Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 541-547.doi: 10.11958/20231338
• Applied Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Jikun1(), XU Rongdi1, XU Jinghan2, WANG Le2, CONG Hongliang2,△(
)
Received:
2023-09-05
Revised:
2023-11-15
Published:
2024-05-15
Online:
2024-05-09
Contact:
△ E-mail:WU Jikun, XU Rongdi, XU Jinghan, WANG Le, CONG Hongliang. Validation and comparison of 6 common model scores in predicting long-term prognosis in patients with NSTEMI[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(5): 541-547.
CLC Number:
评分 | 纳入变量 | 得分/ 分 | 风险分组 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
低危 | 中危 | 高危 | |||
GRACE 评分[ | 年龄、心率、收缩压、血肌酐、充血性心力衰竭病史、住院期间行PCI情况、心肌梗死既往史、ST段压低、心肌损伤标志物升高 | 31~181 | 31~89分,301例 | 90~108分,306例 | 109~181分,302例 |
TIMI评分[ | 年龄≥65岁、≥3项冠心病危险因素(如冠心病家族史、高血压、高胆固醇血症、糖尿病或吸烟等)、冠心病史(冠状动脉狭窄50%以上)、心电图ST段改变>0.05 mV、近24 h内有严重的心绞痛发生(≥2次)、近7 d内有口服阿司匹林史、心肌损伤标志物(肌钙蛋白I或肌钙蛋白T)升高;在计算TIMI评分时用hs-cTnT代替肌钙蛋白T[ | 1~7 | 1~2分, 239例 | 3分, 323例 | 4~7分, 347例 |
ACEF评分[ | ACEF=年龄(岁)/LVEF(%)+1(如果血清肌酐水平>2 mg/dL) | 0.43~4.06 | 0.43~1.03分,300例 | 1.04~1.26分,307例 | 1.26~4.06分,302例 |
mACEF 评分[ | mACEF=年龄(岁)/LVEF(%)+(1~6);GFR根据中国人MDRD公式(c-MDRD)[ | 0.43~5.47 | 0.43~1.03分,302例 | 1.04~1.29分,304例 | 1.30~5.47分,303例 |
CHA2DS2-VASc评分[ | 年龄≥75岁及脑卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作/血栓栓塞病史赋2分;充血性心力衰竭或左心室功能障碍、高血压、糖尿病、血管疾病、年龄65~74岁、女性等变量分别赋1分 | 0~9 | 0~1分, 300例 | 2~3分, 336例 | 4~9分, 273例 |
CAMI-NSTEMI评分[ | 年龄、BMI、收缩压、Killip分级、白细胞、血肌酐、ST段压低、新发完全左束支传导阻滞、心脏骤停、吸烟状态、心肌梗死、PCI史 | 1~20 | 1~6分, 360例 | 7~9分, 309例 | 10~20分,240例 |
Tab.1 Calculation of scores and risk grouping of different models
评分 | 纳入变量 | 得分/ 分 | 风险分组 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
低危 | 中危 | 高危 | |||
GRACE 评分[ | 年龄、心率、收缩压、血肌酐、充血性心力衰竭病史、住院期间行PCI情况、心肌梗死既往史、ST段压低、心肌损伤标志物升高 | 31~181 | 31~89分,301例 | 90~108分,306例 | 109~181分,302例 |
TIMI评分[ | 年龄≥65岁、≥3项冠心病危险因素(如冠心病家族史、高血压、高胆固醇血症、糖尿病或吸烟等)、冠心病史(冠状动脉狭窄50%以上)、心电图ST段改变>0.05 mV、近24 h内有严重的心绞痛发生(≥2次)、近7 d内有口服阿司匹林史、心肌损伤标志物(肌钙蛋白I或肌钙蛋白T)升高;在计算TIMI评分时用hs-cTnT代替肌钙蛋白T[ | 1~7 | 1~2分, 239例 | 3分, 323例 | 4~7分, 347例 |
ACEF评分[ | ACEF=年龄(岁)/LVEF(%)+1(如果血清肌酐水平>2 mg/dL) | 0.43~4.06 | 0.43~1.03分,300例 | 1.04~1.26分,307例 | 1.26~4.06分,302例 |
mACEF 评分[ | mACEF=年龄(岁)/LVEF(%)+(1~6);GFR根据中国人MDRD公式(c-MDRD)[ | 0.43~5.47 | 0.43~1.03分,302例 | 1.04~1.29分,304例 | 1.30~5.47分,303例 |
CHA2DS2-VASc评分[ | 年龄≥75岁及脑卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作/血栓栓塞病史赋2分;充血性心力衰竭或左心室功能障碍、高血压、糖尿病、血管疾病、年龄65~74岁、女性等变量分别赋1分 | 0~9 | 0~1分, 300例 | 2~3分, 336例 | 4~9分, 273例 |
CAMI-NSTEMI评分[ | 年龄、BMI、收缩压、Killip分级、白细胞、血肌酐、ST段压低、新发完全左束支传导阻滞、心脏骤停、吸烟状态、心肌梗死、PCI史 | 1~20 | 1~6分, 360例 | 7~9分, 309例 | 10~20分,240例 |
组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | 性别 (男/女) | 收缩压/ (mmHg) | 心率/(次/min) | BMI/(kg/m2) | 高血压病 | 糖尿病 | 冠心病 | 心力衰竭 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非MACE组 | 684 | 63(55,69) | 533/151 | 130(117,141) | 69(61,78) | 25.78(23.78,27.78) | 454(66.4) | 196(28.7) | 141(20.6) | 7(1.0) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MACE组 | 225 | 67(60,74) | 167/58 | 130(119,145) | 71(64,80) | 25.65(24.69,27.39) | 162(72.0) | 104(46.2) | 92(40.9) | 9(4.0) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z或χ2 | 5.884** | 1.310 | 0.903 | 2.636* | 0.351 | 2.453 | 23.630** | 36.510** | 8.675* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | 脑卒中 | 陈旧性心肌梗死 | 吸烟史 | 冠心病家族史 | 高胆固醇血症 | Killip≥II级 | LVEF | 7 d内口服阿司匹林 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
非MACE组 | 108(15.8) | 79(11.6) | 429(62.7) | 82(12.0) | 130(19.0) | 88(12.9) | 0.57(0.53,0.60) | 398(58.2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MACE组 | 66(29.3) | 44(19.6) | 131(58.2) | 25(11.1) | 44(19.6) | 44(19.6) | 0.55(0.45,0.58) | 149(66.2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z或χ2 | 20.066** | 9.274* | 1.448 | 0.125 | 0.033 | 6.105* | 5.037** | 4.561* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | 入院前心脏骤停 | ST段压低 | 新发左束支传导阻滞 | 行冠脉血运重建 | 单支病变 | 多支病变 | 左主干+单支病变 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
非MACE组 | 7(1.0) | 214(31.3) | 4(0.6) | 53(7.8) | 118(17.3) | 511(74.7) | 8(1.2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MACE组 | 3(1.3) | 62(27.6) | 4(1.8) | 13(5.8) | 40(17.8) | 168(74.7) | 7(3.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z、χ2或P | 0.715▲ | 1.115 | 0.109▲ | 0.977 | 0.033 | 0.000 | 3.932* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | 左主干病变+ 多支病变 | WBC/ (×109/L) | 肌酐清除率/ (mL·min-1·1.73 m-2) | Cr/ (μmol/L) | hs-cTnT/(μg/L) | GRACE/分 | TIMI/分 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
非MACE组 | 83(12.1) | 8.0(6.5,9.5) | 97.61(80.11,112.86) | 76(66,89) | 0.49(0.21,1.09) | 95(80,111) | 3(2,4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MACE组 | 26(11.6) | 8.0(6.6,9.9) | 90.44(66.13,106.26) | 79(69,104) | 0.52(0.17,1.52) | 106(92,127) | 4(3,4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z或χ2 | 0.054 | 0.605 | 4.671** | 3.582** | 5.432** | 6.323** | 4.480** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | ACEF/分 | mACEF/分 | CHA2DS2- VASc/分 | CAMI- NSTEMI/分 | 规律应用抗血小板聚集和(或)抗凝药物 | 他汀类 降脂药物 | β受体阻滞剂 类药物 | ACEI/ARB 类药物 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
非MACE组 | 1.12(0.95,1.29) | 1.12(0.95,1.33) | 2(1,3) | 7(5,9) | 609(89.04) | 588(85.96) | 473(69.15) | 377(55.12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MACE组 | 1.26(1.08,1.57) | 1.28(1.09,1.95) | 3(2,5) | 8(6,11) | 206(91.56) | 202(89.78) | 153(68.00) | 132(58.67) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z或χ2 | 7.187** | 7.311** | 7.989** | 5.345** | 1.160 | 2.163 | 0.105 | 0.866 |
Tab.2 Comparison of clinical baseline data between the MACE group and the non-MACE group
组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | 性别 (男/女) | 收缩压/ (mmHg) | 心率/(次/min) | BMI/(kg/m2) | 高血压病 | 糖尿病 | 冠心病 | 心力衰竭 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非MACE组 | 684 | 63(55,69) | 533/151 | 130(117,141) | 69(61,78) | 25.78(23.78,27.78) | 454(66.4) | 196(28.7) | 141(20.6) | 7(1.0) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MACE组 | 225 | 67(60,74) | 167/58 | 130(119,145) | 71(64,80) | 25.65(24.69,27.39) | 162(72.0) | 104(46.2) | 92(40.9) | 9(4.0) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z或χ2 | 5.884** | 1.310 | 0.903 | 2.636* | 0.351 | 2.453 | 23.630** | 36.510** | 8.675* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | 脑卒中 | 陈旧性心肌梗死 | 吸烟史 | 冠心病家族史 | 高胆固醇血症 | Killip≥II级 | LVEF | 7 d内口服阿司匹林 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
非MACE组 | 108(15.8) | 79(11.6) | 429(62.7) | 82(12.0) | 130(19.0) | 88(12.9) | 0.57(0.53,0.60) | 398(58.2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MACE组 | 66(29.3) | 44(19.6) | 131(58.2) | 25(11.1) | 44(19.6) | 44(19.6) | 0.55(0.45,0.58) | 149(66.2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z或χ2 | 20.066** | 9.274* | 1.448 | 0.125 | 0.033 | 6.105* | 5.037** | 4.561* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | 入院前心脏骤停 | ST段压低 | 新发左束支传导阻滞 | 行冠脉血运重建 | 单支病变 | 多支病变 | 左主干+单支病变 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
非MACE组 | 7(1.0) | 214(31.3) | 4(0.6) | 53(7.8) | 118(17.3) | 511(74.7) | 8(1.2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MACE组 | 3(1.3) | 62(27.6) | 4(1.8) | 13(5.8) | 40(17.8) | 168(74.7) | 7(3.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z、χ2或P | 0.715▲ | 1.115 | 0.109▲ | 0.977 | 0.033 | 0.000 | 3.932* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | 左主干病变+ 多支病变 | WBC/ (×109/L) | 肌酐清除率/ (mL·min-1·1.73 m-2) | Cr/ (μmol/L) | hs-cTnT/(μg/L) | GRACE/分 | TIMI/分 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
非MACE组 | 83(12.1) | 8.0(6.5,9.5) | 97.61(80.11,112.86) | 76(66,89) | 0.49(0.21,1.09) | 95(80,111) | 3(2,4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MACE组 | 26(11.6) | 8.0(6.6,9.9) | 90.44(66.13,106.26) | 79(69,104) | 0.52(0.17,1.52) | 106(92,127) | 4(3,4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z或χ2 | 0.054 | 0.605 | 4.671** | 3.582** | 5.432** | 6.323** | 4.480** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
组别 | ACEF/分 | mACEF/分 | CHA2DS2- VASc/分 | CAMI- NSTEMI/分 | 规律应用抗血小板聚集和(或)抗凝药物 | 他汀类 降脂药物 | β受体阻滞剂 类药物 | ACEI/ARB 类药物 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
非MACE组 | 1.12(0.95,1.29) | 1.12(0.95,1.33) | 2(1,3) | 7(5,9) | 609(89.04) | 588(85.96) | 473(69.15) | 377(55.12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MACE组 | 1.26(1.08,1.57) | 1.28(1.09,1.95) | 3(2,5) | 8(6,11) | 206(91.56) | 202(89.78) | 153(68.00) | 132(58.67) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z或χ2 | 7.187** | 7.311** | 7.989** | 5.345** | 1.160 | 2.163 | 0.105 | 0.866 |
组别 | GRACE | TIMI | ACEF | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | |
中危组vs.低危组 | 27.868** | 1.342(0.980~1.839) | 22.877** | 1.008(0.725~1.402) | 42.25** | 1.356(0.991~1.854) |
高危组vs.中危组 | 1.631(1.178~2.257) | 1.863(1.371~2.533) | 1.876(1.356~2.597) | |||
高危组vs.低危组 | 2.385(1.729~3.290) | 1.879(1.349~2.616) | 2.874(2.079~2.095) | |||
组别 | mACEF | CHA2DS2-VASc | CAMI-NSTEMI | |||
Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | |
中危组vs.低危组 | 37.859** | 1.647(1.202~2.255) | 57.596** | 2.110(1.553~2.868) | 29.066** | 1.162(0.860~1.569) |
高危组vs.中危组 | 1.680(1.213~2.325) | 1.791(1.288~2.491) | 1.884(1.332~2.664) | |||
高危组vs.低危组 | 2.766(2.005~3.816) | 3.780(2.712~5.270) | 2.188(1.564~3.062) |
Tab.3 Kaplan-Meier curve survival analysis of the cumulative MACE-free rate in patients with low, intermediate and high-risk groups with different model scores
组别 | GRACE | TIMI | ACEF | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | |
中危组vs.低危组 | 27.868** | 1.342(0.980~1.839) | 22.877** | 1.008(0.725~1.402) | 42.25** | 1.356(0.991~1.854) |
高危组vs.中危组 | 1.631(1.178~2.257) | 1.863(1.371~2.533) | 1.876(1.356~2.597) | |||
高危组vs.低危组 | 2.385(1.729~3.290) | 1.879(1.349~2.616) | 2.874(2.079~2.095) | |||
组别 | mACEF | CHA2DS2-VASc | CAMI-NSTEMI | |||
Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | Log-rank χ2 | HR(95%CI) | |
中危组vs.低危组 | 37.859** | 1.647(1.202~2.255) | 57.596** | 2.110(1.553~2.868) | 29.066** | 1.162(0.860~1.569) |
高危组vs.中危组 | 1.680(1.213~2.325) | 1.791(1.288~2.491) | 1.884(1.332~2.664) | |||
高危组vs.低危组 | 2.766(2.005~3.816) | 3.780(2.712~5.270) | 2.188(1.564~3.062) |
项目 | CHA2DS2-VASc | ACEF | mACEF | TIMI | CAMI-NSTEMI | GRACE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUC(95%CI) | 0.675 (0.635~0.714) | 0.660 (0.619~0.700) | 0.662 (0.621~0.703) | 0.596 (0.554~0.638) | 0.618 (0.574~0.662) | 0.640 (0.598-0.683) |
Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 | 4.944 | 6.613 | 12.871 | 4.774 | 6.144 | 10.212 |
P1/P2 | <0.001/0.012 | 0.008/0.043 | 0.007/0.037 | - | 0.378/ | 0.049/0.192 |
Tab.4 The discrimination and calibration of different model scores in predicting MACE
项目 | CHA2DS2-VASc | ACEF | mACEF | TIMI | CAMI-NSTEMI | GRACE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUC(95%CI) | 0.675 (0.635~0.714) | 0.660 (0.619~0.700) | 0.662 (0.621~0.703) | 0.596 (0.554~0.638) | 0.618 (0.574~0.662) | 0.640 (0.598-0.683) |
Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 | 4.944 | 6.613 | 12.871 | 4.774 | 6.144 | 10.212 |
P1/P2 | <0.001/0.012 | 0.008/0.043 | 0.007/0.037 | - | 0.378/ | 0.049/0.192 |
[1] | 胡盛寿, 王增武. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2022》概述[J]. 中国心血管病研究, 2023, 21(7):577-600. |
HU S S, WANG Z W. Overview of China cardiovascular health and disease report 2022[J]. Chin J Cardiovasc Res, 2023, 21(7):577-600. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5301.2023.07.001. | |
[2] | MITSIS A, GRAGNANO F. Myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation:a contemporary reappraisal of similarities and differences[J]. Curr Cardiol Rev, 2021, 17(4):e230421189013. doi:ARTNe23042118901310.2174/1573403X16999201210195702. |
[3] | 吕晓, 黄继良, 晋芹, 等. 急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者预后危险因素的分析及预测列线图的建立与验证[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2022, 38(12):967-974. |
LYU X, HUANG J L, JIN Q, et al. Analysis of risk factors for the prognosis of patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and construction and validation of a nomogram[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2022, 38(12):967-974. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.12.008. | |
[4] | YAO Y, SHAO C, LI X, et al. A novel biomarker scoring system alone or in combination with the grace score for the prognostic assessment in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Clin Epidemiol, 2022, 14:911-923. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S370004. |
[5] | KUMAR D, SAGHIR T, ZAHID M, et al. Validity of TIMI score for predicting 14-day mortality of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients[J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(1):e12518. doi:10.7759/cureus.12518. |
[6] | KRISTIC I, CRNCEVIC N, RUNJIC F, et al. ACEF performed better than other risk scores in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome during long term follow-up[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2021, 21(1):70. doi:10.1186/s12872-020-01841-2. |
[7] | HUANG J, WEI X, WANG Y, et al. Comparison of prognostic value among 4 risk scores in patients with acute coronary syndrome:findings from the improving care for cardiovascular disease in China-ACS(CCC-ACS) project[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2021, 27:e928863. doi:10.12659/MSM.928863. |
[8] | FANG C, CHEN Z, ZHANG J, et al. Association of CHA2DS2-VASC score with in-hospital cardiovascular adverse events in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2022, 2022:3659381. doi:10.1155/2022/3659381. |
[9] | 何萍, 李曦铭, 周伽, 等. CAMI-NSTEMI评分优化NSTEMI患者院内死亡风险预测的临床研究[J]. 心血管病防治知识, 2022, 12(20):19-22. |
HE P, LI X M, ZHOU J, et al. A clinical study of the CAMI-NSTEMI score to optimize the prediction of in-hospital mortality risk in patients with NSTEMI[J]. Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease, 2022, 12(20):19-22. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3015(x).2022.20.005. | |
[10] | 非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征诊断和治疗指南中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征诊断和治疗指南(2016)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2017, 45(5):359-376. |
Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association,Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. Guideline and consensus for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome(2016)[J]. Chin J Cardiol, 2017, 45(5):359-376. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.05.003. | |
[11] | EAGLE K A, LIM M J, DABBOUS O H, et al. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome - Estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry[J]. JAMA, 2004, 291(22):2727-2733. doi:10.1001/jama.291.22.2727. |
[12] | ANTMAN E M, COHEN M, BERNINK P, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI - a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making[J]. JAMA, 2000, 284(7):835-842. doi:10.1001/jama.284.7.835. |
[13] | 中国医师协会检验医师分会心血管专家委员会. 心肌肌钙蛋白实验室检测与临床应用中国专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(37):2947-2961. |
Cardiovascular Expert Committee of Laboratory Physician Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Chinese expert consensus on cardiac troponin laboratory detection and clinical application[J]. Natl Med J China, 2021, 101(37):2947-2961. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210519-01166. | |
[14] | 急诊胸痛心血管标志物联合检测共识专家组和中国医疗保健国际交流促进会急诊医学分会. 急诊胸痛心血管标志物检测专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2022, 31(4):448-458. |
Expert Group on Joint Detection of Cardiovascular Markers for Emergency Chest Pain and Emergency Medicine Branch of China Association for the Promotion of International Exchanges in Healthcare Care. Expert consensus on cardiovascular marker testing for emergency chest pain[J]. Chin J Emerg Med, 2022, 31(4):448-458. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2022.04.005. | |
[15] | RANUCCI M, CASTELVECCHIO S, MENICANTI L, et al. Risk of assessing mortality risk in elective cardiac operations:age,creatinine,ejection fraction,and the law of parsimony[J]. Circulation, 2009, 119(24):3053-3061. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.842393. |
[16] | ANDO G, MORABITO G, DE GREGORIO C, et al. Age,glomerular filtration rate,ejection fraction,and the AGEF score predict contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 82(6):878-885. doi:10.1002/ccd.25023. |
[17] | MA Y C, ZUO L, CHEN J H, et al. Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006, 17(10):2937-2944. doi:10.1681/Asn.2006040368. |
[18] | POCI D, HARTFORD M, KARLSSON T, et al. Role of the CHADS2 score in acute coronary syndromes:risk of subsequent death or stroke in patients with and without atrial fibrillation[J]. Chest, 2012, 141(6):1431-1440. doi:10.1378/chest.11-0435. |
[19] | FU R, SONG C, YANG J, et al. CAMI-NSTEMI Score-China acute myocardial infarction registry-derived novel tool to predict in-hospital death in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients[J]. Circ J, 2018, 82(7):1884-1891. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1078. |
[20] | HUANG J, WEI X, WANG Y, et al. Comparison of prognostic value among 4 risk scores in patients with acute coronary syndrome:findings from the improving care for cardiovascular disease in China-ACS(CCC-ACS)project[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2021, 27:e928863. doi:10.12659/MSM.928863. |
[21] | AKBOGA M K, YILMAZ S, YALCIN R. Prognostic value of CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting high SYNTAX score and in-hospital mortality for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in patients without atrial fibrillation[J]. Anatol J Cardiol, 2021, 25(11):789-795. doi:10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.03982. |
[22] | BYRNE R A, ROSSELLO X, COUGHLAN J J, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes[J]. Eur Heart J, 2023, 44(38):3720-3826. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191. |
[23] | 祖丽护玛·色依提, 努尔艾合麦提·加马力, 高晓明, 等. GRACE评分及PARIS评分对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者远期主要心血管不良事件的预测价值[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2022, 36(10):989-992. |
SEYITI Z L H M, JIAMALI N E A H M T, GAO X M, et al. Predictive value of GRACE score and PARIS score for long-term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy, 2022, 36(10):989-992. doi:10.13507/j.issn.1674-3474.2022.10.005. | |
[24] | 卿平, 胡爽, 于丽天, 等. CHA_2DS_2-VASc评分对急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院后1年结局事件的预测价值[J]. 中国分子心脏病学杂志, 2022, 22(2):4525-4533. |
QING P, HU S, YU L T, et al. The predictive value of CHA_2DS_2-VASc scores for outcomes 1 year after hospitalization in patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Mol Cardiol China, 2022, 22(2):4525-4533. doi:10.16563/j.cnki.1671-6272.2022.04.003. | |
[25] | 伏蕊, 窦克非, 许海燕, 等. 中国非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者随访24个月期间死亡的独立危险因素分析[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2020, 35(10):985-989. |
FU R, DOU K F, XU H Y, et al. An independent risk factor analysis of death during 24 months follow-up in Chinese patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2020, 35(10):985-989. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2020.10.008. | |
[26] | LIU Y, WANG L, CHEN W, et al. Validation and comparison of six risk scores for infection in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2021, 7:621002. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2020.621002. |
[27] | BARDOOLI F, KUMAR D, HASAN J, et al. Prognostic significance of electrocardiography,echocardiography,and troponin in patients admitted with non-st elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(4):e37629. doi:10.7759/cureus.37629. |
[28] | 张金莲, 张颖, 刘玉洁, 等. 3D-STI评价老年急性NSTEMI合并慢性肾功能不全的临床研究[J]. 天津医药, 2020, 48(8):769-772. |
ZHANG J L, ZHANG Y, LIU Y J, et al. A 3D-STI clinical study to evaluate the elderly with acute NSTEMI complicated with chronic renal insufficiency[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2020, 48(8):769-772. doi:10.11958/20200370. |
[1] | FAN Wenjun, LIU Yixiang, LIU Jingyi, ZHANG Ying, SI Yueqiao, SHI Fei, SUN Lixian. Effect of ALB-dNLR score on the prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2022, 50(11): 1186-1191. |
[2] | MA Ke-jing, LIU Yu-jie, ZHANG Ying. Study on the treatment strategy of NSTE-ACS non-culprit lesions guided by intravascular ultrasound [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2019, 47(2): 150-154. |
[3] | WANG Dan-dan, LI Xiu, WANG Man-man, LIU Xiang-li△. Effects of rosuvastatin therapy on short-term prognosis of myocardial infarction in patients with acute ST segment elevation [J]. Tianjin Med J, 2017, 45(3): 314-317. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||