Tianjin Med J ›› 2017, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 1324-1329.doi: 10.11958/20170615

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Meta-analysis for efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and simvastatin in the treatment of hyperlipidemia

LIU Shao-yun△, YANG Xue-jia, KONG Li-cha, WANG Dong-ying, DONG Qiu-li, WANG Zhong-ming, WANG Bin, CUI Song, MIAO Jun, TIAN Tao   

  1. Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of North China Petroleum Administration Bureau, Hebei 062552, China △Corresponding Author E-mail: liushaoyun@163.com
  • Received:2017-06-01 Revised:2017-09-30 Published:2017-12-15 Online:2017-12-15

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of rosuvastatin and simvastatin in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Methods The database including CNKI, VIP, Wanfang data base and CBM were retrieved to search the clinical randomized controlled trials (RCT) of rosuvastatin and simvastatin in the treatment of hyperlipidemia, and the data were analyzed with Review Manager 5.2. Results Eighteen RCTs were included with a total sample size of 1 819 cases with hyperlipidemia, in which there were 917 patients in rosuvastatin group and 902 in simvastatin group. The Meta-analysis results showed that there were significantly lower serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride (TG) and significantly higher level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in rosuvastatin group compared with those of simvastatin group [(MD=-0.15, 95%CI: -0.22- -0.09, P<0.01), (MD=-0.18, 95%CI: -0.25- -0.11, P<0.01), (MD=-0.23, 95%CI: -0.28- -0.19, P<0.01) and (MD=-0.11, 95%CI: -0.06- -0.15, P<0.01)]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reaction between the two groups. Conclusion The current clinical evidences show that rosuvastatin has a better effect on the treatment of hyperlipidemia, and has no adverse reactions.

Key words: hyperlipidemias, Meta-analysis, Rosuvastatin, Simvastatin, systemic review