Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 540-543.doi: 10.11958/20222041

• Applied Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Value of contrasten hanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of renal clear cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma

FENG Lianyun1,2(), TIAN Jing1,(), WANG Guangxia3, LIU Shenjia1, WANG Hong2, PANG Lina2   

  1. 1. The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
    2. Zhongshanmenjie Community Health Service Center, Hedong Districct of Tianjin
    3. Tianjin Nankai Hospital
  • Received:2022-12-08 Revised:2023-01-16 Published:2023-05-15 Online:2023-05-05
  • Contact: △E-mail:13821777622@163.com

Abstract:

Objective To observe blood perfusion characteristics of renal clear cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma by contrasten hanced ultrasound, and to explore their differential diagnostic value. Methods A total of 105 patients with renal malignant tumor confirmed by pathology were collected, including 57 cases of renal clear cell carcinoma and 48 cases of urothelial carcinoma. Conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound were performed to compare the length diameter and echo characteristics of conventional ultrasound between the two groups. Enhancement time difference, enhancement peak time difference, enhancement mode and enhancement intensity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound were also compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the diagnostic value of enhanced time difference and enhanced peak time difference for intrarenal tumors. Results The mean length diameter of the renal clear cell carcinoma group was longer than that of the urothelial carcinoma group (P<0.01). The enhancement time difference was shorter in the renal clear cell carcinoma group than that in the urothelial carcinoma group, and the enhancement peak time difference was shorter than that in the urothelial carcinoma group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the enhancement pattern between the two groups after angiography. The enhancement pattern of the tumor after angiography was mainly rapid advance and rapid retreat in the two groups. There was significant difference in enhancement intensity between the two groups (P<0.01). The ROC curve suggested that enhanced time difference was more effective than enhanced time difference in the differential diagnosis of renal clear cell carcinoma and uroepithelial carcinoma (Z=3.600,P<0.01). Conclusion Contrast enhanced ultrasound can be used as an important supplement to conventional ultrasound in differentiating renal clear cell carcinoma from urothelial carcinoma.

Key words: carcinoma, renal cell, urethral neoplasms, ultrasound contrast, differential diagnosis

CLC Number: