Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2022, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (12): 1324-1329.doi: 10.11958/20220461
• Drug Clinical Evaluations • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Rongrong(), XU Xingguo, BIAN Xiaocui, HUANG Xinchong△(
)
Received:
2022-02-28
Revised:
2022-05-10
Published:
2022-12-15
Online:
2022-12-30
Contact:
HUANG Xinchong
E-mail:yangr_ongr@yeah.net;1069460433@qq.com
YANG Rongrong, XU Xingguo, BIAN Xiaocui, HUANG Xinchong. Application of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine thoracic paravertebral block in thoracic surgery[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2022, 50(12): 1324-1329.
CLC Number:
组别 | n | 男性 | 年龄(岁) | BMI(kg/m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 40 | 18(45.00) | 61.80±9.92 | 22.76±1.46 |
低剂量组 | 39 | 17(43.59) | 61.67±9.45 | 22.81±1.22 |
中剂量组 | 40 | 18(45.00) | 58.23±11.74 | 22.74±1.41 |
高剂量组 | 38 | 16(42.11) | 56.84±12.91 | 22.85±1.33 |
χ2或F | 0.090 | 1.967 | 0.058 |
Tab.1 Comparison of general data between the four groups
组别 | n | 男性 | 年龄(岁) | BMI(kg/m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 40 | 18(45.00) | 61.80±9.92 | 22.76±1.46 |
低剂量组 | 39 | 17(43.59) | 61.67±9.45 | 22.81±1.22 |
中剂量组 | 40 | 18(45.00) | 58.23±11.74 | 22.74±1.41 |
高剂量组 | 38 | 16(42.11) | 56.84±12.91 | 22.85±1.33 |
χ2或F | 0.090 | 1.967 | 0.058 |
组别 | n | 术中给药 | 术后自控镇 痛次数(次) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
丙泊酚用量(mg) | 瑞芬太尼用量(mg) | |||
对照组 | 40 | 310.81±19.60 | 1.27±0.08 | 8.88±0.94 |
低剂量组 | 39 | 303.26±22.53 | 1.25±0.09 | 8.08±1.16a |
中剂量组 | 40 | 282.13±24.03ab | 1.19±0.11ab | 7.15±1.55ab |
高剂量组 | 38 | 285.74±27.91ab | 1.18±0.08ab | 7.13±1.47ab |
F | 13.398** | 8.566** | 16.381** |
Tab.2 Comparison of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia between the four groups
组别 | n | 术中给药 | 术后自控镇 痛次数(次) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
丙泊酚用量(mg) | 瑞芬太尼用量(mg) | |||
对照组 | 40 | 310.81±19.60 | 1.27±0.08 | 8.88±0.94 |
低剂量组 | 39 | 303.26±22.53 | 1.25±0.09 | 8.08±1.16a |
中剂量组 | 40 | 282.13±24.03ab | 1.19±0.11ab | 7.15±1.55ab |
高剂量组 | 38 | 285.74±27.91ab | 1.18±0.08ab | 7.13±1.47ab |
F | 13.398** | 8.566** | 16.381** |
组别 | n | HR(次/min) | MAP(mmHg) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | ||
对照组 | 40 | 76.33±8.33 | 72.73±9.09 | 76.43±8.06 | 77.75±8.40 | 76.58±7.92 | 77.45±5.32 | 78.60±6.92 | 79.00±6.94 | 78.50±5.68 | 78.58±4.72 |
低剂量组 | 39 | 75.49±7.47 | 75.33±8.15 | 74.59±9.37 | 75.49±8.57 | 75.67±7.40 | 77.36±7.16 | 78.59±3.48 | 78.69±4.49 | 78.67±6.96 | 79.23±5.78 |
中剂量组 | 40 | 77.65±8.04 | 74.40±8.38 | 76.75±8.44 | 76.83±9.18 | 77.55±7.19 | 78.48±6.00 | 80.30±5.75 | 80.85±5.45 | 81.05±5.47 | 80.65±4.54 |
高剂量组 | 38 | 75.74±8.29 | 74.74±7.80 | 69.50±7.75abc | 71.79±6.89ac | 77.63±7.38 | 78.00±5.97 | 78.18±6.80 | 72.13±4.63abc | 81.18±5.77 | 79.66±4.29 |
F | 0.571 | 0.706 | 6.096** | 3.833* | 0.599 | 0.284 | 1.006 | 18.679** | 2.345 | 1.278 |
Tab.3 Intraoperative hemodynamic changes in each group of patients
组别 | n | HR(次/min) | MAP(mmHg) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | ||
对照组 | 40 | 76.33±8.33 | 72.73±9.09 | 76.43±8.06 | 77.75±8.40 | 76.58±7.92 | 77.45±5.32 | 78.60±6.92 | 79.00±6.94 | 78.50±5.68 | 78.58±4.72 |
低剂量组 | 39 | 75.49±7.47 | 75.33±8.15 | 74.59±9.37 | 75.49±8.57 | 75.67±7.40 | 77.36±7.16 | 78.59±3.48 | 78.69±4.49 | 78.67±6.96 | 79.23±5.78 |
中剂量组 | 40 | 77.65±8.04 | 74.40±8.38 | 76.75±8.44 | 76.83±9.18 | 77.55±7.19 | 78.48±6.00 | 80.30±5.75 | 80.85±5.45 | 81.05±5.47 | 80.65±4.54 |
高剂量组 | 38 | 75.74±8.29 | 74.74±7.80 | 69.50±7.75abc | 71.79±6.89ac | 77.63±7.38 | 78.00±5.97 | 78.18±6.80 | 72.13±4.63abc | 81.18±5.77 | 79.66±4.29 |
F | 0.571 | 0.706 | 6.096** | 3.833* | 0.599 | 0.284 | 1.006 | 18.679** | 2.345 | 1.278 |
组别 | n | 静息状态VAS | 活动状态VAS | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
术后1 h | 术后6 h | 术后12 h | 术后24 h | 术后48 h | 术后1 h | 术后6 h | 术后12 h | 术后24 h | 术后48 h | ||
对照组 | 40 | 2.10±0.44 | 2.03±0.36 | 2.85±0.62 | 3.03±0.62 | 3.10±0.50 | 2.40±0.50 | 2.58±0.50 | 3.53±0.51 | 3.43±0.50 | 3.68±0.53 |
低剂量组 | 39 | 2.10±0.38 | 2.10±0.50 | 2.85±0.49 | 2.62±0.63a | 2.72±0.51a | 2.44±0.50 | 2.72±0.46 | 3.26±0.50a | 3.28±0.51 | 2.92±0.48a |
中剂量组 | 40 | 2.08±0.35 | 2.03±0.36 | 2.35±0.48ab | 2.15±0.53ab | 1.93±0.42ab | 2.63±0.49 | 2.50±0.51 | 2.98±0.36ab | 2.63±0.49ab | 2.35±0.48ab |
高剂量组 | 38 | 2.16±0.37 | 2.11±0.51 | 2.05±0.23abc | 1.97±0.37ab | 1.74±0.45ab | 2.61±0.50 | 2.71±0.46 | 2.97±0.28ab | 2.66±0.48ab | 2.16±0.37ab |
F | 0.314 | 0.428 | 26.027** | 29.214** | 74.568** | 2.122 | 1.925 | 15.441** | 27.670** | 83.151** |
Tab.4 Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects between the four groups
组别 | n | 静息状态VAS | 活动状态VAS | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
术后1 h | 术后6 h | 术后12 h | 术后24 h | 术后48 h | 术后1 h | 术后6 h | 术后12 h | 术后24 h | 术后48 h | ||
对照组 | 40 | 2.10±0.44 | 2.03±0.36 | 2.85±0.62 | 3.03±0.62 | 3.10±0.50 | 2.40±0.50 | 2.58±0.50 | 3.53±0.51 | 3.43±0.50 | 3.68±0.53 |
低剂量组 | 39 | 2.10±0.38 | 2.10±0.50 | 2.85±0.49 | 2.62±0.63a | 2.72±0.51a | 2.44±0.50 | 2.72±0.46 | 3.26±0.50a | 3.28±0.51 | 2.92±0.48a |
中剂量组 | 40 | 2.08±0.35 | 2.03±0.36 | 2.35±0.48ab | 2.15±0.53ab | 1.93±0.42ab | 2.63±0.49 | 2.50±0.51 | 2.98±0.36ab | 2.63±0.49ab | 2.35±0.48ab |
高剂量组 | 38 | 2.16±0.37 | 2.11±0.51 | 2.05±0.23abc | 1.97±0.37ab | 1.74±0.45ab | 2.61±0.50 | 2.71±0.46 | 2.97±0.28ab | 2.66±0.48ab | 2.16±0.37ab |
F | 0.314 | 0.428 | 26.027** | 29.214** | 74.568** | 2.122 | 1.925 | 15.441** | 27.670** | 83.151** |
组别 | n | 肾上腺素(ng/L) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | T3 | 术后12 h | 术后24 h | 术后48 h | |||||||
对照组 | 40 | 42.86±8.39 | 42.20±7.67 | 56.21±8.51 | 74.74±21.76 | 87.88±19.01 | |||||
低剂量组 | 39 | 40.83±8.86 | 42.56±7.41 | 61.82±19.26 | 59.20±20.43a | 64.80±18.10a | |||||
中剂量组 | 40 | 44.62±9.28 | 44.32±7.44 | 47.78±15.03ab | 50.92±11.75ab | 58.65±14.42a | |||||
高剂量组 | 38 | 41.76±8.91 | 41.79±8.30 | 43.22±9.37ab | 47.96±10.95ab | 60.94±10.66a | |||||
F | 1.335 | 0.837 | 14.244** | 19.742** | 28.326** | ||||||
组别 | Cor(nmol/L) | ||||||||||
T0 | T3 | 术后12 h | 术后24 h | 术后48 h | |||||||
对照组 | 331.09±49.32 | 308.35±45.43 | 434.44±60.67 | 558.11±88.35 | 471.05±83.16 | ||||||
低剂量组 | 324.77±59.42 | 320.87±44.07 | 419.88±85.20 | 497.76±67.53a | 491.25±76.50 | ||||||
中剂量组 | 320.17±48.05 | 312.04±39.17 | 374.24±66.68ab | 455.42±71.46ab | 407.00±68.37ab | ||||||
高剂量组 | 325.92±50.65 | 330.66±39.11 | 348.78±71.50ab | 438.74±77.68ab | 420.53±75.09ab | ||||||
F | 0.297 | 2.177 | 12.052** | 18.981** | 10.979** |
Tab.5 Comparison of postoperative stress indicators between the four groups
组别 | n | 肾上腺素(ng/L) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | T3 | 术后12 h | 术后24 h | 术后48 h | |||||||
对照组 | 40 | 42.86±8.39 | 42.20±7.67 | 56.21±8.51 | 74.74±21.76 | 87.88±19.01 | |||||
低剂量组 | 39 | 40.83±8.86 | 42.56±7.41 | 61.82±19.26 | 59.20±20.43a | 64.80±18.10a | |||||
中剂量组 | 40 | 44.62±9.28 | 44.32±7.44 | 47.78±15.03ab | 50.92±11.75ab | 58.65±14.42a | |||||
高剂量组 | 38 | 41.76±8.91 | 41.79±8.30 | 43.22±9.37ab | 47.96±10.95ab | 60.94±10.66a | |||||
F | 1.335 | 0.837 | 14.244** | 19.742** | 28.326** | ||||||
组别 | Cor(nmol/L) | ||||||||||
T0 | T3 | 术后12 h | 术后24 h | 术后48 h | |||||||
对照组 | 331.09±49.32 | 308.35±45.43 | 434.44±60.67 | 558.11±88.35 | 471.05±83.16 | ||||||
低剂量组 | 324.77±59.42 | 320.87±44.07 | 419.88±85.20 | 497.76±67.53a | 491.25±76.50 | ||||||
中剂量组 | 320.17±48.05 | 312.04±39.17 | 374.24±66.68ab | 455.42±71.46ab | 407.00±68.37ab | ||||||
高剂量组 | 325.92±50.65 | 330.66±39.11 | 348.78±71.50ab | 438.74±77.68ab | 420.53±75.09ab | ||||||
F | 0.297 | 2.177 | 12.052** | 18.981** | 10.979** |
[1] | HUAN S, DENG Y, WANG J, et al. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral block versus intercostal nerve block in thoracic surgery and breast surgery:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(10):e0237363. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237363. |
[2] | JI K, WANG Z, ZHENG X, et al. Application of ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block in preemptive analgesia of thoracic surgery[J]. Panmin Med, 2020, 7(10):552-557. doi:10.23736/S0031-0808.20.04215-9. |
[3] | 乔迁, 康芳, 黄祥, 等. 右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术术后恢复质量的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2021, 37(5):453-457. |
QIAO Q, KANG F, HUANG X, et al. Effect of postoperative quality of recovery after thoracic laparoscopy combined with radical esophagectomy of esophageal cancer by using dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine[J]. J Clin Anesthesiol, 2021, 37(5):453-457. doi:10.12089/jca.2021.05.001. | |
[4] | 谢军明, 金慧, 王媛媛, 等. 不同剂量右美托咪定滴鼻用于后路腰椎管减压内固定术患者术前镇静效果的比较[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2020, 36(1):522-524. |
XIE J M, JIN H, WANG Y Y, et al. Comparison of intranasal premedication with different doses of dexmedetomidine on the preoperative sedation in patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and internal fixation surgery[J]. J Clin Anesthesiol, 2020, 36(1):522-524. doi:10.12089/jca.2020.01.007. | |
[5] | ABU ELYAZED M M, MOSTAFA S F. Continuous pectoral nerve block compared with continuous thoracic paravertebral block and intravenous opioid analgesia for the postoperative analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy:A prospective randomized trial[J]. Clin J Pain, 2021, 37(5):359-365. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000932. |
[6] | 逯欣宇, 苗壮, 杨昕, 等. 右美托咪定复合不同镇痛药物静脉自控镇痛对胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(8):727-732. |
LU X Y, MIAO Z, YANG X, et al. Effect of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with dexmedetomidine and other analgesics on post-operative sleep quality in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer[J]. J China Med Univ, 2020, 49(8):727-732. doi:10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2020.08.011. | |
[7] | 高万露, 汪小海. 患者疼痛评分法的术前选择及术后疼痛评估的效果分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2013, 29(23):3892-3894. |
GAO W L, WANG X H. Effect analysis of preoperative selection of patient pain score and postoperative pain assessment[J]. J Pract Med, 2013, 29(23):3892-3894. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2013.23.038. | |
[8] | KANG K, MENG X, LI B, et al. Effect of thoracic paravertebral nerve block on the early postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2020, 18(1):298. doi:10.1186/s12957-020-02071-8. |
[9] | HASSAN M E, Mahran E. Evaluation of the role of dexmedetomidine in improvement of the analgesic profile of thoracic paravertebral block in thoracic surgeries: A randomised prospective clinical trial[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2017, 61(10):826-831. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_221_17. |
[10] | ABD-ELSHAFY S K, ABDALLAL F, KAMEL E Z, et al. Paravertebral dexmedetomidine in video- assisted thoracic surgeries for acute and chronic pain prevention[J]. Pain Phys, 2019, 22(3):271-280. doi:10.1186/s12957-020-02071-8. |
[11] | 盛芳, 李男, 谭文斐, 等. 右美托咪定或地塞米松复合罗哌卡因对椎旁神经阻滞效果的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2021, 37(2):150-154. |
SHENG F, LI N, TAN W F, et al. Effects of ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone on paravertebral block[J]. J Clin Anesthesiol, 2021, 37(2):150-154. doi:10.12089/jca.2021.02.009. | |
[12] | 彭春潮, 吴婧文, 光文辉, 等. 右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因行外周神经阻滞麻醉在老年股骨近端骨折患者中的应用[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(22):4771-4774. |
PENG C C, WU J W, GUANG W H, et al. Application of peripheral nerve block anesthesia with dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2020, 40(22):4771-4774. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2020.22.023. | |
[13] | 王雁, 邵建林, 杨伟. 不同剂量右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因胸椎旁神经阻滞在非插管胸腔镜手术中的比较[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(4):323-326. |
WANG Y, SHAO J L, YANG W. Comparison of thoracic paravertebral block with different doses of dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine in non-intubation thoracoscopic surgery[J]. J Clin Anesthesiol, 2019, 35(4):323-326. doi:10.12089/jca.2019.04.003. | |
[14] | MOTAGHI E, GHASEMI PIRBALOOTI M, BOZORGI H, et al. Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in breast surgeries:A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J PeriAnesth Nurs, 2021, 36(2):179-186. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2020.09.011. |
[15] | KAYE A D, CHERNOBYLSKY D J, THAKUR P, et al. Dexmedetomidine in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)protocols for postoperative pain[J]. Curr Pain Headache Rep, 2020, 24(5):21. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00853-z. |
