
天津医药 ›› 2026, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 538-543.doi: 10.11958/20253569
收稿日期:2025-12-10
修回日期:2026-01-30
出版日期:2026-05-15
发布日期:2026-05-13
作者简介:李英杰(1983),女,主管药师,主要从事药物治疗、慢性病、药学相关方面研究。E-mail:基金资助:
LI Yingjie(
), HOU Ruirui, GUO Lin, JI Yujie, GUO Fang
Received:2025-12-10
Revised:2026-01-30
Published:2026-05-15
Online:2026-05-13
李英杰, 侯瑞蕊, 郭琳, 吉玉洁, 郭芳. 冠心宁片联合吲达帕胺对高血压伴冠心病患者的疗效观察[J]. 天津医药, 2026, 54(5): 538-543.
LI Yingjie, HOU Ruirui, GUO Lin, JI Yujie, GUO Fang. The therapeutic effect of guanxinning tablets combined with indapamide on patients with hypertension and coronary heart disease[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2026, 54(5): 538-543.
摘要:
目的 观察冠心宁片联合吲达帕胺治疗高血压伴冠心病的效果及对患者的血浆循环内皮细胞(CEC)数量和血清能量平衡蛋白(Adropin)水平的影响。方法 纳入150例高血压伴冠心病患者,按随机数字表法分为单用组和联合组,各75例。单用组给予吲达帕胺缓释片,联合组加用冠心宁片,观察疗效、血压、心功能指标、内皮相关指标、血液流变学、血脂指标、炎症指标、Adropin变化。结果 联合组总有效率高于单用组(P<0.05);治疗后2组的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左室收缩末期内径(LVESD)、内皮素-1(ET-1)、CEC、血细胞比容(HCT)、血浆黏度(PV)、三酰甘油(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)较其治疗前均降低,且联合组低于单用组(P<0.05);治疗后2组的左室射血分数(LVEF)、一氧化氮(NO)、Adropin较其治疗前升高,且联合组高于单用组(P<0.05);2组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 冠心宁片联合吲达帕胺治疗高血压伴冠心病疗效理想,可显著改善患者CEC和Adropin水平。
中图分类号:
| 组别 | 性别 | 年龄/岁 | 体质量指数/(kg/m2) | 病程/年 | 心功能分级 | 高血压分级[ | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | Ⅰ级 | Ⅱ级 | 1级 | 2级 | |||||||||||
| 单用组 | 37(49.33) | 38(50.67) | 60.35±6.35 | 22.39±2.17 | 7.16±2.01 | 42(56.00) | 33(44.00) | 44(58.67) | 31(41.33) | |||||||
| 联合组 | 35(46.47) | 40(53.33) | 61.57±5.28 | 22.07±2.83 | 7.65±2.31 | 45(60.00) | 30(40.00) | 42(56.00) | 33(44.00) | |||||||
| t或χ2 | 0.107 | 1.287 | 0.803 | 1.396 | 0.246 | 0.109 | ||||||||||
| 组别 | 合并用药史 | 冠脉病变 | 空腹血糖/(mmol/L) | 糖化血红蛋白/% | ||||||||||||
| 他汀类 | β受体阻滞剂 | ACEI/ARB类 | 单支 | 多支 | ||||||||||||
| 单用组 | 38(50.67) | 41(54.67) | 44(58.67) | 28(37.33) | 47(62.67) | 5.82±0.71 | 5.65±0.43 | |||||||||
| 联合组 | 35(46.67) | 39(52.00) | 46(61.33) | 26(34.67) | 49(65.33) | 5.79±0.68 | 5.71±0.39 | |||||||||
| χ2 | 0.240 | 0.107 | 0.111 | 1.291 | 0.262 | 1.049 | ||||||||||
表1 2组一般资料比较
Tab.1 Comparison of general information between the two groups
| 组别 | 性别 | 年龄/岁 | 体质量指数/(kg/m2) | 病程/年 | 心功能分级 | 高血压分级[ | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | Ⅰ级 | Ⅱ级 | 1级 | 2级 | |||||||||||
| 单用组 | 37(49.33) | 38(50.67) | 60.35±6.35 | 22.39±2.17 | 7.16±2.01 | 42(56.00) | 33(44.00) | 44(58.67) | 31(41.33) | |||||||
| 联合组 | 35(46.47) | 40(53.33) | 61.57±5.28 | 22.07±2.83 | 7.65±2.31 | 45(60.00) | 30(40.00) | 42(56.00) | 33(44.00) | |||||||
| t或χ2 | 0.107 | 1.287 | 0.803 | 1.396 | 0.246 | 0.109 | ||||||||||
| 组别 | 合并用药史 | 冠脉病变 | 空腹血糖/(mmol/L) | 糖化血红蛋白/% | ||||||||||||
| 他汀类 | β受体阻滞剂 | ACEI/ARB类 | 单支 | 多支 | ||||||||||||
| 单用组 | 38(50.67) | 41(54.67) | 44(58.67) | 28(37.33) | 47(62.67) | 5.82±0.71 | 5.65±0.43 | |||||||||
| 联合组 | 35(46.67) | 39(52.00) | 46(61.33) | 26(34.67) | 49(65.33) | 5.79±0.68 | 5.71±0.39 | |||||||||
| χ2 | 0.240 | 0.107 | 0.111 | 1.291 | 0.262 | 1.049 | ||||||||||
| 项目 | 显效 | 有效 | 无效 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 临床症状 | 消失 | 改善 | 明显 |
| 心绞痛、眩晕发作次数 | 减少≥80% | 减少≥50%,<80% | 未达上述 标准 |
| 舒张压 | 降低>20 mmHg或正常 | 降低10~20 mmHg | |
| 硝酸甘油用量 | 减少≥80% | 减少50%~79% | |
| SAQ评分 | ≥80分 | 60~79分 | <60分 |
表2 临床疗效评价标准
Tab.2 Clinical efficacy evaluation criteria
| 项目 | 显效 | 有效 | 无效 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 临床症状 | 消失 | 改善 | 明显 |
| 心绞痛、眩晕发作次数 | 减少≥80% | 减少≥50%,<80% | 未达上述 标准 |
| 舒张压 | 降低>20 mmHg或正常 | 降低10~20 mmHg | |
| 硝酸甘油用量 | 减少≥80% | 减少50%~79% | |
| SAQ评分 | ≥80分 | 60~79分 | <60分 |
| 组别 | 显效/例 | 有效/例 | 无效/例 | 总有效率/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单用组 | 26 | 30 | 19 | 74.67 |
| 联合组 | 32 | 37 | 6 | 92.00 |
| χ2 | 8.112** |
表3 2组临床疗效比较(n=75)
Tab.3 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups
| 组别 | 显效/例 | 有效/例 | 无效/例 | 总有效率/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单用组 | 26 | 30 | 19 | 74.67 |
| 联合组 | 32 | 37 | 6 | 92.00 |
| χ2 | 8.112** |
| 组别 | SBP/mmHg | DBP/mmHg | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||||
| 单用组 | 159.76±10.16 | 140.33±8.26 | 12.376** | 99.57±5.76 | 90.39±6.28 | 8.692** | |||||||||
| 联合组 | 157.48±10.60 | 128.26±7.93 | 19.834** | 98.36±4.23 | 81.91±6.46 | 18.028** | |||||||||
| t | 1.345 | 9.135** | 1.471 | 8.149** | |||||||||||
| 组别 | LVEDD/mm | LVEF/% | LVESD/mm | ||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
| 单用组 | 60.61±6.36 | 56.27±6.25 | 4.324** | 39.43±6.17 | 44.23±6.82 | 4.281** | 50.79±5.35 | 43.58±6.14 | 7.497** | ||||||
| 联合组 | 59.15±7.25 | 50.44±9.61 | 6.159** | 39.76±5.64 | 49.28±5.18 | 10.044** | 50.24±4.89 | 40.41±5.34 | 12.798** | ||||||
| t | 1.320 | 4.402** | 0.342 | 5.106** | 0.669 | 3.385** | |||||||||
表4 2组血压、心功能指标的比较 (n=75,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.4 Comparison of blood pressure and cardiac function indicators between the two groups
| 组别 | SBP/mmHg | DBP/mmHg | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||||
| 单用组 | 159.76±10.16 | 140.33±8.26 | 12.376** | 99.57±5.76 | 90.39±6.28 | 8.692** | |||||||||
| 联合组 | 157.48±10.60 | 128.26±7.93 | 19.834** | 98.36±4.23 | 81.91±6.46 | 18.028** | |||||||||
| t | 1.345 | 9.135** | 1.471 | 8.149** | |||||||||||
| 组别 | LVEDD/mm | LVEF/% | LVESD/mm | ||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
| 单用组 | 60.61±6.36 | 56.27±6.25 | 4.324** | 39.43±6.17 | 44.23±6.82 | 4.281** | 50.79±5.35 | 43.58±6.14 | 7.497** | ||||||
| 联合组 | 59.15±7.25 | 50.44±9.61 | 6.159** | 39.76±5.64 | 49.28±5.18 | 10.044** | 50.24±4.89 | 40.41±5.34 | 12.798** | ||||||
| t | 1.320 | 4.402** | 0.342 | 5.106** | 0.669 | 3.385** | |||||||||
| 组别 | NO/(μmol/L) | ET-1/(ng/L) | CEC/(个/mL) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||||||||||
| 单用组 | 43.21±5.67 | 58.46±7.48 | 14.254** | 80.31±11.02 | 64.28±6.82 | 10.866** | 22.56±5.38 | 17.71±4.53 | 5.496** | ||||||||||||||
| 联合组 | 44.18±5.45 | 67.36±8.37 | 18.680** | 79.46±10.56 | 55.25±7.45 | 16.062** | 21.74±4.76 | 13.36±3.21 | 13.383** | ||||||||||||||
| t | 1.057 | 6.858** | 0.483 | 7.734** | 0.989 | 6.787** | |||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | LDL-C/(mmol/L) | TG/(mmol/L) | TC/(mmol/L) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||||||||||
| 单用组 | 4.63±1.06 | 3.52±0.71 | 7.248** | 2.75±0.65 | 2.33±0.51 | 4.959** | 6.18±1.40 | 4.41±1.42 | 6.968** | ||||||||||||||
| 联合组 | 4.57±0.78 | 2.48±0.48 | 21.484** | 2.64±0.48 | 1.85±0.37 | 12.835** | 5.96±1.12 | 3.37±1.04 | 15.232** | ||||||||||||||
| t | 0.395 | 10.427** | 1.072 | 6.526** | 1.063 | 5.120** | |||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | HCT/% | PV/mPa·s | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||||||||||||
| 单用组 | 48.17±7.56 | 45.37±5.21 | 2.905** | 2.71±0.73 | 1.82±0.55 | 8.658** | |||||||||||||||||
| 联合组 | 48.56±8.34 | 40.51±5.33 | 7.144** | 2.67±0.54 | 1.63±0.41 | 12.276** | |||||||||||||||||
| t | 0.300 | 5.664** | 0.472 | 2.375* | |||||||||||||||||||
表5 2组内皮相关指标、血液流变学和血脂指标的比较 (n=75,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.5 Comparison of endothelial-related indicators, hemorheology and blood lipid indicators between the two groups
| 组别 | NO/(μmol/L) | ET-1/(ng/L) | CEC/(个/mL) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||||||||||
| 单用组 | 43.21±5.67 | 58.46±7.48 | 14.254** | 80.31±11.02 | 64.28±6.82 | 10.866** | 22.56±5.38 | 17.71±4.53 | 5.496** | ||||||||||||||
| 联合组 | 44.18±5.45 | 67.36±8.37 | 18.680** | 79.46±10.56 | 55.25±7.45 | 16.062** | 21.74±4.76 | 13.36±3.21 | 13.383** | ||||||||||||||
| t | 1.057 | 6.858** | 0.483 | 7.734** | 0.989 | 6.787** | |||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | LDL-C/(mmol/L) | TG/(mmol/L) | TC/(mmol/L) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||||||||||
| 单用组 | 4.63±1.06 | 3.52±0.71 | 7.248** | 2.75±0.65 | 2.33±0.51 | 4.959** | 6.18±1.40 | 4.41±1.42 | 6.968** | ||||||||||||||
| 联合组 | 4.57±0.78 | 2.48±0.48 | 21.484** | 2.64±0.48 | 1.85±0.37 | 12.835** | 5.96±1.12 | 3.37±1.04 | 15.232** | ||||||||||||||
| t | 0.395 | 10.427** | 1.072 | 6.526** | 1.063 | 5.120** | |||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | HCT/% | PV/mPa·s | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||||||||||||
| 单用组 | 48.17±7.56 | 45.37±5.21 | 2.905** | 2.71±0.73 | 1.82±0.55 | 8.658** | |||||||||||||||||
| 联合组 | 48.56±8.34 | 40.51±5.33 | 7.144** | 2.67±0.54 | 1.63±0.41 | 12.276** | |||||||||||||||||
| t | 0.300 | 5.664** | 0.472 | 2.375* | |||||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | IL-6/(μg/L) | TNF-α/(μg/L) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
| 单用组 | 37.68±4.24 | 27.42±4.19 | 16.253** | 1.93±0.58 | 1.26±0.38 | 8.682** | ||||||
| 联合组 | 37.12±5.51 | 21.73±5.86 | 17.868** | 1.89±0.47 | 1.10±0.15 | 13.649** | ||||||
| t | 0.709 | 6.842** | 0.460 | 3.436** | ||||||||
| 组别 | hs-CRP/(mg/L) | Adropin/(ng/L) | ||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
| 单用组 | 12.25±2.53 | 6.52±1.24 | 16.289** | 124.21±18.37 | 148.69±20.45 | 7.859** | ||||||
| 联合组 | 11.86±2.67 | 4.73±1.39 | 20.424** | 126.04±20.28 | 158.37±18.36 | 10.191** | ||||||
| t | 0.940 | 8.275** | 0.576 | 3.046* | ||||||||
表6 2组炎性因子和Adropin指标的比较 (n=75,$\bar{x}±s$)
Tab.6 Comparison of inflammatory factors and Adropin indicators between the two groups
| 组别 | IL-6/(μg/L) | TNF-α/(μg/L) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
| 单用组 | 37.68±4.24 | 27.42±4.19 | 16.253** | 1.93±0.58 | 1.26±0.38 | 8.682** | ||||||
| 联合组 | 37.12±5.51 | 21.73±5.86 | 17.868** | 1.89±0.47 | 1.10±0.15 | 13.649** | ||||||
| t | 0.709 | 6.842** | 0.460 | 3.436** | ||||||||
| 组别 | hs-CRP/(mg/L) | Adropin/(ng/L) | ||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||
| 单用组 | 12.25±2.53 | 6.52±1.24 | 16.289** | 124.21±18.37 | 148.69±20.45 | 7.859** | ||||||
| 联合组 | 11.86±2.67 | 4.73±1.39 | 20.424** | 126.04±20.28 | 158.37±18.36 | 10.191** | ||||||
| t | 0.940 | 8.275** | 0.576 | 3.046* | ||||||||
| 组别 | 低血钾症 | 恶心呕吐 | 头晕 | 心悸 | 总发生 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单用组 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 11(14.67) |
| 联合组 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8(10.67) |
| χ2 | 0.055 |
表7 2组不良反应发生情况比较 (n=75)
Tab.7 Comparison of adverse reaction occurrence between the two groups
| 组别 | 低血钾症 | 恶心呕吐 | 头晕 | 心悸 | 总发生 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单用组 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 11(14.67) |
| 联合组 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8(10.67) |
| χ2 | 0.055 |
| [1] | 孙慧, 花继平. 美托洛尔联合心脉通胶囊对老年冠心病患者血脂、心功能及血液流变学的影响分析[J]. 中南医学科学杂志, 2020, 48(1):18-21. |
| SUN H, HUA J P. Effect of metoprolol combined with Xinmaitong Capsule on blood lipid,cardiac function and hemorheology in elderly patients with coronary heart disease[J]. Medical Science Journal of Central South China, 2020, 48(1):18-21. doi:10.15972/j.cnki.43-1509/r.2020.01.005. | |
| [2] | 褚敏, 高彦彩, 李磊, 等. 活血散风针刺法对冠心病伴高血压患者PCI围术期血压、术后血管内皮功能及冠脉再狭窄风险的影响[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2025, 52(5):97-100. |
| CHU M, GAO Y C, LI L, et al. Effect of acupuncture for promoting blood circulation and dispersing windon blood pressure in perioperative period of PCI,postoperative vascular endothelial function and risk of coronary restenosis in patients with coronary heart disease and hypertension[J]. Liaoning J Tradit Chin Med, 2025, 52(5):97-100. doi:10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2025.05.027. | |
| [3] | 高肖坤, 马佳佳, 武晓玲, 等. 高血压合并冠心病患者血管紧张素Ⅱ和可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1与左心室肥厚的相关性[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2025, 33(10):974-978. |
| GAO X K, MA J J, WU X L, et al. The correlation between angiotensin II,soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1,and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension complicated by coronary heart disease[J]. Chin J Hypertens, 2025, 33(10):974-978. doi:10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2024-0392. | |
| [4] | 陈俊民, 郭瑞瑞, 高燕, 等. 阿托伐他汀钙片联合吲达帕胺对高血压合并冠心病患者血清血管活性肽N末端脑钠肽前体的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2020, 49(21):2961-2964. |
| CHEN J M, GUO R R, GAO Y, et al. The effect of atorvastatin calcium tablets combined with indapamide on serum vasoactive peptide N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with hypertension complicated by coronary heart disease[J]. Shanxi Med J, 2020, 49(21):2961-2964. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2020.21.029. | |
| [5] | 庄惊奇, 徐颖, 祁超静, 等. 脑立清胶囊联合吲达帕胺治疗高血压合并冠心病的效果及对PPAR-γ、MCP-1、ADMA水平的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2023, 8(32):124-127. |
| ZHUANG J Q, XU Y, QI C J, et al. Effect of Naoliqing capsule combined with indapamide in the treatment of hypertension complicated with coronary heart disease and its influences on PPAR-γ,MCP-1 and ADMA levels[J]. Clinical Research and Practice, 2023, 8(32):124-127. doi:10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202332031. | |
| [6] | 陈铁军, 陈婕, 王肖龙, 等. 冠心病患者中医证型与其冠状动脉血管病变特点和程度的关系[J]. 医学综述, 2020, 26(4):782-785,791. |
| CHEN T J, CHEN J, WANG X L, et al. Relationship of traditional Chinese medicine syndromes of coronary heart disease with characteristics and degree of coronary angiopathy[J]. Med Recapitulate, 2020, 26(4):782-785,791. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2020.04.031. | |
| [7] | 吴子政, 陈杏, 叶嘉豪, 等. 基于网络药理学及实验验证探讨冠心宁注射液对冠心病大鼠的干预机制[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2025, 45(6):1156-1168. |
| WU Z Z, CHEN X, YE J H, et al. Intervention mechanism of Guanxinning Injection on rats with coronary heart disease based on network pharmacology and experimental verification[J]. J Hunan Univ Chin Med, 2025, 45(6):1156-1168. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-070X.2025.06.027. | |
| [8] | 孔祥慧, 田曦嘉, 马立庆. 磁共振联合血管性血友病因子与循环内皮细胞对冠心病患者左心室心功能的评估价值[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2023, 25(5):473-476. |
| KONG X H, TIAN X J, MA L Q. Evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with CHD by magnetic resonance imaging combined with vWF and circulating endothelial cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart Brain and Vessel Diseases, 2023, 25(5):473-476. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2023.05.007. | |
| [9] | 常先松, 金富璐, 王培育, 等. Adropin与心血管疾病的关系[J]. 河北医药, 2023, 45(4):601-605. |
| CHANG X S, JIN F L, WANG P Y, et al. Relationship between Adropin and cardiovascular disease[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2023, 45(4):601-605. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2023.04.030. | |
| [10] | 颜红兵, 马长生, 霍勇. 临床冠心病诊断与治疗指南[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2010:22-26. |
| YAN H B, MA C S, HUO Y. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of clinical coronary heart disease[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House,2010:22-26. | |
| [11] | 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会. 中国高血压防治指南2018年修订版[J]. 心脑血管病防治, 2019, 19(1):1-44. |
| Revision Committee of Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension in China. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension in China(2018 Revision)[J]. Cardio-cerebrovasc Dis Prev Treat, 2019, 19(1):1-44. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-816X.2019.01.001. | |
| [12] | 中华中医药学会心血管病分会. 冠心病稳定型心绞痛中医诊疗指南[J]. 中医杂志, 2019, 60(21):1880-1890. |
| Cardiovascular Disease Branch of China Association of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Stable Angina Pectoris in Coronary Heart Disease with Traditional Chinese Medicine[J]. J Tradit Chin Med, 2019, 60(21):1880-1890. doi:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2019.21.015. | |
| [13] | 周德伟, 夏莉, 吴家明. 血清25-羟维生素D3与老年高血压及其分级、心血管综合风险分层的相关性[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志, 2023, 15(8):1366-1369,1374. |
| ZHOU D W, XIA L, WU J M. Correlation between serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D3 and geriatric hypertension and its grading,cardiovascular comprehensive risk stratification[J]. Journal of Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 15(8):1366-1369,1374. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-6929.2023.08.021. | |
| [14] | 程航, 杨向东, 李帆, 等. 吲达帕胺联合贝那普利对2级原发性高血压患者血管内皮功能及心血管活性肽Salusins水平的影响[J]. 中国药业, 2022, 31(11):86-89. |
| CHENG H, YANG X D, LI F, et al. Effect of Indapamide combined with Benazepril on vascular endothelial function and level of cardiovascular active peptide salusins in patients with grade-Ⅱ essential hypertension[J]. China Pharmaceuticals, 2022, 31(11):86-89. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2022.11.022. | |
| [15] | 李秀, 王兰兰, 马文涛. 吲达帕胺结合氨氯地平片对高血压伴冠心病患者血压水平、心功能指标的影响[J]. 中外医疗, 2024, 43(17):81-84. |
| LI X, WANG L L, MA W T. Effect of Indapamide combined with Amlodipine tablet on blood pressure level and cardiac function index in patients with hypertension and coronary heart disease[J]. China Foreign Medical Treatment, 2024, 43(17):81-84. doi:10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2024.17.081. | |
| [16] | 尚菊菊, 刘红旭, 李享. 基于指南/共识探讨中医/中西医结合防治冠心病的诊疗进展[J]. 北京中医药, 2023, 42(9):939-942. |
| SHANG J J, LIU H X, LI X. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease with integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine[J]. Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023, 42(9):939-942. doi:10.16025/j.1674-1307.2023.09.002. | |
| [17] | 赵玉涵, 肖光旭, 范斯文, 等. 丹参-川芎药对治疗心脑血管疾病的作用机制及临床研究[J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2022, 30(6):461-469. |
| ZHAO Y H, XIAO G X, FAN S W, et al. Mechanism and clinical study of Danshen-Chuanxiong herbal pair in the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Arteriosclerosis, 2022, 30(6):461-469. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3949.2022.06.001. | |
| [18] | 王洋, 刘悦, 孔德昭, 等. 基于"脾气散精"理论探讨从脾论治冠心病调节血脂水平效果研究[J]. 辽宁中医药大学学报, 2022, 24(2):41-44. |
| WANG Y, LIU Y, KONG D Z, et al. Based on the theory of "Spleen-Qi Transporting the Essence to the Whole Body" to explore the effect of regulating blood lipid level in treating coronary heart disease from the spleen[J]. Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2022, 24(2):41-44. doi:10.13194/j.issn.1673-842x.2022.02.010. | |
| [19] | BABAKR A, MUKHTAR M, ALTHUBITI M, et al. Investigation of hyperlipidemia associated with increased levels of oxidized low-density lipoproteins and 8-hydroxy-2´-deoxyguanosine[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2023, 16:447-455. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S396676. |
| [20] | 姚惠, 张清文, 朱坤. 冠心宁注射液联合酒石酸美托洛尔片治疗冠心病心绞痛的效果观察[J]. 世界中医药, 2020, 15(18):2751-2754. |
| YAO H, ZHANG Q W, ZHU K. Observation on the effects of Guanxinning Injection combined with Metoprolol Tartrate on angina pectoris of coronary heart disease[J]. World Chin Med, 2020, 15(18):2751-2754. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2020.18.015. | |
| [21] | 杨海龙, 张炜, 谢润阳. 高血压合并冠心病患者血清8-OHdG、Adropin水平及其对PCI后发生主要不良心血管事件的预测价值[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2025, 22(16):2195-2201. |
| YANG H L, ZHANG W, XIE R Y. Serum 8-OHdG and Adropin levels in patients with hypertension complicating coronary heart disease and their predictive value for major adverse cardiovascular events occurrence after PCI[J]. Lab Med Clin, 2025, 22(16):2195-2201. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2025.16.007. | |
| [22] | RAMOS-ARELLANO L E, MATIA-GARCIA I, MARINO-ORTEGA L A, et al. Obesity,dyslipidemia,and high blood pressure are associated with cardiovascular risk,determined using high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentration,in young adults[J]. J Int Med Res, 2020, 48(12):300060520980596. doi:10.1177/0300060520980596. |
