
天津医药 ›› 2026, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 384-389.doi: 10.11958/20253164
艾希睿(
), 赵亚男, 刘鹏, 闫景明, 朱藜, 苑成浩△(
)
收稿日期:2025-10-15
修回日期:2025-12-05
出版日期:2026-04-15
发布日期:2026-04-14
通讯作者:
△E-mail: 作者简介:艾希睿(1996),女,中级康复治疗师,主要从事膝关节的康复治疗方面研究。E-mail:基金资助:
AI Xirui(
), ZHAO Ya’nan, LIU Peng, YAN Jingming, ZHU Li, YUAN Chenghao△(
)
Received:2025-10-15
Revised:2025-12-05
Published:2026-04-15
Online:2026-04-14
Contact:
△E-mail: 艾希睿, 赵亚男, 刘鹏, 闫景明, 朱藜, 苑成浩. 膝关节腔内注射PRP联合间歇性低氧训练治疗早期膝骨关节炎的疗效及安全性[J]. 天津医药, 2026, 54(4): 384-389.
AI Xirui, ZHAO Ya’nan, LIU Peng, YAN Jingming, ZHU Li, YUAN Chenghao. Efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma combined with intermittent hypoxic training in the treatment of early knee osteoarthritis[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2026, 54(4): 384-389.
摘要:
目的 观察膝关节腔内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)联合间歇性低氧训练治疗早期膝骨关节炎(KOA)的疗效及安全性。方法 纳入220例早期KOA患者并按照随机数字表法均分为4组,低氧组予以单独间歇性低氧训练,玻璃酸钠+低氧组采取膝关节腔内注射玻璃酸钠联合间歇性低氧训练方案,PRP组予以单独膝关节腔内注射PRP治疗,PRP+低氧组采取膝关节腔内注射PRP联合间歇性低氧训练方案,均连续治疗6周,比较4组治疗前后数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)评分,炎症疼痛介质[C反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素(IL)-17、5-羟色胺(5-HT)、P物质],氧化应激指标[超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、丙二醛(MDA)],膝关节骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)、起立-行走计时测试(TUG)及不良反应。结果 治疗后低氧组、PRP组、玻璃酸钠+低氧组、PRP+低氧组NPRS评分、CRP、TNF-α、IL-17、5-HT、P物质及MDA水平依次降低,SOD水平依次升高,KOOS中疼痛、膝关节生活质量、症状、运动与娱乐、日常活动及总分依次升高,TUG时间依次缩短(均P<0.05);4组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 膝关节腔内注射PRP联合间歇性低氧训练治疗早期KOA可有效改善患者炎症疼痛介质表达水平及氧化应激水平,减轻疼痛,提高膝关节功能与平衡能力,且安全性高。
中图分类号:
| 组别 | 性别 (男/女) | 年龄/岁 | 体质量指数/(kg/m2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低氧组 | 27/28 | 58.29±10.76 | 24.14±2.67 | ||||||
| PRP组 | 23/32 | 55.53±10.30 | 23.66±2.07 | ||||||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 24/31 | 57.95±11.26 | 23.91±2.45 | ||||||
| PRP+低氧组 | 26/29 | 58.58±9.60 | 23.10±2.55 | ||||||
| χ2或F | 0.733 | 0.974 | 1.849 | ||||||
| 组别 | K-L分级 | 病变侧 | 病程/月 | ||||||
| I | II | III | 左侧 | 右侧 | |||||
| 低氧组 | 18 | 25 | 12 | 26 | 29 | 22.67±4.16 | |||
| PRP组 | 15 | 29 | 11 | 30 | 25 | 20.60±4.15 | |||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 17 | 28 | 10 | 28 | 27 | 21.44±4.52 | |||
| PRP+低氧组 | 15 | 27 | 13 | 31 | 24 | 22.25±5.14 | |||
| χ2或F | 1.171 | 1.075 | 2.276 | ||||||
表1 4组患者基线资料对比 (n=55)
Tab.1 Comparison of baseline data between the four groups
| 组别 | 性别 (男/女) | 年龄/岁 | 体质量指数/(kg/m2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低氧组 | 27/28 | 58.29±10.76 | 24.14±2.67 | ||||||
| PRP组 | 23/32 | 55.53±10.30 | 23.66±2.07 | ||||||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 24/31 | 57.95±11.26 | 23.91±2.45 | ||||||
| PRP+低氧组 | 26/29 | 58.58±9.60 | 23.10±2.55 | ||||||
| χ2或F | 0.733 | 0.974 | 1.849 | ||||||
| 组别 | K-L分级 | 病变侧 | 病程/月 | ||||||
| I | II | III | 左侧 | 右侧 | |||||
| 低氧组 | 18 | 25 | 12 | 26 | 29 | 22.67±4.16 | |||
| PRP组 | 15 | 29 | 11 | 30 | 25 | 20.60±4.15 | |||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 17 | 28 | 10 | 28 | 27 | 21.44±4.52 | |||
| PRP+低氧组 | 15 | 27 | 13 | 31 | 24 | 22.25±5.14 | |||
| χ2或F | 1.171 | 1.075 | 2.276 | ||||||
| 组别 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低氧组 | 5.78±0.96 | 4.85±0.73 | 5.886** | |
| PRP组 | 5.65±0.75 | 4.38±0.59a | 9.918** | |
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 5.89±1.08 | 3.78±0.74ab | 12.442** | |
| PRP+低氧组 | 6.09±1.13 | 2.96±0.58abc | 16.703** | |
| F | 1.971 | 83.157** | ||
表2 4组患者NPRS评分比较 (n=55,分,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.2 Comparison of NPRS scores between the four groups of patients
| 组别 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低氧组 | 5.78±0.96 | 4.85±0.73 | 5.886** | |
| PRP组 | 5.65±0.75 | 4.38±0.59a | 9.918** | |
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 5.89±1.08 | 3.78±0.74ab | 12.442** | |
| PRP+低氧组 | 6.09±1.13 | 2.96±0.58abc | 16.703** | |
| F | 1.971 | 83.157** | ||
| 组别 | CRP/(mg/L) | TNF-α/(μg/L) | IL-17/(ng/L) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
| 低氧组 | 28.88±5.71 | 11.25±1.94 | 20.836** | 16.51±2.81 | 13.76±2.53 | 8.261** | 6.67±1.26 | 5.92±1.14 | 4.962** | ||||||
| PRP组 | 28.74±6.62 | 9.89±1.75a | 19.343** | 15.60±2.83 | 12.73±1.99a | 6.571** | 6.64±1.35 | 5.26±1.26a | 7.116** | ||||||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 30.33±5.68 | 8.30±1.44ab | 27.031** | 15.83±2.98 | 11.64±2.62ab | 8.132** | 6.38±1.40 | 4.66±1.05ab | 7.614** | ||||||
| PRP+低氧组 | 30.30±4.65 | 6.86±1.40abc | 38.218** | 15.82±2.40 | 10.16±1.25abc | 14.631** | 6.47±1.41 | 3.93±0.87abc | 11.796** | ||||||
| F | 1.279 | 73.623** | 1.113 | 27.842** | 0.589 | 33.311** | |||||||||
| 组别 | 5-HT/(μg/L) | P物质/(nmol/L) | |||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||||
| 低氧组 | 876.42±115.70 | 669.47±112.18 | 9.344** | 4.43±0.84 | 3.41±0.57 | 7.406** | |||||||||
| PRP组 | 847.00±121.53 | 589.23±110.17a | 11.870** | 4.67±0.95 | 2.93±0.43a | 13.168** | |||||||||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 865.40±118.07 | 534.70±84.88ab | 15.987** | 4.40±0.84 | 2.36±0.47ab | 16.944** | |||||||||
| PRP+低氧组 | 875.48±129.59 | 486.11±75.32abc | 19.779** | 4.49±0.77 | 1.84±0.35abc | 22.318** | |||||||||
| F | 0.697 | 36.176** | 1.082 | 120.561** | |||||||||||
表3 4组患者炎症疼痛介质比较 (n=55,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.3 Comparison of inflammatory pain mediators between the four groups of patients
| 组别 | CRP/(mg/L) | TNF-α/(μg/L) | IL-17/(ng/L) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
| 低氧组 | 28.88±5.71 | 11.25±1.94 | 20.836** | 16.51±2.81 | 13.76±2.53 | 8.261** | 6.67±1.26 | 5.92±1.14 | 4.962** | ||||||
| PRP组 | 28.74±6.62 | 9.89±1.75a | 19.343** | 15.60±2.83 | 12.73±1.99a | 6.571** | 6.64±1.35 | 5.26±1.26a | 7.116** | ||||||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 30.33±5.68 | 8.30±1.44ab | 27.031** | 15.83±2.98 | 11.64±2.62ab | 8.132** | 6.38±1.40 | 4.66±1.05ab | 7.614** | ||||||
| PRP+低氧组 | 30.30±4.65 | 6.86±1.40abc | 38.218** | 15.82±2.40 | 10.16±1.25abc | 14.631** | 6.47±1.41 | 3.93±0.87abc | 11.796** | ||||||
| F | 1.279 | 73.623** | 1.113 | 27.842** | 0.589 | 33.311** | |||||||||
| 组别 | 5-HT/(μg/L) | P物质/(nmol/L) | |||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||||
| 低氧组 | 876.42±115.70 | 669.47±112.18 | 9.344** | 4.43±0.84 | 3.41±0.57 | 7.406** | |||||||||
| PRP组 | 847.00±121.53 | 589.23±110.17a | 11.870** | 4.67±0.95 | 2.93±0.43a | 13.168** | |||||||||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 865.40±118.07 | 534.70±84.88ab | 15.987** | 4.40±0.84 | 2.36±0.47ab | 16.944** | |||||||||
| PRP+低氧组 | 875.48±129.59 | 486.11±75.32abc | 19.779** | 4.49±0.77 | 1.84±0.35abc | 22.318** | |||||||||
| F | 0.697 | 36.176** | 1.082 | 120.561** | |||||||||||
| 组别 | SOD/(U/mL) | MDA/(mmol/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
| 低氧组 | 68.96±12.39 | 85.54±16.32 | 5.909** | 78.99±11.04 | 68.75±12.50 | 4.692** |
| PRP组 | 70.83±12.57 | 94.16±17.00a | 7.848** | 77.99±15.43 | 61.85±11.59a | 6.421** |
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 71.03±14.81 | 102.68±14.81ab | 11.810** | 80.07±13.81 | 56.43±10.22ab | 11.513** |
| PRP+低氧组 | 72.90±14.90 | 112.24±20.76abc | 12.529** | 77.59±15.84 | 45.04±11.14abc | 12.202** |
| F | 0.760 | 23.887** | 0.339 | 42.528** | ||
表4 4组患者氧化应激比较 (n=55,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.4 Comparison of oxidative stress indicators between the four groups of patients
| 组别 | SOD/(U/mL) | MDA/(mmol/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
| 低氧组 | 68.96±12.39 | 85.54±16.32 | 5.909** | 78.99±11.04 | 68.75±12.50 | 4.692** |
| PRP组 | 70.83±12.57 | 94.16±17.00a | 7.848** | 77.99±15.43 | 61.85±11.59a | 6.421** |
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 71.03±14.81 | 102.68±14.81ab | 11.810** | 80.07±13.81 | 56.43±10.22ab | 11.513** |
| PRP+低氧组 | 72.90±14.90 | 112.24±20.76abc | 12.529** | 77.59±15.84 | 45.04±11.14abc | 12.202** |
| F | 0.760 | 23.887** | 0.339 | 42.528** | ||
| 组别 | 疼痛 | 膝关节生活质量 | 症状 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||||
| 低氧组 | 18.31±3.72 | 21.18±4.62 | 3.448** | 7.20±1.37 | 8.62±1.81 | 5.148** | 15.35±3.03 | 16.18±4.62 | 1.200 | |||||||||
| PRP组 | 17.49±2.75 | 23.98±4.23a | 9.086** | 7.27±1.11 | 10.25±1.68a | 10.425** | 15.67±2.99 | 18.55±3.23a | 4.557** | |||||||||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 18.38±3.48 | 26.67±4.62ab | 11.384** | 7.24±1.49 | 11.78±1.97ab | 15.315** | 15.82±3.24 | 20.69±3.56ab | 6.807** | |||||||||
| PRP+低氧组 | 18.75±3.34 | 30.16±4.00abc | 15.276** | 7.00±1.40 | 13.73±1.60abc | 23.719** | 15.53±2.99 | 22.85±3.22abc | 12.276** | |||||||||
| F | 1.382 | 42.254** | 0.448 | 83.217** | 0.240 | 32.916** | ||||||||||||
| 组别 | 运动与娱乐 | 日常活动 | 总分 | |||||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||||
| 低氧组 | 13.35±2.26 | 15.53±3.52 | 4.031** | 37.93±7.74 | 43.84±7.21 | 4.100** | 92.13±8.84 | 105.35±12.10 | 6.920** | |||||||||
| PRP组 | 13.71±2.40 | 17.38±2.70a | 7.112** | 39.20±8.27 | 47.65±7.12a | 5.409** | 93.35±9.21 | 117.82±10.20a | 12.174** | |||||||||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 13.18±2.06 | 19.75±2.97ab | 12.020** | 37.64±5.99 | 52.16±7.63ab | 11.197** | 92.25±7.15 | 131.05±8.95ab | 22.207** | |||||||||
| PRP+低氧组 | 13.49±2.47 | 22.31±4.11abc | 13.011** | 38.07±7.29 | 59.49±5.86abc | 17.711** | 92.84±8.73 | 148.55±8.92abc | 30.382** | |||||||||
| F | 0.519 | 41.907** | 0.475 | 50.997** | 0.239 | 183.685** | ||||||||||||
表5 4组患者KOOS比较 (n=55,分,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.5 Comparison of KOOS scores between the four groups of patients
| 组别 | 疼痛 | 膝关节生活质量 | 症状 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||||
| 低氧组 | 18.31±3.72 | 21.18±4.62 | 3.448** | 7.20±1.37 | 8.62±1.81 | 5.148** | 15.35±3.03 | 16.18±4.62 | 1.200 | |||||||||
| PRP组 | 17.49±2.75 | 23.98±4.23a | 9.086** | 7.27±1.11 | 10.25±1.68a | 10.425** | 15.67±2.99 | 18.55±3.23a | 4.557** | |||||||||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 18.38±3.48 | 26.67±4.62ab | 11.384** | 7.24±1.49 | 11.78±1.97ab | 15.315** | 15.82±3.24 | 20.69±3.56ab | 6.807** | |||||||||
| PRP+低氧组 | 18.75±3.34 | 30.16±4.00abc | 15.276** | 7.00±1.40 | 13.73±1.60abc | 23.719** | 15.53±2.99 | 22.85±3.22abc | 12.276** | |||||||||
| F | 1.382 | 42.254** | 0.448 | 83.217** | 0.240 | 32.916** | ||||||||||||
| 组别 | 运动与娱乐 | 日常活动 | 总分 | |||||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||||
| 低氧组 | 13.35±2.26 | 15.53±3.52 | 4.031** | 37.93±7.74 | 43.84±7.21 | 4.100** | 92.13±8.84 | 105.35±12.10 | 6.920** | |||||||||
| PRP组 | 13.71±2.40 | 17.38±2.70a | 7.112** | 39.20±8.27 | 47.65±7.12a | 5.409** | 93.35±9.21 | 117.82±10.20a | 12.174** | |||||||||
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 13.18±2.06 | 19.75±2.97ab | 12.020** | 37.64±5.99 | 52.16±7.63ab | 11.197** | 92.25±7.15 | 131.05±8.95ab | 22.207** | |||||||||
| PRP+低氧组 | 13.49±2.47 | 22.31±4.11abc | 13.011** | 38.07±7.29 | 59.49±5.86abc | 17.711** | 92.84±8.73 | 148.55±8.92abc | 30.382** | |||||||||
| F | 0.519 | 41.907** | 0.475 | 50.997** | 0.239 | 183.685** | ||||||||||||
| 组别 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低氧组 | 9.44±1.50 | 9.36±1.34 | 0.316 | |
| PRP组 | 9.09±1.51 | 8.36±1.37a | 2.575* | |
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 9.15±1.76 | 7.60±1.49ab | 5.309** | |
| PRP+低氧组 | 9.44±1.82 | 6.89±1.20abc | 9.037** | |
| F | 0.689 | 33.870** | ||
表6 4组患者TUG比较 (n=55,s,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.6 Comparison of TUG between the four groups of patients
| 组别 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低氧组 | 9.44±1.50 | 9.36±1.34 | 0.316 | |
| PRP组 | 9.09±1.51 | 8.36±1.37a | 2.575* | |
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 9.15±1.76 | 7.60±1.49ab | 5.309** | |
| PRP+低氧组 | 9.44±1.82 | 6.89±1.20abc | 9.037** | |
| F | 0.689 | 33.870** | ||
| 组别 | 轻微肿胀 | 感染 | 头晕 | 总发生 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低氧组 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0(0.00) |
| PRP组 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2(3.64) |
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3(5.45) |
| PRP+低氧组 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3(5.45) |
| χ2 | 3.113 |
表7 4组患者不良反应比较 (n=55)
Tab.7 Comparison of adverse reactions between the four groups of patients
| 组别 | 轻微肿胀 | 感染 | 头晕 | 总发生 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低氧组 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0(0.00) |
| PRP组 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2(3.64) |
| 玻璃酸钠+低氧组 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3(5.45) |
| PRP+低氧组 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3(5.45) |
| χ2 | 3.113 |
| [1] | CAO T N, HUYNH K N, TRAN H T, et al. Association between asymptomatic hyperuricemia and knee osteoarthritis in older outpatients[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2022, 26(18):6600-6607. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202209_29760. |
| [2] | CLARK G P. Treatment options for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in adults[J]. JAAPA, 2023, 36(11):1-6. doi:10.1097/01.JAA.0000979536.73946.98. |
| [3] | 孙磊, 郭永园, 赵心. 关节腔注射自体富血小板血浆结合通痹散熏洗治疗早期膝骨关节炎的临床研究[J]. 国际中医中药杂志, 2023, 45(8):963-967. |
| SUN L, GUO Y Y, ZHAO X. Clinical study of intra-articular injection of autologous PRP combined with Tongbi San fumigation in the treatment of early knee osteoarthritis[J]. Int J Tradit Chin Med, 2023, 45(8):963-967. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115398-20220709-00099. | |
| [4] | ATIK I, GUL E, ATIK S. Evaluation of the relationship between knee osteoarthritis and meniscus pathologies[J]. Malawi Med J, 2024, 36(1):48-52. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v36i1.8. |
| [5] | 尚祥, 王飞, 杨琪琪, 等. 富血小板血浆注射联合温针灸治疗膝骨关节炎寒湿痹阻证的临床研究[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2025, 48(2):270-279. |
| SHANG X, WANG F, YANG Q Q, et al. Platelet-rich plasma injection combined with warm acupuncture and moxibustion for treating patients with knee osteoarthritis and cold dampness obstruction syndrome[J]. J Beijing Univ Tradit Chin Med, 2025, 48(2):270-279. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2025.02.017. | |
| [6] | BOFFA A, DE MARZIANI L, ANDRIOLO L, et al. Influence of platelet concentration on the clinical outcome of platelet-rich plasma injections in knee osteoarthritis[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2024, 52(13):3223-3231. doi:10.1177/03635465241283463. |
| [7] | 程宇核, 朱小虎, 程俊华, 等. 富血小板血浆注射联合运动训练治疗早中期膝骨关节炎[J]. 湖北医药学院学报, 2023, 42(2):165-168. |
| CHENG Y H, ZHU X H, CHENG J H, et al. Platelet-rich plasma injection combined with exercise training for the treatment of early and middle stage knee osteoarthritis[J]. J Hubei Univ Med, 2023, 42(2):165-168. doi:10.13819/j.issn.2096-708X.2023.02.010. | |
| [8] | 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 中国医师协会骨科医师分会骨关节炎学组, 国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心(湘雅医院), 等. 中国骨关节炎诊疗指南(2021年版)[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2021, 41(18):1291-1314. |
| The Joint Surgery Branch of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, The Subspecialty Group of Osteoarthritis,Chinese Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons, The National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya Hospital), et al. Chinese guideline for diagnosis and treatment of osteoarthritis (2021 edition)[J]. Chin J Orthop, 2021, 41(18):1291-1314. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20210624-00424. | |
| [9] | 邱佳迪, 沈黎辉. 间歇性低氧训练联合常规康复治疗对脑梗死患者认知和运动功能的影响[J]. 贵州医药, 2024, 48(11):1780-1782. |
| QIU J D, SHEN L H. Effect of intermittent hypoxic training combined with conventional rehabilitation on cognitive and motor function in patients with cerebral infarction[J]. Guizhou Med J, 2024, 48(11):1780-1782. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2024.11.037. | |
| [10] | ROMANDINI I, BOFFA A, DI MARTINO A, et al. Leukocytes do not influence the safety and efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis:a double-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2024, 52(13):3212-3222. doi:10.1177/03635465241283500. |
| [11] | KON E, ANZILLOTTI G, CONTE P, et al. The chimera of reaching a universal consensus on platelet-rich plasma treatment for knee osteoarthritis:a review of recent consensus statements and expert opinion[J]. Expert Opin Biol Ther, 2024, 24(8):827-833. doi:10.1080/14712598.2024.2383865. |
| [12] | 张烽, 王斌, 曹蔼萱, 等. 原发性膝关节骨关节炎严重程度的危险因素分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2024, 26(8):698-704. |
| ZHANG F, WANG B, CAO A X, et al. Risk factors influencing the severity of primary knee osteoarthritis:a correlation study[J]. Chin J Orthop Trauma, 2024, 26(8):698-704. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20240206-00061. | |
| [13] | KUMAR S, KUMAR H, MITTAL A, et al. Correlation between synovial fluid levels of matrix metalloproteinase's (MMP-1,MMP-3,and MMP-9) and TNF-α with the severity of osteoarthritis knee in rural Indian population[J]. Indian J Orthop, 2023, 57(10):1659-1666. doi:10.1007/s43465-023-00974-8. |
| [14] | DIVJAK A, JOVANOVIC I, MATIC A, et al. The influence of vitamin D supplementation on the expression of mediators of inflammation in knee osteoarthritis[J]. Immunol Res, 2023, 71(3):442-450. doi:10.1007/s12026-022-09354-0. |
| [15] | LIU J, LI Y, WANG J, et al. Integrated skin metabolomics and network pharmacology to explore the mechanisms of Goupi Plaster for treating knee osteoarthritis[J]. J Tradit Complement Med, 2024, 14(6):675-686. doi:10.1016/j.jtcme.2024.04.004. |
| [16] | 张立, 丁亮, 黄正泉, 等. 伤科冷痛贴治疗寒湿痹阻型膝骨关节炎的临床随机对照研究[J]. 南京中医药大学学报, 2025, 41(3):393-398. |
| ZHANG L, DING L, HUANG Z Q, et al. A randomized controlled clinical study on the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with Cold-Dampness Arthralgia Obstruction by Shangke Lengtong Patch[J]. J Nanjing Univ Tradit Chin Med, 2025, 41(3):393-398. doi:10.14148/j.issn.1672-0482.2025.0393. | |
| [17] | 余皓, 张洫, 李雪萍, 等. 独活寄生汤对膝关节骨性关节炎患者膝关节功能、疼痛及血清炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2025, 43(6):117-121. |
| YU H, ZHANG X, LI X P, et al. Effect of Duhuo Jisheng Decoction on knee joint function,pain and serum inflammatory factors in patients with knee osteoarthritis[J]. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med, 2025, 43(6):117-121. doi:10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2025.06.022. | |
| [18] | 陈卫华, 庄卫生, 黄韶辉. 关节腔内PRP注射治疗膝骨关节炎对患者炎症及疼痛因子水平和预后的影响[J]. 海南医学, 2024, 35(10):1415-1419. |
| CHEN W H, ZHUANG W S, HUANG S H. Effect of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injection on inflammation,pain factors,and prognosis in patients with knee osteoarthritis[J]. Hainan Med J, 2024, 35(10):1415-1419. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2024.10.010. | |
| [19] | WANG H, SUN W, ZHAO D. Platelet-rich plasma combined with exercise therapy:a treatment option for knee osteoarthritis[J]. Asian J Surg, 2023, 46(3):1382-1383. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.08.125. |
| [20] | 黄丹, 张琪涵, 宋歌, 等. 间歇性低氧训练预防急性低氧损伤有效性和安全性的研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(29):3640-3644. |
| HUANG D, ZHANG Q H, SONG G, et al. Efficacy and safety of intermittent hypoxic training in the prevention of acute hypoxic injury[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2023, 26(29):3640-3644. doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0164. | |
| [21] | AYDIN M, ALP AVCI G, YILMAZ U I, et al. Evaluation of oxidative stress and cellular immunity in grades III-IV knee osteoarthritis[J]. Arch Bone Jt Surg, 2024, 12(12):840-845. doi:10.22038/ABJS.2024.78412.3612. |
| [22] | FERNÁNDEZ-TORRES J, MARTÍNEZ-FLORES K, PUERTA-ESCALANTE I X, et al. Interplay of calcium pyrophosphate crystals,oxidative stress,and clinical features on knee osteoarthritis severity[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2025, 44(1):433-441. doi:10.1007/s10067-024-07220-y. |
| [23] | WANG Z, ZHENG X, LIN J, et al. Electroacupuncture ameliorates cartilage damage in a rat model of knee osteoarthritis and regulates expression of miRNAs and the TLR4/NF-κB pathway[J]. Acupunct Med, 2025, 43(3):164-173. doi:10.1177/09645284251342259. |
| [24] | 段航, 曾凡, 王林华, 等. 桃红四物汤调控Nrf2/Keap1/HO-1信号通路介导的铁死亡在膝骨关节炎中的作用机制[J]. 中药药理与临床, 2024, 40(7):10-15. |
| DUAN H, ZENG F, WANG L H, et al. Mechanism of Taohong Siwu Decoction in regulating ferroptosis mediated by Nrf2/Keap1/HO-1 signaling pathway in knee osteoarthritis[J]. Pharmacol Clin Chin Mater Med, 2024, 40(7):10-15. doi:10.13412/j.cnki.zyyl.20240221.002. | |
| [25] | HUANG S, WANG Q, CHEN D, et al. Clinical trial of arthroscopic debridement combined with functional exercise in the treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis:a retrospective observational study[J]. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 2024, 37(6):1673-1683. doi:10.3233/BMR-240106. |
| [26] | 陈娟, 李洪兵, 陈周. 富血小板血浆注射联合普瑞巴林治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效和安全性评价[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2022, 35(12):1239-1243. |
| CHEN J, LI H B, CHEN Z. Effect and safety of platelet-rich plasma injection combined with pregabalin in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J]. Chin J Blood Transfus, 2022, 35(12):1239-1243. doi:10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2022.12.012. |
| [1] | 苏雅, 张东伟, 宇明慧, 王春花, 吴月月. 复方苦参注射液联合靶向和免疫治疗对晚期肝癌的疗效观察[J]. 天津医药, 2026, 54(3): 324-328. |
| [2] | 高峰, 陈达, 惠文文. 钩吻素子调节AMPK/NLRP3信号通路对膝骨关节炎大鼠软骨损伤的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2026, 54(2): 158-163. |
| [3] | 黄伟, 王健键, 黄英, 杨俊. 复方苦参注射液联合化疗及贝伐珠单抗对卵巢癌患者近期疗效的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2026, 54(1): 88-92. |
| [4] | 万艳波, 刘明, 王勇. 秦皮甲素调节HMGB1/RAGE信号通路对缺氧/复氧诱导的心肌细胞损伤的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(8): 796-801. |
| [5] | 于晓猛, 索睿, 杜昕桃, 索莹, 阿亚拉·阿斯哈尔, 郝天旭, 赵晓赟. 人脐带来源的间充质干细胞对慢性间歇低氧小鼠的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(8): 814-819. |
| [6] | 李诚诚, 李龙骧, 于立恒. 灯盏细辛注射液联合阿托伐他汀钙治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效观察[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(8): 865-869. |
| [7] | 杜昕桃, 索莹, 赵晓赟. 睡眠呼吸障碍与肺动脉高压双向关系的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(8): 889-896. |
| [8] | 何仁豪, 张聘, 尹识渊, 张杰. 关节镜探查联合单髁置换术对膝关节骨性关节炎患者膝关节功能的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(7): 725-729. |
| [9] | 吴宾, 杨自更, 金玲, 张婧, 韦红梅, 蔡冰冰, 魏玉英. miRNA-381-3p/MuRF1轴对低氧性肺动脉高压小鼠心肺损伤的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(6): 571-577. |
| [10] | 冯华, 王魁, 徐文俊, 李能, 张恒喜. 床旁超声造影联合气水交替注射法在重症鼻肠管留置患者中的应用效果[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(5): 542-546. |
| [11] | 于光华, 宋春燕, 宋雪. 苦参黄芪汤联合艾迪注射液治疗原发性肝癌的效果评价[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(4): 429-433. |
| [12] | 贾方, 李平, 李静, 尹路. 全膝关节置换术后神经认知功能障碍的影响因素及列线图模型的构建[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(3): 287-292. |
| [13] | 张晶晶, 肖丽丽, 张鑫杰. 复方苦参注射液联合芬太尼透皮贴治疗癌性疼痛的疗效观察[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(3): 317-320. |
| [14] | 吴宾, 杨自更, 张婧, 李书红, 余凤, 王嘉玮, 李彩玲. 柚皮素对低氧性肺动脉高压大鼠右心室重塑的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(2): 129-134. |
| [15] | 张亚伟, 齐赛卿, 申志国, 李君朝. 注射用丹参多酚酸盐联合替罗非班治疗急性脑梗死的疗效观察[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(2): 203-207. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||