Tianjin Med J ›› 2015, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 936-938.doi: 10.11958/j.issn.0253-9896.2015.08.029

• Diagnostic Techniques • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Investigate the accuracy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring system in the type 2 diabetes subjects

ZHANG Chunfeng1, GE Huanqi1△, XIE Yun2, ZHENG Hui1   

  1. 1 Department of Endocrinology, TEDA International Cardiovascular Disease Hospital, Tianjin 300457, China 2 Department of Neurology, Metabolic Disease Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
  • Received:2014-12-17 Revised:2015-03-26 Published:2015-08-15 Online:2015-08-15

Abstract: Objective To investigate the accuracy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring(RT-CGM)system in the type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM). Methods A total of 318 subjects hospitalized between 2013 May to 2014 August were recruited. Each subject received a RT-CGM system. In order to calibrate the interstitial glucose level, finger-stick blood glucose were measured at least four times every day. Patients were divided into three groups according to their fingerstick blood glucose level: ≤6.99 mmol/L, 7.0-10.0 mmol/L and ≥10.01 mmol/L. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the relationship between the finger-stick glucose and interstitial glucose gained from RT-CGM. Clarke error grid analysis was used to analyze the accuracy of RT-CGM. Results (1)A total of 2, 815 glucose meter values from finger-stick were com⁃ paired with glucose from RT-CGM. A positive relationship(r=0.847)were found between CGM and finger-stick blood glu⁃ cose. The correlation was closer with higher finger-stick blood glucose levels(r=0.457, 0.648 and 0.852 respectively in ≤ 6.99 mmol/L group, 7.0-10.0 mmol/L group and ≥10.01 mmol/L group. P<0.001).(2)The Clarke error grid analysis re⁃ vealed that 76.69% of the readings from RT-CGM were clinical perfect (zone A), 20.28% were acceptable (zone B), 3.03% were unacceptable (zone C-E). Clinical perfect rate was lower when the finger-stick glucose ≤6.99 mmol/L , compared with that when it is between 7.0-10.0 or ≥10.01 mmol/L group(73.12% vs 78.63% & 79.28%,P<0.05), there was no significant difference between group of 7.0-10.0 mmol/L with group ≥10.01 mmol/L (P>0.05). Conclusion RT-CGM provides accu⁃ rate blood glucose values to guide the treatment of diabetes, and the accuracy is more reliable in high glucose environment.

Key words: diabetes mellitus, type 2, real-time continuous glucose monitoring, accuracy, error grid analysis