
Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (12): 1266-1269.doi: 10.11958/20241310
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Chaoyuan(
), ZHAO Fuhao, CHEN Sha, LYU Ruiqian, WU Zixia
Received:2024-09-10
Revised:2024-10-11
Published:2024-12-15
Online:2024-12-17
LI Chaoyuan, ZHAO Fuhao, CHEN Sha, LYU Ruiqian, WU Zixia. Comparison of the effect of different vascular access routes on elderly patients with maintenance hemodialysis[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(12): 1266-1269.
CLC Number:
| 组别 | n | 男/女 | 年龄/岁 | 原发病 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 糖尿病肾病 | 慢性肾小球肾炎 | 其他# | ||||||||
| AVF组 | 43 | 26/17 | 67.63±5.96 | 15(34.9) | 13(30.2) | 15(34.9) | ||||
| TCC组 | 60 | 29/31 | 70.25±8.94 | 25(41.7) | 12(20.0) | 23(38.3) | ||||
| χ2或t | 1.482 | 1.675 | 1.458 | |||||||
| 组别 | 收缩压/mmHg | 舒张压/mmHg | 治疗前Scr/(μmol/L) | |||||||
| AVF组 | 158.93±24.82 | 83.74±13.35 | 711.30(501.90,905.00) | |||||||
| TCC组 | 156.28±23.18 | 82.37±15.75 | 624.50(431.65,856.38) | |||||||
| t或Z | 0.555 | 0.466 | 1.455 | |||||||
Tab.1 Comparison of general data between the two groups
| 组别 | n | 男/女 | 年龄/岁 | 原发病 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 糖尿病肾病 | 慢性肾小球肾炎 | 其他# | ||||||||
| AVF组 | 43 | 26/17 | 67.63±5.96 | 15(34.9) | 13(30.2) | 15(34.9) | ||||
| TCC组 | 60 | 29/31 | 70.25±8.94 | 25(41.7) | 12(20.0) | 23(38.3) | ||||
| χ2或t | 1.482 | 1.675 | 1.458 | |||||||
| 组别 | 收缩压/mmHg | 舒张压/mmHg | 治疗前Scr/(μmol/L) | |||||||
| AVF组 | 158.93±24.82 | 83.74±13.35 | 711.30(501.90,905.00) | |||||||
| TCC组 | 156.28±23.18 | 82.37±15.75 | 624.50(431.65,856.38) | |||||||
| t或Z | 0.555 | 0.466 | 1.455 | |||||||
| 组别 | n | 治疗后Scr/(μmol/L) | UA/(μmol/L) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVF组 | 43 | 689.00(601.00,852.00) | 322.00(228.00,401.50) | |||||||
| TCC组 | 60 | 607.95(498.45,783.73) | 308.00(255.00,367.00) | |||||||
| Z | 1.933 | 0.091 | ||||||||
| 组别 | PTH/(ng/L) | 血钙/(mmol/L) | 血磷/(mmol/L) | |||||||
| AVF组 | 312.10(132.78,402.45) | 2.28(2.17,2.44) | 1.48(1.23,2.06) | |||||||
| TCC组 | 195.80(116.45,352.50) | 2.27(2.13,2.36) | 1.49(1.16,1.92) | |||||||
| Z | 1.551 | 1.532 | 0.635 | |||||||
| 组别 | Hb/(g/L) | TG/(mmol/L) | TC/(mmol/L) | |||||||
| AVF组 | 112.23±17.35 | 1.13(0.81,1.85) | 3.57(2.80,3.79) | |||||||
| TCC组 | 109.00±15.45 | 1.38(1.17,1.91) | 4.00(2.93,4.72) | |||||||
| Z或t | 0.994 | 1.929 | 1.685 | |||||||
Tab.2 Comparison of laboratory indicators between the two groups
| 组别 | n | 治疗后Scr/(μmol/L) | UA/(μmol/L) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVF组 | 43 | 689.00(601.00,852.00) | 322.00(228.00,401.50) | |||||||
| TCC组 | 60 | 607.95(498.45,783.73) | 308.00(255.00,367.00) | |||||||
| Z | 1.933 | 0.091 | ||||||||
| 组别 | PTH/(ng/L) | 血钙/(mmol/L) | 血磷/(mmol/L) | |||||||
| AVF组 | 312.10(132.78,402.45) | 2.28(2.17,2.44) | 1.48(1.23,2.06) | |||||||
| TCC组 | 195.80(116.45,352.50) | 2.27(2.13,2.36) | 1.49(1.16,1.92) | |||||||
| Z | 1.551 | 1.532 | 0.635 | |||||||
| 组别 | Hb/(g/L) | TG/(mmol/L) | TC/(mmol/L) | |||||||
| AVF组 | 112.23±17.35 | 1.13(0.81,1.85) | 3.57(2.80,3.79) | |||||||
| TCC组 | 109.00±15.45 | 1.38(1.17,1.91) | 4.00(2.93,4.72) | |||||||
| Z或t | 0.994 | 1.929 | 1.685 | |||||||
| 组别 | n | LVEDd/mm | IVSTd/mm | LVPWT/mm | E/A | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVF组 | 43 | 56.21±4.15 | 12.22±1.79 | 11.92±1.32 | 0.79±0.28 | ||||
| TCC组 | 60 | 50.07±6.01 | 10.32±1.42 | 10.07±1.39 | 1.22±0.48 | ||||
| t | 5.493** | 5.658** | 6.444** | 4.893** | |||||
| 组别 | n | 肺动脉压/ mmHg | EF | 左心室收缩 功能障碍 | 左心室舒张 功能障碍 | ||||
| AVF组 | 43 | 45.63±8.93 | 0.47±0.06 | 32(82.05) | 30(76.92) | ||||
| TCC组 | 60 | 46.16±10.37 | 0.54±0.07 | 16(41.03) | 16(30.77) | ||||
| t或χ2 | 0.343 | 5.316** | 24.918** | 18.991** | |||||
Tab.3 Comparison of cardiac structure and function indicators between the two groups
| 组别 | n | LVEDd/mm | IVSTd/mm | LVPWT/mm | E/A | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVF组 | 43 | 56.21±4.15 | 12.22±1.79 | 11.92±1.32 | 0.79±0.28 | ||||
| TCC组 | 60 | 50.07±6.01 | 10.32±1.42 | 10.07±1.39 | 1.22±0.48 | ||||
| t | 5.493** | 5.658** | 6.444** | 4.893** | |||||
| 组别 | n | 肺动脉压/ mmHg | EF | 左心室收缩 功能障碍 | 左心室舒张 功能障碍 | ||||
| AVF组 | 43 | 45.63±8.93 | 0.47±0.06 | 32(82.05) | 30(76.92) | ||||
| TCC组 | 60 | 46.16±10.37 | 0.54±0.07 | 16(41.03) | 16(30.77) | ||||
| t或χ2 | 0.343 | 5.316** | 24.918** | 18.991** | |||||
| 组别 | n | 血管通路血流量/(mL/min) | Kt/V |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVF组 | 43 | 219.77±16.40 | 1.40(1.40,1.50) |
| TCC组 | 60 | 189.00±11.60 | 1.30(1.20,1.30) |
| t或Z | 14.123** | 5.569* |
Tab.4 Comparison of blood flow and Kt/V between the two groups
| 组别 | n | 血管通路血流量/(mL/min) | Kt/V |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVF组 | 43 | 219.77±16.40 | 1.40(1.40,1.50) |
| TCC组 | 60 | 189.00±11.60 | 1.30(1.20,1.30) |
| t或Z | 14.123** | 5.569* |
| 组别 | n | 透析通路相关感染 | 机械性损伤 | 心力衰竭 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVF组 | 43 | 3(6.98) | 12(27.91) | 13(30.23) |
| TCC组 | 60 | 24(40.00) | 6(10.00) | 20(33.33) |
| χ2 | 14.123** | 5.569* | 0.111 |
Tab.5 Comparison of dialysis-related complications between the two groups
| 组别 | n | 透析通路相关感染 | 机械性损伤 | 心力衰竭 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVF组 | 43 | 3(6.98) | 12(27.91) | 13(30.23) |
| TCC组 | 60 | 24(40.00) | 6(10.00) | 20(33.33) |
| χ2 | 14.123** | 5.569* | 0.111 |
| [1] | 吕彦辉, 陈建华, 张丽, 等. 降钙素原与维持性血液透析患者自体动静脉内瘘并发症的关系研究[J]. 天津医药, 2022, 50(4):413-417. |
| LYU Y H, CHEN J H, ZHANG L, et al. The relationship between procalcitonin and complications of autogenous arteriovenous[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2022, 50(4):413-417. doi:10.11958/20212097. | |
| [2] | KIM D H, PARK J I, LEE J P, et al. The effects of vascular access types on the survival and quality of life and depression in the incident hemodialysis patients[J]. Ren Fail, 2020, 42(1):30-39. doi:10.1080/0886022X.2019.1702558. |
| [3] | 安娜, 李洪, 陈汝满, 等. 不同血管通路类型对老年维持性血液透析患者生存的影响[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2021, 21(9):733-738. |
| AN N, LI H, CHEN R M, et al. Effects of different types of vascular access on survival of elderly patients on maintenance hemodialysis[J]. J Clin Nephol, 2021, 21(9):733-738. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2021.09.006. | |
| [4] | KITAMURA M, YAMAGUCHI K, OTA Y, et al. Prognostic impact of polypharmacy by drug essentiality in patients on hemodialysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):24238. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03772-0. |
| [5] | WU B, YAN C, ZHANG S, et al. Comparative performance of body composition parameters in prediction of death in hospitalized patients on maintenance hemodialysis:a cohort study[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1):10199. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67019-0. |
| [6] | 中国医院协会血液净化中心分会血管通路工作组. 中国血液透析用血管通路专家共识(第2版)[J]. 中国血液净化, 2019, 18(6):365-381. |
| China Hospital Association Blood Purification Center Branch Vascular Access Work Group. Chinese expert consensus on vascular access for hemodialysis(2nd edition)[J]. Chin J Blood Purif, 2019, 18(6):365-381. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2019.06.001. | |
| [7] | 王立华, 姜埃利, 魏芳, 等. 老年动静脉内瘘与长期置管血液透析患者的生存分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016, 4(36):1678-1680. |
| WANG L H, JIANG A L, WEI F, et al. Survival analysis of elderly patients with arteriovenous fistula and long-term catheterization hemodialysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2016, 4(36):1678-1680. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2016.07.066. | |
| [8] | 黄玉萍, 徐辉, 王道洋, 等. 蚌埠地区老年维持性血液透析患者血管通路调查分析[J]. 中国血液净化, 2021, 20(12):835-838. |
| WANG Y P, XU H, WANG D Y, et al. Investigation of vascular access status in elderly maintenance hemodialysis patients in Bengbu area[J]. Chin J Blood Purif, 2021, 20(12):835-838. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2021.12.010. | |
