Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 609-613.doi: 10.11958/20231349
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Yong(), SU Yakun, ZHANG Hongbo, LI Yuan, LI Zhanhu, YAN Xiaoju
Received:
2023-09-08
Revised:
2023-10-23
Published:
2024-06-15
Online:
2024-06-06
LI Yong, SU Yakun, ZHANG Hongbo, LI Yuan, LI Zhanhu, YAN Xiaoju. Clinical significance of serum asprosin level in patients with early renal damage of essential hypertension[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(6): 609-613.
CLC Number:
组别 | n | 年龄/ 岁 | 性别 (男/女) | 吸烟 | BMI/ (kg/m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 60 | 53.52±11.64 | 35/25 | 17(28.33) | 26.00±2.83 |
单纯高血压组 | 78 | 49.44±11.01 | 53/25 | 21(26.92) | 26.38±3.23 |
早期肾损害组 | 82 | 51.66±10.86 | 54/28 | 22(26.83) | 26.76±3.08 |
F、χ2或Z | 2.231 | 1.468 | 0.132 | 1.064 |
Tab.1 Comparison of baseline data between the control group, the simple hypertension group and the early renal damage group
组别 | n | 年龄/ 岁 | 性别 (男/女) | 吸烟 | BMI/ (kg/m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 60 | 53.52±11.64 | 35/25 | 17(28.33) | 26.00±2.83 |
单纯高血压组 | 78 | 49.44±11.01 | 53/25 | 21(26.92) | 26.38±3.23 |
早期肾损害组 | 82 | 51.66±10.86 | 54/28 | 22(26.83) | 26.76±3.08 |
F、χ2或Z | 2.231 | 1.468 | 0.132 | 1.064 |
组别 | n | BUN/(mmol/L) | SCr/ (mmol/L) | TC/(mmol/L) | TG/ (mmol/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 60 | 5.75±1.06 | 69.11±9.03 | 4.60±0.71 | 1.55(1.29,2.05) | |||||
单纯高血压组 | 78 | 5.97±1.58 | 71.23±7.56 | 4.84±0.90 | 1.67(1.30,2.24) | |||||
早期肾损害组 | 82 | 6.22±1.58 | 72.50±10.63 | 4.87±0.84 | 1.68(1.24,2.49) | |||||
F或Z | 1.766 | 1.754 | 2.271 | 0.003 | ||||||
组别 | LDL-C/ (mmol/L) | FBG/ (mmol/L) | SBP/ mmHg | DBP/ mmHg | ||||||
对照组 | 2.42±0.66 | 5.25±0.42 | 118.55±9.55 | 68.80±7.16 | ||||||
单纯高血压组 | 2.72±0.78 | 5.28±0.44 | 143.23±11.74a | 91.35±11.28a | ||||||
早期肾损害组 | 2.65±0.80 | 5.23±0.34 | 149.82±13.40ab | 101.39±10.05ab | ||||||
F | 2.910 | 0.202 | 128.229** | 193.832** |
Tab.2 Comparison of biochemical indexes and blood pressure levels between the control group, the simple hypertension group and the early renal damage group
组别 | n | BUN/(mmol/L) | SCr/ (mmol/L) | TC/(mmol/L) | TG/ (mmol/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 60 | 5.75±1.06 | 69.11±9.03 | 4.60±0.71 | 1.55(1.29,2.05) | |||||
单纯高血压组 | 78 | 5.97±1.58 | 71.23±7.56 | 4.84±0.90 | 1.67(1.30,2.24) | |||||
早期肾损害组 | 82 | 6.22±1.58 | 72.50±10.63 | 4.87±0.84 | 1.68(1.24,2.49) | |||||
F或Z | 1.766 | 1.754 | 2.271 | 0.003 | ||||||
组别 | LDL-C/ (mmol/L) | FBG/ (mmol/L) | SBP/ mmHg | DBP/ mmHg | ||||||
对照组 | 2.42±0.66 | 5.25±0.42 | 118.55±9.55 | 68.80±7.16 | ||||||
单纯高血压组 | 2.72±0.78 | 5.28±0.44 | 143.23±11.74a | 91.35±11.28a | ||||||
早期肾损害组 | 2.65±0.80 | 5.23±0.34 | 149.82±13.40ab | 101.39±10.05ab | ||||||
F | 2.910 | 0.202 | 128.229** | 193.832** |
组别 | n | 高血压分级 (1/2/3级) | 高血压 病程/年 | 降压药物 应用时间/年 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单纯高血压组 | 78 | 20/26/32 | 5.46±2.61 | 4.00(2.00,6.00) | ||||||
早期肾损害组 | 82 | 21/28/33 | 7.01±2.88a | 5.00(3.00,7.25) | ||||||
t、χ2或Z | 0.014 | 3.565** | 1.998* | |||||||
组别 | β受体阻滞剂 | CCB | ACEI/ARB | ARNI | 利尿剂 | |||||
单纯高血压组 | 21(26.92) | 43(55.13) | 45(57.69) | 11(14.10) | 5(6.41) | |||||
早期肾损害组 | 20(24.39) | 45(54.88) | 47(57.32) | 11(13.41) | 6(7.31) | |||||
χ2 | 0.135 | 0.045 | 0.446 | 1.240 | 1.019 |
Tab.3 Comparison of hypertension classification and medication between the simple hypertension group and the early renal damage group
组别 | n | 高血压分级 (1/2/3级) | 高血压 病程/年 | 降压药物 应用时间/年 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单纯高血压组 | 78 | 20/26/32 | 5.46±2.61 | 4.00(2.00,6.00) | ||||||
早期肾损害组 | 82 | 21/28/33 | 7.01±2.88a | 5.00(3.00,7.25) | ||||||
t、χ2或Z | 0.014 | 3.565** | 1.998* | |||||||
组别 | β受体阻滞剂 | CCB | ACEI/ARB | ARNI | 利尿剂 | |||||
单纯高血压组 | 21(26.92) | 43(55.13) | 45(57.69) | 11(14.10) | 5(6.41) | |||||
早期肾损害组 | 20(24.39) | 45(54.88) | 47(57.32) | 11(13.41) | 6(7.31) | |||||
χ2 | 0.135 | 0.045 | 0.446 | 1.240 | 1.019 |
组别 | n | ASP/(μg/L) | IL-6/(pg/L) | UACR/(mg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 60 | 32.81±8.48 | 19.40±3.54 | 19.08±3.44 |
单纯高血压组 | 78 | 51.87±12.83a | 39.45±10.95a | 20.23±3.49 |
早期肾损害组 | 82 | 99.89±25.88ab | 45.05±11.56ab | 66.07±27.51ab |
F | 267.335** | 126.234** | 182.367** |
Tab.4 Comparison of serum ASP, IL-6 and UACR levels between the control group, the simple hypertension group and the early renal injury group
组别 | n | ASP/(μg/L) | IL-6/(pg/L) | UACR/(mg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 60 | 32.81±8.48 | 19.40±3.54 | 19.08±3.44 |
单纯高血压组 | 78 | 51.87±12.83a | 39.45±10.95a | 20.23±3.49 |
早期肾损害组 | 82 | 99.89±25.88ab | 45.05±11.56ab | 66.07±27.51ab |
F | 267.335** | 126.234** | 182.367** |
组别 | n | ASP/(μg/L) | IL-6/(pg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
高血压1级组 | 50 | 68.15±28.24 | 38.74±8.96 |
高血压2级组 | 52 | 72.39±32.09a | 43.70±13.37a |
高血压3级组 | 58 | 87.34±31.44ab | 44.18±11.30ab |
F | 5.934* | 3.625* |
Tab.5 Comparison of serum ASP and IL-6 levels between patients with different hypertension grades
组别 | n | ASP/(μg/L) | IL-6/(pg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
高血压1级组 | 50 | 68.15±28.24 | 38.74±8.96 |
高血压2级组 | 52 | 72.39±32.09a | 43.70±13.37a |
高血压3级组 | 58 | 87.34±31.44ab | 44.18±11.30ab |
F | 5.934* | 3.625* |
组别 | n | ASP/(μg/L) | IL-6/(pg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
低UACR水平组 | 49 | 91.96±21.06 | 41.04±8.17 |
高UACR水平组 | 33 | 111.67±28.13 | 51.00±13.30 |
t | 3.624* | 4.198* |
Tab.6 Comparison of serum ASP and IL-6 levels between the high UACR level group and the low UACR level group
组别 | n | ASP/(μg/L) | IL-6/(pg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
低UACR水平组 | 49 | 91.96±21.06 | 41.04±8.17 |
高UACR水平组 | 33 | 111.67±28.13 | 51.00±13.30 |
t | 3.624* | 4.198* |
参数 | B | SE | Wald χ2 | P | OR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBP | 0.090 | 0.039 | 5.290 | 0.021 | 1.094(1.013~1.182) |
DBP | 0.024 | 0.040 | 0.343 | 0.558 | 1.024(0.946~1.108) |
高血压分级 | 5.160 | 0.160 | |||
1级 | -8.007 | 4 075.015 | 0.000 | 0.998 | 0.008(0.000~0.946) |
2级 | -0.264 | 1.215 | 0.047 | 0.828 | 0.768(0.071~8.304) |
3级 | 2.356 | 1.138 | 4.282 | 0.039 | 10.545(1.133~98.181) |
ASP | 0.222 | 0.049 | 20.088 | <0.001 | 1.248(1.133~1.375) |
IL-6 | 0.070 | 0.034 | 4.258 | 0.039 | 1.072(1.004~1.146) |
高血压病程 | 0.433 | 0.331 | 1.713 | 0.191 | 1.543(0.806~2.953) |
降压药物 应用时间 | -0.074 | 0.350 | 0.045 | 0.833 | 0.929(0.468~1.843) |
常数项 | -37.419 | 9.047 | 17.109 | <0.001 | 0.000 |
Tab.7 Multivariate Logistic analysis of factors affecting early renal damage in hypertension
参数 | B | SE | Wald χ2 | P | OR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBP | 0.090 | 0.039 | 5.290 | 0.021 | 1.094(1.013~1.182) |
DBP | 0.024 | 0.040 | 0.343 | 0.558 | 1.024(0.946~1.108) |
高血压分级 | 5.160 | 0.160 | |||
1级 | -8.007 | 4 075.015 | 0.000 | 0.998 | 0.008(0.000~0.946) |
2级 | -0.264 | 1.215 | 0.047 | 0.828 | 0.768(0.071~8.304) |
3级 | 2.356 | 1.138 | 4.282 | 0.039 | 10.545(1.133~98.181) |
ASP | 0.222 | 0.049 | 20.088 | <0.001 | 1.248(1.133~1.375) |
IL-6 | 0.070 | 0.034 | 4.258 | 0.039 | 1.072(1.004~1.146) |
高血压病程 | 0.433 | 0.331 | 1.713 | 0.191 | 1.543(0.806~2.953) |
降压药物 应用时间 | -0.074 | 0.350 | 0.045 | 0.833 | 0.929(0.468~1.843) |
常数项 | -37.419 | 9.047 | 17.109 | <0.001 | 0.000 |
预测因子 | AUC | AUC(95%CI) | 敏感度 | 特异度 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ASP | 0.972 | 0.950~0.993 | 0.915 | 0.851 |
IL-6 | 0.661 | 0.576~0.745 | 0.695 | 0.603 |
SBP | 0.712 | 0.632~0.791 | 0.756 | 0.590 |
ASP+IL-6+SBP | 0.986 | 0.972~0.999 | 0.951 | 0.962 |
Tab.8 The diagnostic value of ASP, IL-6, SBP and the combination of three indexes in early renal damage of essential hypertension
预测因子 | AUC | AUC(95%CI) | 敏感度 | 特异度 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ASP | 0.972 | 0.950~0.993 | 0.915 | 0.851 |
IL-6 | 0.661 | 0.576~0.745 | 0.695 | 0.603 |
SBP | 0.712 | 0.632~0.791 | 0.756 | 0.590 |
ASP+IL-6+SBP | 0.986 | 0.972~0.999 | 0.951 | 0.962 |
[1] | UNGER T, BORGHI C, CHARCHAR F, et al. 2020 international society of hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines[J]. Hypertension, 2020, 75(6):1334-1357. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026. |
[2] | DE MIGUEL C, PELEGRIN P, BAROJA-MAZO A, et al. Emerging role of the inflammasome and pyroptosis in hypertension[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(3):1064. doi:10.3390/ijms22031064. |
[3] | LI B, HOU C, LI L X, et al. The associations of adipokines with hypertension in youth with cardiometabolic risk and the mediation role of insulin resistance:the BCAMS study[J]. Hypertens Res, 2023, 46(7):1673-1683. doi:10.1038/s41440-023-01243-9. |
[4] | SHABIR K, GHARANEI S, ORTON S, et al. Asprosin exerts pro-inflammatory effects in THP-1 macrophages mediated via the Toll-like receptor 4(TLR4) pathway[J]. J Mol Sci, 2022, 24(1):227. doi:10.3390/ijms24010227. |
[5] | DENG X, ZHAO L, GUO C, et al. Higher serum asprosin level is associated with urinary albumin excretion and renal function in type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2020, 13(11):4341-4351. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S283413. |
[6] | AMEER O Z. Hypertension in chronic kidney disease:what lies behind the scene[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13(10):949260. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.949260. |
[7] | ZHANG Z, ZHAO L, ZHOU X, et al. Role of inflammation,immunity,and oxidative stress in hypertension:new insights and potential therapeutic targets[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 13(1):1098725. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1098725. |
