
Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (10): 1071-1076.doi: 10.11958/20252351
• Drug Clinical Evaluations • Previous Articles Next Articles
HU Limei(
), LIU Huiying, CHEN Yaru, ZHAO Panpan, GU Jun, REN Weidong
Received:2025-06-24
Revised:2025-07-24
Published:2025-10-15
Online:2025-10-12
HU Limei, LIU Huiying, CHEN Yaru, ZHAO Panpan, GU Jun, REN Weidong. Clinical efficacy of caragliflozin and empagliflozin in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2025, 53(10): 1071-1076.
CLC Number:
| 组别 | n | 性别 | 年龄/岁 | 病程/年 | 吸烟史 | 饮酒史 | 高脂血症 | 高血压史 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | ||||||||
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 39(54.93) | 32(45.07) | 48.94±8.69 | 3.15±0.84 | 24(33.80) | 18(25.35) | 15(21.13) | 20(28.17) |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 37(52.86) | 33(47.14) | 48.29±8.91 | 3.26±0.76 | 19(27.14) | 14(20.00) | 11(15.71) | 15(21.43) |
| χ2或t | 0.061 | 0.450 | 0.769 | 0.738 | 0.576 | 0.687 | 0.858 | ||
Tab.1 Comparison of general information between the two groups of patients
| 组别 | n | 性别 | 年龄/岁 | 病程/年 | 吸烟史 | 饮酒史 | 高脂血症 | 高血压史 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | ||||||||
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 39(54.93) | 32(45.07) | 48.94±8.69 | 3.15±0.84 | 24(33.80) | 18(25.35) | 15(21.13) | 20(28.17) |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 37(52.86) | 33(47.14) | 48.29±8.91 | 3.26±0.76 | 19(27.14) | 14(20.00) | 11(15.71) | 15(21.43) |
| χ2或t | 0.061 | 0.450 | 0.769 | 0.738 | 0.576 | 0.687 | 0.858 | ||
| 组别 | n | TNF-α/(ng/L) | IL-6/(ng/L) | CRP/(mg/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 23.68±3.17 | 16.23±2.30 | 16.472** | 21.06±3.65 | 13.15±3.06 | 14.904** | 3.76±0.97 | 2.03±0.87 | 10.845** |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 24.12±3.39 | 16.82±2.67 | 14.275** | 20.95±3.76 | 13.71±3.24 | 12.551** | 3.68±0.84 | 2.18±0.91 | 10.145** |
| t | 0.814 | 1.427 | 0.176 | 1.075 | 0.459 | 1.007 | ||||
Tab.2 Comparison of inflammatory indexes before and after treatment between the two groups of patients
| 组别 | n | TNF-α/(ng/L) | IL-6/(ng/L) | CRP/(mg/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 23.68±3.17 | 16.23±2.30 | 16.472** | 21.06±3.65 | 13.15±3.06 | 14.904** | 3.76±0.97 | 2.03±0.87 | 10.845** |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 24.12±3.39 | 16.82±2.67 | 14.275** | 20.95±3.76 | 13.71±3.24 | 12.551** | 3.68±0.84 | 2.18±0.91 | 10.145** |
| t | 0.814 | 1.427 | 0.176 | 1.075 | 0.459 | 1.007 | ||||
| 组别 | n | FBG/(mmol/L) | 2 h-PPG/(mmol/L) | HbA1c/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 10.56±1.23 | 6.16±0.91 | 25.430** | 18.31±4.81 | 10.43±3.04 | 13.911** | 9.12±0.75 | 6.96±0.67 | 17.322** |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 10.41±1.17 | 6.53±0.97 | 20.460** | 18.16±4.37 | 11.65±3.61 | 9.042** | 9.06±0.84 | 7.23±0.78 | 12.366** |
| t | 0.741 | 2.327* | 0.211 | 2.169* | 0.448 | 2.204* | ||||
Tab.3 Comparison of glucose metabolism indexes before and after treatment between the two groups of patients
| 组别 | n | FBG/(mmol/L) | 2 h-PPG/(mmol/L) | HbA1c/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 10.56±1.23 | 6.16±0.91 | 25.430** | 18.31±4.81 | 10.43±3.04 | 13.911** | 9.12±0.75 | 6.96±0.67 | 17.322** |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 10.41±1.17 | 6.53±0.97 | 20.460** | 18.16±4.37 | 11.65±3.61 | 9.042** | 9.06±0.84 | 7.23±0.78 | 12.366** |
| t | 0.741 | 2.327* | 0.211 | 2.169* | 0.448 | 2.204* | ||||
| 组别 | n | TG/(mmol/L) | TC/(mmol/L) | LDL-C/(mmol/L) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 2.86±0.65 | 1.42±0.59 | 100.540** | 6.19±0.56 | 3.75±0.59 | 27.769** | 5.06±0.49 | 2.82±0.45 | 31.166** | ||||||
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 2.80±0.79 | 1.62±0.54 | 10.061** | 6.23±0.61 | 3.95±0.64 | 19.318** | 5.11±0.43 | 2.95±0.56 | 33.054** | ||||||
| t | 0.027 | 2.081* | 0.501 | 1.821 | 0.774 | 1.871 | ||||||||||
| 组别 | HDL-C/(mmol/L) | BMI/(kg/m2) | ||||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||||||
| 卡格列净组 | 0.93±0.16 | 1.62±0.24 | 20.120** | 31.87±0.84 | 27.41±0.87 | 22.012** | ||||||||||
| 恩格列净组 | 0.95±0.18 | 1.53±0.28 | 15.314** | 31.94±0.91 | 27.73±0.96 | 15.418** | ||||||||||
| t | 0.816 | 2.193* | 0.475 | 0.460 | ||||||||||||
Tab.4 Comparison of lipid metabolism indexes and BMI before and after treatment between the two groups of patients
| 组别 | n | TG/(mmol/L) | TC/(mmol/L) | LDL-C/(mmol/L) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | ||||||||
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 2.86±0.65 | 1.42±0.59 | 100.540** | 6.19±0.56 | 3.75±0.59 | 27.769** | 5.06±0.49 | 2.82±0.45 | 31.166** | ||||||
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 2.80±0.79 | 1.62±0.54 | 10.061** | 6.23±0.61 | 3.95±0.64 | 19.318** | 5.11±0.43 | 2.95±0.56 | 33.054** | ||||||
| t | 0.027 | 2.081* | 0.501 | 1.821 | 0.774 | 1.871 | ||||||||||
| 组别 | HDL-C/(mmol/L) | BMI/(kg/m2) | ||||||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||||||||
| 卡格列净组 | 0.93±0.16 | 1.62±0.24 | 20.120** | 31.87±0.84 | 27.41±0.87 | 22.012** | ||||||||||
| 恩格列净组 | 0.95±0.18 | 1.53±0.28 | 15.314** | 31.94±0.91 | 27.73±0.96 | 15.418** | ||||||||||
| t | 0.816 | 2.193* | 0.475 | 0.460 | ||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 1.03±0.31 | 0.70±0.09 | 11.787** |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 1.00±0.00 | 0.75±0.12 | 17.540** |
| t | 0.652 | 2.748* |
Tab.5 Comparison of miR-144 expression before and after treatment between the two groups
| 组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 1.03±0.31 | 0.70±0.09 | 11.787** |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 1.00±0.00 | 0.75±0.12 | 17.540** |
| t | 0.652 | 2.748* |
| 组别 | n | 显效 | 有效 | 无效 | 总有效 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 37(52.11) | 29(40.85) | 5(7.04) | 66(92.96) |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 30(42.86) | 32(45.71) | 8(11.43) | 62(88.57) |
| χ2 | 0.810 | ||||
Tab.6 Comparison of clinical efficacy after treatment between the two groups of patients
| 组别 | n | 显效 | 有效 | 无效 | 总有效 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 37(52.11) | 29(40.85) | 5(7.04) | 66(92.96) |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 30(42.86) | 32(45.71) | 8(11.43) | 62(88.57) |
| χ2 | 0.810 | ||||
| 组别 | n | 低血糖 | 泌尿/生殖 系统感染 | 恶心 呕吐 | 疼痛 | 低血 容量 | 总发生 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 2(2.82) | 3(4.23) | 2(2.82) | 1(1.41) | 1(1.41) | 9(12.68) |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 3(4.29) | 4(5.71) | 1(1.43) | 1(1.43) | 2(2.86) | 10(14.29) |
| χ2 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.078 |
Tab.7 Comparison of the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups
| 组别 | n | 低血糖 | 泌尿/生殖 系统感染 | 恶心 呕吐 | 疼痛 | 低血 容量 | 总发生 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卡格列净组 | 71 | 2(2.82) | 3(4.23) | 2(2.82) | 1(1.41) | 1(1.41) | 9(12.68) |
| 恩格列净组 | 70 | 3(4.29) | 4(5.71) | 1(1.43) | 1(1.43) | 2(2.86) | 10(14.29) |
| χ2 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.078 |
| [1] | JI L, LIU J, XU Z J, et al. Efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin added to metformin:a pooled population from Asia with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity[J]. Diabetes Ther, 2023, 14(2):319-334. doi:10.1007/s13300-022-01345-6. |
| [2] | POOCHANASRI M, KOOKANOK C, KAEWPUT W, et al. Comparison of obesity prevalence and associated factors among Thai patients with type 2 diabetes between 2014 and 2018[J]. Diabetol Metab Syndr, 2025, 17(1):254. doi:10.1186/s13098-025-01781-x. |
| [3] | ANDREEA M M, SURABHI S, RAZVAN-IONUT P, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors:harms or unexpected benefits?[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2023, 59(4):742. doi:10.3390/medicina59040742. |
| [4] | 林静, 贝筝, 黄佳琪. 卡格列净联合门冬胰岛素治疗血糖控制不佳老年2型糖尿病的临床研究[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2023, 38(8):1045-1048. |
| LIN J, BEI Z, HUANG J Q. Clinical study of kangkagliflozin combined with insulin aspart in the treatment of elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor blood glucose control[J]. J North Sichuan Med Coll, 2023, 38(8):1045-1048. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3697.2023.08.008. | |
| [5] | LAFFEL L M, DANNE T, KLINGENSMITH G J, et al. Efficacy and safety of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin versus placebo and the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin versus placebo in young people with type 2 diabetes (DINAMO):a multicentre,randomised,double-blind,parallel group,phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2023, 11(3):169-181. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00387-4. |
| [6] | 江苏省老年医学学会老年内分泌专业委员会,江苏省医学会糖尿病学分会,江苏省预防医学会糖尿病预防与控制专业委员会, 等. 老年2型糖尿病病人SGLT-2抑制剂应用专家共识[J]. 实用老年医学, 2023, 37(8):1-8. |
| Geriatric Endocrinology Committee of Jiangsu Geriatric Medical Association,Diabetes Branch of Jiangsu Medical Association,Diabetes Prevention and Control Committee of Jiangsu Preventive Medicine Association, et al. Expert consensus on application of SGLT-2 inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes[J]. Practical Geriatrics, 2023, 37(8):1-8. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.08.027. | |
| [7] | 苏海玉, 张宏颖, 杨俐, 等. 卡格列净联合阿卡波糖对2型糖尿病患者miR-144、NLRP3 mRNA及MCP-1水平的影响[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2022, 43(4):420-423,427. |
| SU H Y, ZHANG H Y, YANG L, et al. Effect of canagliflozin combined with acarbose on levels of miR-144,NLRP3 mRNA and MCP-1 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Int J Lab Med, 2022, 43(4):420-423,427. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809. | |
| [8] | 中华医学会内分泌学分会. 中国2型糖尿病合并肥胖综合管理专家共识[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2016, 32(8):623-627. |
| Endocrinology Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on integrated management of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with obesity in China[J]. Chin J Endocrinol Metab, 2016, 32(8):623-627. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2016.11.006. | |
| [9] | 迟家敏. 实用糖尿病学[M]. 3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009:503-510. |
| CHI J M. Practice of diabetes[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2009:503-510. | |
| [10] | ARTASENSI A, MAZZOLARI A, PEDRETTI A, et al. Obesity and type 2 diabetes: adiposopathy as a triggering factor and therapeutic options[J]. Molecules, 2023, 28(7):3094. doi:10.3390/molecules28073094. |
| [11] | MARUSHCHAK M, KOZAK K, KRYNYTSKA I. Comorbid overweight/obesity and chronic pancreatitis exacerbate the dyslipidemia progression in type 2 diabetic patients[J]. Endocr Regul, 2022, 56(3):168-177. doi:10.2478/enr-2022-0018. |
| [12] | WU Y, YANG Z, CAO Q. Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists combined with SGLT-2 inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes:a meta-analysis[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2024, 16(11):6852-6866. doi:10.62347/MCEE4840. |
| [13] | KLUGER A Y, TECSON K M, LEE A Y, et al. Class effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiorenal outcomes[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2019, 18(1):99. doi:10.1186/s12933-019-0903-4. |
| [14] | PERKOVIC V, DE ZEEUW D, MAHAFFEY K W, et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes:results from the CANVAS Program randomised clinical trials[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2018, 6(9):691-704. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(8)30141-4. |
| [15] | 曾茗, 盛兰兰, 夏宇, 等. 基于模型荟萃分析5个SGLT2抑制剂在单用和联合用药治疗2型糖尿病的临床疗效[J]. 药学与临床研究, 2022, 30(3):200-206. |
| ZENG M, SHENG L L, XIA Y, et al. Model-based meta-analysis of clinical efficacy of five SGLT2 inhibitors in monotherapy and in combination for type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Pharm Clin Res, 2022, 30(3):200-206. doi:10.13664/j.cnki.pcr.2022.03.003 | |
| [16] | TOMLINSON B, LI Y H. Canagliflozin + metformin ER for the treatment of type 2 diabetes:the evidence to date[J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2023, 24(18):1937-1947. doi:10.1080/14656566.2023.2276180. |
| [17] | 徐小英, 侯幸赟, 李玉珍, 等. 国内上市的钠-葡萄糖耦联转运体2抑制剂的比较[J]. 世界临床药物, 2022, 43(6):663-670. |
| XU X Y, HOU X Y, LI Y Z, et al. Comparison of sodium-glucose linked transporter 2 inhibitors approved in China[J]. World Clin Drugs, 2022, 43(6):663-670. doi:10.13683/j.wph.2022.06.003. | |
| [18] | 应纪祥, 钟莉, 张婷, 等. 卡格列净治疗2型糖尿病的疗效观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2023, 20(4):153-157. |
| YING J X, ZHONG L, ZHANG T, et al. Observation on curative effect of canagliflozin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. J Clin Med Pract, 2023, 20(4):153-157. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2023.04.038. | |
| [19] | 程艳璐, 陈瑛, 王雅楠, 等. 卡格列净通过抑制活性氧/NOD样受体热蛋白结构域相关蛋白3信号通路减缓足细胞损伤[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2024, 40(1):42-48. |
| CHENG Y L, CHEN Y, WANG Y N, et al. Canagliflozin attenuates human podocyte injury through inhibiting reactive oxygen species/NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain associated protein 3 signaling pathway[J]. Chin J Nephrol, 2024, 40(1):42-48. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20230602-00605. | |
| [20] | 钱宇池, 万璐, 卢宇欣, 等. 恩格列净通过上调Epac1表达抑制炎症反应减轻2型糖尿病大鼠肾损伤[J]. 细胞与分子免疫学杂志, 2024, 40(2):129-134. |
| QIAN Y C, WAN L, LU Y X, et al. Empagliflozin inhibits inflammatory response and alleviates renal injury in type 2 diabetic rats by up-regulating the expression of exchange protein 1 directly activated by cAMP (Epac1)[J]. Cell Mol Immunol, 2024, 40(2):129-134. doi:10.13423/j.cnki.cjcmi.009712. | |
| [21] | 贾筠, 杜望磊, 肖广智, 等. 血清外泌体源性microRNA对类风湿性关节炎的诊断意义[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2023, 32(2):160-164. |
| JIA Y, DU W L, XIAO G Z, et al. Diagnostic significance of serum exosome derived microRNA in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. J Reg Anat Oper Surg, 2023, 32(2):160-164. doi:10.11659/jjssx.07E022010. | |
| [22] | 裴芝皆, 车俊志, 上官昌盛, 等. 卡格列净联合阿卡波糖治疗对2型糖尿病患者MCP-1、NLRP3 mRNA及miR-144水平的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2023, 22(23):2512-2516. |
| PEI Z J, CHE J Z, SHANGGUAN C S, et al. Effects of cagliazine combined with acarbose on MCP-1,NLRP3 mRNA and miR-144 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. J Clin Exp Med, 2023, 22(23):2512-2516. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2023.23.013. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||