
Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (7): 762-765.doi: 10.11958/20231376
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHU Wenzhi(
), QIU Qian, TAN Hongyu∆(
)
Received:2023-12-19
Revised:2024-02-20
Published:2024-07-15
Online:2024-07-11
Contact:
∆E-mail:maggitan@yeah.net
ZHU Wenzhi, QIU Qian, TAN Hongyu. The impact of preoperative anxiety on anesthesia and postoperative recovery in patients with liver cancer[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(7): 762-765.
CLC Number:
| 组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | 性别(男/女) | BMI/(kg/m2) | ASA分级(Ⅰ/Ⅱ) | Child-pugh(A/B) | 术前ALT/(U/L) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 41 | 55.12±9.79 | 27/14 | 23.20±3.06 | 3/38 | 6/35 | 19(15,31) | |||||||
| 焦虑组 | 55 | 57.42±9.33 | 43/21 | 24.10±3.12 | 2/53 | 13/42 | 21(15,31) | |||||||
| t、Z或χ2 | 1.168 | 0.165 | 1.402 | 0.645 | 1.199 | 0.226 | ||||||||
| 组别 | 术前AST/(U/L) | 肝段切除3段以上 | 高血压 | 冠心病 | 糖尿病 | 吸烟史 | 饮酒史 | |||||||
| 对照组 | 26(19,36) | 3(7.3) | 7(17.1) | 1(2.4) | 9(21.9) | 9(21.9) | 10(24.3) | |||||||
| 焦虑组 | 26(21,33) | 9(16.3) | 16(29.1) | 5(9.1) | 8(14.5) | 12(21.8) | 15(27.3) | |||||||
| t、Z或χ2 | 0.334 | 1.758 | 1.862 | 1.774 | 0.997 | 0.006 | 0.101 | |||||||
Tab.1 Comparison of baseline data between two groups of patients
| 组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | 性别(男/女) | BMI/(kg/m2) | ASA分级(Ⅰ/Ⅱ) | Child-pugh(A/B) | 术前ALT/(U/L) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 41 | 55.12±9.79 | 27/14 | 23.20±3.06 | 3/38 | 6/35 | 19(15,31) | |||||||
| 焦虑组 | 55 | 57.42±9.33 | 43/21 | 24.10±3.12 | 2/53 | 13/42 | 21(15,31) | |||||||
| t、Z或χ2 | 1.168 | 0.165 | 1.402 | 0.645 | 1.199 | 0.226 | ||||||||
| 组别 | 术前AST/(U/L) | 肝段切除3段以上 | 高血压 | 冠心病 | 糖尿病 | 吸烟史 | 饮酒史 | |||||||
| 对照组 | 26(19,36) | 3(7.3) | 7(17.1) | 1(2.4) | 9(21.9) | 9(21.9) | 10(24.3) | |||||||
| 焦虑组 | 26(21,33) | 9(16.3) | 16(29.1) | 5(9.1) | 8(14.5) | 12(21.8) | 15(27.3) | |||||||
| t、Z或χ2 | 0.334 | 1.758 | 1.862 | 1.774 | 0.997 | 0.006 | 0.101 | |||||||
| 组别 | n | HR/(次/min) | MAP/mmHg | 手术时间/h | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 41 | 75.98±10.25 | 93.10±11.32 | 3.42±0.59 | |||||
| 焦虑组 | 55 | 81.60±11.49 | 97.82±10.11 | 3.21±0.65 | |||||
| t | 2.284* | 2.081* | 1.673 | ||||||
| 组别 | 苏醒时间/min | 拔管时间/min | EA评分/分 | ||||||
| 对照组 | 12.29±1.96 | 15.44±1.30 | 1.15±0.34 | ||||||
| 焦虑组 | 13.31±2.13 | 16.12±1.71 | 1.44±0.52 | ||||||
| t | 2.387* | 2.150* | 2.192* | ||||||
| 组别 | 术中补液量/ (mL/kg) | 术中出血量/ mL | 瑞芬太尼消耗量/ (μg/kg) | ||||||
| 对照组 | 37.66±9.67 | 300(150,400) | 24.55±3.04 | ||||||
| 焦虑组 | 41.18±13.42 | 300(200,400) | 27.45±6.82 | ||||||
| t或Z | 0.062 | 0.377 | 2.536* | ||||||
Tab.2 Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative recovery between two groups of patients
| 组别 | n | HR/(次/min) | MAP/mmHg | 手术时间/h | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 41 | 75.98±10.25 | 93.10±11.32 | 3.42±0.59 | |||||
| 焦虑组 | 55 | 81.60±11.49 | 97.82±10.11 | 3.21±0.65 | |||||
| t | 2.284* | 2.081* | 1.673 | ||||||
| 组别 | 苏醒时间/min | 拔管时间/min | EA评分/分 | ||||||
| 对照组 | 12.29±1.96 | 15.44±1.30 | 1.15±0.34 | ||||||
| 焦虑组 | 13.31±2.13 | 16.12±1.71 | 1.44±0.52 | ||||||
| t | 2.387* | 2.150* | 2.192* | ||||||
| 组别 | 术中补液量/ (mL/kg) | 术中出血量/ mL | 瑞芬太尼消耗量/ (μg/kg) | ||||||
| 对照组 | 37.66±9.67 | 300(150,400) | 24.55±3.04 | ||||||
| 焦虑组 | 41.18±13.42 | 300(200,400) | 27.45±6.82 | ||||||
| t或Z | 0.062 | 0.377 | 2.536* | ||||||
| 组别 | n | 静息VAS/分 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |||||||||
| 对照组 | 41 | 1.32±0.42 | 1.67±0.41 | 1.60±0.62 | 1.78±0.61 | 1.02±0.12 | |||||||
| 焦虑组 | 55 | 1.75±0.58 | 2.07±055 | 1.95±0.46 | 1.95±0.52 | 1.13±0.21 | |||||||
| t | 2.351* | 2.153* | 2.015* | 1.419 | 0.867 | ||||||||
| 组别 | 活动VAS/分 | PICA有效按压/次 | 镇痛药物补救 | ||||||||||
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |||||||||
| 对照组 | 2.51±0.35 | 2.73±0.73 | 2.07±0.60 | 1.87±0.66 | 2.22±0.56 | 2(1,5) | 3(7.3) | ||||||
| 焦虑组 | 3.02±0.69 | 3.07±0.57 | 2.34±0.65 | 2.17±0.70 | 2.29±0.53 | 4(1,8) | 12(21.8) | ||||||
| t、Z或χ2 | 2.108* | 2.369* | 2.053* | 2.113* | 0.630 | 2.095* | 4.042* | ||||||
Tab.3 Comparison of pain and analgesia between two groups of patients
| 组别 | n | 静息VAS/分 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |||||||||
| 对照组 | 41 | 1.32±0.42 | 1.67±0.41 | 1.60±0.62 | 1.78±0.61 | 1.02±0.12 | |||||||
| 焦虑组 | 55 | 1.75±0.58 | 2.07±055 | 1.95±0.46 | 1.95±0.52 | 1.13±0.21 | |||||||
| t | 2.351* | 2.153* | 2.015* | 1.419 | 0.867 | ||||||||
| 组别 | 活动VAS/分 | PICA有效按压/次 | 镇痛药物补救 | ||||||||||
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |||||||||
| 对照组 | 2.51±0.35 | 2.73±0.73 | 2.07±0.60 | 1.87±0.66 | 2.22±0.56 | 2(1,5) | 3(7.3) | ||||||
| 焦虑组 | 3.02±0.69 | 3.07±0.57 | 2.34±0.65 | 2.17±0.70 | 2.29±0.53 | 4(1,8) | 12(21.8) | ||||||
| t、Z或χ2 | 2.108* | 2.369* | 2.053* | 2.113* | 0.630 | 2.095* | 4.042* | ||||||
| 组别 | n | 下床时间/h | 排气时间/h | 进食时间/h | 术后住院天数/d | 术后胃肠道反应 | 术后ALT/(U/L) | 术后AST/(U/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 41 | 18.87±7.11 | 70.42±10.36 | 62.20±25.47 | 7.24±1.21 | 4(9.7) | 62(35,84) | 29(20,40) |
| 焦虑组 | 55 | 23.06±9.43 | 79.19±11.13 | 72.72±25.23 | 8.29±1.09 | 19(34.5) | 64(42,92) | 29(24,39) |
| t、Z或χ2 | 2.064* | 2.035* | 2.013* | 2.172* | 7.923** | 0.678 | 0.239 |
Tab.4 Comparison of postoperative recovery between two groups of patients
| 组别 | n | 下床时间/h | 排气时间/h | 进食时间/h | 术后住院天数/d | 术后胃肠道反应 | 术后ALT/(U/L) | 术后AST/(U/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 41 | 18.87±7.11 | 70.42±10.36 | 62.20±25.47 | 7.24±1.21 | 4(9.7) | 62(35,84) | 29(20,40) |
| 焦虑组 | 55 | 23.06±9.43 | 79.19±11.13 | 72.72±25.23 | 8.29±1.09 | 19(34.5) | 64(42,92) | 29(24,39) |
| t、Z或χ2 | 2.064* | 2.035* | 2.013* | 2.172* | 7.923** | 0.678 | 0.239 |
| [1] | SIEGEL R L, MILLER K D, WAGLE N S, et al. Cancer statistics,2023[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2023, 73(1):17-48. doi:10.3322/caac.21763. |
| [2] | FENG R, SU Q, HUANG X, et al. Cancer situation in China:what does the China cancer map indicate from the first national death survey to the latest cancer registration?[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2023, 43(1):75-86. doi:10.1002/cac2.12393. |
| [3] | GÖTZE H, FRIEDRICH M, TAUBENHEIM S, et al. Depression and anxiety in long-term survivors 5 and 10 years after cancer diagnosis[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2020, 28(1):211-220. doi:10.1007/s00520-019-04805-1. |
| [4] | WILLIAMS H, JAJJA M R, BAER W, et al. Perioperative anxiety and depression in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for benign or malignant disease[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2019, 120(3):389-396. doi:10.1002/jso.25584. |
| [5] | BOTZET K, DALYANOGLU H, SCHäFER R, et al. Anxiety and depression in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery: a prospective clinical study[J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 66(7):530-536. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1604461. |
| [6] | AHMETOVIC-DJUG J, HASUKIC S, DJUG H, et al. Impact of preoperative anxiety in patients on hemodynamic changes and a dose of anesthetic during induction of anesthesia[J]. Med Arch, 2017, 71(5):330-333. doi:10.5455/medarh.2017.71.330-333. |
| [7] | STÖHR T, COLIN P J, OSSIG J, et al. Pharmacokinetic properties of remimazolam in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2021, 127(3):415-423. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.027. |
| [8] | STAMENKOVIC D M, RANCIC N K, LATAS M B, et al. Preoperative anxiety and implications on postoperative recovery:what can we do to change our history[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2018, 84(11):1307-1317. doi:10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12520-X. |
| [9] | MENSER C, SMITH H. Emergence agitation and delirium: considerations for epidemiology and routine monitoring in pediatric patients[J]. Local Reg Anesth, 2020, 13:73-83. doi:10.2147/LRA.S181459. |
| [10] | ZHANG M Q, XU M Z, HE Y, et al. Comparison of S-ketamine and midazolam for intravenous preoperative sedative and anxiolytic effects in preschool children:study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Trials, 2023, 24(1):724. doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07767-2. |
| [11] | ZHU H, XIAO H, LU G, et al. Effect of transdermal fentanyl patch combined with enhanced recovery after surgery on the curative effect and analgesic effect of liver cancer[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2022,2022:9722458. doi:10.1155/2022/9722458. |
| [12] | LEE J A, YOUNG S, O'CONNOR V, et al. Safety and efficacy of an enhanced recovery protocol after hepatic resection[J]. Am Surg, 2020, 86(10):1396-1400. doi:10.1177/0003134820964492. |
| [13] | HENRIQUE A J, GABRIELLONI M C, RODNEY P, et al. Non-pharmacological interventions during childbirth for pain relief, anxiety, and neuroendocrine stress parameters: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Nurs Pract, 2018, 24(3):e12642. doi:10.1111/ijn.12642. |
| [14] | CHO C H, SEO H J, BAE K C, et al. The impact of depression and anxiety on self-assessed pain, disability, and quality of life in patients scheduled for rotator cuff repair[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(9):1160-1166. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.006. |
| [15] | MANCUSO C A, DUCULAN R, CRAIG C M, et al. Psychosocial variables contribute to length of stay and discharge destination after lumbar surgery independent of demographic and clinical variables[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2018, 43(4):281-286. |
| [16] | RODRIGUES H F, FURUYA R K, DANTAS R, et al. Association of preoperative anxiety and depression symptoms with postoperative complications of cardiac surgeries[J]. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 2018,26:e3107. doi:10.1590/1518-8345.2784.3107. |
| [17] | 刘欣, 李丽. 原发性肝癌患者体液变化的研究[J]. 天津医药, 2021, 49(7):756-759. |
| LIU X, LI L. The study on changes of body fluid in patients with primary liver cancer[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2021, 49(7):756-759. doi:10.11958/20203264. |
| [1] | ZHU Haiyan, WANG Ye, YIN Yan. Risk factors for postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction in elderly NSCLC patients [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2026, 54(3): 289-294. |
| [2] | SONG Kang, DONG Yu, DAI Yongwen, ZHAO Deyuan, SONG Tienan, SONG Bo, XU Gang. The efficacy analysis of arthroscopic reduction combined with percutaneous screw technique in the treatment of Sanders type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ calcaneal fractures [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2025, 53(11): 1191-1196. |
