Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2022, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (9): 993-997.doi: 10.11958/20212073
• Drug Clinical Evaluations • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Pengfei(), LU Chengzhi(
)
Received:
2021-10-09
Revised:
2022-04-15
Published:
2022-09-15
Online:
2022-09-05
Contact:
LU Chengzhi
E-mail:417992963@qq.com;lucz8@126.com
HUANG Pengfei, LU Chengzhi. Efficacy and safety of low-dose sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and stage 1-3 chronic kidney disease[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2022, 50(9): 993-997.
CLC Number:
组别 | n | 年龄 (岁) | 男性 | 吸烟史 | BMI (kg/m2) | HR (次/min) | NYHA心功能分级 | 既往病史 | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅱ级 | Ⅲ级 | Ⅳ级 | 高血压 | 冠心病 | 糖尿病 | 房颤 | ||||||||||||||||||||
减量组 | 12 | 73.2±9.7 | 9(75.0) | 5(41.7) | 24.80±3.73 | 75±13 | 0 | 2(16.7) | 10(83.3) | 6(50.0) | 6(50.0) | 3(25.0) | 4(33.3) | |||||||||||||
维持组 | 35 | 62.3±11.2 | 23(65.7) | 18(51.4) | 27.55±5.72 | 72±9 | 0 | 11(31.4) | 24(68.6) | 20(57.1) | 27(77.1) | 17(48.6) | 14(40.0) | |||||||||||||
增量组 | 25 | 62.3±13.7 | 23(92.0) | 13(52.0) | 26.25±5.41 | 77±10 | 3(12.0) | 5(20.0) | 17(68.0) | 16(64.0) | 14(56.0) | 12(48.0) | 6(24.0) | |||||||||||||
F或χ2 | 3.132 | 5.602 | 0.402 | 1.291 | 2.373 | 7.120 | 0.694 | 4.359 | 2.207 | 1.680 | ||||||||||||||||
组别 | 既往病史 | 合并用药 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
高脂血症 | 脑卒中 | 外周血管病 | 贫血 | 螺内酯 | 噻嗪类利尿剂 | β受体阻滞剂 | 钙离子拮抗剂 | 地高辛 | 新型口服抗凝药 | 伊伐布雷定 | ||||||||||||||||
减量组 | 1(8.3) | 3(25.0) | 2(16.7) | 1(8.3) | 10(83.3) | 10(83.3) | 6(50.0) | 0 | 2(16.7) | 2(16.7) | 2(16.7) | |||||||||||||||
维持组 | 6(17.1) | 12(34.3) | 6(17.1) | 1(2.9) | 31(88.6) | 31(88.6) | 25(71.4) | 3(8.6) | 5(14.3) | 11(31.4) | 6(17.1) | |||||||||||||||
增量组 | 3(12.0) | 8(32.0) | 2(8.0) | 2(8.0) | 17(68.0) | 19(76.0) | 18(72.0) | 5(20.0) | 6(24.0) | 12(48.0) | 4(16.0) | |||||||||||||||
χ2 | 0.694 | 0.354 | 1.112 | 0.947 | 4.011 | 1.659 | 2.162 | 3.729 | 0.949 | 3.838 | 0.014 |
Tab.1 Comparison of general data between the three groups
组别 | n | 年龄 (岁) | 男性 | 吸烟史 | BMI (kg/m2) | HR (次/min) | NYHA心功能分级 | 既往病史 | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅱ级 | Ⅲ级 | Ⅳ级 | 高血压 | 冠心病 | 糖尿病 | 房颤 | ||||||||||||||||||||
减量组 | 12 | 73.2±9.7 | 9(75.0) | 5(41.7) | 24.80±3.73 | 75±13 | 0 | 2(16.7) | 10(83.3) | 6(50.0) | 6(50.0) | 3(25.0) | 4(33.3) | |||||||||||||
维持组 | 35 | 62.3±11.2 | 23(65.7) | 18(51.4) | 27.55±5.72 | 72±9 | 0 | 11(31.4) | 24(68.6) | 20(57.1) | 27(77.1) | 17(48.6) | 14(40.0) | |||||||||||||
增量组 | 25 | 62.3±13.7 | 23(92.0) | 13(52.0) | 26.25±5.41 | 77±10 | 3(12.0) | 5(20.0) | 17(68.0) | 16(64.0) | 14(56.0) | 12(48.0) | 6(24.0) | |||||||||||||
F或χ2 | 3.132 | 5.602 | 0.402 | 1.291 | 2.373 | 7.120 | 0.694 | 4.359 | 2.207 | 1.680 | ||||||||||||||||
组别 | 既往病史 | 合并用药 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
高脂血症 | 脑卒中 | 外周血管病 | 贫血 | 螺内酯 | 噻嗪类利尿剂 | β受体阻滞剂 | 钙离子拮抗剂 | 地高辛 | 新型口服抗凝药 | 伊伐布雷定 | ||||||||||||||||
减量组 | 1(8.3) | 3(25.0) | 2(16.7) | 1(8.3) | 10(83.3) | 10(83.3) | 6(50.0) | 0 | 2(16.7) | 2(16.7) | 2(16.7) | |||||||||||||||
维持组 | 6(17.1) | 12(34.3) | 6(17.1) | 1(2.9) | 31(88.6) | 31(88.6) | 25(71.4) | 3(8.6) | 5(14.3) | 11(31.4) | 6(17.1) | |||||||||||||||
增量组 | 3(12.0) | 8(32.0) | 2(8.0) | 2(8.0) | 17(68.0) | 19(76.0) | 18(72.0) | 5(20.0) | 6(24.0) | 12(48.0) | 4(16.0) | |||||||||||||||
χ2 | 0.694 | 0.354 | 1.112 | 0.947 | 4.011 | 1.659 | 2.162 | 3.729 | 0.949 | 3.838 | 0.014 |
组别 | n | LVEF | NT-proBNP(ng/L) | NYHA心功能分级改善情况 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 无改善 | 改善=Ⅰ级 | 改善≥Ⅱ级 | 总改善率(%) | ||||||
减量组 | 12 | 0.33±0.07 | 0.36±0.07 | 4.584* | 7 289(4 078,16 501) | 3 289(1 324,8 784) | 2.197* | 4(33.3) | 5(41.7) | 3(25.0) | 66.7 | ||||
维持组 | 35 | 0.34±0.07 | 0.37±0.07 | 4.905* | 3 446(1 967,8 781) | 2 213(1 012,4 110) | 4.488* | 8(22.9) | 18(51.4) | 9(25.7) | 77.1 | ||||
增量组 | 25 | 0.36±0.06 | 0.41±0.06ab | 9.899* | 6 460(2 107,11 079) | 2 229(1 007,3 173) | 3.834* | 5(20.0) | 12(48.0) | 8(32.0) | 80.0 | ||||
F、H或χ2 | 0.562 | 3.373* | 0.190 | 0.311 | 0.821 |
Tab.2 Comparison of LVEF, NT-proBNP and NYHA cardiac function classification between the three groups
组别 | n | LVEF | NT-proBNP(ng/L) | NYHA心功能分级改善情况 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 无改善 | 改善=Ⅰ级 | 改善≥Ⅱ级 | 总改善率(%) | ||||||
减量组 | 12 | 0.33±0.07 | 0.36±0.07 | 4.584* | 7 289(4 078,16 501) | 3 289(1 324,8 784) | 2.197* | 4(33.3) | 5(41.7) | 3(25.0) | 66.7 | ||||
维持组 | 35 | 0.34±0.07 | 0.37±0.07 | 4.905* | 3 446(1 967,8 781) | 2 213(1 012,4 110) | 4.488* | 8(22.9) | 18(51.4) | 9(25.7) | 77.1 | ||||
增量组 | 25 | 0.36±0.06 | 0.41±0.06ab | 9.899* | 6 460(2 107,11 079) | 2 229(1 007,3 173) | 3.834* | 5(20.0) | 12(48.0) | 8(32.0) | 80.0 | ||||
F、H或χ2 | 0.562 | 3.373* | 0.190 | 0.311 | 0.821 |
组别 | n | Scr(μmol/L) | eGFR[mL/(min·1.73 m2)] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | ||
减量组 | 12 | 92(79,110) | 89(73,110) | 0.706 | 59.48(44.42,72.42) | 58.75(43.93,82.38) | 1.255 |
维持组 | 35 | 114(92,140) | 98(80,118) | 3.973* | 54.52(43.47,72.16) | 69.05(49.38,90.16) | 3.931* |
增量组 | 25 | 104(88,143) | 88(86,109) | 2.687* | 62.90(48.13,81.95) | 65.55(53.00,84.33) | 2.771* |
H | 0.104 | 0.585 | 0.639 | 0.717 |
Tab.3 Comparison of Scr and eGFR between the three groups of patients
组别 | n | Scr(μmol/L) | eGFR[mL/(min·1.73 m2)] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | ||
减量组 | 12 | 92(79,110) | 89(73,110) | 0.706 | 59.48(44.42,72.42) | 58.75(43.93,82.38) | 1.255 |
维持组 | 35 | 114(92,140) | 98(80,118) | 3.973* | 54.52(43.47,72.16) | 69.05(49.38,90.16) | 3.931* |
增量组 | 25 | 104(88,143) | 88(86,109) | 2.687* | 62.90(48.13,81.95) | 65.55(53.00,84.33) | 2.771* |
H | 0.104 | 0.585 | 0.639 | 0.717 |
组别 | n | SBP | DBP | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | ||
减量组 | 12 | 117.0(113.0,119.0) | 110.5(109.5,110.0) | 2.662* | 76.4±8.7 | 70.8±11.6 | 13.705* |
维持组 | 35 | 132.0(113.0,141.0) | 120.0(108.0,130.0) | 2.915* | 82.7±13.2 | 72.9±10.2a | 10.585* |
增量组 | 25 | 120.0(112.0,139.0) | 110.0(102.0,120.0) | 2.855* | 77.2±13.4 | 65.2±10.1b | 6.967* |
H或F | 4.385 | 5.955 | 1.830 | 5.541* |
Tab.4 Comparison of SDP and DBP between the three groups of patients
组别 | n | SBP | DBP | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | ||
减量组 | 12 | 117.0(113.0,119.0) | 110.5(109.5,110.0) | 2.662* | 76.4±8.7 | 70.8±11.6 | 13.705* |
维持组 | 35 | 132.0(113.0,141.0) | 120.0(108.0,130.0) | 2.915* | 82.7±13.2 | 72.9±10.2a | 10.585* |
增量组 | 25 | 120.0(112.0,139.0) | 110.0(102.0,120.0) | 2.855* | 77.2±13.4 | 65.2±10.1b | 6.967* |
H或F | 4.385 | 5.955 | 1.830 | 5.541* |
[1] | 中华医学会心血管病分会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2018, 46(10):760-789. |
Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. Chinese Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2018[J]. Chin J Cardiol, 2018, 46(10):760-789. | |
[2] | GREENE S J, BUTLER J, ALBERT N M, et al. Medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction:the CHAMP-HF registry[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 72(4):351-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.070. |
[3] | 邵夏炎, 刘洪智, 杨贝贝, 等. 沙库巴曲缬沙坦在心力衰竭患者中的用药策略[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2020, 36(3):248-252. |
SHAO X Y, LIU H Z, YANG B B, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan in heart failure patients:An analysis on the prescription and treatment patterns[J]. Journal of Clinical Cardiology, 2020, 36(3):248-252. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2020.03.012. | |
[4] | 黄佳佳, 马永成, 王爱凤. 348例心力衰竭患者沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠的临床应用的安全性评价和有效性分析[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2021, 41(6):616-622. |
HUANG J J, MA Y C, WANG A F. Safety evaluations and efficacy analysis of clinical applications of Sacubitril/Valsartan sodium in 348 patients with heart failure[J]. Chin J Hosp Pharm, 2021, 41(6):616-622. doi: 10.13286/j.1001-5213.2021.06.11. | |
[5] | MARTENS P, BELIËN H, DUPONT M, et al. Insights into implementation of Sacubitril/Valsartan into clinical practice[J]. ESC Heart Fail, 2018, 5:275-283. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12258. |
[6] | 本木措, 王峰, 倪黎, 等. 小剂量沙库巴曲缬沙坦与培哚普利治疗射血分数降低慢性心力衰竭的疗效与安全性对比研究[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2021, 41(6):526-530. |
BEN M C, WANG F, NI L, et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy of low-dose Sacubitril/Valsartan and perindopril in the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine, 2021, 41(6):526-530. doi: 10.19538/j.nk2021060116. | |
[7] | LEVEY A S, CORESH J. Chronic kidney disease[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379:165-180. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60178-5. |
[8] | 柴坷, 王华. 中国、美国、欧洲心力衰竭指南差异比较[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2020, 25(3):210-213. |
CHAI K, WANG H. Comparison of Chinese,American and European heart failure guidelines[J]. Chin J Cardiovasc Med, 2020, 25(3):210-213. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5410.2020.03.002. | |
