Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (12): 1317-1321.doi: 10.11958/20241172
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
TU Changming(), TIAN Yuan△(
), WANG Pengcheng, REN Peng, ZHAO Yinsheng
Received:
2024-08-25
Revised:
2024-09-25
Published:
2024-12-15
Online:
2024-12-17
Contact:
△E-mail:TU Changming, TIAN Yuan, WANG Pengcheng, REN Peng, ZHAO Yinsheng. Relationship between SII, RAR and severity of disease and respiratory failure in patients with AECOPD[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2024, 52(12): 1317-1321.
CLC Number:
组别 | n | 男性 | 年龄≥60岁 | 吸烟 | 饮酒 | 基础疾病 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
糖尿病 | 高血压 | ||||||
非重症组 | 73 | 59(80.8) | 65(89.0) | 41(56.2) | 18(24.7) | 6(8.2) | 31(42.5) |
重症组 | 37 | 28(75.7) | 35(94.6) | 18(48.6) | 8(21.6) | 6(16.2) | 16(43.2) |
χ2 | 0.393 | 0.916 | 0.558 | 0.125 | 1.616 | 0.006 |
Tab.1 Comparison of general information between the severe group and the non-severe group
组别 | n | 男性 | 年龄≥60岁 | 吸烟 | 饮酒 | 基础疾病 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
糖尿病 | 高血压 | ||||||
非重症组 | 73 | 59(80.8) | 65(89.0) | 41(56.2) | 18(24.7) | 6(8.2) | 31(42.5) |
重症组 | 37 | 28(75.7) | 35(94.6) | 18(48.6) | 8(21.6) | 6(16.2) | 16(43.2) |
χ2 | 0.393 | 0.916 | 0.558 | 0.125 | 1.616 | 0.006 |
组别 | n | 男性 | 年龄≥60岁 | 吸烟 | 饮酒 | 基础疾病 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
糖尿病 | 高血压 | ||||||
无呼吸 衰竭组 | 84 | 66(78.6) | 75(89.3) | 46(54.8) | 23(27.4) | 7(8.3) | 38(45.2) |
呼吸 衰竭组 | 26 | 21(80.8) | 25(96.2) | 13(50.0) | 3(11.5) | 5(19.2) | 9(34.6) |
χ2 | 0.058 | 1.133 | 0.181 | 2.761 | 2.426 | 0.916 |
Tab.2 Comparison of general information between the respiratory failure group and the non-respiratory failure group
组别 | n | 男性 | 年龄≥60岁 | 吸烟 | 饮酒 | 基础疾病 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
糖尿病 | 高血压 | ||||||
无呼吸 衰竭组 | 84 | 66(78.6) | 75(89.3) | 46(54.8) | 23(27.4) | 7(8.3) | 38(45.2) |
呼吸 衰竭组 | 26 | 21(80.8) | 25(96.2) | 13(50.0) | 3(11.5) | 5(19.2) | 9(34.6) |
χ2 | 0.058 | 1.133 | 0.181 | 2.761 | 2.426 | 0.916 |
组别 | n | NEU/(×109/L) | PLT/(×109/L) | LYM/(×109/L) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非重症组 | 73 | 4.11(3.23,5.02) | 180.0(140.0,237.0) | 1.30(1.06,1.64) | ||||
重症组 | 37 | 7.48(5.05,10.76) | 132.0(83.0,230.0) | 0.86(0.70,1.02) | ||||
Z | 6.317** | 2.300* | 4.998** | |||||
组别 | SII | RDW/% | ALB/(g/L) | RAR | ||||
非重症组 | 568.8(315.0,851.3) | 13.63±0.87 | 36.62±4.69 | 0.38±0.07 | ||||
重症组 | 1 077.0(757.7,1 895.6) | 15.00±1.69 | 37.26±4.75 | 0.41±0.09 | ||||
Z或t | 4.894** | 4.646** | 0.670 | 2.007* |
Tab.3 Comparison of laboratory indicators between the severe group and the non-severe group
组别 | n | NEU/(×109/L) | PLT/(×109/L) | LYM/(×109/L) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非重症组 | 73 | 4.11(3.23,5.02) | 180.0(140.0,237.0) | 1.30(1.06,1.64) | ||||
重症组 | 37 | 7.48(5.05,10.76) | 132.0(83.0,230.0) | 0.86(0.70,1.02) | ||||
Z | 6.317** | 2.300* | 4.998** | |||||
组别 | SII | RDW/% | ALB/(g/L) | RAR | ||||
非重症组 | 568.8(315.0,851.3) | 13.63±0.87 | 36.62±4.69 | 0.38±0.07 | ||||
重症组 | 1 077.0(757.7,1 895.6) | 15.00±1.69 | 37.26±4.75 | 0.41±0.09 | ||||
Z或t | 4.894** | 4.646** | 0.670 | 2.007* |
