
Tianjin Medical Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (12): 1280-1284.doi: 10.11958/20252035
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
YUERIGULI·Aiweila (
), SONG Ningze, SHANG Shuai, CUI Liru, WANG Hanming
Received:2025-06-01
Revised:2025-09-25
Published:2025-12-15
Online:2025-12-08
YUERIGULI·Aiweila , SONG Ningze, SHANG Shuai, CUI Liru, WANG Hanming. Observation on the efficacy of key muscle motor point acupuncture combined with exercise training in patients with spinal cord injury[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2025, 53(12): 1280-1284.
CLC Number:
| 组别 | 年龄/ 岁 | 性别 (男/女) | 病程/ 月 | 受教育 年限/年 | 体质量 指数/(kg/m2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 42.66±2.23 | 18/22 | 11.08±1.10 | 10.73±1.06 | 21.08±1.10 | |||||
| 观察组 | 42.12±2.17 | 20/20 | 11.01±1.05 | 10.68±1.10 | 21.11±1.05 | |||||
| t或χ2 | 1.097 | 0.201 | 0.291 | 0.207 | 0.125 | |||||
| 组别 | 损伤分级 | 损伤原因 | ||||||||
| C级 | D级 | 车祸 | 坠落 | 其他外伤 | ||||||
| 对照组 | 20(50.00) | 20(50.00) | 13(32.50) | 15(37.50) | 12(30.00) | |||||
| 观察组 | 18(45.00) | 22(55.00) | 15(37.50) | 12(30.00) | 13(32.50) | |||||
| χ2 | 0.201 | 0.516 | ||||||||
Tab.1 Comparison of general data between the two groups (n=40)
| 组别 | 年龄/ 岁 | 性别 (男/女) | 病程/ 月 | 受教育 年限/年 | 体质量 指数/(kg/m2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 42.66±2.23 | 18/22 | 11.08±1.10 | 10.73±1.06 | 21.08±1.10 | |||||
| 观察组 | 42.12±2.17 | 20/20 | 11.01±1.05 | 10.68±1.10 | 21.11±1.05 | |||||
| t或χ2 | 1.097 | 0.201 | 0.291 | 0.207 | 0.125 | |||||
| 组别 | 损伤分级 | 损伤原因 | ||||||||
| C级 | D级 | 车祸 | 坠落 | 其他外伤 | ||||||
| 对照组 | 20(50.00) | 20(50.00) | 13(32.50) | 15(37.50) | 12(30.00) | |||||
| 观察组 | 18(45.00) | 22(55.00) | 15(37.50) | 12(30.00) | 13(32.50) | |||||
| χ2 | 0.201 | 0.516 | ||||||||
| 组别 | 正中神经 | 尺神经 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |||||||
| 对照组 | 39.47±5.17 | 44.89±5.23 | 4.661* | 36.58±5.21 | 42.99±5.21 | 5.502* | ||||||
| 观察组 | 39.50±5.14 | 48.07±5.21 | 7.406* | 36.54±5.28 | 46.62±5.27 | 8.546* | ||||||
| t | 0.208 | 2.724* | 0.034 | 3.098* | ||||||||
| 组别 | 胫神经 | 腓总神经 | ||||||||||
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |||||||
| 对照组 | 32.58±5.21 | 40.93±5.33 | 7.285* | 35.58±5.44 | 41.96±5.17 | 5.377* | ||||||
| 观察组 | 32.54±5.01 | 44.62±5.22 | 12.308* | 35.54±5.41 | 45.62±5.20 | 9.339* | ||||||
| t | 0.035 | 3.128* | 0.033 | 3.157* | ||||||||
Tab.2 Comparison of MNCV levels before and after the intervention between the two groups of patients (n=40,m/s,$ \bar{x} \pm s$)
| 组别 | 正中神经 | 尺神经 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |||||||
| 对照组 | 39.47±5.17 | 44.89±5.23 | 4.661* | 36.58±5.21 | 42.99±5.21 | 5.502* | ||||||
| 观察组 | 39.50±5.14 | 48.07±5.21 | 7.406* | 36.54±5.28 | 46.62±5.27 | 8.546* | ||||||
| t | 0.208 | 2.724* | 0.034 | 3.098* | ||||||||
| 组别 | 胫神经 | 腓总神经 | ||||||||||
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |||||||
| 对照组 | 32.58±5.21 | 40.93±5.33 | 7.285* | 35.58±5.44 | 41.96±5.17 | 5.377* | ||||||
| 观察组 | 32.54±5.01 | 44.62±5.22 | 12.308* | 35.54±5.41 | 45.62±5.20 | 9.339* | ||||||
| t | 0.035 | 3.128* | 0.033 | 3.157* | ||||||||
| 组别 | 正中神经 | 尺神经 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |||||||
| 对照组 | 39.25±5.20 | 43.33±5.58 | 3.383* | 34.98±5.11 | 41.98±5.32 | 6.002* | ||||||
| 观察组 | 39.01±5.12 | 49.10±5.64 | 8.378* | 35.50±5.24 | 45.60±5.26 | 8.604* | ||||||
| t | 0.208 | 4.600* | 0.449 | 3.069** | ||||||||
| 组别 | 胫神经 | 腓总神经 | ||||||||||
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |||||||
| 对照组 | 30.58±5.21 | 38.92±5.24 | 7.138* | 32.18±5.36 | 40.02±5.20 | 6.640* | ||||||
| 观察组 | 30.54±5.11 | 42.61±5.17 | 13.982* | 32.13±5.25 | 43.62±5.26 | 9.778* | ||||||
| t | 0.035 | 3.170* | 0.042 | 3.078* | ||||||||
Tab.3 Comparison of SNCV levels before and after the intervention between the two groups of patients (n=40,m/s,$ \bar{x} \pm s$)
| 组别 | 正中神经 | 尺神经 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |||||||
| 对照组 | 39.25±5.20 | 43.33±5.58 | 3.383* | 34.98±5.11 | 41.98±5.32 | 6.002* | ||||||
| 观察组 | 39.01±5.12 | 49.10±5.64 | 8.378* | 35.50±5.24 | 45.60±5.26 | 8.604* | ||||||
| t | 0.208 | 4.600* | 0.449 | 3.069** | ||||||||
| 组别 | 胫神经 | 腓总神经 | ||||||||||
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |||||||
| 对照组 | 30.58±5.21 | 38.92±5.24 | 7.138* | 32.18±5.36 | 40.02±5.20 | 6.640* | ||||||
| 观察组 | 30.54±5.11 | 42.61±5.17 | 13.982* | 32.13±5.25 | 43.62±5.26 | 9.778* | ||||||
| t | 0.035 | 3.170* | 0.042 | 3.078* | ||||||||
| 组别 | FMA评分 | MAS评分 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |
| 对照组 | 69.47±5.17 | 78.89±5.23 | 8.101* | 2.58±0.21 | 0.99±0.21 | 33.861* |
| 观察组 | 69.50±5.14 | 82.07±5.21 | 10.863* | 2.54±0.28 | 0.62±0.15 | 38.228* |
| t | 0.026 | 2.724* | 0.723 | 9.068* | ||
Tab.4 Comparison of limb function before and after the intervention between the two groups of patients (n=40,分,$ \bar{x} \pm s$)
| 组别 | FMA评分 | MAS评分 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |
| 对照组 | 69.47±5.17 | 78.89±5.23 | 8.101* | 2.58±0.21 | 0.99±0.21 | 33.861* |
| 观察组 | 69.50±5.14 | 82.07±5.21 | 10.863* | 2.54±0.28 | 0.62±0.15 | 38.228* |
| t | 0.026 | 2.724* | 0.723 | 9.068* | ||
| 组别 | Barthel指数 | FIM评分 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |
| 对照组 | 62.07±5.57 | 82.89±5.53 | 16.776* | 89.58±6.21 | 95.79±6.21 | 4.472* |
| 观察组 | 62.04±5.54 | 86.67±5.51 | 19.936* | 89.54±6.28 | 99.92±6.27 | 7.398* |
| t | 0.024 | 3.062* | 0.028 | 2.960* | ||
Tab.5 Comparison of quality of life before and after the intervention between the two groups (n=40,分,$ \bar{x} \pm s$)
| 组别 | Barthel指数 | FIM评分 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预后 | t | 干预前 | 干预后 | t | |
| 对照组 | 62.07±5.57 | 82.89±5.53 | 16.776* | 89.58±6.21 | 95.79±6.21 | 4.472* |
| 观察组 | 62.04±5.54 | 86.67±5.51 | 19.936* | 89.54±6.28 | 99.92±6.27 | 7.398* |
| t | 0.024 | 3.062* | 0.028 | 2.960* | ||
| [1] | 朱晶惠, 魏栋敏, 任淑婷, 等. 靶向抑制NLRP3炎性小体在脊髓损伤中的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2023, 51(7):781-784. |
| ZHU J H, WEI D M, REN S T, et al. Research progress of targeted inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome in spinal cord injury[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2023, 51(7):781-784. doi:10.11958/20221718. | |
| [2] | 李诗敏, 刘美帅, 张彩霞. 护士-患者-照护者协同康复训练在促进腰椎骨折伴脊髓损伤患者康复中的作用分析[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2024, 45(2):348-351. |
| LI S M, LIU M S, ZHANG C X. Effect analysis of nurse-patient-caregiver collaborative rehabilitation training in promoting the rehabilitation of patients with lumbar fracture and spinal cord injury[J]. The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia, 2024, 45(2):348-351. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2024.02.032. | |
| [3] | 刘付龙, 张鑫, 陈罗西, 等. 疏密波电针针刺下肢关键肌及神经干穴位治疗不完全脊髓损伤的效果[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2023, 39(10):1133-1137. |
| LIU F L, ZHANG X, CHEN L X, et al. Effect of dense-sparse wave electroacupuncture at key lower limb muscles and nerve trunk acupoints on incomplete spinal cord injury[J]. J Changchun Univ Chin Med, 2023, 39(10):1133-1137. doi:10.13463/j.cnki.cczyy.2023.10.015. | |
| [4] | 赵瀚微, 赵钢, 张金朋, 等. 针刺治疗脊髓损伤作用机制研究进展[J]. 针灸临床杂志, 2023, 39(5):104-108. |
| ZHAO H W, ZHAO G, ZHANG J P, et al. Research progress on the mechanism of acupuncture in treating spinal cord injury[J]. Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 2023, 39(5):104-108. doi:10.19917/j.cnki.1005-0779.023105. | |
| [5] | 桑博文, 覃业校, 田秀燕, 等. 针刺治疗脊髓损伤作用机制的研究进展[J]. 中医药信息, 2023, 40(3):83-86. |
| SANG B W, QIN Y X, TIAN X Y, et al. Research progress on the mechanism of acupuncture in treating spinal cord injury[J]. Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023, 40(3):83-86. doi:10.19656/j.cnki.1002-2406.20230315. | |
| [6] | 中国残疾人康复协会脊髓损伤康复专业委员会. 创伤性脊柱脊髓损伤的系统管理及常见并发症处理专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中国老年保健医学, 2022, 20(4):10-15. |
| China Association of Rehabilitation of Disabled Persons-Society of Spinal Cord Injuryies. Expert consensus on systematic management and management of common complications of traumatic spinal cord injury (2022 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Care, 2022, 20(4):10-15. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2671.2022.04.003. | |
| [7] | 国际神经修复学会暨中国神经修复学会. 脊髓损伤神经修复临床治疗指南(IANR/CANR2019年版)[J]. 西部医学, 2020, 32(6):790-802. |
| International Association of Neurorestoratology,Chinese Association of Neurorestoratology. Clinical guidelines for neurorestoration of spinal cord injury(IANR/CANR 2019 edition)[J]. Medical Journal of West China, 2020, 32(6):790-802. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3511.2020.06.003. | |
| [8] | 侯春林, 范肇鹏, 王诗波. 脊髓损伤康复指南[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社,2006:98. |
| HOU C L, FAN Z P, WANG S B. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation guide[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technological Publishers,2006:98. | |
| [9] | LING S S, PAN R H, ZHAN L C, et al. Ruyi zhenbao pills for patients with motor and sensory dysfunction after stroke:a double-blinded,randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial[J]. Chin J Integr Med, 2022, 28(10):872-878. doi:10.1007/s11655-022-3577-9. |
| [10] | 肖观伟, 曾科学. 针刺灵骨,大白穴治疗中风后下肢痉挛性偏瘫疗效观察[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2024, 33(9):1219-1224. |
| XIAO G W, ZENG K X. Therapeutic effect observation of acupuncture at Linggu and Dabai acupoints for post-stroke spastic hemiplegia of lower limb[J]. Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, 2024, 33(9):1219-1224. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2024.09.008. | |
| [11] | TEKEOGIU TOSUN A, IPEK Y, RAZAK OZDINCLER A, et al. The efficiency of mirror therapy on drop foot in multiple sclerosis patients[J]. Acta Neurol Scand, 2021, 143(5):545-553. doi:10.1111/ane.13385. |
| [12] | OLIVERA D S, PONFICK M, BRAUN D I, et al. A direct spinal cord-computer interface enables the control of the paralysed hand in spinal cord injury[J]. Brain, 2024, 147(10):3583-3595. doi:10.1093/brain/awae088. |
| [13] | 王卫珍, 杨来福, 徐丹丹, 等. 经皮脊髓直流电刺激联合运动训练改善亚急性脊髓损伤患者步行功能及减轻痉挛的效果观察[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2023, 44(1):93-95. |
| WANG W Z, YANG L F, XU D D, et al. Effect of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation combined with motor training on improving walking function and alleviating spasticity in patients with subacute spinal cord injury[J]. The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia, 2023, 44(1):93-95. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2023.01.026. | |
| [14] | 刘勇. 脊髓损伤康复的临床策略[J]. 大连医科大学学报, 2024, 46(1):1-8. |
| LIU Y. Clinical strategies for spinal cord injury rehabilitation[J]. Journal of Dalian Medical University, 2024, 46(1):1-8. doi:10.11724/jdmu.2024.01.01. | |
| [15] | 孙忠人, 王瑞琪, 卢英琦, 等. 基于MAPK信号通路调控探究针灸治疗脊髓损伤的研究进展[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2023, 38(3):1172-1175. |
| SUN Z R, WANG R Q, LU Y Q, et al. Research progress on acupuncture treatment for spinal cord injury based on MAPK signaling pathway regulation[J]. China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, 2023, 38(3):1172-1175. | |
| [16] | 赵卓越, 刘佳雯, 孙长城, 等. 脑卒中患者步态启动时早期姿势调节阶段时间和强度参数特点[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2024, 28(28):4429-4435. |
| ZHAO Z Y, LIU J W, SUN C C, et al. Characteristics of temporal and intensity parameters during the anticipatory postural adjustment phase in stroke patients during gait initiation[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2024, 28(28):4429-4435. doi:10.12307/2024.494. | |
| [17] | 刘潇, 李崖雪. 电刺激面部肌肉运动点治疗特发性面神经麻痹临床研究[J]. 针灸临床杂志, 2023, 39(4):41-45. |
| LIU X, LI Y X. Clinical study on electrical stimulation of facial muscle motor points for treating idiopathic facial paralysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 2023, 39(4):41-45. doi:10.19917/j.cnki.1005-0779.023071. | |
| [18] | 孙茁, 刘凯, 马舒婷, 等. 关键肌运动点针刺对脊髓损伤患者神经电生理指标,下肢运动功能及日常生活能力的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2024, 24(14):2776-2779. |
| SUN Z, LIU K, MA S T, et al. Effects of acupuncture at motor points of key muscles on neuroelectrophysiological indicators,lower limb motor function,and activities of daily living in spinal cord injury patients[J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2024, 24(14):2776-2779. doi:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2024.14.034. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||