| [3] | JIANG Zehua, CUI Haojun, ZHANG Boyu, REN Zhishuai, MA Junfeng, ZHANG Hongjie, ZHU Rusen. Research progress on the correlation between sagittal spinopelvic parameters and the prognosis of lumbar fusion surgery [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2025, 53(1): 103-107. |
| [4] | ZHANG Yang, DUAN Ying, CUI Mingxia, SHU Lingbo. Effects of internal trabeculectomy on postoperative intraocular pressure and visual acuity in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2025, 53(1): 85-87. |
| [5] | LI Chaoyuan, ZHAO Fuhao, CHEN Sha, LYU Ruiqian, WU Zixia. Comparison of the effect of different vascular access routes on elderly patients with maintenance hemodialysis [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(12): 1266-1269. |
| [6] | YANG Kai, HOU Dingcong, DUAN Shaoxian, BI Yi, XIE Yan, ZHANG Li, JIANG Wentao. Predictive values of PNI, LMR and MELD for early lung infection after liver transplantation [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(10): 1041-1045. |
| [7] | SHAO Yanmei, SONG Jie, YANG Mengsi, HUANG Xiaoci, TANG Xinyu, HU Xianwen. The effect of permissibility hypercapnia on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical surgery of esophageal cancer [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(3): 282-285. |
| [8] | ZHAO Xuenan, GUO Xufeng, DING Chengzhi, CHEN Dongdong, WEI Lirui, LI Chen, QIN Guijun, WANG Jiao. Influence of body mass index on postoperative complications and long-term prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(10): 1131-1135. |
| [9] | HE Shifeng, ZHU Zefei, ZHANG Wanyue, YANG Guanyu, ZHENG Hongyu, SUN Zhentao△. Clinical application of automated titration guided by EEG wavelet index [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2022, 50(6): 648-652. |
| [10] | ZHANG Yu, , SUN Wei, SUN Weichao, JIANG Luoyong, YANG Shiwei, △. The predictive value of red cell distribution width for postoperative lung infection in elderly patients with hip fracture [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2022, 50(6): 608-612. |
| [11] | YANG Jun, WEI Rui-hua, TIAN Fang△. Research progress on the mechanism of dry eye after cataract surgery [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2021, 49(9): 1004-1008. |
| [12] | ZHANG Lei, ZHAO Hong, PAN Ye△. Clinical research about correction of severe ptosis using a modified frontalis muscle suspension [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2021, 49(9): 996-999. |
| [13] | JIN Ju-ying, LIU Dan, MIN Su. Effects of crystalloid or colloid for intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy on postoperative complications in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2021, 49(8): 852-856. |
| [14] | GUO Gao-zheng, ZHENG Xue-ping△, TAN Yan-yan, XU Da-chao, CAO Lei, HUANGFU Shao-hua, WANG Xing-bao. Comparative analysis of two kinds of intersphincter approach in the treatment of high simple anal fistula#br# [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2021, 49(5): 534-538. |
| [15] | WANG Duo-duo, HUANG Chun-xia, LI Yun, XU Xing-mei, TANG Jia, HU Xian-wen△. The effect of different intraoperative fluid therapy on postoperative delirium in patients undergoing spinal surgery [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2021, 49(1): 64-68. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||