天津医药 ›› 2022, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 404-407.doi: 10.11958/20212808

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

锁骨远端锁定板和锁骨钩锁定板治疗成人NeerⅡ型锁骨 远端骨折的临床疗效对比

孙若宾 1,许少刚 1,赵家邦 1,赵士君 2   

  1. 1郑州市骨科医院急诊科(邮编450052),2微创骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-21 修回日期:2022-01-12 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 孙若宾 E-mail:26971185@qq.com
  • 作者简介:孙若宾(1985),男,主治医师,主要从事四肢创伤骨科、脊柱相关疾病的诊断及治疗研究。E-mail:26971185@qq.com

Comparison of clinical efficacy of distal clavicular locking plate and clavicular hook locking plate in the treatment of adult Neer type Ⅱ distal clavicular fracture

SUN Ruobin1, XU Shaogang1, ZHAO Jiabang1, ZHAO Shijun2 #br#   

  1. 1 Department of Emergency, 2 Department of Minimally Invasive Orthopedic Surgery, Zhengzhou Orthopedic Hospital,
    Zhengzhou 450052, China

  • Received:2021-12-21 Revised:2022-01-12 Published:2022-04-15 Online:2022-04-15

摘要: 目的 比较锁骨远端锁定板和锁骨钩锁定板治疗成人NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折的临床疗效。方法 回顾 性分析63例NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折患者,锁骨远端锁定板组31例,锁骨钩锁定板组32例,从手术切口长度、术后疼 痛、术后并发症及肩关节功能方面比较2组患者的临床疗效。结果 锁骨远端锁定板组手术切口长度小于锁骨钩锁 定板组。2组患者均在3个月左右达到骨性愈合。术后3个月,锁骨远端锁定板组术后疼痛评分和肩关节功能优于 锁骨钩锁定板组;术后6个月,2组在术后疼痛评分和肩关节功能方面差异无统计学意义。锁骨远端锁定板组未出现 明显并发症,锁骨钩锁定板组出现肩峰下骨侵蚀4例和肩关节疼痛10例;锁骨远端锁定板组的并发症发生率低于锁 骨钩锁定板组(P<0.01)。结论 对于成人NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折,使用锁骨远端锁定板内固定疗效更佳、并发症更 少,有利于患者肩关节功能的快速康复,临床工作中可优先采用锁骨远端锁定板治疗。

关键词: 骨折固定术, 内, 锁骨, Neer Ⅱ型锁骨远端骨折, 锁骨远端锁定板, 锁骨钩锁定板

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of distal clavicular locking plate and clavicular hook locking plate in the treatment of adult Neer type Ⅱ distal clavicular fracture. Methods A total of 63 patients with Neer Ⅱ distal clavicle fracture were retrospectively analyzed, including 31 patients in the distal clavicle locking plate group and 32 patients in the clavicle hook locking plate group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared in terms of the length of surgical incision, postoperative pain, postoperative complications and shoulder joint function. Results The incision length was smaller in the distal clavicular locking plate group than that of the clavicular locking plate group. Bone healing was achieved in the both groups after 3 months. Three months after surgery, the postoperative pain score and shoulder function were better in the distal clavicular locking plate group than those of the clavicular hook locking plate group. Six months after surgery, there were no significant differences in postoperative pain score and shoulder function between the two groups. There were no obvious complications in the distal clavicle locking plate group, and 4 cases of subacromial bone erosion and 10 cases of shoulder pain occurred in the clavicular hook locking plate group. The complication rate was significantly lower in the distal clavicular locking plate group than that of the clavicular hook locking plate group (P < 0.01). Conclusion For adult Neer Ⅱ distal clavicle fracture, the use of distal clavicle locking plate internal fixation has better efficacy and fewer complications, which is conducive to the rapid recovery of shoulder joint function. The distal clavicle locking plate is preferred in clinical work.

Key words: fracture fixation, internal, clavicle, Neer Ⅱ distal clavicle fracture, distal clavicle locking plate, clavicle hook locking plate

中图分类号: