天津医药 ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (2): 172-176.doi: 10.11958/20231051

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

急性缺血性脑卒中患者血清指标与病情和预后的关系

丁波1(), 龚洁芹1,(), 沈李奎2   

  1. 1.上海交通大学医学院苏州九龙医院神经内科(邮编215028),2. 神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-16 修回日期:2023-09-14 出版日期:2024-02-15 发布日期:2024-01-26
  • 通讯作者: E-mail:yu0xiao2xiao@163.com
  • 作者简介:丁波(1985),男,副主任医师,主要从事脑血管病研究。E-mail:dingbo85218@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省医院协会医院管理创新研究课题(JSYGY-3-2021-455)

Relationship between serum indexes, pathogenetic condition and prognosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke

DING Bo1(), GONG Jieqin1,(), SHEN Likui2   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology, 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou 215028, China
  • Received:2023-07-16 Revised:2023-09-14 Published:2024-02-15 Online:2024-01-26
  • Contact: E-mail: yu0xiao2xiao@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者血清脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2(Lp-PLA2)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、β淀粉样蛋白1-42(Aβ1-42)、可溶性细胞间黏附分子1(sICAM-1)水平与美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分和预后的关系。方法 选取AIS静脉溶栓患者(溶栓组)106例、未溶栓患者(未溶栓组)30例和健康体检者(对照组)95例。将溶栓患者根据溶栓后是否静脉再通分为再通组41例和未通组65例,依据NIHSS评分分为轻度组45例、中度组36例、重度组25例,通过改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分分为预后良好组65例和预后不良组41例。对比不同分组情况下4种血清指标水平,并分析其与NIHSS评分及预后的关系。结果 106例溶栓患者静脉再通率为38.68%(41/106);再通组血清Lp-PLA2、LDL、Aβ1-42、sICAM-1水平均低于未通组(P<0.05);对照组、溶栓组、未溶栓组血清Lp-PLA2、LDL、Aβ1-42、sICAM-1水平均依次升高(P<0.05);4种血清指标随溶栓患者病情加重而上升,且与NIHSS评分呈正相关(P<0.05);高水平血清Lp-PLA2、LDL、Aβ1-42、sICAM-1是溶栓患者预后不良的危险因素,其联合预测溶栓患者预后不良的曲线下面积(AUC)、特异度均高于单一指标检测(P<0.05)。结论 血清Lp-PLA2、LDL、Aβ1-42、sICAM-1水平在AIS患者中呈高表达,可作为病情监测及预后评估的重要参考指标。

关键词: 缺血性卒中, 脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2, 低密度脂蛋白, β淀粉样蛋白1-42, 可溶性细胞间黏附分子1, 预后

Abstract:

Objective To discuss the relationship between serum lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), amyloid beta 1-42 (Aβ1-42) and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) levels, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and prognosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods A total of 106 patients with AIS who underwent intravenous thrombolysis (the thrombolysis group), 30 AIS patients without thrombolysis (the non-thrombolysis group) and 95 healthy individuals (the control group) were included in the study. The thrombolysis group was divided into the recanalization group (n=41) and the non-recanalization group (n=65) according to whether the vein was recanalized after thrombolysis. Patients were divided into the mild group (n=45), the moderate group (n=36) and the severe group (n=25) based on the NIHSS score. They were divided into the good prognosis group (n=65) and the poor prognosis group (n=41) based on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Serum levels of four indexes in different groups were compared. Their relationship with the NIHSS score and the prognosis was analyzed. Results The vein recanalization rate in 106 patients with thrombolysis was 38.68% (41/106). Serum Lp-PLA2, LDL, Aβ1-42 and sICAM-1 levels were lower in the recanalization group than those in the non-canalization group (P<0.05). Serum Lp-PLA2, LDL, Aβ1-42 and sICAM-1 levels increased successively in the control group, the thrombolysis group and the non-thrombolysis group (P<0.05). The 4 serum indexes increased with the aggravation of disease condition, and were positively correlated with NIHSS score (P<0.05). High serum levels of Lp-PLA2, LDL, Aβ1-42 and sICAM-1 were risk factors for poor prognosis of patients with thrombolysis (P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) and specificity of the combination of 4 serum indexes for predicting poor prognosis of patients with thrombolysis were higher than those of prediction with single index (P<0.05). Conclusion The expression levels of serum Lp-PLA2, LDL, Aβ1-42 and sICAM-1 in patients with AIS are high. They can be used as important reference indexes for disease condition monitoring and prognosis evaluation.

Key words: ischemic stroke, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase a2, low density lipoprotein, amyloid beta 1-42, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1, prognosis

中图分类号: