Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (7): 771-775.doi: 10.11958/20221006
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Chunye(), XING Jun, GONG Baoqi(
)
Received:
2022-06-29
Revised:
2023-02-09
Published:
2023-07-15
Online:
2023-07-18
Contact:
△GONG Baoqi
E-mail:gbq_556@163.com
WU Chunye, XING Jun, GONG Baoqi. Short-term clinical efficacy observation of belizumab in the treatment of primary systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(7): 771-775.
CLC Number:
组别 | 男性 | 病程/月 | 年龄/岁 | SLEDAI-2000评分/分 | 浆膜腔 积液 | 皮肤黏膜 受累 | 肌肉骨骼 受损 | 肾脏受损 | 血液系统 受损 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
标准治疗组 | 2(6.7) | 5.50(4.00,7.00) | 30.00(26.00,39.25) | 13.00(12.75,14.00) | 5(16.7) | 14(46.7) | 12(40.0) | 12(40.0) | 18(60.0) |
贝利尤单抗组 | 2(6.7) | 5.00(3.00,8.00) | 31.50(26.00,39.25) | 13.00(13.00,14.00) | 4(13.3) | 16(53.3) | 11(36.7) | 12(40.0) | 18(60.0) |
χ2或Z | 0.000 | 0.551 | 0.163 | 0.831 | 0.577 | 0.267 | 0.071 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Tab.1 Comparison of general data between the two groups
组别 | 男性 | 病程/月 | 年龄/岁 | SLEDAI-2000评分/分 | 浆膜腔 积液 | 皮肤黏膜 受累 | 肌肉骨骼 受损 | 肾脏受损 | 血液系统 受损 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
标准治疗组 | 2(6.7) | 5.50(4.00,7.00) | 30.00(26.00,39.25) | 13.00(12.75,14.00) | 5(16.7) | 14(46.7) | 12(40.0) | 12(40.0) | 18(60.0) |
贝利尤单抗组 | 2(6.7) | 5.00(3.00,8.00) | 31.50(26.00,39.25) | 13.00(13.00,14.00) | 4(13.3) | 16(53.3) | 11(36.7) | 12(40.0) | 18(60.0) |
χ2或Z | 0.000 | 0.551 | 0.163 | 0.831 | 0.577 | 0.267 | 0.071 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
组别 | WBC/(×109/L) | Hb/(g/L) | PLT/(×109/L) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
标准治疗组 | 5.61±2.65 | 6.48±1.81 | 2.066* | 110.43±17.41 | 124.57±15.05 | 5.292** | 143.63±47.19 | 232.67±70.33 | 6.212* |
贝利尤单抗组 | 5.76±2.70 | 8.75±3.54 | 5.763** | 112.40±16.30 | 129.23±16.53 | 6.160** | 162.20±52.67 | 233.93±60.99 | 5.358* |
t | 0.215 | 3.127* | 0.452 | 1.143 | 1.441 | 0.075 | |||
组别 | 补体C3/(mg/L) | 补体C4/(mg/L) | |||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | ||||
标准治疗组 | 465.50(384.25,560.25) | 607.50(469.50,690.75) | 4.546** | 128.00(87.03,172.50) | 171.00(138.50,193.50) | 3.466** | |||
贝利尤单抗组 | 529.00(424.00,696.00) | 913.00(846.50,995.75) | 4.782** | 149.50(79.95,182.00) | 182.00(156.25,223.50) | 3.875** | |||
Z | 1.841 | 6.535** | 0.629 | 1.361 | |||||
组别 | IgG/(mg/L) | AGR | ds-DNA/(IU/mL) | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | |
标准治疗组 | 14 504±6 877 | 10 455±2 762 | 3.542* | 1.56±0.62 | 1.85±0.37 | 2.862* | 223(143,285) | 37(22,57) | 4.330** |
贝利尤单抗组 | 14 669±7 027 | 8 615±2 206 | 4.912** | 1.58±0.69 | 2.21±0.51 | 4.322** | 223(148,285) | 14(10,30) | 4.700** |
t或Z | 0.092 | 2.851* | 0.108 | 3.152* | 0.067 | 2.994* | |||
组别 | ESR/(mm/1 h) | CRP/(mg/L) | ANA滴度 | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | |
标准治疗组 | 30.87±31.42 | 10.40±8.03 | 4.211** | 10.08±21.30 | 3.03±4.11 | 1.840 | 1︰320(1︰320,1︰490) | 1︰320(1︰320,1︰320) | 1.000 |
贝利尤单抗组 | 30.87±31.70 | 6.87±3.37 | 4.371** | 10.14±21.96 | 3.00±3.86 | 1.814 | 1︰320(1︰320,1︰320) | 1︰320(1︰320,1︰320) | 1.857 |
t或Z | 0.000 | 2.223* | 0.012 | 0.032 | 0.311 | 1.148 |
Tab.2 Comparison of blood laboratory indexes before and after treatment between the two groups
组别 | WBC/(×109/L) | Hb/(g/L) | PLT/(×109/L) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |
标准治疗组 | 5.61±2.65 | 6.48±1.81 | 2.066* | 110.43±17.41 | 124.57±15.05 | 5.292** | 143.63±47.19 | 232.67±70.33 | 6.212* |
贝利尤单抗组 | 5.76±2.70 | 8.75±3.54 | 5.763** | 112.40±16.30 | 129.23±16.53 | 6.160** | 162.20±52.67 | 233.93±60.99 | 5.358* |
t | 0.215 | 3.127* | 0.452 | 1.143 | 1.441 | 0.075 | |||
组别 | 补体C3/(mg/L) | 补体C4/(mg/L) | |||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | ||||
标准治疗组 | 465.50(384.25,560.25) | 607.50(469.50,690.75) | 4.546** | 128.00(87.03,172.50) | 171.00(138.50,193.50) | 3.466** | |||
贝利尤单抗组 | 529.00(424.00,696.00) | 913.00(846.50,995.75) | 4.782** | 149.50(79.95,182.00) | 182.00(156.25,223.50) | 3.875** | |||
Z | 1.841 | 6.535** | 0.629 | 1.361 | |||||
组别 | IgG/(mg/L) | AGR | ds-DNA/(IU/mL) | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | |
标准治疗组 | 14 504±6 877 | 10 455±2 762 | 3.542* | 1.56±0.62 | 1.85±0.37 | 2.862* | 223(143,285) | 37(22,57) | 4.330** |
贝利尤单抗组 | 14 669±7 027 | 8 615±2 206 | 4.912** | 1.58±0.69 | 2.21±0.51 | 4.322** | 223(148,285) | 14(10,30) | 4.700** |
t或Z | 0.092 | 2.851* | 0.108 | 3.152* | 0.067 | 2.994* | |||
组别 | ESR/(mm/1 h) | CRP/(mg/L) | ANA滴度 | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | |
标准治疗组 | 30.87±31.42 | 10.40±8.03 | 4.211** | 10.08±21.30 | 3.03±4.11 | 1.840 | 1︰320(1︰320,1︰490) | 1︰320(1︰320,1︰320) | 1.000 |
贝利尤单抗组 | 30.87±31.70 | 6.87±3.37 | 4.371** | 10.14±21.96 | 3.00±3.86 | 1.814 | 1︰320(1︰320,1︰320) | 1︰320(1︰320,1︰320) | 1.857 |
t或Z | 0.000 | 2.223* | 0.012 | 0.032 | 0.311 | 1.148 |
组别 | SLEDAI-2000评分/分 | 泼尼松剂量/(mg/d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | |
标准治疗组 | 13.00(12.75,14.00) | 6.00(5.00,8.00) | 4.795** | 40.00(40.00,45.00) | 15.00(14.38,20.00) | 4.792** |
贝利尤单抗组 | 13.00(13.00,14.00) | 3.00(2.00,6.25) | 4.807** | 41.25(40.00,50.00) | 10.00(7.38,15.00) | 4.795** |
Z | 0.831 | 3.055* | 0.789 | 4.579** |
Tab.3 Comparison of SLEDAI score and prednisone dose levels before and after treatment between the two groups
组别 | SLEDAI-2000评分/分 | 泼尼松剂量/(mg/d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | |
标准治疗组 | 13.00(12.75,14.00) | 6.00(5.00,8.00) | 4.795** | 40.00(40.00,45.00) | 15.00(14.38,20.00) | 4.792** |
贝利尤单抗组 | 13.00(13.00,14.00) | 3.00(2.00,6.25) | 4.807** | 41.25(40.00,50.00) | 10.00(7.38,15.00) | 4.795** |
Z | 0.831 | 3.055* | 0.789 | 4.579** |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z |
---|---|---|---|---|
标准治疗组 | 12 | 1.41(1.13,1.80) | 0.47(0.31,0.56) | 3.061* |
贝利尤单抗组 | 12 | 1.22(1.03,1.56) | 0.29(0.19,0.40) | 3.059* |
Z | 1.213 | 1.968* |
Tab.4 Comparison of 24 hour urinary protein before and after treatment between the two groups
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z |
---|---|---|---|---|
标准治疗组 | 12 | 1.41(1.13,1.80) | 0.47(0.31,0.56) | 3.061* |
贝利尤单抗组 | 12 | 1.22(1.03,1.56) | 0.29(0.19,0.40) | 3.059* |
Z | 1.213 | 1.968* |
组别 | 显效 | 有效 | 无效 | 总有效 |
---|---|---|---|---|
标准治疗组 | 1(3.3) | 22(73.3) | 7(23.3) | 23(76.7) |
贝利尤单抗组 | 5(16.7) | 24(80.0) | 1(3.3) | 29(96.7) |
χ2 | 5.192* |
Tab.5 Comparison of overall curative effect between the two groups
组别 | 显效 | 有效 | 无效 | 总有效 |
---|---|---|---|---|
标准治疗组 | 1(3.3) | 22(73.3) | 7(23.3) | 23(76.7) |
贝利尤单抗组 | 5(16.7) | 24(80.0) | 1(3.3) | 29(96.7) |
χ2 | 5.192* |
[1] | 中华医学会风湿病学分会, 国家皮肤与免疫疾病临床医学研究中心, 中国系统性红斑狼疮研究协作组. 2020中国系统性红斑狼疮诊疗指南[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2020, 59(3):172-185. |
Chinese Rheumatology Association, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Chinese Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment and Research Group. 2020 Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Chin J Intern Med,2020, 59(3):172-185. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2020.03.002. | |
[2] | 贺成美, 张奉春. 贝利木单克隆抗体:治疗系统性红斑狼疮的新型靶向药物[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2020, 11(2):130-134. |
HE C M, ZHANG F C. Belimumab:A new targeted drug for systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2020, 11(2):130-134. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081. 20190114. | |
