Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (10): 1084-1088.doi: 10.11958/20240288
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
CAI Jun1(), QIN Han2, YAN Jian'e1
Received:
2024-03-11
Revised:
2024-05-29
Published:
2024-10-15
Online:
2024-10-14
CAI Jun, QIN Han, YAN Jian'e. Effects of 3-2-3 abdominal breathing exercises on supine hypotension syndrome and fetus after subarachnoid block in caesarean section parturients[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(10): 1084-1088.
CLC Number:
组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | 手术时长/min | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 44 | 28.32±4.10 | 30.81±3.42 | 43.55±5.53 | |||||
深呼吸组 | 43 | 27.51±4.41 | 29.86±4.42 | 44.87±4.98 | |||||
3-2-3组 | 44 | 27.53±4.04 | 29.45±2.70 | 45.01±5.31 | |||||
F | 0.232 | 1.128 | 0.231 | ||||||
组别 | 孕龄/周 | 初产 | 麻醉平面 | ||||||
T6 | T8 | T10 | |||||||
对照组 | 38.12±1.52 | 32(72.7) | 8(18.2) | 33(75.0) | 3(6.8) | ||||
深呼吸组 | 38.55±0.98 | 33(76.7) | 4(9.3) | 37(86.0) | 2(4.7) | ||||
3-2-3组 | 37.97±1.02 | 31(70.4) | 7(15.9) | 34(77.3) | 3(6.8) | ||||
F或χ2 | 0.750 | 0.450 | 1.866 |
Tab.1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between three groups
组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | 手术时长/min | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 44 | 28.32±4.10 | 30.81±3.42 | 43.55±5.53 | |||||
深呼吸组 | 43 | 27.51±4.41 | 29.86±4.42 | 44.87±4.98 | |||||
3-2-3组 | 44 | 27.53±4.04 | 29.45±2.70 | 45.01±5.31 | |||||
F | 0.232 | 1.128 | 0.231 | ||||||
组别 | 孕龄/周 | 初产 | 麻醉平面 | ||||||
T6 | T8 | T10 | |||||||
对照组 | 38.12±1.52 | 32(72.7) | 8(18.2) | 33(75.0) | 3(6.8) | ||||
深呼吸组 | 38.55±0.98 | 33(76.7) | 4(9.3) | 37(86.0) | 2(4.7) | ||||
3-2-3组 | 37.97±1.02 | 31(70.4) | 7(15.9) | 34(77.3) | 3(6.8) | ||||
F或χ2 | 0.750 | 0.450 | 1.866 |
组别 | n | T0 | T1 | T2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 44 | 81.23±7.88 | 90.47±12.71A | 74.03±9.91A | ||
深呼吸组 | 43 | 80.90±6.57 | 85.50±8.71A | 81.20±10.73a | ||
3-2-3组 | 44 | 84.16±10.10 | 81.70±8.99a | 79.61±7.57Aa | ||
F | 1.278 | 6.512** | 4.505* | |||
组别 | T3 | T4 | F | |||
对照组 | 93.86±12.53A | 91.76±10.24A | 19.111** | |||
深呼吸组 | 90.41±10.43A | 83.62±10.22a | 6.411** | |||
3-2-3组 | 82.36±8.73ab | 81.11±9.68a | 1.237 | |||
F | 8.844** | 8.909** |
Tab.2 Comparison of changes in heart rate during anesthesia between three groups
组别 | n | T0 | T1 | T2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 44 | 81.23±7.88 | 90.47±12.71A | 74.03±9.91A | ||
深呼吸组 | 43 | 80.90±6.57 | 85.50±8.71A | 81.20±10.73a | ||
3-2-3组 | 44 | 84.16±10.10 | 81.70±8.99a | 79.61±7.57Aa | ||
F | 1.278 | 6.512** | 4.505* | |||
组别 | T3 | T4 | F | |||
对照组 | 93.86±12.53A | 91.76±10.24A | 19.111** | |||
深呼吸组 | 90.41±10.43A | 83.62±10.22a | 6.411** | |||
3-2-3组 | 82.36±8.73ab | 81.11±9.68a | 1.237 | |||
F | 8.844** | 8.909** |
组别 | n | SBP/mmHg | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | T1 | t | |||||
对照组 | 44 | 122.86±10.65 | 102.06±12.46 | 12.582** | |||
深呼吸组 | 43 | 121.16±9.93 | 107.86±7.70a | 11.505** | |||
3-2-3组 | 44 | 122.10±10.53 | 113.14±7.57a | 7.577** | |||
F | 0.015 | 22.068** | |||||
组别 | MAP/mmHg | ||||||
T0 | T1 | t | |||||
对照组 | 66.70±5.22 | 55.06±5.01 | 11.884** | ||||
深呼吸组 | 66.86±5.64 | 59.90±4.12a | 7.332** | ||||
3-2-3组 | 68.16±3.35 | 66.83±4.21a | 2.026 | ||||
F | 0.876 | 51.455** |
Tab.3 Comparison of SBP before and after anesthesia between three groups
组别 | n | SBP/mmHg | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | T1 | t | |||||
对照组 | 44 | 122.86±10.65 | 102.06±12.46 | 12.582** | |||
深呼吸组 | 43 | 121.16±9.93 | 107.86±7.70a | 11.505** | |||
3-2-3组 | 44 | 122.10±10.53 | 113.14±7.57a | 7.577** | |||
F | 0.015 | 22.068** | |||||
组别 | MAP/mmHg | ||||||
T0 | T1 | t | |||||
对照组 | 66.70±5.22 | 55.06±5.01 | 11.884** | ||||
深呼吸组 | 66.86±5.64 | 59.90±4.12a | 7.332** | ||||
3-2-3组 | 68.16±3.35 | 66.83±4.21a | 2.026 | ||||
F | 0.876 | 51.455** |
组别 | n | 不良反应 | 升压药 | 呼吸坚持 时长/min | SHS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 44 | 16(36.3) | 11(25.0) | 1.66±0.61 | 17(38.6) |
深呼吸组 | 43 | 8(18.6) | 5(11.6) | 2.23±0.37a | 11(25.6) |
3-2-3组 | 44 | 4(9.1)a | 2(4.5)a | 4.31±0.67ab | 5(11.3)a |
χ2或F | 10.029** | 8.007* | 50.926** | 8.688* |
Tab.4 Comparison of using vasopressor drugs and adverse reactions between three groups
组别 | n | 不良反应 | 升压药 | 呼吸坚持 时长/min | SHS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 44 | 16(36.3) | 11(25.0) | 1.66±0.61 | 17(38.6) |
深呼吸组 | 43 | 8(18.6) | 5(11.6) | 2.23±0.37a | 11(25.6) |
3-2-3组 | 44 | 4(9.1)a | 2(4.5)a | 4.31±0.67ab | 5(11.3)a |
χ2或F | 10.029** | 8.007* | 50.926** | 8.688* |
组别 | n | Apgar评分/分 | 转科治疗 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 min | 5 min | t | |||
对照组 | 44 | 9.31±0.95 | 9.64±0.75 | 1.730 | 12(27.1) |
深呼吸组 | 43 | 9.57±0.83 | 9.78±0.54 | 1.295 | 8(18.6) |
3-2-3组 | 44 | 9.82±0.47a | 9.92±0.25a | 1.362 | 3(7.8)a |
F或χ2 | 4.251* | 3.652* | 6.408* |
Tab.5 Comparison of the neonate Apgar scores and transfer treatment between three groups
组别 | n | Apgar评分/分 | 转科治疗 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 min | 5 min | t | |||
对照组 | 44 | 9.31±0.95 | 9.64±0.75 | 1.730 | 12(27.1) |
深呼吸组 | 43 | 9.57±0.83 | 9.78±0.54 | 1.295 | 8(18.6) |
3-2-3组 | 44 | 9.82±0.47a | 9.92±0.25a | 1.362 | 3(7.8)a |
F或χ2 | 4.251* | 3.652* | 6.408* |
组别 | n | 炎性因子 | 血气分析 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL-1/(μg/L) | IL-6/(ng/L) | TNF-α/(μg/L) | Cor/(μg/L) | NE/(μg/L) | pH值 | Lac/(mmol/L) | BE | ||
对照组 | 44 | 5.87±1.28 | 12.36±1.37 | 48.77±4.67 | 213.22±19.67 | 87.71±12.21 | 7.26±0.03 | 2.56±0.35 | -3.93±0.54 |
深呼吸组 | 43 | 4.41±1.09a | 9.97±1.28a | 41.27±4.91a | 197.63±21.26 | 62.23±11.89a | 7.29±0.02 | 2.29±0.35 | -3.37±0.46 |
3-2-3组 | 44 | 4.37±1.16a | 8.77±1.35ab | 33.76±5.24ab | 175.53±18.35a | 59.77±12.03a | 7.36±0.03ab | 1.73±0.29ab | -2.23±0.69ab |
F | 281.951** | 235.285** | 30.274** | 3.505 | 17.791** | 26.266** | 10.475** | 20.723** |
Tab.6 Comparison of placental umbilical arterial blood inflammatory factors and blood gas analysis between three groups
组别 | n | 炎性因子 | 血气分析 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL-1/(μg/L) | IL-6/(ng/L) | TNF-α/(μg/L) | Cor/(μg/L) | NE/(μg/L) | pH值 | Lac/(mmol/L) | BE | ||
对照组 | 44 | 5.87±1.28 | 12.36±1.37 | 48.77±4.67 | 213.22±19.67 | 87.71±12.21 | 7.26±0.03 | 2.56±0.35 | -3.93±0.54 |
深呼吸组 | 43 | 4.41±1.09a | 9.97±1.28a | 41.27±4.91a | 197.63±21.26 | 62.23±11.89a | 7.29±0.02 | 2.29±0.35 | -3.37±0.46 |
3-2-3组 | 44 | 4.37±1.16a | 8.77±1.35ab | 33.76±5.24ab | 175.53±18.35a | 59.77±12.03a | 7.36±0.03ab | 1.73±0.29ab | -2.23±0.69ab |
F | 281.951** | 235.285** | 30.274** | 3.505 | 17.791** | 26.266** | 10.475** | 20.723** |
[1] | HUMPHRIES A, MIRJALILI S A, TARR G P, et al. Hemodynamic changes in women with symptoms of supine hypotensive syndrome[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2020, 99(5):631-636. doi:10.1111/aogs.13789. |
[2] | MASSOTH C, CHAPPELL D, KRANKE P, et al. Supine hypotensive syndrome of pregnancy:a review of current knowledge[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2022, 39(3):236-243. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001554. |
[3] | GOMMEZ N A G, WARREN N, LABKO Y, et al. Intrathecal opioid dosing during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section:an integrative review[J]. J DrNursPract, 2020, 13(2):108-119. doi:10.1891/JDNP-D-19-00025. |
[4] | HUGHES E J, PRICE A N, MCCABE L, et al. The effect of maternal position on venous return for pregnant women during MRI[J]. NMR Biomed, 2021, 34(4):e4475. doi:10.1002/nbm.4475. |
[5] | AHMED A, RUZIEH M, KANJWAL S, et al. Syndrome of supine hypertension with orthostatic hypotension:pathophysiology and clinical approach[J]. Curr Cardiol Rev, 2020, 16(1):48-54. doi:10.2174/1573403X15666190617095032. |
[6] | XIAO T, LI W, YU M, et al. The effect of various pressure of pneumatic uterine bracket by using sacculesterine external stent on incidence of supine hypotensive syndrome[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2021, 92(7):505-511. doi:10.5603/GP.a2021.0009. |
[7] | 章凤强. 腹式深呼吸在剖宫产手术中仰卧位低血压中的防治应用[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2012, 5(24):117. |
ZHANG F Q. The application of abdominal deep breathing in the prevention and treatment of supine hypotension during cesarean section[J]. Journal of Clinical Rational Medication, 2012, 5(24):117. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3296.2012.24.091. | |
[8] | SHABAN M, RAZA S E A, HASSAN M, et al. A digital score of tumour-associated stroma infiltrating lymphocytes predicts survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. J Pathol, 2022, 256(2):174-185. doi:10.1002/path.5819. |
[9] | 崔红丽, 吴雅峰, 李雁平. 超声心动图对妊娠中晚期下腔静脉压迫综合征的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(9):880-884. |
CUI H L, WU Y F, LI Y P. The diagnostic value of echocardiography in inferior vena cava compression syndrome in the second and third trimester of pregnancy[J]. J Chinese Medical Ultrasound(electronic version), 2020, 17(9):880-884. doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.09.011. | |
[10] | 陈果, 胡丰登, 陈晓丽, 等. 变换体位平均动脉压差对剖宫产腰硬联合麻醉术中仰卧位低血压综合征的预测价值[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(7):1694-1696. |
CHEN G, HU F D, CHEN X L, et al. The predictive value of postural mean arterial pressure difference in supine hypotension syndrome during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section[J]. Matern Child Health Care China, 2021, 36(7):1694-1696. doi:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.07.074. | |
[11] | ZHANG Y, XIAO F, ZHANG W. Intravenous ondansetron for the prevention of supine hypotensive syndrome during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2024, 15:1194196. doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1194196. |
[12] | MASSOTH C, TÖPEL L, WENK M. Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section:how to approach the iatrogenic sympathectomy[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2020, 33(3):291-298. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000848. |
[13] | CAI S, DAI R, MI J, et al. Perioperative management of a patient with a giant ovarian tumor:a case report[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(41):e22625. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000022625. |
[14] | 杜唯佳, 徐振东, 刘志强, 等. 剖宫产腰麻后低血压预测方法的研究进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(2):192-194. |
DU W J, XU Z D, LIU Z Q, et al. Research progress on prediction methods of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section[J]. J Clin Anesthesiology, 2019, 35(2):192-194. doi:10.12089/jca.2019.02.022. | |
[15] | 牛鹏飞, 孙铭阳, 李宁涛, 等. 产妇腰麻后发生仰卧位低血压综合征的危险因素及其预测模型[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2023, 43(11):1311-1315. |
NIU P F, SUN M Y, LI N T, et al. Risk factors for supine hypotension syndrome after cesarean section and development of a prediction model in parturients[J]. J Chinese Anesthesiology, 2023, 43(11):1311-1315. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20230707.01107. | |
[16] | 耿志宇, 王东信, 杨慧霞. 《产科麻醉和围产医学会加速剖宫产术后康复共识声明和推荐》解读[J]. 北京医学, 2022, 44(6):547-550. |
GENG Z Y, WANG D X, YANG H X. Interpretation of "Society of obstetric anesthesia and perinatology medicine consensus statement and recommendations on accelerating recovery after Cesarean section"[J]. Beijing Medicine, 2022, 44(6):547-550. doi:10.15932/j.0253-9713.2022.06.040. | |
[17] | EHRHARDT H, AUBERT A M, ÅDEN U, et al. EPICE-SHIPS Research Group. Apgar score and neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 5 years in infants born extremely preterm[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2023, 6(9):e2332413. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.32413. |
[18] | 崔明珠, 牛鹏飞, 阮孝国, 等. 新型子宫托架对蛛网膜下腔麻醉剖宫产产妇及新生儿的影响[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2020, 34(6):588-591. |
CUI M Z, NIU P F, RUAN X G, et al. Effect of a new type of uterine bracket on parturient and neonate during subarachnoid anesthesia for cesarean delivery[J]. Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy, 2020, 34(6):588-591. doi:10.13507/j.issn.1674-3474.2020.06.013. | |
[19] | 卢旭俊, 王文革, 杨云月, 等. 脐带血IL-36γ水平与早期婴儿湿疹的关系分析[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(12):1356-1360. |
LU X J, WANG W G, YANG Y Y, et al. Analysis of the relationship between IL-36γ level in umbilical cord blood and early infant eczema[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2023, 51(12):1356-1360. doi:10.11958/20230643. | |
[20] | BEDELL S, HUTSON J, DE VRIJER B, et al. Effects of maternal obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus on the placenta:current knowledge and targets for therapeutic interventions[J]. Curr Vasc Pharmacol, 2021, 19(2):176-192. doi:10.2174/1570161118666200616144512. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||