变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P | OR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SII | 0.357 | 0.114 | 9.807 | 0.002 | 1.429(1.143~1.787) |
RAR | 0.497 | 0.186 | 7.140 | 0.008 | 1.644(1.139~2.367) |
常数项 | -3.854 | 0.682 | 31.934 | <0.001 | 0.021 |
Tab.4 Analysis of influencing factors of severe condition in patients with AECOPD
变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P | OR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SII | 0.357 | 0.114 | 9.807 | 0.002 | 1.429(1.143~1.787) |
RAR | 0.497 | 0.186 | 7.140 | 0.008 | 1.644(1.139~2.367) |
常数项 | -3.854 | 0.682 | 31.934 | <0.001 | 0.021 |
指标 | AUC(95% CI) | 截断值 | 敏感度/ % | 特异度/ % | 约登 指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SII | 0.786(0.698~0.859) | 763.52 | 75.68 | 69.86 | 0.455 |
RAR | 0.779(0.690~0.852) | 0.39 | 75.68 | 75.34 | 0.510 |
指标联合 | 0.882(0.806~0.935) | - | 99.80 | 73.97 | 0.740 |
Tab.5 Analysis of the predictive value of SII and RAR for severe condition in patients with AECOPD
指标 | AUC(95% CI) | 截断值 | 敏感度/ % | 特异度/ % | 约登 指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SII | 0.786(0.698~0.859) | 763.52 | 75.68 | 69.86 | 0.455 |
RAR | 0.779(0.690~0.852) | 0.39 | 75.68 | 75.34 | 0.510 |
指标联合 | 0.882(0.806~0.935) | - | 99.80 | 73.97 | 0.740 |
组别 | n | NEU/(×109/L) | PLT/(×109/L) | LYM/(×109/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无呼吸 衰竭组 | 84 | 4.35(3.39,5.54) | 171.5(131.8,221.3) | 1.28(0.99,1.61) | |||||
呼吸 衰竭组 | 26 | 7.33(4.84,10.60) | 202.5(104.5,251.3) | 0.81(0.61,0.98) | |||||
Z | 4.316** | 0.690 | 4.633** | ||||||
组别 | SII | RDW/% | ALB/(g/L) | RAR | |||||
无呼吸 衰竭组 | 610.1(328.9,855.6) | 13.74±0.99 | 37.76±3.98 | 0.37±0.06 | |||||
呼吸 衰竭组 | 1 570.9(1 009.5,2 730.9) | 15.21±1.78 | 33.86±5.61 | 0.46±0.10 | |||||
Z或t | 5.424** | 4.025** | 3.298** | 4.482** |
Tab.6 Comparison of laboratory indicators between the respiratory failure group and the non-respiratory failure group
组别 | n | NEU/(×109/L) | PLT/(×109/L) | LYM/(×109/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无呼吸 衰竭组 | 84 | 4.35(3.39,5.54) | 171.5(131.8,221.3) | 1.28(0.99,1.61) | |||||
呼吸 衰竭组 | 26 | 7.33(4.84,10.60) | 202.5(104.5,251.3) | 0.81(0.61,0.98) | |||||
Z | 4.316** | 0.690 | 4.633** | ||||||
组别 | SII | RDW/% | ALB/(g/L) | RAR | |||||
无呼吸 衰竭组 | 610.1(328.9,855.6) | 13.74±0.99 | 37.76±3.98 | 0.37±0.06 | |||||
呼吸 衰竭组 | 1 570.9(1 009.5,2 730.9) | 15.21±1.78 | 33.86±5.61 | 0.46±0.10 | |||||
Z或t | 5.424** | 4.025** | 3.298** | 4.482** |
变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P | OR(95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SII | 0.326 | 0.111 | 8.626 | 0.003 | 1.385(1.115~1.722) |
RAR | 0.425 | 0.121 | 12.337 | <0.001 | 1.530(1.207~1.939) |
常数项 | -3.219 | 1.054 | 9.327 | 0.002 | 0.040 |
Tab.7 Analysis of influencing factors of respiratory failure in patients with AECOPD
变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P | OR(95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SII | 0.326 | 0.111 | 8.626 | 0.003 | 1.385(1.115~1.722) |
RAR | 0.425 | 0.121 | 12.337 | <0.001 | 1.530(1.207~1.939) |
常数项 | -3.219 | 1.054 | 9.327 | 0.002 | 0.040 |
指标 | AUC(95%CI) | 截断值 | 敏感度/ % | 特异度/ % | 约登 指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SII | 0.801(0.714~0.871) | 744.32 | 84.62 | 71.43 | 0.561 |
RAR | 0.814(0.728~0.882) | 0.37 | 92.31 | 59.52 | 0.518 |
指标联合 | 0.908(0.837~0.954) | - | 92.31 | 86.90 | 0.792 |
Tab.8 Analysis of predictive values of SII and RAR for respiratory failure in patients with AECOPD
指标 | AUC(95%CI) | 截断值 | 敏感度/ % | 特异度/ % | 约登 指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SII | 0.801(0.714~0.871) | 744.32 | 84.62 | 71.43 | 0.561 |
RAR | 0.814(0.728~0.882) | 0.37 | 92.31 | 59.52 | 0.518 |
指标联合 | 0.908(0.837~0.954) | - | 92.31 | 86.90 | 0.792 |
[1] | 孔德昭, 王科雯, 罗文晔, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期诊疗指南评价与综合分析[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2023, 29(8):1307-1317. |
KONG D Z, WANG K W, LUO W Y, et al. Evaluation and comprehensive analysis of diagnostic and treatment guidelines for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. J Basic Chin Med, 2023, 29(8):1307-1317.doi:10.19945/j.cnki.issn.1006-3250.2023.08.028. | |
[2] | JI L C, YIN J F, LU C R, et al. Control of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in urban populations: findings from a cross-sectional prevalence survey in Shenzhen,China[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2022, 29(8):11843-11853. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16553-z. |
[3] | DO A R, DO K Y, KIM J Y, et al. Genome-wide association study of airway wall thickening in a korean chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cohort[J]. Genes(Basel), 2022, 13(7):1258. doi:10.3390/genes13071258. |
[4] | HUA X, LONG Z Q, ZHANG Y L, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index in breast cancer:a propensity score-matching study[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10:580. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.00580. |
[5] | MA C G, LIANG G P, WANG B, et al. Clinical value of the red blood cell distribution width to albumin ratio in the assessment of prognosis in critically ill patients with sepsis:a retrospective analysis[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2024, 16(1):516-529. doi:10.21037/jtd-23-1696. |
[6] | CRISAFULLI E, BARBETA E, IELPO A, et al. Management of severe acute exacerbations of COPD:an updated narrative review[J]. Multidiscip Respir Med, 2018, 13(15):34-36. doi:10.1186/s40248-018-0149-0. |
[7] | ZUO H, XIE X, PENG J, et al. Predictive value of novel inflammation-based biomarkers for pulmonary hypertension in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Anal Cell Pathol(Amst), 2019, 2019:5189165. doi:10.1155/2019/5189165. |
[8] | 吴海涛, 周洪礼, 宋玉, 等. 穿心莲内酯对盲肠结扎穿孔诱导的脓毒症大鼠心肺功能和炎症损伤的保护作用[J]. 天津医药, 2022, 50(1):67-72. |
WU H T, ZHOU H L, SONG Y, et al. Protective effects of andrographolide on cardiopulmonary function and inflammatory damage in sepsis rats induced by cecal ligation and perforation[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2022, 50(1):67-72. doi:10.11958/20210462. | |
[9] | LIAO Q Q, MO Y J, ZHU K W, et al. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR),monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio(MLR),and eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(ELR)as biomarkers in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD)[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2024, 19(23):501-518. doi:10.2147/COPD.S447519. |
[10] | 黄颖骏, 秦斌斌, 沈斌, 等. 血清炎性因子联合检测在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者病情评估中的临床应用价值[J]. 中国医药, 2022, 17(3):399-402. |
HUANG Y J, QIN B B, SHEN B, et al. Clinical value of combined detection of serum inflammatory factors in the evaluation of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. China Med, 2022, 17(3):399-402. doi:10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2022.03.018. | |
[11] | 范艳妮, 王璋. 免疫炎症指数联合预后营养指数对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的严重程度及预后的评估价值[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2023, 29(3):475-481,492. |
FAN Y N, WANG Z. Value of immunoinflammatory index combined with prognostic nutrition index in evaluating the severity and prognosis of AECOPD in the elderly[J]. Geriatr Heal Care, 2023, 29(3):475-481,492. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8296.2023.03.009. | |
[12] | ELLINGSEN J, JANSON C, BROMS K, et al. CRP,fibrinogen,white blood cells,and blood cell indices as prognostic biomarkers of future COPD exacerbation frequency:the tie cohort study[J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(13):3851-3855. doi:10.3390/jcm13133855. |
[13] | 张转转. 血清NLR、PLR、RDW在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期中的临床意义[D]. 新疆: 新疆医科大学, 2023. |
ZHANG Z Z. Clinical significance of serum NLR,PLR,and RDW in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[D]. Xinjiang: Xinjiang Medical University, 2023. | |
[14] | 朱春明, 张鹤, 郑锐. 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、红细胞分布宽度与慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的相关分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2018, 47(4):312-315. |
ZHU C M, ZHANG H, ZHENG R. Correlation of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and distribution width of erythrocytes with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. J China Med Univ, 2018, 47(4):312-315. doi:10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2018.04.006. | |
[15] | YAO C, WANG L, SHI F, et al. Optimized combination of circulating biomarkers as predictors of prognosis in AECOPD patients complicated with heart failure[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2021, 18(7):1592-1599. doi:10.7150/ijms.52405. |
[16] | 许路阳, 李靖, 张国俊. 红细胞分布宽度与白蛋白比值对急性呼吸窘迫综合征预后的预测价值[J]. 中国医药导报, 2022, 19(7):23-26. |
XU L Y, LI J, ZHANG G J. Predictive value of red blood cell distribution width to albumin ratio in prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. China Med Her, 2022, 19(7):23-26. | |
[17] | SEO Y J, YU J, PARK J Y, et al. Red cell distribution width/albumin ratio and 90-day mortality after burn surgery[J]. Burns Trauma, 2022, 10(25):47-50. doi:10.1093/burnst/tkab050. |
[18] | KIMURA H, TANAKA K, SAITO H, et al. Impact of red blood cell distribution width-albumin ratio on prognosis of patients with CKD[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1):15774. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42986-2. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||