[16] | ZHENG C J, WANG J Y, XIE S X. Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block on postoperative pain,quality of life,and recovery in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. BioMed Res Int, 2021, 21(2):1-6. doi:10.1155/2021/6692815. |
[17] | 刘冲, 王晓娜, 董龙, 等. 右美托咪定辅助全麻对老年肩关节镜手术患者血流动力学及镇静效果的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 9(10):526-529. |
LIU C, WANG X N, DONG L, et al. Effects of dexmedetomidine-assisted general anesthesia on hemodynamics and sedation effect in elderly patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2020, 9(10):526-529. | |
[18] | DOI R, MIYAZAKI T, TSUCHIYA T, et al. Mirogabalin treatment of postoperative neuropathic pain after thoracic surgery:study protocol for a multicenter,randomized,open-label,parallel-group,interventional trial[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2021, 13(10):6062-6070. doi:10.21037/jtd-21-741. |
[19] | RAZI S S, STEPHENS-MCDONNOUGH J A, HAQ S, et al. Significant reduction of postoperative pain and opioid analgesics requirement with an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery protocol[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 161(5):1689-1701. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.137. |
[20] | 任雪锋, 封婷, 陈练, 等. 超声引导下不同剂量右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因髂筋膜间隙阻滞对老年全髋关节置换术患者镇痛效果及应激水平的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(10):2100-2104. |
REN X F, FENG T, CHEN L, et al. Effects of ultrasound-guided different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine fascia-iliac space block on analgesia and stress level in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2020, 40(10):2100-2104. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2020.10.027. | |
[21] | LI J, XIE M, ZHANG J, et al. Efficacy of different dose of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil in colonoscopy:a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2020, 20(1):225. doi:10.1186/s12871-020-01141-4. |
[22] | 胡晓旻, 刘刚, 刘超, 等. 超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全身麻醉对老年肺癌患者应激反应和炎性反应及血流动力学的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2017, 37(24):6111-6113. |
HU X M, LIU G, LIU C, et al. Effects of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia on stress response,inflammatory response and hemodynamics in elderly patients with lung cancer[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2017, 37(24):6111-6113. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2017.24.046. | |
[23] | 张楠, 姜万维, 刘宏武. 超声引导下双侧胸椎旁神经节阻滞对行腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术患者应激反应的影响[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2021, 31(1):686-691. |
ZHANG N, JIANG W W, LIU H W. Effect of bilateral paravertebral nerve block guided by ultrasound on stress response in patients undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Chin J Modern Med, 2021, 31(1):686-691. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2021.01.015. | |
[24] | TASBIHGOU S R, BARENDS C R M, ABSALOM A R. The role of dexmedetomidine in neurosurgery[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2021, 35(2):221-229. doi:10.1016/j.bpa. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||