Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (7): 765-769.doi: 10.11958/20250601
• Drug Clinical Evaluations • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHU Fangfang(), LI Shida△(
), CHEN Xiuying
Received:
2025-02-17
Revised:
2025-04-14
Published:
2025-07-15
Online:
2025-07-21
Contact:
△E-mail:ZHU Fangfang, LI Shida, CHEN Xiuying. The therapeutic effect of Dangui Quyu Pill combined with acupuncture on adenomyosis[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2025, 53(7): 765-769.
CLC Number:
组别 | n | 显效 | 有效 | 无效 | 总有效 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 60 | 15(25.00) | 28(46.67) | 17(28.33) | 43(71.67) |
治疗组 | 60 | 22(36.67) | 32(53.33) | 6(10.00) | 54(90.00) |
χ2 | 6.508* |
Tab.1 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups
组别 | n | 显效 | 有效 | 无效 | 总有效 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 60 | 15(25.00) | 28(46.67) | 17(28.33) | 43(71.67) |
治疗组 | 60 | 22(36.67) | 32(53.33) | 6(10.00) | 54(90.00) |
χ2 | 6.508* |
组别 | 疼痛VAS评分 | 中医症候积分 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | |
对照组 | 7(6,8) | 5(4,6) | 9.335** | 14(13,16) | 6(5,8) | 9.566** |
治疗组 | 7.(6,8) | 4(3,5) | 9.601** | 14(13,15) | 5(4,6) | 9.623** |
Z | 0.836 | 6.721** | 0.153 | 6.651** |
Tab.2 Comparison of pain degree score and TCM syndrome score between the two groups
组别 | 疼痛VAS评分 | 中医症候积分 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z | |
对照组 | 7(6,8) | 5(4,6) | 9.335** | 14(13,16) | 6(5,8) | 9.566** |
治疗组 | 7.(6,8) | 4(3,5) | 9.601** | 14(13,15) | 5(4,6) | 9.623** |
Z | 0.836 | 6.721** | 0.153 | 6.651** |
组别 | 月经量/mL | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 95.47±10.23 | 74.52±8.14 | 11.648** | ||||
治疗组 | 97.88±10.17 | 65.30±7.11 | 19.368** | ||||
t | 1.297 | 6.607** | |||||
组别 | 月经周期/d | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 28.20±4.47 | 27.65±3.32 | 0.725 | ||||
治疗组 | 29.25±4.54 | 28.15±4.01 | 1.467 | ||||
t | 1.277 | 0.743 | |||||
组别 | 子宫体积/cm3 | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 155.58±18.36 | 123.65±13.47 | 9.926** | ||||
治疗组 | 157.22±17.89 | 110.22±12.02 | 18.046** | ||||
t | 0.496 | 5.762** |
Tab.3 Comparison of menstrual volume, menstrual cycle and uterine volume between the two groups
组别 | 月经量/mL | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 95.47±10.23 | 74.52±8.14 | 11.648** | ||||
治疗组 | 97.88±10.17 | 65.30±7.11 | 19.368** | ||||
t | 1.297 | 6.607** | |||||
组别 | 月经周期/d | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 28.20±4.47 | 27.65±3.32 | 0.725 | ||||
治疗组 | 29.25±4.54 | 28.15±4.01 | 1.467 | ||||
t | 1.277 | 0.743 | |||||
组别 | 子宫体积/cm3 | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 155.58±18.36 | 123.65±13.47 | 9.926** | ||||
治疗组 | 157.22±17.89 | 110.22±12.02 | 18.046** | ||||
t | 0.496 | 5.762** |
组别 | VEGF/(mmol/L) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 115.58±12.04 | 78.58±8.02 | 19.391** | ||||
治疗组 | 116.32±13.15 | 66.47±7.18 | 25.747** | ||||
t | 0.321 | 8.720** | |||||
组别 | CA199/(U/mL) | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 50.36±5.23 | 42.21±4.35 | 9.905** | ||||
治疗组 | 51.04±5.18 | 32.17±3.42 | 21.837** | ||||
t | 0.715 | 14.037** | |||||
组别 | CA125/(U/mL) | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 64.58±21.34 | 28.51±6.45 | 12.472** | ||||
治疗组 | 61.37±19.76 | 21.94±4.38 | 15.578** | ||||
t | 0.855 | 6.533** |
Tab.4 Comparison of serum levels of VEGF, CA199 and CA125 between the two groups
组别 | VEGF/(mmol/L) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 115.58±12.04 | 78.58±8.02 | 19.391** | ||||
治疗组 | 116.32±13.15 | 66.47±7.18 | 25.747** | ||||
t | 0.321 | 8.720** | |||||
组别 | CA199/(U/mL) | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 50.36±5.23 | 42.21±4.35 | 9.905** | ||||
治疗组 | 51.04±5.18 | 32.17±3.42 | 21.837** | ||||
t | 0.715 | 14.037** | |||||
组别 | CA125/(U/mL) | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
对照组 | 64.58±21.34 | 28.51±6.45 | 12.472** | ||||
治疗组 | 61.37±19.76 | 21.94±4.38 | 15.578** | ||||
t | 0.855 | 6.533** |
[1] | 陈紫均, 沈宇杰, 廖文静, 等. 子宫腺肌病引发不孕的发病机制及治疗进展[J]. 医学综述, 2024, 30(1):87-92. |
CHEN Z J, SHEN Y J, LIAO W J, et al. Pathogenesis and treatment progress of infertility caused by adenomyosis[J]. Medical Recapitulate, 2024, 30(1):87-92. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2024.01.015. | |
[2] | DONNEZ J, STRATOPOULOU C A, DOLMANS M M. Uterine adenomyosis:From disease pathogenesis to a new medical approach using GnRH antagonists[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(19):9941. doi:10.3390/ijerph18199941. |
[3] | ANTERO M F, AYHAN A, SEGARS J, et al. Pathology and pathogenesis of adenomyosis[J]. Semin Reprod Med, 2020, 38(2):108-118. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1718922. |
[4] | 何浏铭, 黄剑, 黄菲. 地诺孕素在子宫腺肌病患者高强度超声聚焦治疗后的应用效果及安全性[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2024, 23(24):2636-2640. |
HE L M, HUANG J, HUANG F. Comparison of the effects and safety of dienogest after high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy in patients with uterine adenomyosis[J]. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2024, 23(24):2636-2640. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.24.016. | |
[5] | 杨帅, 刘婷. 子宫切除术中采用复合麻醉对患者围术期镇痛及卵巢功能的影响[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2022, 51(7):803-806. |
YANG S, LIU T. Effect of compound anesthesia in hysterectomy on perioperative analgesia and ovarian function[J]. Shaanxi Medical Journal, 2022, 51(7):803-806. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.07.008. | |
[6] | 潘丹, 郎伯旭, 林巧. 针刺联合隔药饼灸周期调治肾虚血瘀型子宫腺肌症疗效观察[J]. 上海针灸杂志, 2020, 39(1):42-46. |
PAN D, LANG B X, LIN Q. Observations on the efficacy of periodic treatment with acupuncture plus herbal cake moxibustion for adenomyosis of kidney deficiency and blood stasis type[J]. Shanghai J Acu-mox, 2020, 39(1):42-46. doi:10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2020.01.0042. | |
[7] | 李世大, 陈秀英, 张士表. 针刺联合丹归祛瘀丸治疗子宫腺肌症临床研究[J]. 光明中医, 2023, 38(20):3899-3903. |
LI S D, CHEN X Y, ZHANG S B. Clinical study of acupuncture combined with Danguiquyu pill in the treatment of adenomyosis[J]. Guangming Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023, 38(20):3899-3903. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-8914.2023.20.003. | |
[8] | 温馨, 萨日娜, 宋建东. CA125、MDM2、VEGF、FAK在子宫腺肌症中的表达水平及其意义[J]. 中国医学创新, 2022, 19(24):41-45. |
WEN X, SA R N, SONG J D. Expression and significance of CA125,MDM2,VEGF and FAK in adenomyosis[J]. Medical Innovation of China, 2022, 19(24):41-45. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2022.24.010. | |
[9] | SHUANG T, WANG Y, ZHAO L, et al. Extremely high serum CA19-9 level along with elevated D-dimer in assisting detection of ruptured ovarian endometriosis[J]. Ann Med, 2022, 54(1):1444-1451. doi:10.1080/07853890.2022.2074534. |
[10] | 谈勇. 中医妇产科学[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国中医出版社,2016:324-350. |
TAN Y. Obstetrics and Gynecology[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: China Traditional Chinese Medicine Press,2016:324-350. | |
[11] | 国家中医药管理局. 中医病证诊断疗效标准[M]. 南京大学出版社,1994:244-245. |
National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine(NATCM). Diagnostic efficacy criteria of TCM syndrome[M]. Nanjing University Press,1994:244-245. | |
[12] | SUNG Y T, WU J S. The visual analogue scale for rating,ranking and paired-comparison(VAS-RRP):A new technique for psychological measurement[J]. Behav Res Methods, 2018, 50(4):1694-1715. doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8 |
[13] | 郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社,2002:68-69. |
ZHENG X Y. Guiding principles of clinical research of new traditional Chinese medicine(trial implementation)[M]. Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press,2002:68-69. | |
[14] | 夏心瑀, 梁艳, 曹世杰, 等. 基于“病因、病位、病性、病势”浅析子宫腺肌症的针灸治疗思路[J]. 中国针灸, 2024, 44(4):455-459. |
XIA X Y, LIANG Y, CAO S J, et al. Treatment ideas of acupuncture and moxibustion for adenomyosis based on "etiology,location natureand development of disease"[J]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, 2024, 44(4):455-459. doi:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20230726-k0001. | |
[15] | ZHAI J, VANNUCCINI S, PETRAGLIA F, et al. Adenomyosis:mechanisms and pathogenesis[J]. Semin Reprod Med, 2020, 38(2/3):129-143. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1716687. |
[16] | KHO K A, CHEN J S, HALVORSON L M. Diagnosis,evaluation,and treatment of adenomyosis[J]. JAMA, 2021, 326(2):177-178. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.26436. |
[17] | 李世大, 陈秀英, 张士表. 丹归祛瘀丸联合醋酸亮丙瑞林治疗子宫腺肌病的临床观察[J]. 中国民间疗法, 2024, 32(1):80-82. |
LI S D, CHEN X Y, ZHANG S B. Clinical observation of Danguiquyu pill combined with leuprolide acetate in the treatment of adenomyosis[J]. China's Naturopathy, 2024, 32(1):80-82. doi:10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.2024.0125. | |
[18] | 侯学思, 赵吉平, 王宁, 等. 针刺治疗子宫腺肌病继发性痛经:前瞻性病例系列研究[J]. 中国针灸, 2020, 40(8):834-838. |
HOU X S, ZHAO J P, WANG N, et al. Acupuncture for secondary dysmenorrhea of adenomyosis: a prospective case-series study[J]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, 2020, 40(8):834-838. doi:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20190630-0002. | |
[19] | 王应梅. 针刺法治疗子宫腺肌病的效果观察[J]. 当代医药论丛, 2018, 16(21):188-189. |
WANG Y M. Effect of acupuncture therapy on adenomyosis[J]. Contemporary Medicine Forum, 2018, 16(21):188-189. doi:CNKI:SUN:QYWA.0.2018-21-137. | |
[20] | 田丽颖, 成自霞, 程晓嫚, 等. 针刺治疗子宫腺肌病痛经——随机临床试验(英文)[J]. 世界针灸杂志(英文版), 2022, 32(3):199-203. |
TIAN L Y, CHENG Z X, CHENG X M, et al. Acupuncture for dysmenorrhea of adenomyosis:A randomized clinical trial[J]. World Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 2022, 32(3):199-203. doi:10.1016/j.wjam.2021.11.004. | |
[21] | 张玉, 王凯平. 当归多糖的研究进展[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2023, 58(12):1065-1073. |
ZHANG Y, WANG K P. Research progress of Angelica sinensis Polysaccharide[J]. Chin Pharm J, 2023, 58(12):1065-1073. doi:10.11669/cpj.2023.12.002. | |
[22] | 杨卜瑞, 贺小芳, 师晶晶, 等. 基于网络药理学分析山慈菇-浙贝母药对治疗乳腺癌的作用机制[J]. 世界中医药, 2021, 16(21):3143-3147. |
YANG B R, HE X F, SHI J J, et al. Study on mechanisms of drug pair of Edible Tulip-Bulbus Fritillariae Thunbergii on the treatment of breast cancer based on network pharmacology[J]. World Chinese Medicine, 2021, 16(21):3143-3147. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2021.21.007. | |
[23] | 黄艺婷, 苏丹, 鲍毅, 等. 青皮的炮制历史沿革,效应物质及古今临方配伍研究进展[J]. 中南药学, 2024, 22(1):186-193. |
HUANG Y T, SU D, BAO Y, et al. Research progress in process evolution,effector substances,and compatibility of Citri reticulatae pericarpium viride[J]. Central South Pharmacy, 2024, 22(1):186-193. doi:10.7539/j.issn.1672-2981.2024.01.029. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||