Tianjin Med J ›› 2016, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 869-873.doi: 10.11958/20150415

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of coronary stenosis by using the gemstone spectral CTCA: A Phantom Study

SU Yan, YANG Liping, HUANG Chong, GONG Lianggeng, YIN Jianhua, LIAN Luo, QIN Xiaohua, ZHAN Jinfeng, TU Weiping, FANG Xiangdong   

  1. 1 Tianjin Baodi Hospital, Tianjin 301800, China; 2 Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
  • Received:2015-12-22 Revised:2016-01-05 Published:2016-07-15 Online:2016-07-15
  • Contact: Zhang Zhang E-mail:filea1249@sina.com

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate diagnosis accuracy for coronary stenosis from diameter measurements of different severities of stenosis by using gemstone spectral imaging(GSI). Methods: Totally 3 different coronary artery models(internal diameter: 3.00 mm)with different severities of stenosis (residual lumen diameter ratio : 75%, 50%, 25%,) were placed in a pulsating cardiac phantom (ALPHA 1-VT PC, Fuyo Corporation, Japan). The coronary phantom was scanned in 2 models: gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) and Axial scan model(AXIAL). All the spectral imaging data were analyzed by using GSI viewer to reconstruct the VMS images (40~140keV by 10 keV interval) and AXIAL. CT values (HU) of the remained lumen from all different stenositc lumens were measured. The residual rate (%) was calculated by dividing the diameters of the remained lumen to normal lumen on the reformatted short axial images. One-Way ANOVA was used to compare the residual rate measurement difference between VMS. Student t test was used to compare the residual rate measurement difference between VMS and AXIAL. Bland-Altman test was used to compare the measured residual rates and the gold standard. P<0.05was considered as significant differences. Results: There were no significant differences among the VMS diameter measurements(P>0.05). From student t test, only significant difference between 70keV VMS and AXIAL was found on 50% stenosis(t =4.617,P<0.042). From the Bland-Altman test, residual rate measurement from 70keV VMS was more accurate than AXIAL by taking the real model stenosis rate as gold standard(t =14.560,P<0.000). In the mild severity of stenosis (75% of the residual lumen), GSI slightly underestimated the degree of stenosis, while AXIAL slightly overestimated the stenosis. The accuracy of the GSI measurement was slightly higher than that of AXIAL. Conclusion: VMS image (70keV) showed more accurate than AXIAL images on both diameter measurement and evaluation of the coronary stenosis rate.

Key words: Spiral cone-beam computed tomography, Coronary disease, coronary stenosis, CT angiography, Dual energy imaging