[8] | CLEMENTE-SUAREZ V J, REDONDO-FLOREZ L, BELTRAN-VELASCO A I, et al. The role of adipokines in health and disease[J]. Biomedicines, 2023, 11(5):1290. doi:10.3390/biomedicines11051290. |
[9] | OKAMURA Y, NIIJIMA R, KAMESHIMA S, et al. Human omentin-1 administration ameliorates hypertensive complications without affecting hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(4):3835. doi:10.3390/ijms24043835. |
[10] | ROMERE C, DUERRSCHMID C, BOURNAT J, et al. Asprosin,a fasting-induced glucogenic protein hormone[J]. Cell, 2016, 165(3):566-579. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.063. |
[11] | OVALI M A, BOZGEYIK I. Asprosin,a C-terminal cleavage product of fibrillin1 encoded by the FBN1 gene,in health and disease[J]. Mol Syndromol, 2022, 13(3):175-183. doi:10.1159/000520333. |
[12] | MAZUR-BIALY A I. Asprosin enhances cytokine production by a co-culture of fully differentiated mature adipocytes and macrophages leading to the exacerbation of the condition typical of obesity-related inflammation[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 4(6):5745. doi:10.3390/ijms24065745. |
[13] | WANG X L, WANG J X, CHEN J L, et al. Asprosin in the paraventricular nucleus induces sympathetic activation and pressor responses via cAMP-dependent ROS production[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(20):12595. doi:10.3390/ijms232012595. |
[14] | ARABI T, SHAFQAT A, SABBAH B N, et al. Obesity-related kidney disease:beyond hypertension and insulin-resistance[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2022, 13(1):1095211. doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.1095211. |
[15] | XU L, CUI J, LI M, et al. Association between seruma asprosin and diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the community:a cross-sectional study[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2022, 15(1):1877-1884. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S361808. |
[16] | GOODARZI G, SETAYESH L, FADAEI R, et al. Circulating levels of asprosin and its association with insulin resistance and renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2021, 48(7):5443-5450. doi:10.1007/s11033-021-06551-2. |
[17] | MAZUR-BIALY A I. Asprosin-a fasting-induced glucogenic,and orexigenic adipokine as a new promising player. Will it be a new factor in the treatment of obesity,diabetes,or infertility? A review of the literature[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13(2):620. doi:10.3390/nu13020620. |
[18] | HAO Y, LI X, ZHU Y, et al. Effect of age and isolated systolic or diastolic hypertension on target organ damage in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. Aging(Albany NY), 2021, 13(4):6144-6155. doi:10.18632/aging.202609. |
[19] | SAGI B, KESOI I, VAS T, et al. Relationship between arterial stiffness,left ventricular diastolic function,and renal function in chronic kidney disease[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2023, 24(1):261. doi:10.1186/s12882-023-03308-w. |
[1] | GAO Pan, XIE Bingxin, ZHOU Zandong, LIU Tong. Promoting effect of circulating FGF23 on atrial fibrosis in chronic kidney disease [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(9): 917-923. |
[2] | JIAO Aiju, REN Baolong, ZHANG Chunhua, LI Wenrui, ZHAO Weijing. The predictive value of NIHSS score combined with serum BDNF and IL-6 for post-stroke depression [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(9): 963-966. |
[3] | SUN Ruixue, LIU Xiaoxiao, YUE Xinyi, YANG Dongmei, REN Luning, WANG Fei, DU Hongyang. Predictive value of preoperative blood inflammatory markers for recurrence risk of basal cell carcinoma [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(12): 1274-1277. |
[4] | GU Wei, ZHANG Huina, HOU Liping, YU Min, CHENG Lirong. Correlation between lipid correlation index and diabetic kidney disease [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(12): 1308-1312. |
[5] | HUANG Xiaolei, GE Tingting, ZHAO Junsong, NI Zhihua. Study on the role of ginsenoside Rg1 in IL-6-induced neuronal ferroptosis in rats [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(11): 1137-1140. |
[6] | GU Yunyun, ZHONG Chongming, YANG Haiyan. Predictive value of uric acid/albumin ratio for coronary heart disease in patients with chronic kidney disease [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(11): 1202-1206. |
[7] | WU Meina, DAI Weizheng, PAN Yudun, FU Maolin, CHEN Xiaoyu. Clinical value of routine electroencephalogram combined with serum miR-146a and miR-129-5p levels in diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy patients [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(11): 1207-1210. |
[8] | GONG Xiujuan, ZHAO Huixia, ZHANG Xiaoqing, ZHANG Lianxia. Evaluation values of PIV, IL-6, HBP and PAB levels in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(11): 1216-1220. |
[9] | QIN Chundi, MA Wen, LI Yuan, ZHU Yaquan, LI Yu, ZOU Lin, ZHANG Xin. Butyrate reduces blood pressure in hypertensive rats by activating the G protein-coupled receptor 41/43 pathway [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(9): 972-976. |
[10] | LIU Dezhao, LUO Xiaozhi, HUANG Feng. Mechanism of action of EV-YF1 based on artificially synthesized Y RNA fragments from extracellular vesicles of cardiosphere-derived cells on improving myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(6): 601-606. |
[11] | YANG Yuanyuan, WANG Ziyun, ZHOU Zhong. Influencing factors and prognostic value of ESR, hs-CRP, IL-6 and D-D in patients with tuberculous polyserous effusion [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(6): 628-632. |
[12] | SHI Kunlin, LI Chenxi, ZONG Jianchun. The effect and mechanism of roflumilast on traumatic brain injury in rats [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(5): 473-476. |
[13] | LIU Zhufeng, WANG Wenhong, FAN Shuying, LIU Yan, LIU Tao, WANG Xin, WU Xia. Protective effect of Klotho protein on acute renal injury and fibrosis in rats with ischemia-reperfusion [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(4): 371-375. |
[14] | HU Bin, WANG Dabin, GUO Mao. Effects of tetramethylpyrazine on analgesia and neuronal damage in migraine rats by regulating SIRT1/AMPK/PGC1α signaling pathway [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(4): 382-386. |
[15] | HUANG Xiaobi, ZHAO Sheng, ZHENG Liyun, QI Xiaohui. Predictive value of acute phase proteins SAA and CRP in non-response to intravenous immunoglobulin in Kawasaki disease [J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2023, 51(3): 299-302. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||