Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (10): 1146-1152.doi: 10.11958/20230652
• Drug Clinical Evaluations • Previous Articles
JI Tianzhen1(), XU Cheng2, LIU Hongxia1, LI Guofang1, LI Rui3, ZHU Haijuan1,△(
)
Received:
2023-05-04
Revised:
2023-05-19
Published:
2023-10-15
Online:
2023-10-18
Contact:
∆E-mail:35880762@qq.com
JI Tianzhen, XU Cheng, LIU Hongxia, LI Guofang, LI Rui, ZHU Haijuan. Effect of epidural injection with different doses of 1.5% chloroprocaine in relieving breakthrough pain during labor analgesia[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(10): 1146-1152.
CLC Number:
组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | 孕龄/周 | 宫颈口直径/cm | ASA分级(Ⅰ/Ⅱ) | 基线FHR/(次/min) | 基础MAP/mmHg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R组 | 29 | 26.5±3.5 | 26.9±3.6 | 39.6(38.4,40.5) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | 25/4 | 133.0±6.2 | 117.8±9.0 |
C1组 | 27 | 25.7±3.3 | 26.5±3.3 | 39.9(38.7,40.6) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | 22/5 | 134.6±5.8 | 118.5±10.0 |
C2组 | 28 | 25.9±3.8 | 26.8±2.8 | 39.6(38.9,40.6) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | 23/5 | 133.8±8.1 | 116.7±10.4 |
C3组 | 27 | 26.6±3.2 | 27.1±2.8 | 39.4(38.3,40.4) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | 23/4 | 131.9±6.0 | 117.4±7.5 |
F或χ2 | 0.443 | 0.152 | 0.571 | 0.155 | 0.957▲ | 0.797 | 0.173 |
Tab.1 Comparison of patient characteristics between the four groups
组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | 孕龄/周 | 宫颈口直径/cm | ASA分级(Ⅰ/Ⅱ) | 基线FHR/(次/min) | 基础MAP/mmHg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R组 | 29 | 26.5±3.5 | 26.9±3.6 | 39.6(38.4,40.5) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | 25/4 | 133.0±6.2 | 117.8±9.0 |
C1组 | 27 | 25.7±3.3 | 26.5±3.3 | 39.9(38.7,40.6) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | 22/5 | 134.6±5.8 | 118.5±10.0 |
C2组 | 28 | 25.9±3.8 | 26.8±2.8 | 39.6(38.9,40.6) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | 23/5 | 133.8±8.1 | 116.7±10.4 |
C3组 | 27 | 26.6±3.2 | 27.1±2.8 | 39.4(38.3,40.4) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | 23/4 | 131.9±6.0 | 117.4±7.5 |
F或χ2 | 0.443 | 0.152 | 0.571 | 0.155 | 0.957▲ | 0.797 | 0.173 |
组别 | n | 爆发痛治疗成功 | 补救 镇痛 | 产妇满意度 | 爆发痛发生次数 (1次/2次) | 首次爆发痛 发生时间/min | 首次爆发痛 宫口直径/cm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
爆发痛给药后5 min | 胎儿娩出后24 h | |||||||
R组 | 29 | 14(48.3) | 10(34.5) | 8.0(7.0,9.0) | 8.0(8.0,9.0) | 26/3 | 130(110,160) | 8.0(7.0,9.0) |
C1组 | 27 | 18(66.7) | 8(29.6) | 9.0(8.0,9.0) | 9.0(8.0,9.0) | 23/4 | 135(112,163) | 8.0(7.0,9.0) |
C2组 | 28 | 23(82.1)a | 3(10.7) | 9.0(9.0,9.0)ab | 9.0(9.0,10.0)ab | 25/3 | 130(100,160) | 8.0(6.5,9.0) |
C3组 | 27 | 26(96.3)ab | 0ab | 9.0(9.0,10.0)ab | 10.0(9.0,10.0)ab | 25/2 | 140(110,168) | 8.0(7.0,9.0) |
F或χ2 | 18.154** | 14.127** | 25.179** | 41.462** | 0.876▲ | 0.534 | 0.118 |
Tab.2 Comparison of the breakthrough pain related indicators between the four groups
组别 | n | 爆发痛治疗成功 | 补救 镇痛 | 产妇满意度 | 爆发痛发生次数 (1次/2次) | 首次爆发痛 发生时间/min | 首次爆发痛 宫口直径/cm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
爆发痛给药后5 min | 胎儿娩出后24 h | |||||||
R组 | 29 | 14(48.3) | 10(34.5) | 8.0(7.0,9.0) | 8.0(8.0,9.0) | 26/3 | 130(110,160) | 8.0(7.0,9.0) |
C1组 | 27 | 18(66.7) | 8(29.6) | 9.0(8.0,9.0) | 9.0(8.0,9.0) | 23/4 | 135(112,163) | 8.0(7.0,9.0) |
C2组 | 28 | 23(82.1)a | 3(10.7) | 9.0(9.0,9.0)ab | 9.0(9.0,10.0)ab | 25/3 | 130(100,160) | 8.0(6.5,9.0) |
C3组 | 27 | 26(96.3)ab | 0ab | 9.0(9.0,10.0)ab | 10.0(9.0,10.0)ab | 25/2 | 140(110,168) | 8.0(7.0,9.0) |
F或χ2 | 18.154** | 14.127** | 25.179** | 41.462** | 0.876▲ | 0.534 | 0.118 |
组别 | n | 疼痛VAS/分 | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | F | ||||||||||||||
R组 | 29 | 8.0±1.3 | 7.8±1.2 | 7.3±0.9A | 6.7±1.0A | 5.9±1.0A | 4.9±0.7A | 4.6±0.7A | 39.539** | ||||||||||||
C1组 | 27 | 7.9±1.5 | 7.1±1.5A | 6.4±1.2Aa | 5.5±1.4Aa | 4.5±1.2Aa | 4.3±1.2Aa | 4.3±1.1A | 39.710** | ||||||||||||
C2组 | 28 | 8.1±1.4 | 6.8±1.4Aa | 5.5±1.4Aab | 4.4±1.1Aab | 3.8±0.8Aab | 3.7±0.5Aab | 3.7±0.5Aab | 62.789** | ||||||||||||
C3组 | 27 | 7.9±1.4 | 6.3±1.5Aab | 4.9±1.3Aab | 3.9±1.0Aab | 3.4±0.6Aab | 3.4±0.6Aab | 3.4±0.6Aab | 67.934** | ||||||||||||
F | 0.145 | 5.836** | 20.008** | 33.875** | 40.715** | 17.768** | 13.098** | ||||||||||||||
组别 | 改良Bromage评分/分 | ||||||||||||||||||||
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | |||||||||||||||
R组 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.03AB | 5.00±0.04AB | 5.00±0.04AB | 4.97±0.04AB | 4.97±0.03AB | ||||||||||||||
C1组 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.04AB | 4.96±0.04AB | 4.96±0.04AB | 5.00±0.04AB | 5.00±0.04AB | ||||||||||||||
C2组 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.96±0.03AB | 4.93±0.04AB | 4.93±0.04AB | 4.93±0.04AB | 4.96±0.04AB | ||||||||||||||
C3组 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.89±0.04AB | 4.89±0.04AB | 4.93±0.04AB | 4.93±0.04AB | 4.93±0.04AB | ||||||||||||||
组别 | FHR/(次/min) | ||||||||||||||||||||
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | |||||||||||||||
R组 | 134.2±6.5 | 132.3±5.9 | 134.9±8.8 | 133.0±9.0 | 132.6±8.4 | 134.3±11.3 | 135.9±10.9 | ||||||||||||||
C1组 | 135.7±5.4 | 134.8±7.0 | 132.8±8.5 | 134.3±10.9 | 130.9±9.6 | 135.9±9.3 | 136.4±11.1 | ||||||||||||||
C2组 | 134.3±8.9 | 132.6±6.8 | 133.7±9.2 | 134.5±7.7 | 133.1±10.5 | 133.5±7.7 | 131.6±7.4 | ||||||||||||||
C3组 | 136.0±5.5 | 132.6±5.8 | 133.8±9.9 | 130.5±7.3 | 135.4±8.2 | 131.8±6.9 | 135.4±8.5 |
Tab.3 Comparison of VAS, modified Bromage score and FHR before and after administration of breakthrough pain between the four groups
组别 | n | 疼痛VAS/分 | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | F | ||||||||||||||