| [9] | ARHUIDESE I J, COOPER M A, RIZWAN M, et al. Vascular access for hemodialysis in the elderly[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2019, 69(2):517-525.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.219. |
| [10] | ZHANG H, LU H, LI W, et al. Expert consensus on the establishment and maintenance of native arteriovenous fistula[J]. Chronic Dis Transl Med, 2021, 7(4):235-253. doi:10.1016/j.cdtm.2021.05.002. |
| [11] | 翟蕾, 段淑敏, 韩玲玉, 等. 3种血管通路在老年维持性血液透析患者中的应用效果比较[J]. 安徽医学, 2023, 44(3):293-296. |
| ZHAI L, DUAN S M, HAN L Y, et al. Comparison of the effects of 3 types of vascular access in maintenance hemodialysis patients over 60 years old[J]. Anhui Med J, 2023, 44(3):293-296. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2023.03.010. | |
| [12] | STOUMPOS S, RANKIN A, HALL BARRIENTOS P, et al. Interrogating the haemodynamic effects of haemodialysis arteriovenous fistula on cardiac structure and function[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):18102. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97625-5. |
| [13] | 陈爱青, 陈勇. 自体动静脉内瘘对尿毒症患者左心室心肌功能的影响[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2024, 24(9):705-711. |
| CHEN A Q, CHEN Y. Effect of establishing arteriovenous fistula on left ventricular myocardial function in uremic patients[J]. J Clin Nephrol, 2024, 24(9):705-711. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2024.09.001. | |
| [14] | 蒋利, 王永春. 不同血管通路对维持性血液透析尿毒症患者的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(18):81-84. |
| JIANG L, WANG Y C. Effects of different vascular pathways in uremia patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(18):81-84. doi:10.7619/jcmp.202018023. | |
| [15] | 陈娟, 刘伊芳, 施文剑, 等. PTA术后的维持性血液透析患者血清生物标志物水平变化对肺动脉压影响的研究[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2022, 43(2):208-212,216. |
| CHEN J, LIU Y F, SHI W J, et al. Effect of changes in serum biomarker levels on pulmonary artery pressure in maintenance hemodialysis patients after PTA[J]. Int J Lab Med, 2022, 43(2):208-212,216. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2022.02.016. | |
| [16] | YU Q, ZHANG Q. Pulmonary hypertension in hemodialysis patients and its determinants:a hospital based cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Gen Med, 2024, 17:3919-3926. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S471779. |
| [17] | 任红旗, 何群鹏, 贾凤玉, 等. 维持性血液透析患者血管通路使用情况分析[J]. 肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志, 2017, 26(3):235-239. |
| REN H Q, HE Q P, JIA F Y, et al. Analysis of vascular access in hemodialysis patients[J]. J Nephrol Dialy Transplant, 2017, 26(3):235-239. doi:10.3969/cndt.j.issn.1006-298X.2017.03.007. | |
| [18] | 李隽, 李海燕. 动静脉内瘘和透析导管对老年透析患者透析充分性、微炎症状态和肾性贫血的影响[J]. 中国中西医结合肾病杂志, 2020, 21(2):148-150. |
| LI J, LI H Y. Effects of intra-arteriovenous fistula and dialysis catheter on dialysis adequacy, microinflammatory status and renal anemia in elderly dialysis patients[J]. CJITWN, 2020, 21(2):148-150. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-587X.2020.02.018. | |
| [19] | 王瑞雪, 张磊, 王心亮. 动静脉内瘘和隧道式导管通路维持性血液透析患者营养状况、炎症及心功能的比较[J]. 中国煤炭工业医学杂志, 2024, 27(1):52-56. |
| WANG R X, ZHANG L, WANG X L. Comparison of effects of arteriovenous fistula and tunnel catheter pathway on nutritional status,inflammation and cardiac function in maintenance hemodialysis patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Coal Industry Medicine, 2024, 27(1):52-56. doi:10.11723/mtgyyx1007-9564202401011. | |
| [20] | PUSHEVSKI V, DEJANOV P, GERASIMOVSKA V, et al. Severe endothelial damage in chronic kidney disease patients prior to haemodialysis vascular access surgery[J]. Pril(Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki), 2015, 36(3):43-49. doi:10.1515/prilozi-2015-0077. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||