Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2026, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 473-477.doi: 10.11958/20253058

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of the clinical efficacy between limited craniotomy and standard decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage

WANG Xueyan1(), SHANG Gechu2△(), WANG Guan1, WANG Huile2, ZHANG Qiyang1   

  1. 1 Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of TCM, Tianjin 300151, China
    2 Graduate School of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
  • Received:2025-09-29 Revised:2026-02-05 Published:2026-05-15 Online:2026-05-13
  • Contact: E-mail:1378834511@qq.com

Abstract:

Objective To explore the differences of perioperative indicators, inflammatory response and neurological prognosis between small bone window craniotomy and traditional large bone flap craniotomy in middle-aged and elderly patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH). Methods A total of 133 middle-aged and elderly SICH patients were selected and 94 were included after propensity score matching. Patients were divided into the small bone window group (47 cases) and the large bone flap group (47 cases) according to the surgical methods. The baseline data (gender, age, smoking history, drinking history, history of hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease and coronary heart disease), surgical related indicators (operation time, hospital stay and postoperative fever days), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell count (WBC) on postoperative 1, 3 and 7 days, preoperative and postoperative hematoma volume and hematoma clearance rate, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), 90-day mortality and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were compared on admission and postoperative 1, 3, 7 and 14 days between the two groups. Results There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, smoking history, drinking history, history of hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease and coronary heart disease, hospital stay, postoperative fever days, WBC, preoperative and postoperative hematoma volume and hematoma clearance rate, GCS score, 90-day mRS score distribution and 90-day cumulative survival rate between the two groups. The operation time of the small bone window group was shorter than that of the large bone flap group, and the CRP and PCT levels on postoperative 3 days were lower than those of the large bone flap group (P<0.01). Conclusion Small bone window craniotomy for middle-aged and elderly patients with SICH can achieve a comparable long-term prognosis compared to that of large bone flap decompression, and it has the advantages of shorter operation time and milder postoperative inflammatory response.

Key words: cerebral hemorrhage, hematoma, C-reactive protein, middle-aged, limited craniotomy, decompressive craniectomy, neuroinflammation

CLC Number: