concentration serum (nearly 0.04 ng/ml) within-run CV was 7.9%, between run CV was 8.1%; High concentration serum (0.11 ng/ml) within-run CV was 4.6 %, between run CV was 5.4%. Conclusion ADVIA Centaur TnI-Ultra detection method analysis performance reach "guideline acceptable" (CV=10% or less), but when AMI happened, judgment threshold the provided materials by manufacturers have difference, the application of routine clinical diagnosis still needs further observation and study.