[9] | PONIKOWSKI P, VOORS A A, ANKER S D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure:The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC[J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37(27):2129-2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. |
[10] | YANCY C W, JESSUP M, BOZKURT B, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure:A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America[J]. Circulation, 2017, 136(6):e137-e161. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000509. |
[11] | FU S, PING P, WANG F Q, et al. Synthesis,secretion,function,metabolism and application of natriuretic peptides in heart failure[J]. J Bio Engineering, 2018, 12(1):2-15. doi: 10.1186/s13036-017-0093-0. |
[12] | IBRAHIM N E, MCCARTHY C P, SHRESTHA S, et al. Effect of neprilysin inhibition on various natriuretic peptide assays[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73,1273-1284. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.063. |
[13] | MYHRE P L, VADUGANATHAN M, CLAGGETT B, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide during treatment with sacubitril/valsartan:the PARADIGM-HF trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73:1264-1272. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(19)33679-4. |
[14] | CIKES M, SOLOMON S D. Beyond ejection fraction:an integrative approach for assessment of cardiac structure and function in heart failure[J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37(21):1642-1650. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv510. |
[15] | 彭文近, 李彤, 刘迎午, 等. 沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合重组人脑利尿钠肽治疗高血压伴心力衰竭患者的临床疗效[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2021, 29(6):572-575. |
PENG W J, LI T, LIU Y W, et al. The clinical efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan combined with recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide in the treatment of patients with hypertension and heart failure[J]. Chin J Hypertens, 2021, 29(6):572-575. doi: 10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2021.06.012. | |
[16] | CHEN X, JIN C, XIE L, et al. LCZ696 and preservation of renal function in heart failure:A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials[J]. Rev Cardiovasc Med, 2020, 21:113-118. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.01.2. |
[17] | KIDO K, BIANCO C, CACCAMO M, et al. Evaluating sacubitril/valsartan dose dependence on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction[J]. Ann Pharmacother, 2021, 55(9):1069-1075. doi: 10.1177/1060028020983522. |
[18] | BEJAN-ANGOULVANT T, GENET T, VRIGNAUD L, et al. Three case reports of involuntary muscular movements as adverse reactions to sacubitril/valsartan[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2018, 84(5):1072-1074. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13545. |
[19] | ALMUFLEH A, MIELNICZUK L M, ZINOVIEV R, et al. Profound vasoplegia during sacubitril/valsartan treatment after heart transplantation[J]. Can J Cardiol, 2018, 34(3):343.e5-343.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.004. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||