天津医药 ›› 2021, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (12): 1297-1302.doi: 10.11958/20211069

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

同步整合加量调强联合选择性淋巴结照射根治性治疗食管鳞癌的长期预后分析

李运华,颜学军,谭亚丽,胡亚,肖茂良   

  1. 湖南中医药高等专科学校附属第一医院(湖南省直中医医院)肿瘤一科(邮编412000
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-06 修回日期:2021-07-25 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2021-12-27
  • 作者简介:李运华(1979),男,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事恶性肿瘤放化疗方面研究。E-mail:yunhuali1979@sohu.com
  • 基金资助:
    2020年湖南省自然科学基金科卫联合项目(S2020JJKWLH0228

Long-term prognostic analysis of simultaneous integration and intensity modulation combined with selective lymph node radiation radical therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

LI Yun-hua, YAN Xue-jun, TAN Ya-li, HU Ya, XIAO Mao-liang #br#   

  1. Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine,
    Zhuzhou 412000, China

  • Received:2021-05-06 Revised:2021-07-25 Published:2021-12-15 Online:2021-12-27

摘要: 目的 探讨同步整合加量调强(SIB-IMRT)联合选择性淋巴结照射(ENI)加或不加化疗根治性治疗食管鳞 癌患者的长期预后。方法 对130例接受根治性放(化)疗的食管鳞癌患者进行回顾性分析,分析患者的长期生存情 况及其预后影响因素、治疗失败模式和不良反应情况。结果 所有患者1、3、5年总生存(OS)率和无进展生存(PFS) 率分别为81.5%、52.7%、39.8%和70.7%、40.6%、35.8%,中位OS期和PFS期分别为36.37个月和23.89个月。多因素 Cox分析显示,cT3期、cN1期、未接受化疗和GTV-V>37.0 cm3为影响患者OS的独立危险因素,cT3期为影响患者PFS 的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。所有患者出现局部区域复发39例(30.0%),远隔部位转移20例(15.4%),其中两者并存 4例;单纯局部区域复发的35例患者中原食管病变局部复发32例,区域淋巴结复发1例,食管局部联合区域淋巴结复 发2例。所有患者治疗期间及治疗后未出现≥4级相关不良反应。化疗组患者的≥2级不良反应发生率与未化疗组患 者差异无统计学意义。结论 SIB-IMRT联合ENI治疗食管鳞癌患者安全有效,对一般情况较好的患者可予以联合 化疗。

关键词: 食管肿瘤, 癌, 鳞状细胞, 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案, 预后, 放射疗法, 调强适形, 同步整合加量

Abstract: Objective To investigate the long-term prognosis of simultaneous integrated intensity modulation (SIBIMRT) combined with selective lymph node irradiation (ENI) with or without chemotherapy for radical treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Data of 130 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received radical radiotherapy were analyzed retrospectively, and the long-term survival, prognostic factors, treatment failure mode and adverse reactions were analyzed. Results The 1- , 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 81.5%, 52.7%, 39.8% and 70.7%, 40.6%, 35.8%, respectively. The median OS stage and PFS stage were 36.37 months and 23.89 months, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that cT3, cN1, no chemotherapy and GTV-V>37.0 cm3 were independent risk factors for OS, and cT3 was independent risk factors for PFS (P<0.05). In all patients, 39 patients (30.0%) had local recurrence, 20 patients (15.4%) had distant metastasis, and 4 patients had both. Among the 35 patients with local regional recurrence, there were 32 cases of local esophageal lesion recurrence, 1 case of regional lymph node recurrence, and 2 cases of local esophageal combined regional lymph node recurrence. All patients had no grade≥4 related adverse reactions during and after treatment. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade≥2 adverse reactions between patients with combined chemotherapy and patients without combined chemotherapy. Conclusion SIB-IMRT combined with ENI is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. It is recommended to combine chemotherapy for patients with better general conditions.

Key words: esophageal neoplasms, carcinoma, squamous cell, antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols, prognosis, radiotherapy, intensity-modulated, simultaneous integrated boost

中图分类号: