
天津医药 ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (10): 1031-1037.doi: 10.11958/20240774
张桂贤1(
), 刘大卫1, 李文畅1, 蔡隽1, 宗文辉1, 刘洪斌2, 赵秀梅1,△(
)
收稿日期:2024-06-14
修回日期:2024-08-27
出版日期:2024-10-15
发布日期:2024-10-14
通讯作者:
△ E-mail:作者简介:张桂贤(1981),女,副研究员,主要从事急、慢性胰腺炎药理学方面研究。E-mail:基金资助:
ZHANG Guixian1(
), LIU Dawei1, LI Wenchang1, CAI Jun1, ZONG Wenhui1, LIU Hongbin2, ZHAO Xiumei1,△(
)
Received:2024-06-14
Revised:2024-08-27
Published:2024-10-15
Online:2024-10-14
Contact:
△ E-mail:张桂贤, 刘大卫, 李文畅, 蔡隽, 宗文辉, 刘洪斌, 赵秀梅. BOC2抑制N-甲酰肽/甲酰肽受体信号通路减轻SAP炎症损伤的机制研究[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(10): 1031-1037.
ZHANG Guixian, LIU Dawei, LI Wenchang, CAI Jun, ZONG Wenhui, LIU Hongbin, ZHAO Xiumei. Mechanism study of BOC2 alleviating SAP inflammatory damage by inhibiting N-formyl peptide/formyl peptide receptor pathway[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(10): 1031-1037.
摘要:
目的 观察BOC-Phe-Leu-Phe-Leu-Phe(BOC2)对重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)大鼠血中6种线粒体N-甲酰肽(NFPs)及胰腺组织中2种甲酰肽受体(FPRs)表达的影响,探讨其减轻SAP炎症损伤的机制。方法 将40只雄性SD大鼠随机分为4组:假手术组,模型组,BOC2低、高剂量组(分别为0.1、0.2 mg/kg),每组10只。后3组以胆胰管逆行注射5%牛磺胆酸钠(50 mg/kg)制备SAP模型。造模结束后0.5 h腹腔注射相应剂量药物,4 h取材。苏木精-伊红染色观察胰腺病理改变;蛋白免疫印迹法检测血浆中NFPs的表达;免疫组化法检测胰腺FPRs表达;酶联免疫吸附试验检测血浆中白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α水平;实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应检测胰腺局部组织炎性因子的表达。结果 与模型组比较,BOC2低、高剂量组胰腺出血、腺泡细胞坏死、炎性细胞浸润、水肿等病理现象均改善;胰腺病理评分,血浆线粒体NADH-泛素氧化还原酶链(MT-ND)1、MT-ND2、MT-ND3、MT-ND5、MT-ND6表达,胰腺FPRs表达,血浆及胰腺组织中3种炎性因子表达均下降(P<0.05)。结论 BOC2可通过拮抗线粒体NFPs/FPRs信号通路减少炎性因子产生,减轻SAP炎症损伤。
中图分类号:
| 基因 | 引物序列(5′→3′) | 产物大小/bp |
|---|---|---|
| IL-1β | 上游:GCAGCTTTCGACAGTGAGGA | 98 |
| 下游:TCTGGACAGCCCAAGTCAAG | ||
| IL-6 | 上游:CACTTCACAAGTCGGAGGCT | 114 |
| 下游:TCTGACAGTGCATCATCGCT | ||
| TNF-α | 上游:CTCGAGTGACAAGCCCGTAG | 187 |
| 下游:GCAGCCTTGTCCCTTGAAGA | ||
| GAPDH | 上游:GACATGCCGCCTGGAGAAAC | 92 |
| 下游:AGCCCAGGATGCCCTTTAGT |
表1 qPCR引物序列
Tab.1 Sequences of primers for qPCR
| 基因 | 引物序列(5′→3′) | 产物大小/bp |
|---|---|---|
| IL-1β | 上游:GCAGCTTTCGACAGTGAGGA | 98 |
| 下游:TCTGGACAGCCCAAGTCAAG | ||
| IL-6 | 上游:CACTTCACAAGTCGGAGGCT | 114 |
| 下游:TCTGACAGTGCATCATCGCT | ||
| TNF-α | 上游:CTCGAGTGACAAGCCCGTAG | 187 |
| 下游:GCAGCCTTGTCCCTTGAAGA | ||
| GAPDH | 上游:GACATGCCGCCTGGAGAAAC | 92 |
| 下游:AGCCCAGGATGCCCTTTAGT |
| 组别 | 腹水量/mL | 胰腺干湿质量比/(g/g) |
|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 0 | 0.51±0.09 |
| 模型组 | 7.89±0.53a | 0.22±0.05a |
| BOC2低剂量组 | 5.39±0.59ab | 0.36±0.06ab |
| BOC2高剂量组 | 3.80±0.46abc | 0.41±0.06ab |
| F | 520.973** | 31.964** |
表2 各组大鼠腹水量和胰腺干湿质量比的比较(n=10,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.2 Comparison of ascites volume and pancreatic dry and wet ratio between four groups of rats
| 组别 | 腹水量/mL | 胰腺干湿质量比/(g/g) |
|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 0 | 0.51±0.09 |
| 模型组 | 7.89±0.53a | 0.22±0.05a |
| BOC2低剂量组 | 5.39±0.59ab | 0.36±0.06ab |
| BOC2高剂量组 | 3.80±0.46abc | 0.41±0.06ab |
| F | 520.973** | 31.964** |
| 组别 | 病理评分/分 | CD11b阳性细胞数/(个/视野) |
|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 0 | 0 |
| 模型组 | 13.32±0.93a | 90.50±6.35a |
| BOC2低剂量组 | 10.27±0.89ab | 47.60±2.95ab |
| BOC2高剂量组 | 5.98±0.75abc | 22.40±2.72abc |
| F | 601.452** | 1 068.648** |
表3 各组大鼠胰腺组织形态学变化的比较 (n=10,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.3 Comparison of morphological changes in pancreatic tissue of rats between four groups
| 组别 | 病理评分/分 | CD11b阳性细胞数/(个/视野) |
|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 0 | 0 |
| 模型组 | 13.32±0.93a | 90.50±6.35a |
| BOC2低剂量组 | 10.27±0.89ab | 47.60±2.95ab |
| BOC2高剂量组 | 5.98±0.75abc | 22.40±2.72abc |
| F | 601.452** | 1 068.648** |
图2 BOC2对大鼠血浆中6种线粒体NFPs蛋白表达的影响 A:假手术组;B:模型组;C:BOC2低剂量组;D:BOC2高剂量组。
Fig.2 The effect of BOC2 on the expression of six mitochondrial NFPs proteins in rat plasma
| 组别 | MT-ND1 | MT-ND2 | MT-ND3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 0.06±0.01 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.08±0.01 | |||
| 模型组 | 0.72±0.02a | 0.64±0.02a | 0.38±0.02a | |||
| BOC2低剂量组 | 0.34±0.02ab | 0.08±0.01ab | 0.22±0.04ab | |||
| BOC2高剂量组 | 0.25±0.05abc | 0.09±0.01ab | 0.09±0.01bc | |||
| F | 297.968** | 1 952.960** | 100.922** | |||
| 组别 | MT-ND4 | MT-ND5 | MT-ND6 | |||
| 假手术组 | 0.90±0.08 | 0.27±0.06 | 0.08±0.01 | |||
| 模型组 | 0.97±0.09 | 0.87±0.07a | 0.81±0.08a | |||
| BOC2低剂量组 | 0.95±0.08 | 0.46±0.03ab | 0.53±0.02ab | |||
| BOC2高剂量组 | 0.91±0.08 | 0.40±0.03ab | 0.29±0.07abc | |||
| F | 0.461 | 85.969** | 98.705** | |||
表4 各组大鼠血浆中NFPs蛋白表达的比较 (n=3,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.4 Comparison of NFPs protein expression in plasma of rats between four groups
| 组别 | MT-ND1 | MT-ND2 | MT-ND3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 0.06±0.01 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.08±0.01 | |||
| 模型组 | 0.72±0.02a | 0.64±0.02a | 0.38±0.02a | |||
| BOC2低剂量组 | 0.34±0.02ab | 0.08±0.01ab | 0.22±0.04ab | |||
| BOC2高剂量组 | 0.25±0.05abc | 0.09±0.01ab | 0.09±0.01bc | |||
| F | 297.968** | 1 952.960** | 100.922** | |||
| 组别 | MT-ND4 | MT-ND5 | MT-ND6 | |||
| 假手术组 | 0.90±0.08 | 0.27±0.06 | 0.08±0.01 | |||
| 模型组 | 0.97±0.09 | 0.87±0.07a | 0.81±0.08a | |||
| BOC2低剂量组 | 0.95±0.08 | 0.46±0.03ab | 0.53±0.02ab | |||
| BOC2高剂量组 | 0.91±0.08 | 0.40±0.03ab | 0.29±0.07abc | |||
| F | 0.461 | 85.969** | 98.705** | |||
| 组别 | FPR1 | FPR2 |
|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 64.71±5.37 | 1.84±0.77 |
| 模型组 | 158.04±8.15a | 90.19±6.47a |
| BOC2低剂量组 | 121.24±10.53ab | 59.72±4.22ab |
| BOC2高剂量组 | 57.85±3.08abc | 20.92±2.53abc |
| F | 423.016** | 937.290** |
表5 各组大鼠胰腺组织FPRs蛋白表达水平的比较 (n=10,OD值,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.5 Comparison of FPRs protein expression levels in pancreatic tissue of rats between four groups
| 组别 | FPR1 | FPR2 |
|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 64.71±5.37 | 1.84±0.77 |
| 模型组 | 158.04±8.15a | 90.19±6.47a |
| BOC2低剂量组 | 121.24±10.53ab | 59.72±4.22ab |
| BOC2高剂量组 | 57.85±3.08abc | 20.92±2.53abc |
| F | 423.016** | 937.290** |
| 组别 | IL-1β | IL-6 | TNF-α |
|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 3.92±0.49 | 19.48±2.34 | 15.52±2.42 |
| 模型组 | 14.35±2.81a | 83.36±7.80a | 53.99±5.25a |
| BOC2低剂量组 | 10.22±2.34ab | 62.95±10.10ab | 47.87±5.54ab |
| BOC2高剂量组 | 8.33±1.51abc | 47.98±4.45abc | 35.38±4.06abc |
| F | 46.966** | 153.786** | 143.213** |
表6 各组大鼠血浆中IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-α水平的比较 (n=10,ng/L,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.6 Comparison of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α levels in plasma of rats between four groups
| 组别 | IL-1β | IL-6 | TNF-α |
|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 3.92±0.49 | 19.48±2.34 | 15.52±2.42 |
| 模型组 | 14.35±2.81a | 83.36±7.80a | 53.99±5.25a |
| BOC2低剂量组 | 10.22±2.34ab | 62.95±10.10ab | 47.87±5.54ab |
| BOC2高剂量组 | 8.33±1.51abc | 47.98±4.45abc | 35.38±4.06abc |
| F | 46.966** | 153.786** | 143.213** |
| 组别 | IL-1β | IL-6 | TNF-α |
|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 1.00±0.05 | 1.00±0.09 | 1.00±0.06 |
| 模型组 | 8.01±0.66a | 49.72±5.11a | 39.98±3.01a |
| BOC2低剂量组 | 4.01±0.36ab | 18.11±1.80ab | 9.88±1.03ab |
| BOC2高剂量组 | 2.11±0.25abc | 11.45±1.24abc | 4.67±0.77abc |
| F | 483.861** | 456.466** | 942.534** |
表7 各组大鼠胰腺组织中IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-α mRNA相对表达量的比较 (n=10,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.7 Comparison of relative expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α mRNA in pancreatic tissue of rats between four groups
| 组别 | IL-1β | IL-6 | TNF-α |
|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 1.00±0.05 | 1.00±0.09 | 1.00±0.06 |
| 模型组 | 8.01±0.66a | 49.72±5.11a | 39.98±3.01a |
| BOC2低剂量组 | 4.01±0.36ab | 18.11±1.80ab | 9.88±1.03ab |
| BOC2高剂量组 | 2.11±0.25abc | 11.45±1.24abc | 4.67±0.77abc |
| F | 483.861** | 456.466** | 942.534** |
| [1] | 中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组. 中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2021)[J]. 浙江实用医学, 2021, 26(6):511-519,535. |
| Chinese Pancreatic Surgery Association,Chinese Society of Surgery,Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis in China (2021)[J]. Zhejiang Practical Medicine, 2021, 26(6):511-519,535. doi:10.16794/j.cnki.cn33-1207/r.2021.06.003. | |
| [2] | 张雪奇, 兑秋李, 张云娜, 等. 急性胰腺炎的中医药治疗知识图谱可视化分析[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2023, 29(6):746-752. |
| ZHANG X Q, DUI Q L, ZHANG Y N, et al. Visual analysis of knowledge graph of traditional Chinese medicine treatment of acute pancreatitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Surgery of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, 2023, 29(6):746-752. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6948.2023.05.005. | |
| [3] | ZEREM E, KURTCEHAJIC A, KUNOSIĆ S, et al. Current trends in acute pancreatitis:diagnostic and therapeutic challenges[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2023, 29(18):2747-2763. doi:10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2747. |
| [4] | LU Y Y, LI B Q, WEI M, et al. HDL inhibits pancreatic acinar cell NLRP3 inflammasome activation and protect against acinar cell pyroptosis in acute pancreatitis[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2023, 125(Pt A):110950. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110950. |
| [5] | BARRERA GUTIERREZ J C, GREENBURG I, SHAH J, et al. Severe acute pancreatitis prediction:a model derived from a prospective registry cohort[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(10):e46809. doi:10.7759/cureus.46809. |
| [6] | LIU Y, CUI H, MEI C, et al. Sirtuin4 alleviates severe acute pancreatitis by regulating HIF-1α/HO-1 mediated ferroptosis[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2023, 14(10):694. doi:10.1038/s41419-023-06216-x. |
| [7] | LI L, ZHANG Q, FENG Y, et al. A novel serum exosomal miRNA signature in the early prediction of persistent organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis[J]. Ann Surg, 2024 Feb 7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006229. Online ahead of print. |
| [8] | CHEN G, WANG X, LIAO Q, et al. Structural basis for recognition of N-formyl peptides as pathogen-associated molecular patterns[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1):5232. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32822-y. |
| [9] | D'AMICO R, FUSCO R, CORDARO M, et al. Modulation of NLRP3 inflammasome through formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR-1) pathway as a new therapeutic target in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(6):2144. doi:10.3390/ijms21062144. |
| [10] | CHEN T, XIONG M, ZONG X, et al. Structural basis of ligand binding modes at the human formyl peptide receptor 2[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1):1208. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15009-1. |
| [11] | TSAI Y F, YANG S C, CHANG W Y, et al. Garcinia multiflora inhibits FPR1-mediated neutrophil activation and protects against acute lung injury[J]. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2018, 51(6):2776-2793. doi:10.1159/000495970. |
| [12] | 肖懿, 张桂贤, 高瑞芳, 等. 重症急性胰腺炎大鼠血浆中6种线粒体N-甲酰肽及胰腺FPR1的表达研究[J]. 天津医药, 2022, 50(2):150-154. |
| XIAO Y, ZHANG G X, GAO R F, et al. The expression of six kinds of mitochondrial N-formyl peptides in plasma and pancreatic FPR1 in severe acute pancreatitis rats[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2022, 50(2):150-154. doi:10.11958/20211715. | |
| [13] | 胡泉东, 杨玉娟, 余珊珊. 脂氧素受体激动剂BML-111对大鼠急性肝损伤的干预作用及其机制[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2020, 36(5):494-498,532. |
| HU Q D, YANG Y J, YU S S. Intervention effect of lipoxygen receptor agonist BML-111 on acute liver injury in rats and its mechanism[J]. Chin J Appl Physiol, 2020, 36(5):494-498,532. doi:10.12047/j.cjap.5990.2020.105. | |
| [14] | 肖懿, 冯志乔, 张桂贤, 等. 血必净注射液调节线粒体N-甲酰肽/NLRP3炎症通路对重症急性胰腺炎大鼠模型的治疗机制[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2022, 28(7):88-94. |
| XIAO Y, FENG Z Q, ZHANG G X, et al. Xuebijing injection regulates mitochondrial N-formyl peptides/NLRP3 inflammatory pathway to treat severe acute pancreatitis in rats[J]. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Form, 2022, 28(7):88-94. doi:10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20220738. | |
| [15] | ITAGAKI K, KACZMAREK E, KWON W Y, et al. Formyl peptide receptor-1 blockade prevents receptor regulation by mitochondrial danger-associated molecular patterns and preserves neutrophil function after trauma[J]. Crit Care Med, 2020, 48(2):e123-e132. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004094. |
| [16] | WINTHER M, DAHLGREN C, FORSMAN H. Formyl peptide receptors in mice and men:similarities and differences in recognition of conventional ligands and modulating lipopeptides[J]. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2018, 122(2):191-198. doi:10.1111/bcpt.12903. |
| [17] | ABOUELASRAR SALAMA S, GOUWY M, VAN DAMME J, et al. Acute-serum amyloid A and A-SAA-derived peptides as formyl peptide receptor (FPR) 2 ligands[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2023, 14:1119227. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1119227. |
