天津医药 ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 1216-1220.doi: 10.11958/20240710

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

重症社区获得性肺炎患者PIV、IL-6、HBP、PAB水平对疗效的评估价值

宫秀娟(), 赵慧霞, 张小庆, 张连霞()   

  1. 东南大学医学院附属南京同仁医院呼吸内科(邮编211000)
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-03 修回日期:2024-07-02 出版日期:2024-11-15 发布日期:2024-11-12
  • 通讯作者: △E-mail:zhanglx@njtrh.org
  • 作者简介:宫秀娟(1991),女,主治医师,主要从事肺部感染疾病、肺癌方面研究。E-mail:1522766725@qq.com

Evaluation values of PIV, IL-6, HBP and PAB levels in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia

GONG Xiujuan(), ZHAO Huixia, ZHANG Xiaoqing, ZHANG Lianxia()   

  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, the Affiliated Nanjing Tongren Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Nanjing 211000, China
  • Received:2024-06-03 Revised:2024-07-02 Published:2024-11-15 Online:2024-11-12
  • Contact: △E-mail:zhanglx@njtrh.org

摘要:

目的 分析重症社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的泛免疫炎症值(PIV)、白细胞介素(IL)-6、肝素结合蛋白(HBP)、前白蛋白(PAB)水平变化及其对入院72 h治疗效果的评估价值。方法 120例重症CAP患者(重症组)按照初始治疗效果分为有效组87例和失败组33例,另选取同期收治的非重症CAP患者120例为非重症组。比较重症组与非重症组、失败组与有效组入院次日PIV、IL-6、HBP及PAB水平,以受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以上指标单独及联合检测对CAP病情及入院72 h治疗效果的评估价值。结果 重症组PIV、IL-6及HBP水平高于非重症组,PAB水平低于非重症组(P<0.05);ROC曲线分析示,单独检测时PIV评估重症CAP的曲线下面积(AUC)最高,为0.830(95% CI:0.780~0.881);PIV联合IL-6、HBP及PAB评估重症CAP的AUC为0.929(95% CI:0.892~0.967),高于各单一指标检测(P<0.05)。失败组PIV、IL-6及HBP水平高于有效组,PAB水平低于有效组(P<0.05);ROC曲线分析示,单独检测时PIV评估重症CAP入院72 h治疗效果的AUC最高,为0.777(95%CI:0.692~0.862);PIV联合IL-6、HBP及PAB评估重症CAP入院72 h治疗效果的AUC为0.916(95%CI:0.846~0.986),高于各单一指标检测(P<0.05)。结论 PIV联合IL-6、HBP、PAB检测对CAP患者病情及重症CAP入院72 h治疗效果评估均具有良好的价值。

关键词: 白细胞介素6, 前白蛋白, 预后, ROC曲线, 社区获得性肺炎, 泛免疫炎症值, 肝素结合蛋白

Abstract:

Objective To analyze levels of pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), interleukin-6 (IL-6), heparin-binding protein (HBP) and prealbumin (PAB) in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), and their values in evaluating the therapeutic effect at 72 h after admission. Methods According to the initial (72 h) treatment outcome, 120 patients with severe CAP (the severe group) were divided into the effective group (n=87) and the failed group (n=33). Meanwhile, 120 patients with non-severe CAP admitted in the same period were selected as the non-severe group. PIV, IL-6, HBP and PAB levels on the day after admission were compared between the severe group, the non-severe group, the failed group and the effective group. The value of above indicators in evaluating the condition of CAP and the therapeutic effect at 72 h after admission separately and in combination were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Compared with the non-severe group, there were higher PIV, IL-6 and HBP levels, and lower PAB levels in the servere grouop (P<0.05). ROC curves indicated that for evaluating severe CAP using a single indicator, the area under the curve (AUC) of PIV was the highest [0.830 (95%CI: 0.780-0.881)]. The AUC of PIV combined with IL-6, HBP and PAB for evaluating severe CAP was 0.929 (95%CI: 0.892-0.967), which was higher than that of evaluation using a single indicator (P<0.05). Compared with the effective group, there were higher PIV, IL-6 and HBP levels, and lower PAB level in the failed group (P<0.05). ROC curves indicated that for evaluating the therapeutic effect on severe CAP at 72 h after admission using a single indicator the AUC of PIV was the highest [0.777 (95%CI: 0.692-0.862)]. The AUC of PIV combined with IL-6, HBP and PAB for evaluating the therapeutic effect on severe CAP at 72 h after admission was 0.916 (95%CI: 0.846-0.986), which was higher than that of evaluation using a single indicator (P<0.05). Conclusion Detection of PIV combined with IL-6, HBP and PAB has a good value in evaluating the condition of patients with CAP and the therapeutic effect on severe CAP at 72 h after admission.

Key words: interleukin-6, prealbumin, prognosis, ROC curve, community acquired pneumonia, pan immune inflammatory value, heparin binding protein

中图分类号: