
Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2026, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 88-92.doi: 10.11958/20252396
• Drug Clinical Evaluations • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Wei1(
), WANG Jianjian2, HUANG Ying3, YANG Jun4,△(
)
Received:2025-07-01
Revised:2025-09-16
Published:2026-01-15
Online:2026-01-19
Contact:
△ E-mail:HUANG Wei, WANG Jianjian, HUANG Ying, YANG Jun. The effect of compound Kushen Injection combined with chemotherapy and bevacizumab on short-term efficacy of patients with ovarian cancer[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2026, 54(1): 88-92.
CLC Number:
| 组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 47 | 50.55±8.62 | 21.37±2.56 | |||||||
| 观察组 | 45 | 54.38±12.21 | 21.03±2.39 | |||||||
| t | 1.741 | 0.660 | ||||||||
| 组别 | FIGO分期 | 病理类型 | ||||||||
| Ⅱ期 | Ⅲ期 | Ⅳ期 | 高级别 浆液性癌 | 透明 细胞癌 | 子宫内膜 样癌 | |||||
| 对照组 | 4(8.5) | 41(87.2) | 2(4.3) | 44(93.6) | 1(2.1) | 2(4.3) | ||||
| 观察组 | 3(6.7) | 40(88.9) | 2(4.4) | 44(97.8) | 1(2.2) | 0(0.0) | ||||
| χ2 | 0.291 | 1.828 | ||||||||
Tab.1 Comparison of general information between two groups of patients
| 组别 | n | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 47 | 50.55±8.62 | 21.37±2.56 | |||||||
| 观察组 | 45 | 54.38±12.21 | 21.03±2.39 | |||||||
| t | 1.741 | 0.660 | ||||||||
| 组别 | FIGO分期 | 病理类型 | ||||||||
| Ⅱ期 | Ⅲ期 | Ⅳ期 | 高级别 浆液性癌 | 透明 细胞癌 | 子宫内膜 样癌 | |||||
| 对照组 | 4(8.5) | 41(87.2) | 2(4.3) | 44(93.6) | 1(2.1) | 2(4.3) | ||||
| 观察组 | 3(6.7) | 40(88.9) | 2(4.4) | 44(97.8) | 1(2.2) | 0(0.0) | ||||
| χ2 | 0.291 | 1.828 | ||||||||
| 组别 | n | 完全缓解 | 部分缓解 | 疾病稳定 | 疾病进展 | 客观缓解 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 47 | 10(21.3) | 18(38.3) | 13(27.7) | 6(12.7) | 28(59.6) |
| 观察组 | 45 | 15(33.3) | 21(46.7) | 6(13.3) | 3(6.7) | 36(80.0) |
| χ2 | 4.530* |
Tab.2 Comparison of treatment effects between two groups of patients [例(%)]
| 组别 | n | 完全缓解 | 部分缓解 | 疾病稳定 | 疾病进展 | 客观缓解 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 47 | 10(21.3) | 18(38.3) | 13(27.7) | 6(12.7) | 28(59.6) |
| 观察组 | 45 | 15(33.3) | 21(46.7) | 6(13.3) | 3(6.7) | 36(80.0) |
| χ2 | 4.530* |
| 组别 | n | HE4/(pmol/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
| 对照组 | 47 | 566.36±163.72 | 121.38±56.33 | 17.648** | |||
| 观察组 | 45 | 530.56±104.77 | 79.89±24.69 | 27.521** | |||
| t | 1.243 | 4.541** | |||||
| 组别 | CA125/(U/mL) | ||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
| 对照组 | 1 464.23±239.84 | 394.49±94.38 | 11.373** | ||||
| 观察组 | 1 355.71±395.82 | 96.07±87.64 | 20.103** | ||||
| t | 1.598 | 15.699** | |||||
Tab.3 Comparison of tumor marker levels between two groups of patients ($\bar{x}±s$)
| 组别 | n | HE4/(pmol/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
| 对照组 | 47 | 566.36±163.72 | 121.38±56.33 | 17.648** | |||
| 观察组 | 45 | 530.56±104.77 | 79.89±24.69 | 27.521** | |||
| t | 1.243 | 4.541** | |||||
| 组别 | CA125/(U/mL) | ||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
| 对照组 | 1 464.23±239.84 | 394.49±94.38 | 11.373** | ||||
| 观察组 | 1 355.71±395.82 | 96.07±87.64 | 20.103** | ||||
| t | 1.598 | 15.699** | |||||
| 组别 | n | VEGF | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
| 对照组 | 47 | 53.32±5.50 | 34.87±8.09 | 27.801** | |||
| 观察组 | 45 | 54.62±6.94 | 22.09±5.15 | 19.072** | |||
| t | 1.000 | 8.993** | |||||
| 组别 | TGF-β1 | ||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
| 对照组 | 346.55±21.94 | 209.32±19.55 | 31.987** | ||||
| 观察组 | 348.82±21.54 | 165.80±17.52 | 42.914** | ||||
| t | 0.472 | 11.229** | |||||
Tab.4 Comparison of VEGF and TGF-β1 levels between two groups of patients (ng/L,$\bar{x}±s$)
| 组别 | n | VEGF | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
| 对照组 | 47 | 53.32±5.50 | 34.87±8.09 | 27.801** | |||
| 观察组 | 45 | 54.62±6.94 | 22.09±5.15 | 19.072** | |||
| t | 1.000 | 8.993** | |||||
| 组别 | TGF-β1 | ||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t | |||||
| 对照组 | 346.55±21.94 | 209.32±19.55 | 31.987** | ||||
| 观察组 | 348.82±21.54 | 165.80±17.52 | 42.914** | ||||
| t | 0.472 | 11.229** | |||||
| 组别 | n | 胃肠道反应 | 骨髓抑制 | 肝肾功能异常 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 47 | 13(27.7) | 21(44.7) | 2(4.3) |
| 观察组 | 45 | 10(22.2) | 17(37.8) | 1(2.2) |
| χ2 | 0.362 | 0.452 | 0.000 |
Tab.5 Comparison of adverse reactions between two groups of patients [例(%)]
| 组别 | n | 胃肠道反应 | 骨髓抑制 | 肝肾功能异常 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 47 | 13(27.7) | 21(44.7) | 2(4.3) |
| 观察组 | 45 | 10(22.2) | 17(37.8) | 1(2.2) |
| χ2 | 0.362 | 0.452 | 0.000 |
| [1] | SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660. |
| [2] | ZAPARDIEL I, DIESTRO M D, ALETTI G. Conservative treatment of early stage ovarian cancer:oncological and fertility outcomes[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2014, 40(4):387-393. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.11.028. |
| [3] | 凌小婷, 徐国才, 林荣春, 等. 晚期卵巢癌腹腔化疗联合静脉化疗用于新辅助化疗Ⅰ期临床试验研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2019, 35(12):1345-1349. |
| LING X Y, XU G C, LIN R C, et al. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with intravenous chemotherapy for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer:a phase Ⅰ clinical trial[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 35(12):1345-1349. doi:10.19538/j.fk2019120114. | |
| [4] | 卢雯平, 白萍, 田小飞, 等. 卵巢癌中西医结合诊疗指南[J]. 中国医药, 2024, 19(5):641-648. |
| LU W P, BAI P, TIAN X F, et al. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine[J]. China Medicine, 2024, 19(5):641-648. doi:10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2024.05.001. | |
| [5] | 李丽华, 宋俊莉, 杨幸繁. 贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇、卡铂治疗复发性卵巢癌的疗效及对血清糖类抗原125、人附睾蛋白4水平的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2020, 18(16):1708-1711,1727. |
| LI L H, SONG J L, YANG X F, et al. Efficacy of bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer and its effect on serum carbohydrate antigen 125 and human epididymal protein 4 levels[J]. Oncology Progress, 2020, 18(16):1708-1711,1727. doi:10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2020.18.16.24. | |
| [6] | 中国临床肿瘤学会指南工作委员会. 卵巢癌诊疗指南2023[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2023:10-13. |
| Guidelines Working Committee of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer 2023[M]. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House,2023:10-13. | |
| [7] | EISENHAUER E A, THERASSE P, BOGAERTS J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours:revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2):228-247. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. |
| [8] | DAI L, LIU Y, XIE L, et al. Sphingosine kinase 1/sphingosine-1-phosphate(S1P)/S1P receptor axis is involved in ovarian cancer angiogenesis[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(43):74947-74961. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.20471. |
| [9] | 喻萍, 周敏, 苏丹. 卵巢癌化疗耐药预测模型的建立及效果评价[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(11):1177-1183. |
| YU P, ZHOU M, SU D. Construction and validation of chemotherapy resistance prediction model for ovarian cancer[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2024, 52(11):1177-1183. doi:10.11958/20240546. | |
| [10] | DUAN X, YANG B, ZHAO C, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative hematological markers in patients with glioblastoma multiforme and construction of random survival forest model[J]. BMC Cancer, 2023, 23(1):432. doi:10.1186/s12885-023-10889-0. |
| [11] | PETITJEAN A, SMITH-PALMER J, VALENTINE W, et al. Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in specialist oncology centers in France[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019, 19(1):140. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5335-8. |
| [12] | 崔晓娟, 陆晓兰, 冯炜炜. 载紫杉醇的聚乙二醇聚丙交酯-乙交酯聚赖氨酸纳米粒制备及其对耐药卵巢癌细胞的作用[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2020, 39(9):552-557. |
| CUI X J, LU X L, FENG W W. Preparation of paclitaxel-loaded mPEG-PLGA-PLL nanoparticles and their effects on drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies, 2020, 39(9):552-557. doi:10.14109/j.cnki.xyylc.2020.09.10. | |
| [13] | 王真, 翟永宁. 紫杉醇联合卡铂对卵巢癌患者的有效性及患者血清TNF-α、CA125水平的影响[J]. 中国性科学, 2019, 28(10):33-36. |
| WANG Z, ZHAI Y N. Effect of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin on ovarian cancer patients and their serum TNF-α and CA125 levels[J]. Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality, 2019, 28(10):33-36. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2019.10.009. | |
| [14] | 张新, 高雁荣, 黄伟娟, 等. 奥拉帕利联合贝伐珠单抗方案对卵巢癌患者近期疗效及血清P-selectin、sICAM-1水平的影响[J]. 中国医学工程, 2024, 32(4):59-63. |
| ZHANG X, GAO Y R, HUANG W J, et al. Effects of olaparib combined with bevacizumab regimen on short term efficacy and serum P-selectin,sICAM-1 levels in patients with ovarian cancer[J]. China Medical Engineering, 2024, 32(4):59-63. doi:10.19338/j.issn.1672-2019.2024.04.013. | |
| [15] | 曹金芳. 复方苦参注射液联合放化疗治疗宫颈癌的临床观察[J]. 中国民间疗法, 2019, 27(22):64-65. |
| CAO J F. Clinical observation of compound Sophora flavescens injection combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer[J]. China's Naturopathy, 2019, 27(22):64-65. doi:10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.2019.2233. | |
| [16] | 刘婷, 王文萍. 复方苦参注射液联合TP方案化疗在肺癌、卵巢癌、宫颈癌治疗中网状Meta分析[J]. 辽宁中医药大学学报, 2023, 25(4):144-152. |
| LIU T, WANG W P. Network Meta-analysis of compound Fufang Kushen injection combined with TP chemotherapy in lung cancer,ovarian cancer and cervical cancer[J]. Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023, 25(4):144-152. doi:10.13194/j.issn.1673-842x.2023.04.032. | |
| [17] | 肖义森, 杨丽梅, 潘国基, 等. 探讨血清肿瘤标志物糖类抗原125、糖类抗原19-9、甲胎蛋白和癌胚抗原在卵巢肿瘤诊断中的临床价值[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2019, 13(10):50-51. |
| XIAO Y S, YANG L M, PAN G J, et al. Exploring the clinical value of serum tumor markers carbohydrate antigen 125,carbohydrate antigen 19-9,alpha fetoprotein,and carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application, 2019, 13(10):50-51. doi:10.14164/j.cnki.cn11-5581/r.2019.10.026. | |
| [18] | 贾素娟, 王治洁, 张美琴, 等. 血清CA125、HE4和影像学检查在上皮性卵巢癌术后复发诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2015, 25(6):452-456. |
| JIA S J, WANG Z J, ZHANG M Q, et al. The value of serum CA125,HE4 and imaging examinations in detecting the recurrence of postoperative ovarian cancer[J]. China Oncology, 2015, 25(6):452-456. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2015.06.008. | |
| [19] | 杨红耀, 郭哲, 张欣贺. Piezo1、VEGF在上皮性卵巢癌组织中的表达及与其临床病理特征相关性分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2023, 38(4):558-561. |
| YANG H Y, GUO Z, ZHANG X H. Expression of Piezo1 and VEGF in epithelial ovarian cancer and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics[J]. The Practical Journal of Cancer, 2023, 38(4):558-561. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2023.04.009. | |
| [20] | PARVATHAREDDY S K, SIRAJ A K, AL-BADAWI I A, et al. Differential expression of PD-L1 between primary and metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer and its clinico-pathological correlation[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):3750. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83276-z. |
| [21] | 全碧波. 参葵汤对卵巢癌模型大鼠淋巴细胞、免疫球蛋白及相关炎症因子的影响分析[J]. 中医临床研究, 2019, 11(24):97-98. |
| QUAN B B. Effects of Shenkui Decoction on lymphocyte,immunoglobulin and related inflammatory factor in ovarian cancer model rats[J]. Clinical Journal of Chinese Medicine, 2019, 11(24):97-98. doi:10.3969/i.issn.1674-7860.2019.24.042. | |
| [22] | 刘海燕, 官燕, 孙颖, 等. 腹腔内贝伐珠单抗联合热化疗对老年卵巢癌患者血转化生长因子β1和巨噬细胞移动抑制因子水平的影响[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2018, 37(4):434-436. |
| LIU H Y, GUAN Y, SUN Y, et al. The effect of abdominal Bevacizumab combined with hyperthermia chemotherapy on serum transforming growth factor beta 1 and migration-inhibitory factor levels in elderly patients with ovarian cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics, 2018, 37(4):434-436. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2018.04.019. | |
| [23] | 贾英杰, 张莹, 史福敏. 复方苦参注射液对小鼠移植性S180肉瘤血管形成抑制作用[J]. 天津中医学院学报, 2006, 25(1):25-26. |
| JIA Y J, ZHANG Y, SHI F M. Sarcoma by Fufangkushen Injection experimental study on inhibiting angiogenesis in mice S180[J]. Journal of Tianjin College of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2006, 25(1): 25-26. doi:1005-7145(2006)01-0025-02. | |
| [24] | 赵艳勋, 刘苓, 卢玲, 等. 复方苦参注射液对卵巢癌化疗患者生活质量及治疗疗效影响研究[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2018, 46(1):89-91. |
| ZHAO Y X, LIU L, LU L, et al. Study on the effect of Compound Kushen Injection on the quality of life and therapeutic efficacy of ovarian cancer chemotherapy patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Physicians, 2018, 46(1):89-91. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2018.01.032. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||