| [23] | LI B, WANG Z, HE Y, et al. Adropin improves radiation-induced myocardial injury via VEGFR2/PI3K/Akt pathway[J]. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2022, 2022:8230214. doi:10.1155/2022/8230214. |
| [24] | GOHBARA M, IWAHASHI N, NAKAHASHI H, et al. Clinical impact of admission urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine level for predicting cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome[J]. Heart Vessels, 2021, 36(1):38-47. doi:10.1007/s00380-020-01663-4. |
| [25] | 张泽骅, 任明. Adropin蛋白在心血管疾病中的临床研究进展[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2018, 20(2):205-207. |
| ZHANG Z H, REN M. Clinical research progress of Adropin protein in cardiovascular diseases[J]. Chin J Geriatr Heart Brain Vessel Dis, 2018, 20(2):205-207. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2018.02.026. | |
| [26] | 田祖云. 冠心宁片联合西药治疗冠心病合并轻度高血压病临床研究[J]. 新中医, 2022, 54(18):35-39. |
| TIAN Z Y. Clinical study on Guanxinning Tablets combined with Western Medicine for coronary heart disease complicated with mild hypertension[J]. Journal of New Chinese Medicine, 2022, 54(18):35-39. doi:10.13457/j.cnki.jncm.2022.18.008. |
| [1] | 邬文伟, 丘妙玲, 朱海坤, 罗荣. 乙醛脱氢酶2基因多态性在冠心病中的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2026, 54(1): 108-112. |
| [2] | 徐培璐, 乔建民, 李静, 刘建荣, 陈树军, 季春鹏. 心外膜脂肪厚度联合血清ADAM10、STIM1对冠心病的诊断价值[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(9): 963-966. |
| [3] | 贾薇, 田志. Furin启动子甲基化水平与社区非糖尿病人群血压的相关性[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(9): 987-992. |
| [4] | 陈国庆, 严琴, 陈明九, 王允琴. 撮风散加味治疗前循环脑梗死急性期风痰阻络证的临床研究[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(7): 761-764. |
| [5] | 吴宾, 杨自更, 金玲, 张婧, 韦红梅, 蔡冰冰, 魏玉英. miRNA-381-3p/MuRF1轴对低氧性肺动脉高压小鼠心肺损伤的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(6): 571-577. |
| [6] | 郝妍妍, 张宇, 白耀武, 石东海. 瑞马唑仑调控Nrf2/GPX4通路对脓毒性休克大鼠循环功能的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(4): 349-354. |
| [7] | 吴宾, 杨自更, 张婧, 李书红, 余凤, 王嘉玮, 李彩玲. 柚皮素对低氧性肺动脉高压大鼠右心室重塑的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(2): 129-134. |
| [8] | 吴静静, 张福森, 陈皓, 赵亿, 刘泉, 李冬梅. 血清Syndecan-1、endocan-1联合qSOFA评分在脓毒症诊断及预后评估中的应用价值[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(2): 185-188. |
| [9] | 李雪奇, 李世光, 许恩文, 张瑞雷, 陈鹏莉, 张庆斌. 脂代谢指标、血清γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与冠心病合并冠状动脉钙化的关联分析[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(11): 1165-1169. |
| [10] | 王吕, 卢红. 血浆ET-1、NO水平联合评估妊娠期高血压疾病患者母婴结局的价值[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(11): 1185-1190. |
| [11] | 赵树站, 金冬霞, 李曦铭, 郝天旭, 陆艺蓓. 低密度脂蛋白跨内皮细胞转运机制的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(10): 1110-1115. |
| [12] | 李莘, 李雪, 王谙. 温石棉对内皮细胞Wnt5a、p16和p21表达的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 679-682. |
| [13] | 杨睿, 魏琼, 孙逸坤, 赵梦竹, 程序, 刘梦华, 张冬梅. 缺氧H9c2来源外泌体对HUVEC增殖、迁移和成管能力的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(7): 714-719. |
| [14] | 李勇, 苏亚坤, 张宏博, 李原, 李占虎, 闫小菊. 原发性高血压早期肾损害患者血清白脂素水平的临床意义[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(6): 609-613. |
| [15] | 郑康鹏, 唐鑫国, 徐琦, 樊钰亭, 梁博, 付晓伟, 方路. 胆囊癌根治手术成功实施列线图预测模型的建立和验证[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(5): 536-540. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||