R组 | 29 | 8.0±1.3 | 7.8±1.2 | 7.3±0.9A | 6.7±1.0A | 5.9±1.0A | 4.9±0.7A | 4.6±0.7A | 39.539** | ||||||||||||
C1组 | 27 | 7.9±1.5 | 7.1±1.5A | 6.4±1.2Aa | 5.5±1.4Aa | 4.5±1.2Aa | 4.3±1.2Aa | 4.3±1.1A | 39.710** | ||||||||||||
C2组 | 28 | 8.1±1.4 | 6.8±1.4Aa | 5.5±1.4Aab | 4.4±1.1Aab | 3.8±0.8Aab | 3.7±0.5Aab | 3.7±0.5Aab | 62.789** | ||||||||||||
C3组 | 27 | 7.9±1.4 | 6.3±1.5Aab | 4.9±1.3Aab | 3.9±1.0Aab | 3.4±0.6Aab | 3.4±0.6Aab | 3.4±0.6Aab | 67.934** | ||||||||||||
F | 0.145 | 5.836** | 20.008** | 33.875** | 40.715** | 17.768** | 13.098** | ||||||||||||||
组别 | 改良Bromage评分/分 | ||||||||||||||||||||
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | |||||||||||||||
R组 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.03AB | 5.00±0.04AB | 5.00±0.04AB | 4.97±0.04AB | 4.97±0.03AB | ||||||||||||||
C1组 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.04AB | 4.96±0.04AB | 4.96±0.04AB | 5.00±0.04AB | 5.00±0.04AB | ||||||||||||||
C2组 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.96±0.03AB | 4.93±0.04AB | 4.93±0.04AB | 4.93±0.04AB | 4.96±0.04AB | ||||||||||||||
C3组 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.89±0.04AB | 4.89±0.04AB | 4.93±0.04AB | 4.93±0.04AB | 4.93±0.04AB | ||||||||||||||
组别 | FHR/(次/min) | ||||||||||||||||||||
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | |||||||||||||||
R组 | 134.2±6.5 | 132.3±5.9 | 134.9±8.8 | 133.0±9.0 | 132.6±8.4 | 134.3±11.3 | 135.9±10.9 | ||||||||||||||
C1组 | 135.7±5.4 | 134.8±7.0 | 132.8±8.5 | 134.3±10.9 | 130.9±9.6 | 135.9±9.3 | 136.4±11.1 | ||||||||||||||
C2组 | 134.3±8.9 | 132.6±6.8 | 133.7±9.2 | 134.5±7.7 | 133.1±10.5 | 133.5±7.7 | 131.6±7.4 | ||||||||||||||
C3组 | 136.0±5.5 | 132.6±5.8 | 133.8±9.9 | 130.5±7.3 | 135.4±8.2 | 131.8±6.9 | 135.4±8.5 |
组别 | n | 宫缩间隔时间/min | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
爆发痛时 | 第2次 | 第4次 | 第6次 | 第8次 | 第10次 | 第12次 | |||||||||
R组 | 29 | 2.5±0.5 | 2.8±0.4 | 3.1±0.5 | 3.3±0.5 | 3.4±0.5 | 3.3±0.5 | 3.2±0.4 | |||||||
C1组 | 27 | 2.6±0.5 | 2.8±0.5 | 3.2±0.4 | 3.3±0.4 | 3.2±0.4 | 3.1±0.4 | 3.0±0.3 | |||||||
C2组 | 28 | 2.4±0.5 | 2.9±0.5 | 3.3±0.5 | 3.4±0.5 | 3.4±0.6 | 3.2±0.4 | 3.0±0.5 | |||||||
C3组 | 27 | 2.5±0.5 | 3.0±0.4 | 3.4±0.6 | 3.5±0.6 | 3.4±0.6 | 3.3±0.6 | 3.1±0.4 | |||||||
组别 | 宫缩持续时间/s | ||||||||||||||
爆发痛时 | 第2次 | 第4次 | 第6次 | 第8次 | 第10次 | 第12次 | |||||||||
R组 | 42.0±6.6 | 40.4±6.2 | 38.4±5.6 | 36.4±5.6 | 35.1±5.4 | 35.0±5.1 | 36.0±5.0 | ||||||||
C1组 | 41.2±6.7 | 39.1±6.3 | 37.3±6.2 | 36.1±6.7 | 37.0±6.1 | 37.5±4.5 | 38.5±5.5 | ||||||||
C2组 | 41.9±6.5 | 38.3±6.2 | 36.1±5.9 | 35.1±5.4 | 36.1±5.6 | 37.1±6.0 | 38.2±6.2 | ||||||||
C3组 | 42.9±5.9 | 37.5±5.7 | 35.5±5.5 | 34.1±4.9 | 35.1±5.5 | 36.5±5.6 | 37.4±4.6 |
Tab.4 Comparison of the interval and duration of uterine contraction before and after administration of breakthrough pain between the four groups
组别 | n | 宫缩间隔时间/min | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
爆发痛时 | 第2次 | 第4次 | 第6次 | 第8次 | 第10次 | 第12次 | |||||||||
R组 | 29 | 2.5±0.5 | 2.8±0.4 | 3.1±0.5 | 3.3±0.5 | 3.4±0.5 | 3.3±0.5 | 3.2±0.4 | |||||||
C1组 | 27 | 2.6±0.5 | 2.8±0.5 | 3.2±0.4 | 3.3±0.4 | 3.2±0.4 | 3.1±0.4 | 3.0±0.3 | |||||||
C2组 | 28 | 2.4±0.5 | 2.9±0.5 | 3.3±0.5 | 3.4±0.5 | 3.4±0.6 | 3.2±0.4 | 3.0±0.5 | |||||||
C3组 | 27 | 2.5±0.5 | 3.0±0.4 | 3.4±0.6 | 3.5±0.6 | 3.4±0.6 | 3.3±0.6 | 3.1±0.4 | |||||||
组别 | 宫缩持续时间/s | ||||||||||||||
爆发痛时 | 第2次 | 第4次 | 第6次 | 第8次 | 第10次 | 第12次 | |||||||||
R组 | 42.0±6.6 | 40.4±6.2 | 38.4±5.6 | 36.4±5.6 | 35.1±5.4 | 35.0±5.1 | 36.0±5.0 | ||||||||
C1组 | 41.2±6.7 | 39.1±6.3 | 37.3±6.2 | 36.1±6.7 | 37.0±6.1 | 37.5±4.5 | 38.5±5.5 | ||||||||
C2组 | 41.9±6.5 | 38.3±6.2 | 36.1±5.9 | 35.1±5.4 | 36.1±5.6 | 37.1±6.0 | 38.2±6.2 | ||||||||
C3组 | 42.9±5.9 | 37.5±5.7 | 35.5±5.5 | 34.1±4.9 | 35.1±5.5 | 36.5±5.6 | 37.4±4.6 |
组别 | 第一产程/min | 第二产程/min | 第三产程/min | 镇痛泵罗哌 卡因用量/mg | 镇痛泵舒芬太尼 用量/μg | 脐动脉血 pH | p(CO2)/ mmHg | p(O2)/ mmHg | 1 min时Apgar 评分/分 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R组 | 450.0±131.7 | 61.7±18.6 | 7.0(6.0,9.0) | 60.3±17.8 | 24.1±7.2 | 7.3±0.1 | 49.1±5.5 | 23.0±5.3 | 9.0(9.0,9.3) | ||||||||
C1组 | 445.7±119.6 | 60.2±16.7 | 7.0(6.0,8.0) | 63.0±16.1 | 25.2±6.4 | 7.2±0.1 | 51.0±5.6 | 21.6±5.4 | 9.0(8.9,9.5) | ||||||||
C2组 | 452.4±121.1 | 59.5±20.6 | 7.0(6.0,9.0) | 59.5±19.4 | 23.7±8.2 | 7.2±0.1 | 49.8±7.1 | 21.3±6.0 | 9.0(8.8,9.2) | ||||||||
C3组 | 451.5±122.0 | 62.1±16.4 | 7.0(6.5,8.5) | 61.0±20.1 | 24.5±8.0 | 7.2±0.1 | 49.3±6.4 | 22.6±5.1 | 9.0(8.9,9.3) | ||||||||
F或χ2 | 0.031 | 0.226 | 1.025 | 0.176 | 0.170 | 1.008 | 0.536 | 0.609 | 1.969 | ||||||||
组别 | 5 min时Apgar 评分/分 | 新生儿体质量/g | 分娩方式(自然分娩/产钳助产/剖宫产) | 皮肤 瘙痒 | 恶心 | 寒战 | 爆发痛给药30 min内 出现胎儿心动过缓 | 爆发痛给药30 min内 出现下肢麻木感 | |||||||||
R组 | 10.0(10.0,10.0) | 3 400.0±344.1 | 26/1/2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||||||
C1组 | 10.0(10.0,10.0) | 3 397.4±374.1 | 25/0/2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
C2组 | 10.0(10.0,10.0) | 3 394.6±378.4 | 25/0/3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |||||||||
C3组 | 10.0(10.0,10.0) | 3 390.7±450.7 | 25/1/1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7ab | |||||||||
F或χ2 | 1.570 | 0.003 | 0.971▲ | 0.799▲ | 1.000▲ | 1.000▲ | 0.872▲ | 0.001▲ |
Tab.5 Comparison of the delivery situation, neonatal indicators and incidence of maternal adverse reactions between the four groups
组别 | 第一产程/min | 第二产程/min | 第三产程/min | 镇痛泵罗哌 卡因用量/mg | 镇痛泵舒芬太尼 用量/μg | 脐动脉血 pH | p(CO2)/ mmHg | p(O2)/ mmHg | 1 min时Apgar 评分/分 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R组 | 450.0±131.7 | 61.7±18.6 | 7.0(6.0,9.0) | 60.3±17.8 | 24.1±7.2 | 7.3±0.1 | 49.1±5.5 | 23.0±5.3 | 9.0(9.0,9.3) | ||||||||