| [18] | QIN C X, NORLING L V, VECCHIO E A, et al. Formylpeptide receptor 2:nomenclature,structure,signalling and translational perspectives:IUPHAR review 35[J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2022, 179(19):4617-4639. doi:10.1111/bph.15919. |
| [19] | WEN X, XU X, SUN W, et al. G-protein-coupled formyl peptide receptors play a dual role in neutrophil chemotaxis and bacterial phagocytosis[J]. Mol Biol Cell, 2019, 30(3):346-356. doi:10.1091/mbc.E18-06-0358. |
| [20] | CAO Y, LI F, SUN Z, et al. Regulation of microtubule stability in pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in rats with severe acute pancreatitis:Qingyi decoction is a potential CDK5 inhibitor[J]. J Inflamm Res, 2024, 17:2513-2530. doi:10.2147/JIR.S451755. |
| [21] | FAN J H, LUO N, LIU G F, et al. Mechanism of annexin A1/N-formylpeptide receptor regulation of macrophage function to inhibit hepatic stellate cell activation through Wnt/β-catenin pathway[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2023, 29(22):3422-3439. doi:10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3422. |
| [22] | FORSMAN H, WU Y L, MÅRTENSSON J, et al. AZ2158 is a more potent formyl peptide receptor 1 inhibitor than the commonly used peptide antagonists in abolishing neutrophil chemotaxis[J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 2023, 211:115529. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115529. |
| [1] | 姜天佑, 李敏, 孙碧文, 李越洋, 邢丽静, 田晨. Let-7b诱导白血病相关巨噬细胞复极抑制AML的发展[J]. 天津医药, 2026, 54(3): 225-231. |
| [2] | 张婧, 魏玉英, 宁海虹, 韦红梅, 王嘉玮, 曹薇, 吴宾. DUSP9在2型糖尿病心肌病小鼠心肌损伤中的保护作用及其机制[J]. 天津医药, 2026, 54(3): 238-244. |
| [3] | 黄熷远, 付靖, 赵亚, 王龙灏, 仓顺东. 非小细胞肺癌EGFR-TKI耐药与p53基因突变的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2026, 54(3): 333-336. |
| [4] | 楚兴, 刘磊, 杨华, 陈宏. 胆总管结石并发急性胆源性胰腺炎的危险因素及预测模型的构建[J]. 天津医药, 2026, 54(1): 35-40. |
| [5] | 万艳波, 刘明, 王勇. 秦皮甲素调节HMGB1/RAGE信号通路对缺氧/复氧诱导的心肌细胞损伤的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(8): 796-801. |
| [6] | 陈慧, 赵凯, 刘振国, 常瑛, 巨康璐. 金丝桃素通过调控NLRP3炎症小体改善小鼠急性胰腺炎的机制探讨[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(8): 820-825. |
| [7] | 贾文歆, 周利娟, 王丽香. 血清CCL21、NLRP3与脑梗死患者机械取栓术后出血转化的相关性研究[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(7): 700-703. |
| [8] | 吴素勤, 徐子舒, 许智晶, 吴洁, 王聪梅. 重症颅脑损伤减压术患者血清MMP-10、TLR2水平及其与疾病转归的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(7): 704-708. |
| [9] | 杜凌云, 王耀武, 任楠. 肾透明细胞癌中PRMT2、TRAF2与转移相关基因表达对预后的评估价值[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(5): 492-497. |
| [10] | 董丹, 陈立娟, 俞荷花. 急性胰腺炎并发低血压的危险因素分析及预测模型建立[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(5): 509-513. |
| [11] | 邓海娟, 权永娟, 李芳. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血清GPER1、CFH水平与妊娠结局的关系[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(4): 369-373. |
| [12] | 郑少阳, 智慧, 王曼, 武冰, 张清格, 李冠阳. 酒精性肝病患者外周血sTim-3、sST2水平与疾病严重程度的相关性[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(4): 383-388. |
| [13] | 彭溪, 杨莉莉, 刘敏, 张峻梅. 肺部肺炎克雷伯菌感染患者血清SOCS-1、sTREM-2、ACLY变化及临床意义[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(4): 397-401. |
| [14] | 张叶杭, 牛向东, 耿一鸣. 血清sST2、DcR3联合动态心电图对无症状性心肌缺血的诊断价值[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(4): 420-424. |
| [15] | 丁杨娟, 夏时海, 许威, 高庆红, 刘涛涛. 氧化应激及抗氧化剂在急性胰腺炎中的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(4): 444-448. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||