Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 648-652.doi: 10.11958/20221629
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Keyi1(), HUANG Yong1, XU Chenghao1, MA Tianming1, DAI Feibiao2, LI Xue2, TANG Chaoliang2,△
Received:
2022-10-10
Revised:
2023-01-08
Published:
2023-06-15
Online:
2023-06-20
Contact:
△E-mail:WU Keyi, HUANG Yong, XU Chenghao, MA Tianming, DAI Feibiao, LI Xue, TANG Chaoliang. Effects of general anesthesia combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block on postoperative analgesia and pulmonary infection in patients with lung cancer surgery[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(6): 648-652.
CLC Number:
组别 | n | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA组 | 80 | 31/49 | 58.61±13.12 | |||||
联合组 | 90 | 43/47 | 59.47±10.66 | |||||
χ2或t | 1.404 | 0.468 | ||||||
组别 | BMI(kg/m2) | 病理分型 | 临床分期 | |||||
鳞癌 | 腺癌 | Ⅰ期 | Ⅱ期 | |||||
GA组 | 24.25±3.33 | 23 | 57 | 47 | 33 | |||
联合组 | 24.22±2.35 | 22 | 68 | 59 | 31 | |||
χ2或t | 0.081 | 0.403 | 0.836 |
Tab.1 Comparison of general data between the two groups
组别 | n | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA组 | 80 | 31/49 | 58.61±13.12 | |||||
联合组 | 90 | 43/47 | 59.47±10.66 | |||||
χ2或t | 1.404 | 0.468 | ||||||
组别 | BMI(kg/m2) | 病理分型 | 临床分期 | |||||
鳞癌 | 腺癌 | Ⅰ期 | Ⅱ期 | |||||
GA组 | 24.25±3.33 | 23 | 57 | 47 | 33 | |||
联合组 | 24.22±2.35 | 22 | 68 | 59 | 31 | |||
χ2或t | 0.081 | 0.403 | 0.836 |
组别 | n | 瑞芬太尼 用量(mg) | 丙泊酚用量(mg) | 镇痛泵按压次数(次) |
---|---|---|---|---|
GA组 | 80 | 1.61±0.20 | 507.93±32.57 | 11.50±0.78 |
联合组 | 90 | 1.32±0.18 | 343.44±34.38 | 6.14±0.61 |
t | 10.021** | 31.914** | 49.449** |
Tab.2 Comparison of drug use in the two groups
组别 | n | 瑞芬太尼 用量(mg) | 丙泊酚用量(mg) | 镇痛泵按压次数(次) |
---|---|---|---|---|
GA组 | 80 | 1.61±0.20 | 507.93±32.57 | 11.50±0.78 |
联合组 | 90 | 1.32±0.18 | 343.44±34.38 | 6.14±0.61 |
t | 10.021** | 31.914** | 49.449** |
组别 | n | DBP(mmHg) | SBP(mmHg) | HR(次/min) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
麻醉诱导前 | 麻醉诱导后 | 术毕 | 麻醉诱导前 | 麻醉诱导后 | 术毕 | 麻醉诱导前 | 麻醉诱导后 | 术毕 | ||
GA组 | 80 | 85.30±5.90 | 77.59±7.54a | 79.53±5.86a | 121.84±8.53 | 107.24±7.59a | 112.06±10.03ab | 82.04±6.39 | 73.94±5.93a | 76.23±6.09ab |
联合组 | 90 | 86.14±5.48 | 82.28±5.04a | 83.38±5.19a | 119.52±8.56 | 115.86±8.42a | 117.46±10.69a | 82.99±5.92 | 79.62±5.83a | 79.88±5.28a |
t | 0.968 | 4.710** | 4.549** | 1.763 | 6.976** | 3.379** | 1.008 | 7.443** | 4.188** |
Tab.3 Comparison of perioperative vital signs between the two groups
组别 | n | DBP(mmHg) | SBP(mmHg) | HR(次/min) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
麻醉诱导前 | 麻醉诱导后 | 术毕 | 麻醉诱导前 | 麻醉诱导后 | 术毕 | 麻醉诱导前 | 麻醉诱导后 | 术毕 | ||
GA组 | 80 | 85.30±5.90 | 77.59±7.54a | 79.53±5.86a | 121.84±8.53 | 107.24±7.59a | 112.06±10.03ab | 82.04±6.39 | 73.94±5.93a | 76.23±6.09ab |
联合组 | 90 | 86.14±5.48 | 82.28±5.04a | 83.38±5.19a | 119.52±8.56 | 115.86±8.42a | 117.46±10.69a | 82.99±5.92 | 79.62±5.83a | 79.88±5.28a |
t | 0.968 | 4.710** | 4.549** | 1.763 | 6.976** | 3.379** | 1.008 | 7.443** | 4.188** |
组别 | n | 4 h | 8 h | 12 h | 24 h | 48 h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA组 | 80 | 1.08±0.27 | 1.71±0.46a | 2.24±0.51ab | 1.85±0.55ac | 1.14±0.41bcd |
联合组 | 90 | 0.92±0.27 | 1.26±0.46a | 1.83±0.55ab | 1.21±0.41ac | 0.97±0.18bcd |
t | 3.719** | 6.468** | 4.974** | 8.609** | 3.419** |
Tab.4 Comparison of postoperative pain VAS scores between the two groups
组别 | n | 4 h | 8 h | 12 h | 24 h | 48 h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA组 | 80 | 1.08±0.27 | 1.71±0.46a | 2.24±0.51ab | 1.85±0.55ac | 1.14±0.41bcd |
联合组 | 90 | 0.92±0.27 | 1.26±0.46a | 1.83±0.55ab | 1.21±0.41ac | 0.97±0.18bcd |
t | 3.719** | 6.468** | 4.974** | 8.609** | 3.419** |
组别 | n | IL-6 | TNF-α | IL-8 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
术前 | 术后 | t | 术前 | 术后 | t | 术前 | 术后 | t | ||
GA组 | 80 | 5.08±0.82 | 56.37±3.41 | 138.553** | 8.89±2.27 | 43.55±4.52 | 59.125** | 9.37±1.44 | 21.24±2.83 | 33.210** |
联合组 | 90 | 5.30±0.90 | 36.94±4.36 | 69.303** | 9.07±2.71 | 33.04±4.61 | 44.424** | 9.11±1.76 | 15.09±2.70 | 18.028** |
t | 1.730 | 32.547** | 0.479 | 14.977** | 1.061 | 14.495** |
Tab.5 Comparison of inflammatory factor levels before and after operation between the two groups
组别 | n | IL-6 | TNF-α | IL-8 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
术前 | 术后 | t | 术前 | 术后 | t | 术前 | 术后 | t | ||
GA组 | 80 | 5.08±0.82 | 56.37±3.41 | 138.553** | 8.89±2.27 | 43.55±4.52 | 59.125** | 9.37±1.44 | 21.24±2.83 | 33.210** |
联合组 | 90 | 5.30±0.90 | 36.94±4.36 | 69.303** | 9.07±2.71 | 33.04±4.61 | 44.424** | 9.11±1.76 | 15.09±2.70 | 18.028** |
t | 1.730 | 32.547** | 0.479 | 14.977** | 1.061 | 14.495** |
组别 | n | 自主呼吸恢复时间(min) | 拔管时间(min) | 苏醒室留置时间(min) | 术后首次下床时间(h) | 住院时间(d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA组 | 80 | 16.75±4.00 | 27.46±6.48 | 48.46±15.62 | 21.35±4.86 | 7.48±1.24 |
联合组 | 90 | 10.48±3.43 | 22.43±6.34 | 39.94±9.35 | 15.63±5.12 | 5.51±0.82 |
t | 11.009** | 5.111** | 4.248** | 7.445** | 11.986** |
Tab.6 Comparison of postoperative recovery time between the two groups
组别 | n | 自主呼吸恢复时间(min) | 拔管时间(min) | 苏醒室留置时间(min) | 术后首次下床时间(h) | 住院时间(d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA组 | 80 | 16.75±4.00 | 27.46±6.48 | 48.46±15.62 | 21.35±4.86 | 7.48±1.24 |
联合组 | 90 | 10.48±3.43 | 22.43±6.34 | 39.94±9.35 | 15.63±5.12 | 5.51±0.82 |
t | 11.009** | 5.111** | 4.248** | 7.445** | 11.986** |
组别 | n | 肺部 感染 | 麻醉不良反应 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
呼吸抑制 | 呕吐 | 嗜睡 | 恶心 | 头晕 | 总计 | |||
GA组 | 80 | 8(10.00) | 3(3.75) | 3(3.75) | 4(5.00) | 5(6.25) | 2(2.50) | 17(21.25) |
联合组 | 90 | 1(1.11) | 1(1.11) | 2(2.22) | 2(2.22) | 3(3.33) | 0 | 8(8.89) |
χ2 | 5.019* | 5.159* |
Tab.7 Comparison of incidence rates of postoperative pulmonary infection and adverse anesthesia reactions between the two groups
组别 | n | 肺部 感染 | 麻醉不良反应 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
呼吸抑制 | 呕吐 | 嗜睡 | 恶心 | 头晕 | 总计 | |||
GA组 | 80 | 8(10.00) | 3(3.75) | 3(3.75) | 4(5.00) | 5(6.25) | 2(2.50) | 17(21.25) |
联合组 | 90 | 1(1.11) | 1(1.11) | 2(2.22) | 2(2.22) | 3(3.33) | 0 | 8(8.89) |
χ2 | 5.019* | 5.159* |
[1] | RUIZ-CORDERO R, DEVINE W P. Targeted therapy and checkpoint immunotherapy in lung cancer[J]. Surg Pathol Clin, 2020, 13(1):17-33. doi:10.1016/j.path.2019.11.002. |
[2] | BONNARD A. Thoracoscopic lobectomy for congenital pulmonary airway malformation:Where are we in 2019?[J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2020, 30(2):146-149. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1702221. |
[3] | HUNG W T, CHENG Y J, CHEN J S. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer in nonintubated anesthesia[J]. Thorac Surg Clin, 2020, 30(1):73-82. doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.09.002. |
[4] | 侯丕红, 鲍红光, 李金生, 等. 超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜手术患者苏醒质量及术后镇痛的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(5):421-424. |
HOU P H, BAO H G, LI J S, et al. Effect of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block on the quality of recovery and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery[J]. J Clin Anesthesiol, 2019, 35(5):421-424. doi:10.12089/jca.2019.05.001. | |
[5] | 宗雨, 谢言虎, 胡利国, 等. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜下肺叶切除术患者术后镇痛的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2019, 47(2):163-166. |
ZONG Y, XIE Y H, HU L G, et al. Effects of ultrasound-guided SAPB (serratus anterior plane block) on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2019, 47(2):163-166. doi:10.11958/20181314. | |
[6] | CHEN X, CAI H, GUO J. Effect of TEAS combined with general anesthesia on early postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2022, 38(8):2118-2124. doi:10.12669/pjms.38.8.6927. |
[7] | TURHAN Ö, SIVRIKOZ N, SUNGUR Z, et al. Thoracic paravertebral block achieves better pain control than erector spinae plane block and intercostal nerve block in thoracoscopic surgery:a randomized study[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2021, 35(10):2920-2927. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2020.11.034. |
[8] | OZEN V, DERDIYOK O, KARACALAR S. Ultrasound-guided thoracal paravertebral block for awake thoracoscopic lobectomy in a high-risk patient:The first reported case[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2021, 17(4):562-565. doi:10.4103/jmas.JMAS_106_21. |
[9] | 何彩云, 樊龙昌, 许环航, 等. 全身麻醉复合胸椎旁神经阻滞在胸腔镜肺癌根治术中麻醉效果研究[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2021, 49(2):208-209,212. |
HE C Y, FAN L C, XU H H, et al. Anesthesia effect of general anesthesia combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block in thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer[J]. Clin J Med Off, 2021, 49(2):208-209,212. doi:10.16680/j.1671-3826.2021.02.34. | |
[10] | OHNHAUS E E, ADLER R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain:a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale[J]. Pain, 1975, 1(4):379-384. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90075-5. |
[11] | 中华人民共和国卫生部. 医院感染诊断标准(试行)[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2001, 81(5):314-320. |
Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. Diagnostic criteria for nosocomial infections(proposed)[J]. Natl Med J China, 2001, 81(5):314-320. doi:10.3760/j.issn.0376-2491.2001.05.027. | |
[12] | WANG Y L, KONG X Q, JI F H. Effect of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative surgical pleth index in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung lobectomy[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2020, 15(1):296-302. doi:10.1186/s13019-020-01346-1. |
[13] | WEI W, ZHENG X, GU Y, et al. Effect of general anesthesia with thoracic paravertebral block on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy:A randomized-controlled trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2022, 22(1):1-10. doi:10.1186/s12871-021-01532-1. |
[14] | ZHANG J W, FENG X Y, YANG J, et al. Ultrasound-guided single thoracic paravertebral nerve block and erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy:A randomized controlled trial[J]. Insights Imaging, 2022, 13(1):16-24. doi:10.1186/s13244-021-01151-x. |
[15] | 徐锋, 杨玉珍, 吴彬. 罗哌卡因肋间神经阻滞及胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2020, 33(9):102-107. |
XU F, YANG Y Z, WU B. Influence of ropivacaine intercostal nerve block and thoracic paravertebral nerve block on analgesic effect after thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. Clin Misdiagn Misther, 2020, 33(9):102-107. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2020.09.023. | |
[16] | 吴树彪, 蔡莉娜, 董铁立, 等. 胸椎旁神经阻滞与全身麻醉对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者术后镇痛效果及血清相关肿瘤标志物水平的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2018, 38(3):611-614. |
WU S B, CAI L N, DONG T L, et al. Effects of thoracic paravertebral nerve block and general anesthesia on postoperative analgesia effect and levels of serum related tumor markers in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2018, 38(3):611-614. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2018.03.042. | |
[17] | QIU Y, WU J, HUANG Q, et al. Acute pain after serratus anterior plane or thoracic paravertebral blocks for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery:anoninferiority randomised trial[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2021, 38(Suppl 2):S97-S105. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001450. |
[18] | 周银燕, 张宇, 白文娅, 等. 直视下胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸科手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2020, 41(7):64-70. |
ZHOU Y Y, ZHANG Y, BAI W Y, et al. Effects of open thoracic paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing open pulmonary lobectomy[J]. J Kunming Med Univ, 2020, 41(7):64-70. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4706.2020.07.013. | |
[19] | 胡晓旻, 刘刚, 刘超, 等. 超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全身麻醉对老年肺癌患者应激反应和炎性反应及血流动力学的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2017, 37(24):6111-6113. |
HU X M, LIU G, LIU C, et al. Effects of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with general anesthesia on stress response,inflammatory response and hemodynamics in elderly patients with lung cancer[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2017, 37(24):6111-6113. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2017.24.046. | |
[20] | LEBLANC C, BARON M, DESSELAS E, et al. Congenital pulmonary airway malformations:state-of-the-art review for pediatrician's use[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2017, 176(12):1559-1571. doi:10.1007/s00431-017-3032-7. |
[21] | 乔迁, 康芳, 黄祥, 等. 右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术术后恢复质量的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2021, 37(5):453-457. |
QIAO Q, KANG F, HUANG X, et al. Effect of postoperative quality of recovery after thoracic laparoscopy combined with radical esophagectomy of esophageal cancer by using dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine[J]. J Clin Anesthesiol, 2021, 37(5):453-457. doi:10.12089/jca.2021.05.001. | |
[22] | 魏红芳, 陈永学. 超声引导胸椎旁神经阻滞对肺癌根治术患者术后感染的影响[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2022, 32(9):1337-1341. |
WEI H F, CHEN Y X. Impact of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block on postoperative infection in lung cancer patients undergoing radical surgery[J]. Chin J Nosocomio, 2022, 32(9):1337-1341. doi:10.11816/cn.ni.2022-211567. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||