C1组 | 445.7±119.6 | 60.2±16.7 | 7.0(6.0,8.0) | 63.0±16.1 | 25.2±6.4 | 7.2±0.1 | 51.0±5.6 | 21.6±5.4 | 9.0(8.9,9.5) | ||||||||
C2组 | 452.4±121.1 | 59.5±20.6 | 7.0(6.0,9.0) | 59.5±19.4 | 23.7±8.2 | 7.2±0.1 | 49.8±7.1 | 21.3±6.0 | 9.0(8.8,9.2) | ||||||||
C3组 | 451.5±122.0 | 62.1±16.4 | 7.0(6.5,8.5) | 61.0±20.1 | 24.5±8.0 | 7.2±0.1 | 49.3±6.4 | 22.6±5.1 | 9.0(8.9,9.3) | ||||||||
F或χ2 | 0.031 | 0.226 | 1.025 | 0.176 | 0.170 | 1.008 | 0.536 | 0.609 | 1.969 | ||||||||
组别 | 5 min时Apgar 评分/分 | 新生儿体质量/g | 分娩方式(自然分娩/产钳助产/剖宫产) | 皮肤 瘙痒 | 恶心 | 寒战 | 爆发痛给药30 min内 出现胎儿心动过缓 | 爆发痛给药30 min内 出现下肢麻木感 | |||||||||
R组 | 10.0(10.0,10.0) | 3 400.0±344.1 | 26/1/2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||||||
C1组 | 10.0(10.0,10.0) | 3 397.4±374.1 | 25/0/2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
C2组 | 10.0(10.0,10.0) | 3 394.6±378.4 | 25/0/3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |||||||||
C3组 | 10.0(10.0,10.0) | 3 390.7±450.7 | 25/1/1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7ab | |||||||||
F或χ2 | 1.570 | 0.003 | 0.971▲ | 0.799▲ | 1.000▲ | 1.000▲ | 0.872▲ | 0.001▲ |
[1] | TAN H S, SNG B L, SIA A. Reducing breakthrough pain during labour epidural analgesia: an update[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2019, 32(3):307-314. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000713. |
[2] | 计天珍, 李锐, 朱海娟, 等. 氯普鲁卡因缓解分娩镇痛中爆发痛的效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2021, 37(7):698-701. |
JI T Z, LI R, ZHU H J, et al. Efficacy of chloroprocaine for relieving breakthrough pain during labor analgesia[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2021, 37(7):698-701. doi:10.12089/jca.2021.07.005. | |
[3] | RESCHKE M M, MONKS D T, VARADAY S S, et al. Choice of local anaesthetic for epidural caesarean section:a Bayesian network meta-analysis[J]. Anaesthesia, 2020, 75(5):674-682. doi:10.1111/anae.14966. |
[4] | 刘泽文, 刘会长. 氯普鲁卡因与布比卡因用于硬膜外自控分娩镇痛的比较[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2009, 25(9):820-821. |
LIU Z W, LIU H C. Comparison of chloroprocaine versus bupivacaine for patient-controlled epidural labor analgesia[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2009, 25(9):820-821. | |
[5] | ZHU H J, HE Y, WANG S Y, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing different concentrations of chloroprocaine with lidocaine for activating epidural analgesia during labor[J]. Int J Gen Med, 2022, 15:1307-1317. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S351030. |
[6] | TAN H S, REED S E, MEHDIRATTA J E, et al. Quality of labor analgesia with dural puncture epidural versus standard epidural technique in obese parturients:a double-blind randomized controlled study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2022, 136(5):678-687. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000004137. |
[7] | LEE A, LANDAU R, LAVIN T, et al. Comparative efficacy of epidural clonidine versus epidural fentanyl for treating breakthrough pain during labor:a randomized double-blind clinical trial[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2020, 42:26-33. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.11.003. |
[8] | LIU L, DRZYMALSKI D, XU W, et al. Dose dependent reduction in median effective concentration(EC50)of ropivacaine with adjuvant dexmedetomidine in labor epidural analgesia:an up-down sequential allocation study[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2021, 68:110115. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110115. |
[9] | XU H, LI H, ZUO Y, et al. A multicenter study of the analgesic effects of epidural chloroprocaine after lower limb orthopedic surgery[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2016, 35:313-320. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.009. |
[10] | YANG Z, LI D, ZHANG K, et al. Comparison of epidural anesthesia with chloroprocaine and lidocaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2019, 27(3):2309499019865534. doi:10.1177/2309499019865534. |
[11] | ITUK U, WONG C A. Anesthetic choices for intrapartum cesarean delivery in patients with epidural labor analgesia[J]. Adv Anesth, 2020, 38:23-40. doi:10.1016/j.aan.2020.07.002. |
[12] | MOORE P A, HERSH E V. Local anesthetics:pharmacology and toxicity[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2010, 54(4):587-599. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.015. |
[13] | RELLAND L M, BELTRAN R, KIM S S, et al. Continuous epidural chloroprocaine after abdominal surgery is associated with lower postoperative opioid exposure in NICU infants[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2022, 57(4):683-689. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.05.015. |
[14] | LIM G, FACCO F L, NATHAN N, et al. A review of the impact of obstetric anesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes[J]. Anesthesiology, 2018, 129(1):192-215. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000002182. |
[15] | 李冰, 陈绪军, 郭艳, 等. 不同浓度罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼在硬膜外阶梯式分娩镇痛中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2016, 32(4):361-365. |
LI B, CHEN X J, GUO Y, et al. Application of different doses of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil in epidural stepwise labor analgesia[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2016, 32(4):361-365. | |
[16] | 马丽, 李彩娟, 冯善武. 0.15%罗哌卡因硬膜外给药用于分娩镇痛中爆发痛的治疗效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2017, 33(2):148-151. |
MA L, Li C J, FENG S W. Analgesic effects of 0.15% ropivacaine for the breakthrough pain during labor after epidural analgesia[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2017, 33(2):148-151. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5805.2017.02.011. | |
[17] | 许兰兰, 唐淑蕙, 张爱莲, 等. 氯普鲁卡因在分娩镇痛中转剖宫产中的临床效果[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版), 2019, 40(5):613-617. |
XU L L, TANG S H, ZHANG A L, et al. Analgesic effect of chloroprocaine in patients with painless labor converted to cesarean section[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Medical Science), 2019, 40(5):613-617. doi:10.16118/j.1008-0392.2019.05.015. | |
[18] | LEE S C, MOLL V. Continuous epidural analgesia using an ester-linked local anesthetic agent,2-chloroprocaine,during labor:a case report[J]. A A Case Rep, 2017, 8(11):297-299. doi:10.1213/XAA.0000000000000494. |
[19] | 傅润乔, 田玉科. 氯普鲁卡因麻醉进展[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2006, 25(12):949-954. |
FU R Q, TIAN Y K. Progress of chloroprocaine in anesthesia[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies, 2006, 25(12):949-954. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7669.2006.12.018. | |
[20] | TOLEDO P, MCCARTHY R J, EBARVIA M J, et al. The interaction between epidural 2-chloroprocaine and morphine:a randomized controlled trial of the effect of drug administration timing on the efficacy of morphine analgesia[J]. Anesth Analg, 2009, 109(1):168-173. doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a40cf6. |
[21] | LEE L O, RAMIREZ-CHAPMAN A L, WHITE D L, et al. Postcesarean analgesia with epidural morphine after epidural 2-chloroprocaine:a randomized noninferiority trial[J]. Anesth Analg, 2023, 136(1):86-93. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000006109. |
[22] | HESS P E, SNOWMAN C E, HAHN C J, et al. Chloroprocaine may not affect epidural morphine for postcesarean delivery analgesia[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2006, 18(1):29-33. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.05.003. |
[23] | SHARAWI N, BANSAL P, WILLIAMS M, et al. Comparison of chloroprocaine versus lidocaine with epinephrine,sodium bicarbonate,and fentanyl for epidural extension anesthesia in elective cesarean delivery:a randomized,triple-blind,noninferiority study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2021, 132(3):666-675. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000005141. |
[24] | HEYDINGER G, TOBIAS J, VENEZIANO G. Fundamentals and innovations in regional anaesthesia for infants and children[J]. Anaesthesia, 2021, 76(Suppl 1):74-88. doi:10.1111/anae.15283. |
[1] | JI Tian-zhen, LI Rui, ZHU Hai-juan, LIU Hong-xia, ZHANG Ye. Effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine on preventing breakthrough pain of epidural labor analgesia [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2021, 49(7): 742-747. |
[2] | . Analysis of 182 cases with labor analgesia [J]. , 2011, 39(1): 67-68 . |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||