[3] | REÁTEGUI-SOKOLOVA C, RODRÍGUEZ-BELLIDO Z, GAMBOA CÁRDENAS R V, et al. Remission and low disease activity state prevent hospitalizations in systemic lupus erythematosus patients[J]. Lupus, 2019, 28(11):1344-1349. doi:10.1177/0961203319876998. |
[4] | COLLINS C E, CORTES-HERNÁNDEZ J, GARCIA M A, et al. Real-world effectiveness of belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: pooled analysis of multi-country data from the observe studies[J]. Rheumatol Ther, 2020, 7:949-965. doi:10.1007/s40744-020-00243-2. |
[5] | GATTO M, SACCON F, ZEN M, et al. Early disease and low baseline damage as predictors of response to belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a real-life Setting[J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2020, 72(8):1314-1324. doi:10.1002/art.41253. |
[6] | ARINGER M, COSTENBADER K, DAIKH D, et al. 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Ann Rheum Dis,2019, 78(9):1151-1159. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214819. |
[7] | ANJO C, MASCARÓ J M J R, ESPINOSA G, et al. Effectiveness and safety of belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a real-world setting[J]. Scand J Rheumatol, 2019, 48(6):469-473. doi:10.1080/03009742.2019.1603324. |
[8] | WALLCE D J, GINZLER E M, MERRILL J T, et al. Safety and efficacy of belimumab plus standard therapy for up to thirteen years in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2019, 71(7):1125-1134. doi:10.1002/art.40861. |
[9] | 杨华夏, 张奉春. 系统性红斑狼疮新型生物治疗靶点:希望与挑战[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2020, 11(3):241-246. |
YANG H X, ZHANG F C. New biologic targets for systemic lupus erythematosus:Hope and challenge[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2020, 11(3):241-246. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.20200091. | |
[10] | FURIE R A, WALLACE D J, ARANOW C, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus:A continuation of a seventy-six-week phase III parent study in the United States[J]. Arthritis Rheumatology, 2018, 70(6):868-877. doi:10.1002/art.40439. |
[11] | ZHANG F C, BAE S C, BASS D, et al. A pivotal phase III,randomized,placebo-controlled study of belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus located in China,Japan and South Korea[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2018, 77(3):355-363. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211631. |
[12] | SHAMRIZ O, YAHIA S H, RAMOT Y, et al. Alopecia areata in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with belimumab:A plausible association[J]. Lupus, 2020, 29:426-430. doi:10.1177/0961203319899985. |
[13] | KWON O C, KIM Y G, PARK J H, et al. Seroconversion to antinuclear antibody negativity and its association with disease flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Lupus, 2020, 29(7):697-704. doi:10.1177/0961203320917748. |
[14] | LIU X R, QI Y Y, ZHAO Y F, et al. Albumin-to-globulin ratio(AGR) as a potential marker of predicting lupus nephritis in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Lupus, 2021, 30(3):412-420. doi:10.1177/0961203320981139. |
[15] | FURIE R, ROVIN B H, HOUSSIAU F, et al. Twoyear, randomized,controlled trial of belimumab in lupus nephritis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 383(12):1117-1128. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2001180. |
[1] | HUANG Pengfei, LU Chengzhi. Efficacy and safety of low-dose sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and stage 1-3 chronic kidney disease [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2022, 50(9): 993-997. |
[2] | WEN Zhu, ZHANG Xiansheng. Efficacy and experience of five-step low power direct- release green laser prostatic enucleation in the treatment of large prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2022, 50(7): 743-747. |
[3] | WANG Fang, XUE Juanjuan, XIA Xiaoshuang, SHANG Shuling, ZHANG Fuqing, LI Xin. Correlation between meteorological parameters and outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke in Tangshan area [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2022, 50(3): 305-309. |
[4] | LIU Yin#, LU Peng-ju#, GAO Ming-dong, XIAO Jian-yong, LI Chun-jie, LI Chang-ping, WANG Hui, WANG Ji-xiang, ZHANG Nan, LI Xiao-wei, ZHAO Hai-wang, DOU Jing, BAI Miao-na, SHI Yu-tian, ZHAO Jia, ZAN Chun, GAO Jing△, GUO Zhi-gang△. Clinical study on the treatment status of acute myocardial infarction during the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2020, 48(6): 474-478. |
[5] | XUE Juan-juan, LU Wei, XIA Xiao-shuang, LI Xin△. Predictive value of red blood cell distribution width for outcome of intravenous#br# thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke #br# [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2020, 48(4): 284-288. |
[6] | CHEN Xin, SHEN Xiao-bo, PENG Jia-mei, FENG Xing-mei. Effects of modified Twin-Block appliance on profile and PAR index of children with skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2020, 48(3): 199-203. |
[7] | LIU Zhi-jia, , JIA Jin-fu, FENG Wei, WANG Hao-jie, , ZHANG Shu-jian, LIU Zhi-jie, ZHAN Jiang-hua△. Establishment of poor effect model and external validation of oral propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangioma [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2020, 48(10): 992-996. |
[8] | LI Qian-feng, DUAN Fa-liang, WU Jing-lei, CHEN Xiao-bin, HUANG Cong-gang, LUO Ming. Clinical analysis of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of hypertensive lobar cerebral hemorrhage [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2018, 46(6): 644-647. |
[9] | ZHANG Xi-you, LI Dan-dan, CHEN Feng, SONG Qing-kun, ZHONG Xiao-song. The efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy in B-cell lymphoma: Meta-analysis [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2018, 46(12): 1330-1335. |
[10] | TIAN Zhong-lan, XU Ling-ling, ZHANG Yong, YANG Chun, HE Gai-ping△. The clinical efficacy of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for the treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease caused by cerebral thrombosis [J]. Tianjin Med J, 2017, 45(9): 961-941. |
[11] | GUO Yong-sheng, ZOU Ying-xue, SHEN Yang. Clinical observation of the effect of budesonide atomization on tracheal extubation in children [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2017, 45(7): 719-722. |
[12] | ZHU He-tao1,2, ZHU Bo1, GAO Tian-yang1, ZHANG Lin3, DENG Xiao-lei4, ZHANG Xi-feng2△. The middle and long term curative effects of percutaneous minimally invasive surgical treatment on lumbar spinal tuberculosis [J]. Tianjin Med J, 2017, 45(6): 614-619. |
[13] | YANG Guo-yue1, JIANG Han1, LIU Zhi1, CHEN Zhi-qing1, HOU Xiao-bin1, ZHANG Hong2△. Selection of surgical approach for posterior malleolar fracture [J]. Tianjin Med J, 2017, 45(2): 205-209. |
[14] | LIU Xin-yu, YUAN Suo-mao, TIAN Yong-hao, WANG Lian-lei, YAN Jun, ZHENG Yan-ping, GONG Liang-tai, LI Jian-min. Combination of anterior debridement via small incision and posterior mini-invasive internal fixation for the treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis [J]. Tianjin Med J, 2017, 45(2): 116-120. |
[15] | CHENG Feng,CHEN Qingliang, JIANG Nan,et al.. A comparison of Sun’ s operation and ascending aorta replacement combined with open placement of triple-branched stent graft in treatment of type A aortic dissection [J]. Tianjin Med J, 2016, 44(8): 951-954. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||